Mechanical simulation study of postoperative displacement of trochanteric fractures using the finite element method

BACKGROUND

Femoral trochanteric fractures are common among older adults. In the reduction of trochanteric fractures, acquiring the support of the anterior cortex at the fracture site on lateral view immediately after surgery is important. However, even if the cortical support is acquired, postoperative displacement due to the loss of this support often occurs. This study aimed to investigate local stress distribution in several trochanteric fracture models and to evaluate risk factors for postoperative displacement using the finite element (FE) method.

METHODS

Displaced two-fragment fracture models with an angulation deformity at the fracture site and a non-displaced two-fragment fracture model were constructed. The models with an angulation deformity were of two types, one with the proximal fragment directed backward (type A) and the other with the proximal fragment rotated forward from the femoral neck axis (type B). Thereafter, FE models of the femur and a sliding hip screw mounted on a 135° three-hole side-plate were constructed. A 2010-N load was applied to the femoral head, and a 1086-N load was applied to the greater trochanter. Under this condition, the maximum value of the von Mises stress distribution and the amount of displacement of the femoral head vertex in the distal direction were investigated.

RESULTS

A larger maximum stress value at the medial femoral neck cortex and a higher amount of displacement in the distal direction were particularly recognized in type A models. These results indicate that microstructural damage was larger in type A models and that type A fracture alignment may be particularly related to fracture collapse and subsequent postoperative displacement.

CONCLUSION

Even if support of the anterior cortex at the fracture site on lateral view is acquired immediately after surgery, caution is necessary for cases in which the proximal fragment is directed backward in the postoperative displacement from the viewpoint of the biomechanics of the FE method.

Plate fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures: What happens to the cement mantle?

Osteosynthesis of periprosthetic femur fractures by screw fixation around the implanted prosthetic stem is currently regarded as the biomechanically superior option compared with cerclage. The aim of this biomechanical study was damage analysis of the cement mantle after revision screw insertion. A prosthetic stem (Bicontact) was implanted in 20 cadaveric femora in cemented technique. A locking compression plate (Synthes) was then applied to the lateral femur at the level of the prosthetic stem. The method of plate fixation to the femur was assigned randomly to three groups: bicortical non-locking screws, monocortical locking screws, and bicortical locking screws. This was followed by applying a fluctuating axial load (2100 N, 0.5 Hz) for 20,000 cycles. After testing, macroscopic and microscopic evaluations of the cement mantle were conducted. Cracks formed in the cement mantle in 14% of the 80 screw holes. The type of screw (bicortical or monocortical; locking or non-locking) had no significant effect on the number of cracks (p = 0.52). The relationship between manifestation of crack damage and cement mantle thickness was not significant (p = 0.36), whereas the relationship between crack formation and screw position was significant (p = 0.019). Those screws whose circumference was only partially within the cement mantle yielded a significantly lower number of cracks compared with screws positioned completely within the cement mantle or even touching the prosthetic stem. In order to reduce the incidence of crack formation in the cement mantle during plate osteosynthesis of periprosthetic femur fractures, the screws should not be either placed within the cement mantle or make direct contact with the stem.

Comparison of the Lag Screw Placements for the Treatment of Stable and Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures regarding Trabecular Bone Failure

Background. In this study, the cut-out risk of Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) was investigated in nine different positions of the lag screw for two fracture types by using Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Methods. Two types of fractures (31-A1.1 and A2.1 in AO classification) were generated in the femur model obtained from Computerized Tomography images. The DHS model was placed into the fractured femur model in nine different positions. Tip-Apex Distances were measured using SolidWorks. In FEA, the force applied to the femoral head was determined according to the maximum value being observed during walking. Results. The highest volume percentage exceeding the yield strength of trabecular bone was obtained in posterior-inferior region in both fracture types. The best placement region for the lag screw was found in the middle of both fracture types. There are compatible results between Tip-Apex Distances and the cut-out risk except for posterior-superior and superior region of 31-A2.1 fracture type. Conclusion. The position of the lag screw affects the risk of cut-out significantly. Also, Tip-Apex Distance is a good predictor of the cut-out risk. All in all, we can supposedly say that the density distribution of the trabecular bone is a more efficient factor compared to the positions of lag screw in the cut-out risk.

Improve the Efficiency of Surgery for Femoral Shaft Fractures with A Novel Instrument: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

To improve the efficacy of closed reduction and wire guiding during intramedullary nail internal fixation in femoral shaft fractures.

Methods

A novel instrument was designed and manufactured. Sixty-eight patients were enrolled from February 2011 to December 2013. The instrument designed was used during the operation in the experimental group, but not in the control group.

