Diagnosis of Osteoporosis: Clinical and Densitometric Analysis

Impact of altitude on the development of low bone mineral density and osteoporosis in individuals aged 50 years and older: protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporotic fractures are a leading cause of disability and contribute significantly to medical care costs worldwide. Variations in bone mineral density and the risk of osteoporosis are notably influenced by altitude. This study aims to longitudinally examine individuals with osteoporosis and low bone mass at three different altitudes (low, high and very high) to understand the effects of high-altitude environments on bone density.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre, prospective cohort study will involve 893 participants divided into three groups based on altitude: low (500-1500 m), high (2500-4500 m) and very high (4500-5500 m). Participants will undergo comprehensive diagnostic assessments, including demographic data collection, structured questionnaires, medical examinations and clinical laboratory tests. Follow-up visits will occur annually for a minimum of 5 years. The primary outcome will be changes in bone mineral density values. Secondary outcomes will include the incidence of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Cox proportional hazard models will be used to calculate the risk associated with osteoporotic events and related fractures.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region (No: 2024-70). The acquired insights will be disseminated via academic forums, scholarly articles and stakeholder engagement sessions.

TRIAL REGISTRATIONNUMBER

ChiCTR2300078872.

A retrospective observational study of osteoporosis management after a fragility fracture in primary care

In many countries, osteoporosis is predominantly managed by primary care physicians; however, management after a fragility fracture has not been widely investigated. We describe osteoporosis care gaps in a real-world patient cohort. Our findings help inform initiatives to identify and overcome obstacles to effective management of patients after fragility fracture.

PURPOSE

A fragility fracture is a major risk factor for subsequent fracture in adults aged ≥ 50 years. This retrospective observational study aimed to characterize post-fracture management in Canadian primary care.

METHODS

A total of 778 patients with an index fragility fracture (low-trauma, excluding small bones) occurring between 2014 and 2016 were identified from medical records at 76 primary care centers in Canada, with follow-up until January 2018.

RESULTS

Of 778 patients (80.5% female, median age [IQR] 73 [64-80]), 215 were on osteoporosis treatment and 269 had osteoporosis diagnosis recorded prior to their index fracture. The median follow-up was 363 (IQR 91-808) days. Of patients not on osteoporosis treatment at their index fracture, 60.2% (n = 339/563) remained untreated after their index fracture and 62.2% (n = 23/37) continued untreated after their subsequent fracture. After their index fracture, fracture risk assessment (FRAX or CAROC) was not performed in 83.2% (n = 647/778) of patients, and 59.9% (n = 466/778) of patients did not receive bone mineral density testing. Of patients without osteoporosis diagnosis recorded prior to their index date, 61.3% (n = 300/489) remained undiagnosed after their index fracture. At least one subsequent fracture occurred in 11.5% (n = 86/778) of patients.

CONCLUSION

In the primary care setting, fragility fracture infrequently resulted in osteoporosis treatment or fracture risk assessment, even after multiple fragility fractures. These results suggest a fragility fracture is not recognized as a major risk factor for subsequent fracture and its occurrence does not prompt primary care physicians to intervene. These data urge initiatives to identify and overcome obstacles to primary care physicians' effective management of patients after fragility fractures.