Natural history of Oppenheim's dystonia (DYT1) in Israel

Investigating DYT1 in a Taiwanese dystonia cohort

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

A heterozygous three-nucleotide (GAG) in-frame deletion in the TOR1A gene causes the rare disease, dystonia (DYT1), which typically presents as focal limb dystonia during adolescence, then spreads to other limbs. This study investigated the frequency and clinical features of DYT1 in a Taiwanese dystonia cohort.

METHODS

We performed targeted next generation sequencing in 318 patients with primary dystonia. We identified one DYT1 family with various types of dystonia, and we described the clinical presentations observed in this family during a 30-year follow-up. We compared the clinical characteristics to those reported in previous studies on DYT1 from 2000 to 2020.

RESULTS

Among 318 patients, we identified only one DYT1 patient (0.3%) with an autosomal dominant family history of dystonia. The proband was a 43-year-old man that experienced progressive onset of focal lower limb dystonia from age 11 years. The disease spread caudal-rostrally to the upper limbs and cervical muscles. Prominent cervical dystonia was noted during follow-up, which was an atypical presentation of DYT1. Clinical assessments of other family members showed intrafamily variability. The proband's father and an affected sibling demonstrated only mild right-hand writer's cramp. A systematic review of previously reported DTY1 cases showed that Asian patients had a higher frequency of cervical dystonia (44.8%) than groups of Ashkenazi Jews (35%) and Non-Jewish Caucasians (30.5%) (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed that DYT1 is rare in a Taiwanese dystonia cohort. The presentation of marked cervical dystonia could be the main feature of Asian patients with DYT1.

Dystonia and leveraging oral pharmacotherapy

Dystonia is a clinically diverse disorder, characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions causing abnormal and often repetitive movements and/or postures. Accurate clinical diagnosis is tantamount to effective dystonia management. Current guidelines in the treatments of dystonia, including oral therapy, are prescribed to improve symptoms and to restore functional capacity. Identifying treatable causes from co-existing phenomenologies is relevant to provide the most optimal and disease-specific medications. In other forms of dystonia, genetic factors may affect outcome. Moreover, proper selection of patients, early initiation of medications and customized drug titration are keys to increasing the chances of success when using oral therapies for dystonia. Treatment of dystonia primarily involves agents that target dopamine and acetylcholine receptors. Other drugs used include benzodiazepines, baclofen, antiepileptics, some antipsychotics drugs and antihistamine, with different levels of evidence of effectiveness. Unfortunately, most of the widely used drugs have low levels of evidence and are primarily based on anecdotal experiences. Finally, other adjunctive therapeutic strategies are often necessary to complement oral therapy.

Bilateral Pallidotomy for Dystonia: A Systematic Review

Stereotactic lesioning of the bilateral globus pallidus (GPi) was one of the first surgical treatments for medication‐refractory dystonia but has largely been abandoned in clinical practice after the introduction of deep brain stimulation (DBS). However, some patients with dystonia are not eligible for DBS. Therefore, we reviewed the efficacy, safety, and sustainability of bilateral pallidotomy by conducting a systematic review of individual patient data (IPD). Guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses and IPD were followed. In May 2020, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting on outcome of bilateral pallidotomy for dystonia. If available, IPD were collected. In this systematic review, 100 patients from 33 articles were evaluated. Adverse events were reported in 20 patients (20%), of which 8 were permanent (8%). Pre‐and postoperative Burke‐Fahn‐Marsden Dystonia Rating Movement Scale scores were available for 53 patients. A clinically relevant improvement (>20%) of this score was found in 42 of 53 patients (79%). Twenty‐five patients with status dystonicus (SD) were described. In all but 2 the SD resolved after bilateral pallidotomy. Seven patients experienced a relapse of SD. Median‐reported follow‐up was 12 months (n = 83; range: 2–180 months). Based on the current literature, bilateral pallidotomy is an effective and relatively safe procedure for certain types of dystonia, particularly in medication‐refractory SD. Although due to publication bias the underreporting of negative outcomes is very likely, bilateral pallidotomy is a reasonable alternative to DBS in selected dystonia patients. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Unilateral pallidotomy as a potential rescue therapy for cervical dystonia after unsatisfactory selective peripheral denervation

OBJECTIVE

Selective peripheral denervation (SPD) is a widely accepted surgery for medically refractory cervical dystonia (CD), but when SPD has failed, the available approaches are limited. The authors investigated the results from a cohort of CD patients treated with unilateral pallidotomy after unsatisfactory SPD.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed patients with primary CD who underwent unilateral pallidotomy after SPD between April 2007 and August 2019. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) was used to evaluate symptom severity before surgery, 7 days postsurgery, 3 months postsurgery, and at the last follow-up. TWSTRS subscores for disability and pain and the 24-item Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24) were used to assess quality of life.

