An evaluation of the safety of ranitidine during seven years daily oral administration to beagle dogs

Metabolic profile and ruminal and abomasal pH in sheep subjected to intravenous ranitidine

Resumo: Brazilian sheep production has intensified, predisposing sheep to an increased incidence of digestive disorders, such as abomasal ulcers. Ranitidine is used to prevent and treat this disease; however, there is little information on the parenteral use of this drug in adult ruminants. Few data exist on the concomitant metabolic changes and the behavior of the digestive system associated with its use. For this study, five healthy male sheep with ruminal and abomasal cannulas were used. A 5x5 Latin square experiment with a 2x2+1 factorial arrangement of the treatments was performed. Sheep treated with drug doses of 1 or 2mg/kg ranitidine administered intravenously every 8 or 12 hours were compared with the control group, was treated intravenously with 1 mL of physiological solution per 25 kg every 12 hours. Higher total protein concentrations, hemoglobin levels, as well as increased aspartate aminotransferase activity and increased abomasal pH for up to 150 min following drug administration were observed in all animals that received the drug, regardless of dose and frequency. The animals treated every 12 hours showed a decrease in leukocyte number compared with the control group and with the animals treated every 8 hours. Increased serum creatinine concentrations were observed in the animals treated every 8 hours. Treatments of 1mg/kg every 8 hours and 2mg/kg every 12 hours increased the red blood cell count and decreased the serum pepsinogen. All protocols studied were safe for healthy sheep, but 1mg/kg ranitidine every 8 hours and 2mg/kg ranitidine every 12 hours were the most effective protocols for gastric protection.

Effects of omeprazole on ethanol lesions

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were used to study the effects of omeprazole on normal and ethanol damaged gastric mucosa, and to estimate plasma gastrin levels following the administration of omeprazole for 2 weeks. The dosage of omeprazole was 50 mg/kg body weight, once daily via gavage. In omeprazole treated animals, serum gastrin levels showed statistically significant increases compared with the control and ethanol treated animals. Our results indicate that omeprazole has no protective effect on ethanol-induced alterations in gastric mucosa and, in fact, appears to produce worsened lesions. In achlorohydric doses, omeprazole can induce significant gastrin levels with consequent hypertrophy and hyperplasia of enterochromaffin-like cells and somatostatin cells. It is believed that this powerful drug should be reserved for patients who are refractory to standard H(2)-receptor antagonist therapy.

Gastrointestinal drugs

Various drugs are commonly used for the many gastrointestinal problems that are routinely seen in dogs and cats. Many of these drugs are briefly reviewed in this article. Anecdotal as well as documented findings are provided that will hopefully allow the clinician to use them wisely and effectively in the many clinical situations that arise daily. Emetics, although not used for gastrointestinal problems, are also reviewed because of their obvious connection with the gastrointestinal tract.

Effects of ranitidine on gastric vesicles containing H+,K(+)-adenosine triphosphatase in rats

BACKGROUND

To ascertain the mechanism for rebound acid hypersecretion after treatment with an H2-receptor blocker, we investigated the effects of ranitidine on gastric H+,K(+)-adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) in rats.

METHODS

Male Wistar rats received ranitidine (1-50 mg/kg body weight intraperitoneally twice a day for 5 days). The rats were starved for 15 h after the last treatment and then killed, and gastric vesicles containing H+,K(+)-ATPase were prepared.

RESULTS

Treatment with ranitidine dose-dependently increased protein content in the gastric vesicular fraction purified from the gastric mucosa without changing total protein content. Ranitidine also increased the content of a 94,000-dalton protein, the catalytic subunit of H+,K(+)-ATPase. On the other hand, ranitidine did not affect the specific activity of the enzyme (mumol/min/mg of the gastric vesicular protein). Since gastric vesicles in the fasting state mainly consist of the tubulovesicular membrane, these results suggest that ranidine administration increases total tubulovesicular H+,K(+)-ATPase content (mumol/min/rat) by increasing the number of tubulovesicles per parietal cell. The ranitidine-induced increase in total tubulovesicular H+,K(+)-ATPase activity was still evident 1 week after treatment and returned to control level 1 month later.

CONCLUSIONS

All these findings suggest that the increased content and total activity of tubulovesicular H+,K(+)-ATPase after ranitidine treatment may contribute to the mechanism for acid rebound after H2-blocker therapy.

Side effects of ranitidine

Ranitidine was first marketed in 1981; since then many patients have been treated such that much experience has been accumulated on the safety of this histamine H2-receptor antagonist in the treatment of gastroduodenal disease. A wide array of ranitidine-associated side effects has been described, but infrequently. As so much information is now available, the aim of this review is to assess the weight of evidence for a causal link between ranitidine and the reported side effects. Overall, ranitidine is well tolerated. The incidence of general side effects at less than 2% is very similar to placebo. Headaches, tiredness, dizziness and mild gastrointestinal disturbance (e.g. diarrhoea, constipation and nausea) are among the most frequent complaints, but have very seldom resulted in stopping treatment. Cardiovascular side effects are extremely rare and unpredictable with the usual doses of oral ranitidine (at most 1 in 1 million patients). They mostly comprise sinusal bradycardia and atrioventricular blockade, especially after rapid intravenous administration, receding after cessation of the drug. Clinical studies, however, have not shown a significant pharmacological effect of ranitidine on the cardiovascular system via H2-receptors, even though individual sensitivities cannot be ruled out in a few isolated reports. Ranitidine is unlikely to be directly hepatotoxic: a transient change in liver function tests has been noted in only 1 in 100 to 1 in 1000 patients. Several cases of mixed hepatitis have been reported, but very few were fully documented. The incidence of ranitidine-associated acute hepatitis has been estimated to be less than 1 in 100,000 patients. Neuropsychiatric complications may be less common and clinically quite similar to those reported with cimetidine, i.e. confusion, disorientation, hallucinations, delirium. These side effects have occurred especially in critically ill and multiple-therapy patients, or patients with chronic renal or hepatic failure, so that the direct causal link with ranitidine treatment was often difficult to ascertain. Even though an H2-receptor-mediated effect is an attractive hypothesis (since similar complications were noted with other H2-receptor antagonists), other mechanisms have been suggested to play a role, e.g. cholinergic or histaminic effects. The overall incidence of neuropsychiatric complications is probably markedly less than 1%. White cell injury (i.e. agranulocytosis) appears to be the most frequent haematological complication, even though case reports are very few and poorly documented.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)