Heidegger's philosophical foundations and his contribution to palliative nursing and spiritual care

This study aimed to reflect on the spiritual care of nursing in palliative care from the conceptual perspective of Martin Heidegger. The approximation between Heidegger's philosophical aspects and palliative nursing practice, with a clinical view of spiritual care, promotes reflections on human existence and finitude. Being in palliative care can generate anguish, loss of meaning of life and connection with the world. The relationship of care between nurse and patient, which is established through language, favors comprehensive, intentional and humanized care, and is revealed as this relationship of care deepens. In this relational process, bonds begin to be established between nurse and patient, which can lead to authentic spiritual care. Approaching health from the spiritual dimension is a challenge, as it forces healthcare professionals to come into contact with existential issues of patients, families and themselves. Thus, reflection based on Heidegger's philosophical aspects allows us to become aware of the facticity of death.

Family caregiver emotional distress in advanced cancer: the DME-C scale psychometric properties

BACKGROUND

Family caregivers of patients with advanced illness at end of life often report high levels of emotional distress. To address this emotional distress is necessary to have adequate and reliable screening tools.

AIM

This study analyses the psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Family Caregiver Emotional Detection Scale for caregivers of patients with end-stage cancer (DME-C, Spanish acronym) who are receiving palliative care (PC).

DESIGN

Multicentre, cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS/PARTICIPANTS

Family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer at end of life receiving palliative treatment were interviewed to explore their emotional distress through the DME-C scale and other instruments measuring anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)), distress thermometer (DT) and overload (B), as well as a clinical psychological assessment (CPA).

RESULTS

138 family caregivers, 85 (61.6%) female and 53 (38.4%) male, with an average age of 59.69±13.3 participated in the study. The reliability of the scale, as measured by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.76, and its stability over time was 0.734. Positive, significant correlations were found between the DME-C and the scores for anxiety and depression registered on the HADS scale, as well as with the total result of this latter scale and the results for B, the DT and the CPA. A statistical analysis of the receiver-operating characteristic curves showed that the scale has a sensitivity and specificity of 75%, and that the cut-off point for the detection of emotional distress was a score ≥11. Fifty-four per cent of the caregivers displayed emotional distress according to this scale.

CONCLUSIONS

The DME-C displays good psychometric properties. It is simple, short, reliable and easy to administer. We believe that the instrument is useful for the detection of emotional distress in the family caregivers of hospitalised patients suffering from end-stage illnesses and receiving PC.

Spanish Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Advance Care Planning Self-Efficacy: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Perceived self-efficacy in advance care planning (ACP) is frequently used to measure the impact of ACP programs for professionals responsible for advanced chronic patients. A validated ACP Self-Efficacy (ACP-SE) scale is not currently available in Spanish. Objective: To culturally adapt and validate Baughman's ACP-SE scale into Spanish (ACP-SEs). Methodology/Design: An instrumental study was performed in two phases: (1) cultural adaptation of the ACP-SE scale and (2) psychometric properties measurement. Setting/Participants: The survey was sent to 5785 professionals: physicians, nurses, psychologists, and social workers, members of scientific associations in the areas of primary care, geriatrics, and palliative care in Catalonia, Spain. Results: Five hundred thirty-eight questionnaires were obtained, respondents were physicians (69.0%) and nurses (28.4%) and mean age was 47 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.1). Most were women (79.6%), 68% had >15 years of professional experience, and 80.7% worked in primary care. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95) and showed a unidimensional structure explaining 56.2% of total variance. Mean score was 67.37 (SD = 16.1). Variables associated with greater self-efficacy were previous training (t = -3.23, df = 273.76, p = 0.001), previous participation in ACP processes (t = -6.23, df = 521, p < 0.001), and membership in geriatric or palliative care scientific association (p < 0.001). ACP-SEs positively correlated to other compared scales. Conclusion: The ACP-SE scale demonstrates adequate psychometric properties. This is the first self-efficacy scale for ACP in Spanish. It should facilitate a better understanding of implementation processes related to ACP programs for professionals involved in caring for patients with advanced diseases.

Prevalence of ethical dilemmas in advanced cancer patients (secondary analysis of the PALCOM study)

PURPOSE

The main aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of ethical dilemmas in the end-of-life process in advanced cancer patients.

METHODS

We carried out a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational, prospective study in a cohort of cancer patients whose life expectancy was ≤ 6 months. We recorded sociodemographic characteristics, diagnosis of cancer, symptom burden, cognitive and functional status, emotional impact, and sociofamilial risk factors. The main outcome measure was the detection of ethical dilemmas, based on the following definition: conflict in decision-making during the end-of-life process that involves the need to choose between morally acceptable opposing options, where none is clearly preferable to another.

RESULTS

We included 324 patients (mean age, 69 years; 58% men). We identified 117 dilemmas in 90 patients (27.8%). The dilemmas detected were as follows: (a) conflicts of information (adaptive denial, conspiracy of silence, information exceeding patient's desired limit), 15.7%; (b) discrepancies in proportionality (discussion on futility, rejection of treatment, withdrawal of life support measures), 16.7%; (c) unrealistic expectations about the outcome of clinical trials, 2.5%; and (d) request for euthanasia or medically assisted suicide, 1.2%. We observed a greater prevalence of ethical dilemmas in men, in patients receiving active cancer treatment, and in patients with emotional distress (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of ethical dilemmas during the end-of-life process in cancer patients is relevant. Most dilemmas were associated directly or indirectly with respect for patient autonomy. In this context, the communication skills of the health professionals and advanced care planning take on a key role.

