Acquired Hemophilia A: A Case Report

Crohn's disease in hemophilic arthropathy patient: a case report

Crohn's disease (CD) is an inflammatory bowel disease affecting the digestive tract, the incidence of which is on the rise worldwide. The most common clinical manifestation of hemophilia is arthropathy secondary to recurrent joint effusions and chronic synovitis. This article reports on a rare 25-year-old male patient with both hemophilic arthropathy and Crohn's disease who was at risk for pathogenic gastrointestinal bleeding. After undergoing endoscopic pathologic testing and genetic testing, a multidisciplinary expert work-up of a treatment and nutritional plan was performed. The patient improved clinically and adhered to conservative treatment. This case report is the first report of this rare co-morbidity, demonstrating the highly pathogenic mutation locus and summarizing the clinical experience of early diagnosis and treatment.

A case of acquired hemophilia A after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare disease that results from factor VIII inhibitors causing abnormal coagulation, and certain cases may develop after highly invasive surgery. The present case study reports on a 68-year-old male patient who developed AHA after undergoing a subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma. The patient experienced complications after surgery, requiring reoperation on postoperative day (PD) 5 due to rupture of the Braun's enterostomy. On PD 6, angiography was performed after bleeding was detected in the jejunal limb, but hemostasis occurred spontaneously during the examination. Bleeding was observed again on PD 8 and direct surgical ligation was performed. On PD 14, bleeding recurred in the jejunal limb and angiography was performed to embolize the periphery of the second jejunal artery. During the procedure, the prothrombin time was normal, but only the activated partial thromboplastin time was prolonged. A close examination of the coagulation system revealed a decrease in factor VIII levels and the presence of factor VIII inhibitors, resulting in the diagnosis of AHA. Administration of steroids was initiated on PD 15 and, in addition to daily blood transfusions, activated prothrombin complex concentrate was administered to achieve hemostasis. The patient was discharged from the intensive care unit on PD 36 but later developed an intractable labial fistula due to suture failure at the gastrojejunostomy site. As the use of factor VIII inhibitors continued despite the administration of steroids, cyclophosphamide (CPA) pulse therapy was added at PD 58. However, CPA was ineffective and the administration of rituximab was initiated on PD 98. After 12 courses of rituximab, the patient tested negative for factor VIII inhibitors on PD 219. On PD 289, labial fistula closure was performed with continuous replacement of factor VIII and the patient was discharged on PD 342.

[Translated article] Consensus recommendations for the improvement of inter- and intra-centre care coordination in the management of hemophilia

OBJECTIVE

Define consensus recommendations to improve care coordination between Hospital Pharmacy, Hematology and Nursing, inter- and intra-center, in the care of hemophilia patients.

METHOD

Recommendations for the improvement of care coordination in the management of hemophilia patients were identified and assessed by a multidisciplinary panel of professionals with experience in this field (Hospital Pharmacy, Hematology and Nursing) and supported by scientific evidence. The identified recommendations were assessed by Rand/UCLA consensus methodology (Delphi-adapted) based on their appropriateness and, subsequently, on their necessity. In both cases, it was used ordinal Likert scale. Data were statistically analyzed through different metrics.

RESULTS

Fifty-three recommendations for the improvement of care coordination between Hospital Pharmacy, Hematology and Nursing in the management of hemophilia patients were identified, grouped into eight areas of action: i) Hemophilia units, reference centers and multidisciplinary care; ii) Role of Hematology, Hospital Pharmacy and Nursing in the patient journey of hemophilia patients; iii) Telepharmacy and telemedicine; iv) Pharmacokinetic monitoring; v) Transition to adult patient regimen; vi) Patient health education; vii) Surgery, emergency room and hospital admission; and viii) Outcome evaluation. All recommendations were assessed as appropriate and necessary by the external expert panel.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemophilia patient journey is complex and depends on different variables. It also requires the involvement of different healthcare professionals who must act in a coordinated and integrated manner at all stages of the patient's life, adapted to their individual needs. On this matter, the identified and agreed recommendations may improve continuity and quality of care, as they facilitate the integration and coordination of the professionals involved in the management of this pathology, especially Hospital Pharmacy, Hematology and Nursing.

