Self-medication by women attending a genitourinary medicine clinic

Benefits and risks of self medication

Self medication is becoming an increasingly important area within healthcare. It moves patients towards greater independence in making decisions about management of minor illnesses, thereby promoting empowerment. Self medication also has advantages for healthcare systems as it facilitates better use of clinical skills, increases access to medication and may contribute to reducing prescribed drug costs associated with publicly funded health programmes. However, self medication is associated with risks such as misdiagnosis, use of excessive drug dosage, prolonged duration of use, drug interactions and polypharmacy. The latter may be particularly problematic in the elderly. Monitoring systems, a partnership between patients, physicians and pharmacists and the provision of education and information to all concerned on safe self medication, are proposed strategies for maximising benefit and minimising risk.

[Self-medication: concept and "users'" profile]

Self-medication constitutes one of the most modern expressions of the always present need of men and women for care of their health. However, in contrast to other expressions of selfcare, the self-medication includes, for a good part of population and the most of the doctors, negative connotations. Contrary to this vision, the WHO marks the existence of a valid role for self-medication in developed societies. This article has two objectives: to revise the different concepts of self-medication proposed in literature; and to revise the socio-demographic and socio-medical factors connected with the practice of self-medication.

How common is self-treatment in non gonococcal urethritis?

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of self-treatment in men with new episode non gonococcal urethritis (NGU).

METHOD

Three hundred consecutive men with new episode NGU attending an open access genitourinary medicine clinic were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire. Details of treatment used before attending the clinic were obtained.

RESULTS

Thirty (10%) men had used treatment, for an average of 7 days, prior to the clinic attendance. Agents used included antibiotics (11), savion or iodine (4), vitamin tablets (4), cisapride (2), local anaesthetic gel (2), antiseptic cream (2), cod liver oil (1), ferrous sulphate (1), naproxen (1), clotrimazole cream (1) and a poultice (1). Over 70% of the men reporting antibiotic use had self-medicated and in one case a fixed drug eruption had ensued.

CONCLUSION

A significant number of men with NGU self-treat. In addition to the adverse effects of such treatment and the potential effect on culture tests, clinic attendance may be postponed, the use of appropriate therapy delayed, and sexual contacts will remain at risk. Early attendance for treatment and contact tracing is essential and should be actively promoted.

Pharyngeal flora in a sexually active population

During a 7-week period 1141 patients attending the Genitourinary Clinic at Charing Cross Hospital completed a brief questionnaire and had pharyngeal swabs cultured for Neisseria spp, beta-haemolytic streptococci, corynebacterium and yeasts. The study included 397 heterosexual men, 492 heterosexual women, 189 homosexuals, 41 lesbians and 22 bisexual men and women. Four hundred and sixty patients (40%) admitted oro-genital contact in the preceding 2 weeks. The meningococcal carriage rate was 11.6%. Homosexuals had the highest carriage 23.8% and heterosexual females the lowest 5.9%. Significant differences in carriage rates were found between homosexual and heterosexual men (P < 0.0001), heterosexual men and women (P < 0.005) and between lesbian and heterosexual women (P < 0.025). Recent oro-anal contact significantly increased meningococcal isolation (P < 0.001). A significant association between beta-haemolytic streptococci and concomitant meningococcal carriage was also found (P < 0.01). Sexual orientation and oro-genital contact influences both meningococcal and pharyngeal yeast isolation and should be considered when interpreting pharyngeal culture results.