Results

All patients exhibited fracture union, excluding 1 patient in the experimental group and 2 in the control group who had non-union; all of whom achieved fracture union with reoperation. There were no statistically significant differences in operative blood loss or duration of hospital stay between the groups (P > 0.05). The operative time, frequency of wire drilling, and number of open reduction cases, were significantly smaller in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Femoral shaft fractures are difficult to reduce using general methods; the novel instrument showed high clinical value and proved effective and safe in assisting with closed reduction and intramedullary nail fixation for femoral shaft fractures.

Trial Registration

ChiCTR ChiCTR-ICR-15007335

Biomechanical comparison of different external fixator configurations for stabilization of supracondylar humerus fractures in children

BACKGROUND

Currently, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning are considered the treatment of choice for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures. However, indications exist for the use of external fixation with Schanz screws. In this in vitro study, we evaluate the biomechanical properties of a new variation for external fixation and compare them to an established construct.

METHODS

Twenty distal cadaver humeri (10 pairs) were allocated to 2 groups. The humeri of the first group were fixed by an external fixator consisting of Schanz screws and an oblique K-wire inserted from the distal radial cortex of the humerus, those of the second group were fixed by a new variation with the oblique K-wire inserted from the distal ulnar cortex of the humerus. Displacement and stiffness in static loading in internal and external rotation, as well as in extension and flexion were evaluated and compared.

FINDINGS

The variation of the external fixator of the second group proved to be statistically significantly superior to the variation of the first group in internal rotation loading (p>0.05). In sagittal loading conditions and external rotation loading, the variations were equally stable (p>0.05). There was no significant effect of the samples' bone density on displacement and stiffness values in any direction of loading.

INTERPRETATION

In cases of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures when an external fixator is used for osteosynthesis, the insertion of an additional ulnarly inserted anti-rotation K-wire should be preferred to a radially inserted one as it reduces secondary displacement of the distal fragment.

Biomechanical evaluation of two innovative locking implants for comminuted olecranon fractures under high-cycle loading conditions

INTRODUCTION

The relatively high complication rate after fixation of olecranon fractures has led to an increasing application of anatomically pre-contoured locking plate systems. The purpose of the present study was to conduct a biomechanical comparison of olecranon osteosyntheses by applying the Olecranon VA-LCP and the 3.5mm LCP Hook Plate (LCP, locking compression plate) to an unstable fracture model under high-cycle loading conditions.

METHODS

After creating an unstable fracture (Schatzker type B), osteosynthesis was performed on eight pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric ulnae by application of either the Olecranon VA-LCP (Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland) or the 3.5mm LCP Hook Plate (Synthes, Solothurn, Switzerland). Loading (50,000 alternating loads, cyclic and sinusoidal 10-300 N) was conducted by application of tensile load with the elbow in 90° flexion to simulate the tensile strength of the triceps brachii. For statistical analysis, angular displacement in the region of the humeral trochlea was taken as a measure of olecranon dislocation.

RESULTS

In Group 1 (Olecranon VA-LCP), a median angular displacement of 0.36° (minimum 0.10°; maximum 0.80°) was observed after 500 alternating loads. In Group 2 (3.5-mm LCP Hook Plate), the medial displacement was 0.80° (minimum 0.13°; maximum 2.72°). The difference was nonsignificant (p = 0.128). The mean value for angular displacement in Group 1 after 50,000 cycles was 0.80° (minimum 0.31°; maximum 1.99°), whereas in Group 2 a mean angular displacement of 2.02° (minimum 0.71°; maximum 6.40°) was recorded. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.017). In Group 2, implant failure in the form of proximal plate pullout occurred in one construct after 756 cycles.

CONCLUSION

A significantly higher biomechanical stability can be achieved in the fixation of unstable olecranon fractures by application of the Olecranon VA-LCP rather than the 3.5mm LCP Hook Plate.