RESULTS

At a mean final follow-up of 5 years, TWSTRS severity subscores and total scores were significantly improved (n = 12, mean improvement 57.3% and 62.3%, respectively, p = 0.0022 and p = 0.0022), and 8 of 12 patients (66.7%) were characterized as responders (improvement ≥ 25%). Patients with rotation symptoms before pallidotomy showed greater improvement in TWSTRS severity subscores than those who did not (p = 0.049). The most common adverse event was mild upper-limb weakness (n = 3). Patients' quality of life was also improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral pallidotomy seems to offer an effective and safe option for patients with CD who have otherwise experienced limited benefits from SPD.

Medication use in childhood dystonia

BACKGROUND

Data around current prescription practices in childhood dystonia is limited. Medication use may be limited by side effects, the incidence of which is uncertain. For a large cohort assessed by our supra-regional service we aimed to: i) Review medications used at the point of referral. ii) Determine the prevalence of adverse drug responses (ADR) resulting in discontinuation of drug use. iii) Identify clinical risk factors for ADR.

METHODS

Case note review of 278 children with dystonia referred to our service. Data collected on medications, ADR, dystonia aetiology, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level and motor phenotype (pure dystonia/mixed dystonia-spasticity). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for ADR.

RESULTS

At referral 82/278 (29.4%) children were taking no anti-dystonic medication. In the remainder the median number of anti-dystonic medications was 2 (range 1-5). Medications use increased with worsening GMFCS level. The commonest drugs used were baclofen (118/278: 42.4%), trihexyphenidyl (98/278: 35.2%), l-Dopa (57/278: 20.5%) and diazepam (53/278: 19%). Choice of medication appeared to be influenced by dystonia aetiology. ADR had been experienced by 171/278 (61.5%) of children. The commonest drugs responsible for ADR were trihexyphenidyl (90/171: 52.3%), baclofen (43/171: 25.1%) and l-Dopa (26/171: 15.2%). Binary logistic regression demonstrated no clinical risk factors for ADR.

CONCLUSIONS

ADR is commonly experienced by children with dystonia, regardless of dystonia severity or aetiology. A wide variation in drug management of dystonia was identified. Collectively these findings highlight the need for a rational approach to the pharmacological management of dystonia in childhood.

The factor structure of the SF-36 in adults with progressive neuromuscular disorders

OBJECTIVE

Quality of life (QoL) is an important consideration in the care of patients with chronic neuromuscular disorder (NMD). The current study sought to determine the factor structure of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) version 2 in patients with NMD to determine the appropriateness of using this instrument to assess QoL in this clinical population.

METHODS

Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on self-report SF-36 data from 245 individuals diagnosed with NMD. Six structural models of the SF-36 were evaluated against the participants' data.

RESULTS

The underlying factor structure of the SF-36 in NMD was observed to be consistent with contemporary theoretical models of the instrument. However, the traditional measurement model of SF-36 performed comparatively poorly.

CONCLUSION

The use of the SF-36 in individuals with NMD can be recommended when eight sub-scales are used and reported. However, the suggestion that the SF-36 can be usefully used as a two-sub-scale measure of physical health and mental health components in this clinical group was not supported because of model fit limitations.

The non-motor syndrome of primary dystonia: clinical and pathophysiological implications

Dystonia is typically considered a movement disorder characterized by motor manifestations, primarily involuntary muscle contractions causing twisting movements and abnormal postures. However, growing evidence indicates an important non-motor component to primary dystonia, including abnormalities in sensory and perceptual functions, as well as neuropsychiatric, cognitive and sleep domains. Here, we review this evidence and discuss its clinical and pathophysiological implications.

Clinical phenomenology of dystonia

Dystonia is defined as a motor syndrome characterized by sustained muscle contractions, usually producing twisting and repetitive movements or abnormal postures. Dystonia can be present at rest or worsened by action. Dystonia is commonly classified according to age at onset (childhood, adolescent type, and adult type), etiology (idiopathic, and symptomatic), and distribution (focal dystonia, segmental dystonia, generalized dystonia, multifocal dystonia and hemidystonia). The different subtypes of focal and segmental dystonias may have different clinical features. Neuropsychiatric disorders may be present in dystonia.