Developing a consensus definition of psychosocial complexity in cancer patients using Delphi methods

OBJECTIVE

Cancer is one of the biggest health challenges of our times, affecting all the personal areas of a patient. The interrelationships between these areas and the need for multidisciplinary care require the assessment of psychosocial complexity in cancer patients. The main aim of this study was to reach a consensus on the general definition of psychosocial complexity in cancer and its main elements according to the experts in the field.

METHOD

A Delphi study was performed, which first involved a comprehensive review of the literature to create a questionnaire that was validated by two expert panels. The first panel consisted of intra-institutional experts, while the second included extra-institutional experts in the field. The study included three more rounds: (1) validation of the questionnaire by the internal panel, (2) discussion of the results and resolving discrepancies, and (3) validation of the questionnaire by the external panel.

RESULTS

After the four-round Delphi process, we obtained a consensus definition of psychosocial complexity in cancer patients, as well as of its main factors: medical-physical, social-family, psychological, and spiritual. A 21-indicators list and its 8-indicators brief version were also proposed as indicators of psychosocial complexity.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

We present a definition of psychosocial complexity in cancer patients that has been agreed by experts, also establishing its four factors: medical-physical, social-family, psychological, and spiritual. This has led to the development of a list of indicators (and its brief version) that, after a validation process, could help health professionals to identify patients with high psychosocial complexity to provide them an optimal care.

Proactive and systematic multidimensional needs assessment in patients with advanced cancer approaching palliative care: a study protocol

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of palliative care rely on how healthcare professionals assess patients' needs in the initial encounter/s; crucial to the design of a personalised therapeutic plan. However, there is currently no evidence-based guideline to perform this needs assessment. We aim to design and evaluate a proactive and systematic method for the needs assessment using quality guidelines for developing complex interventions. This will involve patients, their relatives and healthcare professionals in all phases of the study and its communication to offer clinical practice a reliable approach to address the palliative needs of patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

To design and assess the feasibility of an evidence-based, proactive and systematic Multidimensional needs Assessment in Palliative care (MAP) as a semistructured clinical interview guide for initial palliative care encounter/s in patients with advanced cancer. This is a two-phase multisite project conducted over 36 months between May 2019 and May 2022. Phase I includes a systematic review, discussions with stakeholders and Delphi consensus. The evidence gathered from phase I will be the basis for the initial versions of the MAP, then submitted to Delphi consensus to develop a preliminary guide of the MAP for the training of clinicians in the feasibility phase. Phase II is a mixed-methods multicenter feasibility study that will assess the MAP's acceptability, participation, practicality, adaptation and implementation. A nested qualitative study will purposively sample a subset of participants to add preliminary clues about the benefits and barriers of the MAP. The evidence gathered from phase II will build a MAP user guide and educational programme for use in clinical practice.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval for this study has been granted by the university research ethics committee where the study will be carried out (approval reference MED-2018-10). Dissemination will be informed by the results obtained and communication will occur throughout.

Enhancing psychosocial and spiritual palliative care: Four-year results of the program of comprehensive care for people with advanced illnesses and their families in Spain

Objective:

We aimed to describe the overall quantitative and qualitative results of a “La Caixa” Foundation and World Health Organization Collaborating Center Program entitled “Comprehensive Care for Patients with Advanced Illnesses and their Families” after four years of experience.

Method:

Qualitative and quantitative methods were employed to assess the program. Quasiexperimental, prospective, multicenter, single-group, and pretest/posttest methods were utilized to assess the quantitative data. The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions was assessed at baseline (visit 1) and after four follow-up visits. The following dimensions were assessed: mood state, discomfort, anxiety, degree of adjustment or adaptation to disease, and suffering. We also assessed the four dimensions of the spiritual pain scale: faith or spiritual beliefs, valuable faith or spiritual beliefs, meaning in life, and peace of mind/forgiveness. Qualitative analyses were performed via surveys to evaluate stakeholder satisfaction.

Results:

We built 29 psychosocial support teams involving 133 professionals—mainly psychologists and social workers. During the study period, 8,964 patients and 11,810 family members attended. Significant improvements were observed in the psychosocial and spiritual dimensions assessed. Patients, family members, and stakeholders all showed high levels of satisfaction.

Significance of Results:

This model of psychosocial care could serve as an example for other countries that wish to improve psychosocial and spiritual support. Our results confirm that specific psychosocial interventions delivered by well-trained experts can help to ease suffering and discomfort in end-of-life and palliative care patients, particularly those with high levels of pain or emotional distress.

[Healthcare preferences of the very elderly: A review]

The preferences of the very elderly are not taken into account in healthcare planning. For this reason, a medical literature review was performed in order to fill the gap in appropriate information on this issue. The majority of them think that they receive good healthcare. They favour building a trusting relationship, with the physician handling their decision-making. They also maximise their quality of life at the expense of quantity, and give great importance to comfort and safety. Most of them express the wish to be cared for and die at home. But when an acute event occurs, they want to be transferred to hospital. More explicit communication must be encouraged between very elderly patients, providers, and families to meet their subjective needs, through on-going discussions, focused on expected outcomes and patient care goals. A healthcare system designed to look after them should be based on individual and flexible care, with coordination between healthcare services. Such a healthcare system could enable a growing number of them to die in their preferred conditions.