Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Management Strategies: A Narrative Review

Comparison of 2 different inhaled epoprostenol dosing strategies for acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill adults: Weight-based vs fixed-dose administration

PURPOSE

Inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO) is a viable, temporizing option for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), although the optimal iEPO dosing strategy remains inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate oxygenation and ventilation parameters in a comparison of weight-based and fixed-dose iEPO in adult patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at 2 academic medical centers in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients administered either fixed-dose or weight-based iEPO for moderate-to-severe ARDS. The primary endpoint was the highest recorded change in the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) within 4 hours of baseline. Secondary analyses compared responder rates within 4 hours of initiation, oxygenation and ventilation parameters, in-hospital mortality rates, mechanical ventilation duration, length of stay (ICU and hospital), and tracheostomy rates between the study groups.

RESULTS

A total of 294 patients were included, n = 194 with 100 (34.0%) and 194 (66.0%) in the weight-based and fixed-dose iEPO groups, respectively. The mean (SD) change in the highest recorded PaO2/FiO2 value from baseline up to 4 hours after initiation in the fixed-dose and weight-based groups was 81.1 (106.0) and 41.0 (72.5) mm Hg, respectively (P = 0.0015). The responder rate at 4 hours after iEPO initiation was significantly higher in the fixed-dose group (69.9%) than in the weight-based group (30.1%) (P = 0.02). The only predictor of response was fixed-dose administration (odds ratio, 3.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-6.7; P = 0.0012). Clinical outcomes were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Fixed-dose iEPO was associated with significantly higher response rates then weight-based iEPO during the first 4 hours of therapy. Fixed-dose iEPO is a more convenient strategy than weight-based approaches.

Evaluation of Continuous Inhaled Epoprostenol in the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Including Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) management is primarily supportive. Pulmonary vasodilators, such as inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO), have been shown to improve PaO2:FiO2 (PF) and are used as adjunctive therapy.

Objective

To identify the positive response rate and variables associated with response to iEPO in adults with ARDS. A positive response to iEPO was defined as a 10% improvement in PF within 6 hours.

Methods

This retrospective study included adults with ARDS treated with iEPO. The primary endpoint was the variables associated with a positive response to iEPO. Secondary endpoints were positive response rate and the change in PF and SpO2:FiO2 within 6 hours. Statistical analysis included multivariable regression.

Results

Three hundred thirty-one patients were included. As baseline PF increased, the odds of responding to iEPO decreased (odds ratio [OR], 0.752, 95% CI, 0.69-0.819, p < 0.001). Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related ARDS (OR 0.478, 95% CI, 0.281-0.814, p = 0.007) was associated with decreased odds of a positive response to iEPO. The total population had a 68.3% positive response rate to iEPO. SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS and non-SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS had a 59.5% and 72.7% positive response rate, respectively. iEPO significantly improved PF (71 vs 95, P < 0.001) in the whole population.

Conclusion and Relevance

iEPO was associated with a positive effect in a majority of moderate-to-severe ARDS patients, including patients with SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS. Lower baseline PF and non-SARS-CoV-2-related ARDS were significantly associated with a positive response to iEPO. The ability to predict which patients will respond to iEPO can facilitate better utilization.

Uninterrupted Continuous and Intermittent Nebulizer Therapy in a COVID-19 Patient Using Sequential Vibratory Mesh Nebulizers: A Case Report

Interruptions in continuous nebulized pulmonary vasodilators, such as epoprostenol, can potentially result in clinical deterioration in respiratory status. Coadministration of other intermittent nebulized therapies may require opening the ventilator circuit to facilitate administration. However, in patients with SARS-CoV2 infection, it is preferred to avoid opening the circuit whenever feasible to prevent aerosolization of the virus and exposure of health care workers. In this study, we describe a unique method of administering continuous epoprostenol nebulization and intermittent nebulized antibiotics, mucolytics, and bronchodilators, using Aerogen vibrating mesh nebulizers without interruptions in epoprostenol or opening the ventilator circuit. This technique set up consisted of stacking two Aerogen nebulizer cups, each with its own controller. This approach was successful in allowing concomitant delivery of intermittent and continuous nebulized therapy without interruptions. To our knowledge, this method has not been previously described in the literature and may be helpful to bedside clinicians facing a similar clinical scenario.

Comparison of Fixed-Dose Inhaled Epoprostenol and Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Critically Ill Adults

PURPOSE

Several reports have demonstrated similar effects on oxygenation between inhaled epoprostenol (iEPO) compared to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Previous studies directly comparing oxygenation and clinical outcomes between iEPO and iNO exclusively in an adult ARDS patient population utilized a weight-based dosing strategy. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and economic impact between iNO and fixed-dosed iEPO for ARDS in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a major academic medical center between January 1, 2014, and October 31, 2018. Patients ≥18 years of age with moderate-to-severe ARDS were included. The primary end point was to compare the mean change in partial arterial oxygen pressure to fraction of inspired oxygen (Pao ₂: Fio ₂) at 4 hours from baseline between iEPO and iNO. Other secondary aims were total acquisition drug costs, in-hospital mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients were included with 139 (58.2%) and 100 (41.8%) in the iEPO and iNO groups, respectively. The mean change in Pao ₂: Fio ₂ at 4 hours from baseline in the iEPO and iNO groups were 31.4 ± 54.6 and 32.4 ± 42.7 mm Hg, respectively (P = .88). The responder rate at 4 hours was similar between iEPO and iNO groups (64.7% and 66.0%, respectively, P = .84). Clinical outcomes including mortality, overall hospital and ICU length of stay, and mechanical ventilation duration were similar between iEPO and iNO groups. Estimated annual cost-savings realized with iEPO was USD1 074 433.

CONCLUSION

Fixed-dose iEPO was comparable to iNO in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS for oxygenation and ventilation parameters as well as clinical outcomes. Significant cost-savings were realized with iEPO use.