Treatment strategies for dystonia

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Dystonia is a neurological syndrome characterized by involuntary twisting movements and unnatural postures. It has many different manifestations and causes, and many different treatment options are available. These options include physical and occupational therapy, oral medications, intramuscular injection of botulinum toxins, and neurosurgical interventions.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

In this review, we first summarize the treatment options available, then we provide suggestions from our own experience for how these can be applied in different types of dystonia. In preparing this review article, an extensive literature search was undertaken using PubMed. Only selected references from 1970 to 2008 are cited.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

This review is intended to provide the clinician with a practical guide to the treatment of dystonia.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Treatment of dystonia begins with proper diagnosis and classification, followed by an appropriate search for underlying etiology, and an assessment of the functional impairment associated with the dystonia. The therapeutic approach, which is usually limited to symptomatic therapy, must then be tailored to the individual needs of the patient.

Cognitive disturbances in primary blepharospasm

The common belief that primary dystonia is a purely motor disorder with no anatomical substrate and no other accompanying neurological dysfunction has recently been challenged. In addition, there is increasing evidence that the basal ganglia besides motor control, plays a role in cognitive functioning. However, no systematic cognitive performance evaluation has been carried out in patients with primary blepharospasm (BS), one of the most common forms of adult dystonia. We evaluated a series of 20 patients with primary BS and a group of 17 controls matched by severity of mood symptoms, age, and sex. BS patients performed significantly worse on the Luria sequencing test, Purdue pegboard test, reciprocal coordination, tactile denomination, and reverse visuospatial span and the differences persisted after correction for age, duration of disease, severity of BS, and degree of depression. The Wisconsin card sorting test showed no statistical difference, but BS patients made more errors and more perseverative answers than expected according to population means, whereas the control group performed poorly but within normal parameters. Our findings suggest broad cortical involvement in focal dystonia that is not correlated with the severity or duration of dystonia.

Surgery for movement disorders

Movement disorders, such as Parkinson's disease, tremor, and dystonia, are among the most common neurological conditions and affect millions of patients. Although medications are the mainstay of therapy for movement disorders, neurosurgery has played an important role in their management for the past 50 years. Surgery is now a viable and safe option for patients with medically intractable Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and dystonia. In this article, we provide a review of the history, neurocircuitry, indication, technical aspects, outcomes, complications, and emerging neurosurgical approaches for the treatment of movement disorders.

Subthalamic nucleus stimulation for primary dystonia and tardive dystonia

With the renaissance of stereotactic pallidotomy for Parkinson's disease in 1990s, pallidotomy has become increasingly used as an effective treatment for various manifestations of medically refractory dystonia. More recently, deep brain stimulation of globus pallidus internus (GPi) has been replacing pallidotomy. Although GPi DBS has great promise for treating dystonia, there are some disadvantages. We introduce our experiences in subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS for primary dystonia and tardive dystonia in this chapter. We propose that STN DBS has the following advantages over GPi DBS: (1) symptomatic improvement is seen immediately after stimulation, allowing us to quickly select the most suitable stimulation parameters; (2) the stimulation parameters for the STN are lower than those used for the GPi, resulting in longer battery life; and (3) STN DBS results in better symptomatic control than GPi DBS in dystonia patients when our STN data is compared to that obtained by others with using the GPi as the target. We suggest that STN DBS may be the most appropriate surgical technique for dystonia.

Deep brain stimulation of globus pallidus internus for dystonia

Neuromodulation is the functional modification of neural structures through the use of electrical stimulation. Its most clinically applicable use is deep brain stimulation (DBS) of basal ganglia structures in Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). More recently, it has been used as a means of treating dystonic movement disorders. The main target of DBS for dystonia is the posteroventral globus pallidus internus (GPi), although the thalamus has been used as an alternate target in a minority of cases. In comparison to the effects seen in PD, the improvement in dystonic postures appear to differ in several ways--delay of clinical benefit, higher voltage requirements, and varied stimulator settings. In this review, the authors discuss the clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, microelectrode recording (MER) signatures, optimal surgical targets, programming parameters and outcomes in dystonia.

The management of cervical dystonia

Cervical dystonia (CD), also known as 'spasmodic torticollis', is the most common form of adult-onset focal dystonia. It is a chronic disorder for which there is no curative treatment. Proposed interventions only have a symptomatic effect that is directed at controlling the intensity of the dystonic contractions and their associated symptoms. Both serotypes of botulinum toxin (BtA and BtB) have shown efficacy for the treatment of CD, and they constitute the first-line therapy for CD. BtB constitutes the best medical treatment for secondary failures to BtA. The efficacy of all other proposed medications, including anticholinergics, should be considered unknown due to the lack of good-quality trials. This lack of evidence applies also to all physical rehabilitation treatments. Although the authors have concluded that all surgical procedures for CD should still be considered investigational, the best data supporting benefit of surgery comes from case series of selective peripheral denervation and pallidal deep brain stimulation.