Consensus recommendations for the improvement of inter- and intra-centre care coordination in the management of hemophilia

OBJECTIVE

Define consensus recommendations to improve care coordination between Hospital Pharmacy, Haematology and Nursing, inter- and intra-center, in the care of haemophilia patients.

METHOD

Recommendations for the improvement of care coordination in the management of haemophilia patients were identified and assessed by a multidisciplinary panel of professionals with experience in this field (Hospital Pharmacy, Haematology and Nursing) and supported by scientific evidence. The identified recommendations were assessed by Rand/UCLA consensus methodology (Delphi-adapted) based on their appropriateness and, subsequently, on their necessity. In both cases, it was used ordinal Likert scale. Data were statistically analysed through different metrics.

RESULTS

Fifty-three recommendations for the improvement of care coordination between Hospital Pharmacy, Haematology and Nursing in the management of haemophilia patients were identified, grouped into eight areas of action: i) Haemophilia units, reference centers and multidisciplinary care; ii) Role of Haematology, Hospital Pharmacy and Nursing in the patient journey of haemophilia patients; iii) Telepharmacy and telemedicine; iv) Pharmacokinetic monitoring; v) Transition to adult patient regimen; vi) Patient health education; vii) Surgery, emergency room and hospital admission; and viii) Outcome evaluation. All recommendations were assessed as appropriate and necessary by the external expert panel.

CONCLUSIONS

Haemophilia patient journey is complex and depends on different variables. It also requires the involvement of different healthcare professionals who must act in a coordinated and integrated manner at all stages of the patient's life, adapted to their individual needs. On this matter, the identified and agreed recommendations may improve continuity and quality of care, as they facilitate the integration and coordination of the professionals involved in the management of this pathology, especially Hospital Pharmacy, Haematology and Nursing.

Review of Potential Barriers to Effective Hemostatic Management of Acquired Hemophilia A by Non-Hemophilia Experts in the United States

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is an ultra-rare autoimmune disorder caused by autoantibodies against factor VIII. It often presents with life-threatening bleeding to non-hemophilia experts, who have limited awareness of this condition. This review evaluated hemostatic management and identified barriers to optimal management of AHA by non-hemophilia experts in the United States through a literature review. AHA case reports published by non-hemophilia experts from January 2016 through November 2021 in non-hematology journals were critically reviewed for a chronology of clinical course and management, consultation with a hemophilia expert, referencing of available AHA recommendations, discussion of all hemostatic options, and bleed control outcomes; 24 case reports representing 24 patients were identified. Twelve patients had an apparent delay in diagnosis, 17 cases did not seek expert consultation, and 15 did not reference the 2009 International AHA Recommendations, including six in whom hemostatic treatment was not consistent with the recommendations. Of the 17 articles published after the 2017 AHA Guidance, eight did not reference them. Of the five articles published after the 2020 International Recommendations for AHA, three did not reference them. Overall, 14 articles did not discuss all available hemostatic treatment options. Four patients died. Our findings reveal variability in hemostatic management of AHA by non-hemophilia experts in the United States. Lack of AHA awareness remains a primary barrier for optimal management of AHA among non-hemophilia experts. Increasing education about existing AHA guidelines, including available therapies and access to expert care at hemophilia treatment centers, may help improve the outcomes of patients with AHA.

Unexplained hemorrhagic syndrome? Consider acquired hemophilia A or B

There is a dire need to develop an algorithm to improve the recognition of acquired hemophilia A and B (AHA and AHB) in clinical practice. Initial and intensive care unit (ICU) management of the disorder is particular and represents a challenge for the internist/hematologist and the ICU physician. A delay in the proper treatment of bleeding episodes can lead to a life-threatening event. Expert advice should be sought as soon as possible. Succesful resolution involves accurate diagnosis, bleeding control with hemostatic and immunotherapy, and eradication of the autoantibodies to improve overall survival. Current treatment guidelines are based on the literature in the form of cases and observational studies due to a lack of randomized controlled trials. AH can be triggered by many pathologies, presenting as a paraneoplastic syndrome in case of malignancies or as surgical associated acquired hemophilia (SAHA). We have reviewed the literature from 2015 to 2021 regarding the new case reports to further assess if there is an improvement in the clinical approach.