Biomechanical testing of an innovative fixation procedure to stabilize olecranon osteotomy

For the treatment of distal humerus an approach involving olecranon osteotomy is frequently preferred as it offers a clearer view, especially in cases of complex intraarticular fractures. It is however associated with the high risk of osteotomy-related complications such as nonunion, delayed healing, implant failure and migration of wires. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stability of different new procedures that stabilize olecranon osteotomy compared with conventional tension band wiring. We hypothesize that the new implants provide equivalent stability as the conventional tension band wiring. To test the hypothesis 27 biomechanically evaluated synthetic ulnae were osteotomized and stabilized with either the application of tension band wiring, the Olecranon Hook LCP (Synthes, Switzerland), or the Olecranon Osteotomy nail (Synthes, Switzerland). Loading was performed providing a tensile load to simulate the tensile force applied by the triceps muscle. Cyclic force-controlled loading was performed at 300 alternating forces between 10N and 500N at a speed of 200N/sec. An ultrasound-based system measured displacement to an accuracy of 0.1 mm. Statistical analysis showed significantly less displacement in the Olecranon Hook LCP and Olecranon Osteotomy nail groups compared with tension banding. Comparison of plate and nail yielded no differences in stability. Biomechanical testing did however show significantly higher stability for newer fixation methods for olecranon osteotomies compared with the frequently applied technique of tension band wiring. Whether the use of these implants will also lower complication rates remains to be evaluated in future clinical studies.

Level of evidence: Basic Science Study, Biomechanical Study.

Failure after osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures. Where is the limit of osteoporosis?

SUMMARY

The aim of this study is to identify osteoporosis values, beyond which there is a high risk of osteosynthesis failure. Bone mineral density (BMD) of 30 cadaveric femora with a pertrochanteric fracture osteotomy was correlated to the risk of cut out after osteosynthesis on a biomechanical testing approach. For a BMD less than 250 mg/cm(3), there is a high risk of fixation failure after surgical treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. This value can be regarded as a reference value for future experimental and clinical studies.

INTRODUCTION

Despite continuous modification of intramedullary load carriers for the surgical stabilization of trochanteric fractures, cut out remains the most frequent complication. The aim of this experimental study was to identify threshold osteoporosis values, beyond which there is a high risk of osteosynthesis failure.

METHODS

Bone mineral density (BMD) of 30 cadaveric femora was recorded for the femoral head by QCT measurement. Subsequently, a standardized osteotomy mimicking an unstable trochanteric type fracture was stabilized by intramedullary nailing. The constructs were loaded axially at a force of 2,100 N up to 20,000 cycles. Cut out at the femoral head was documented by radiograph. Statistical evaluation of the cohort group was performed by calculation of relative risk in relation to the BMD values.

RESULTS

In total, there were six cases of cut out after 10,000 cycles. The incidence of cut out for BMD less than 250 mg/cm(3) was 0.55 (5 of 9) and for BMD greater than 250 mg/cm(3), it was 0.05 (1 of 21). Therefore, the relative risk of cut out for BMD <250 mg/cm(3) is 11× greater than for a BMD >250 mg/cm(3). After 20,000 cycles, an additional test caused one cut out (relative risk of cut out for a BMD <250 mg/cm(3) 5.8).

CONCLUSIONS

For a BMD less than 250 mg/cm(3), there is a high risk of fixation failure after surgical treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. Although this value is based on an experimental in vitro study design with all its associated limitations, it can be regarded as a reference value for future experimental and clinical studies.

Intramedullary nailing of trochanteric fractures: central or caudal positioning of the load carrier? A biomechanical comparative study on cadaver bones

BACKGROUND

Current recommendations with regard to central or caudal positioning of the femur head carrier in the management of trochanteric fractures are contradictory.

METHODS

A standardised pertrochanteric osteotomy was stabilised in 15 pairs of cadaver femurs by means of intramedullary osteosynthesis (5xPFN-A-Synthes, 5xIntertan-Smith&Nephew, 5xTargon-PF-Aesculap). For each pair randomised central (group A) or caudal (group B) implantation of the femoral neck component was performed. Subsequently, the constructs were axially loaded to 2100N. In the absence of cut out after 20,000 cycles, load was increased to a maximum force of 3100N. Angular displacement was recorded based on ultrasound. Migration of the load carrier in the femoral head was monitored radiologically.

FINDINGS DISPLACEMENT

No significant difference between groups (p>0.15) was found for the first 50 load cycles. A significantly greater degree of varus deformity was observed in group A (p=0.049) after 2000 load cycles and became more apparent as the number of load cycles increased (after 6000 cycles p=0.039, after 20,000 cycles p=0.034, after 22,000 cycles p=0.016). Angular displacement in the other two planes did not differ significantly across groups. CUT OUT: Migration of the load carrier in the femoral head was not significantly different for the two groups. Overall cut out occurred in 9 constructs, 3 in group A and 6 in group B. The difference in cut-out rate was not significant (p=0.213, chi-squared test).

CONCLUSION

Biomechanical superiority can be shown for caudal positioning of the femoral neck load carrier in terms of reduced varus deformity. The incidence of cut out is however unaffected by the position of the load carrier.