Early onset torsion dystonia (Oppenheim's dystonia)

Early onset torsion dystonia (EOTD) is a rare movement disorder characterized by involuntary, repetitive, sustained muscle contractions or postures involving one or more sites of the body. A US study estimated the prevalence at approximately 1 in 30,000. The estimated prevalence in the general population of Europe seems to be lower, ranging from 1 in 330,000 to 1 in 200,000, although precise numbers are currently not available. The estimated prevalence in the Ashkenazi Jewish population is approximately five to ten times higher, due to a founder mutation. Symptoms of EOTD typically develop first in an arm or leg in middle to late childhood and progress in approximately 30% of patients to other body regions (generalized dystonia) within about five years. Distribution and severity of symptoms vary widely between affected individuals. The majority of cases from various ethnic groups are caused by an autosomal dominantly inherited deletion of 3 bp (GAG) in the DYT1 gene on chromosome 9q34. This gene encodes a protein named torsinA, which is presumed to act as a chaperone protein associated with the endoplasmic reticulum and the nuclear envelope. It may interact with the dopamine transporter and participate in intracellular trafficking, although its precise function within the cell remains to be determined. Molecular genetic diagnostic and genetic counseling is recommended for individuals with age of onset below 26 years, and may also be considered in those with onset after 26 years having a relative with typical early onset dystonia. Treatment options include botulinum toxin injections for focal symptoms, pharmacological therapy such as anticholinergics (most commonly trihexiphenydil) for generalized dystonia and surgical approaches such as deep brain stimulation of the internal globus pallidus or intrathecal baclofen application in severe cases. All patients have normal cognitive function, and despite a high rate of generalization of dystonia, 75% of those patients are able to maintain ambulation and independence, and therefore a comparatively good quality of life, with modern treatment modalities.

Treatment of dystonia

Dystonia may be a sign or symptom, that is comprised of complex abnormal and dynamic movements of different etiologies. A specific cause is identified in approximately 28% of patients, which only occasionally results in specific treatment. In most cases, treatment is symptomatic and designed to relieve involuntary movements, improve posture and function and reduce associated pain. Therapeutic options are dictated by clinical assessment of the topography of dystonia, severity of abnormal movements, functional impairment and progression of disease and consists of pharmacological, surgical and supportive approaches. Several advances have been made in treatment with newer medications, availability of different forms of botulinum toxin and globus pallidus deep brain stimulation (DBS). For patients with childhood-onset dystonia, the majority of whom later develop generalized dystonia, oral medication is the mainstay of therapy. Recently, DBS has emerged as an effective alternative therapy. Botulinum toxin is usually the treatment of choice for those with adult-onset primary dystonia in which dystonia usually remains focal. In patients with secondary dystonia, treatment is challenging and efficacy is typically incomplete and partially limited by side effects. Despite these treatment options, many patients with dystonia experience only partial benefit and continue to suffer significant disability. Therefore, more research is needed to better understand the underlying cause and pathophysiology of dystonia and to explore newer medications and surgical techniques for its treatment.

Efficacy of pharmacological treatment of dystonia: evidence-based review including meta-analysis of the effect of botulinum toxin and other cure options

The treatment of both generalized and focal dystonia is symptomatic. There is no evidence-based information about the efficacy of the different methods of the pharmacological therapeutic options currently being applied in dystonia. The specific questions addressed by this study were which treatments for dystonia have proven efficacy and which of them have unproven results. Following evidence-based principles, a literature review based on MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library, augmented by manual search of the most important journals was performed to identify the relevant publications issued between 1973 and 2003. All articles appearing in the professional English literature, including case reports, were considered. In the presence of comparable studies the meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled information and make a reasonable inference. Based on this review, we conclude: (i) botulinum toxin has obvious benefit (level A, class I-II evidence) for the treatment of cervical dystonia and blepharospasm; (ii) trihexyphenidyl in high dosages is effective for the treatment of segmental and generalized dystonia in young patients (level A, class I-II evidence); (iii) all other methods of pharmacological intervention for generalized or focal dystonia, including botulinum toxin injections, have not been confirmed as being effective according to accepted evidence-based criteria (level U, class IV studies).