Efficacy and safety of cyclosporine A in patients with refractory systemic lupus erythematosus in a daily clinical practice

Revolutionizing Precision Medicine: Exploring Wearable Sensors for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Personalized Therapy

Precision medicine, particularly therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), is essential for optimizing drug dosage and minimizing toxicity. However, current TDM methods have limitations, including the need for skilled operators, patient discomfort, and the inability to monitor dynamic drug level changes. In recent years, wearable sensors have emerged as a promising solution for drug monitoring. These sensors offer real-time and continuous measurement of drug concentrations in biofluids, enabling personalized medicine and reducing the risk of toxicity. This review provides an overview of drugs detectable by wearable sensors and explores biosensing technologies that can enable drug monitoring in the future. It presents a comparative analysis of multiple biosensing technologies and evaluates their strengths and limitations for integration into wearable detection systems. The promising capabilities of wearable sensors for real-time and continuous drug monitoring offer revolutionary advancements in diagnostic tools, supporting personalized medicine and optimal therapeutic effects. Wearable sensors are poised to become essential components of healthcare systems, catering to the diverse needs of patients and reducing healthcare costs.

Combination strategies for lupus nephritis: facts and controversies

INTRODUCTION

There is an unmet need to improve the efficacy of therapeutic regimens in lupus nephritis (LN). Cocktail immunosuppressive therapy for the synergistic effect of individual drugs may enhance efficacy and enable dosage reduction. However, the potential increase in the risk of serious and opportunistic infections is a concern. Moreover, the timing of combination therapy, adoption of a step-up or step-down approach, and the choice of drugs is still controversial, partly related to the cost-effectiveness issue.

AREAS COVERED

Evidence of a combination of conventional, newer immunosuppressive, and biologic/targeted agents in LN.

EXPERT OPINION

Early combination of conventional regimens with anti-B cell activation factor (anti-BAFF) or calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) enhances the therapeutic effect without increasing serious adverse events in LN. However, combining anti-CD20 and anti-BAFF biologics appears to be less promising from the results of clinical trials. Initial combination strategy may be more cost-effective for patients at risk of treatment failure and renal function deterioration. With the availability of more options, the treat-to-target approach in LN is increasingly feasible and further studies are needed to compare the step-up and step-down approaches in the treatment of LN.

Advancement in therapeutic strategies for immune-mediated oral diseases

BACKGROUND

Immune-mediated diseases are a diverse group of conditions characterized by alteration of cellular homeostasis and inflammation triggered by dysregulation of the normal immune response. Several immune-mediated diseases exhibit oral signs and symptoms. Traditionally, these conditions are treated with corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents, including azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, and thalidomide. Recent research into the developmental pathways of these diseases has led to the exploration of novel approaches in treatment. This review examines newer treatment modalities for the management of immune-mediated diseases with oral presentations. Topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) such as tacrolimus and pimecrolimus have been employed successfully in managing oral lichen planus and pemphigus vulgaris. Biologic agents, comprising monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, and recombinant cytokines, can provide targeted therapy with fewer adverse effects. Neutraceutical agents comprising aloe vera, curcumin, and honey are commonly used in traditional medicine and offer a holistic approach. They may have a place as adjuvants to current standard therapeutic protocols. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) utilize a specific wavelength of light to achieve desired cellular change. While the use of PDT in immune-mediated diseases is contentious, LLLT has shown positive results. Newer therapeutic modalities involve kinase inhibitors, S1P₁ receptor modulators, MSCs, and iRNA providing targeted treatment of specific diseases.

Effectiveness and tolerability of immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies in preventive treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several immunosuppressants or monoclonal antibodies have been used as preventive treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD); however, the optimal therapies have not been clarified. In this study, we aimed to compare and rank the effectiveness and tolerability of all preventive therapies for NMOSD.

METHODS

Qualified studies were identified in a search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. We combined direct and indirect evidence via meta-analyses. The annualized relapse rate (ARR) was defined as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and hazard ratios (HR) for the counts of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

We identified one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and five observational studies including a total 631 patients with NMOSD. Among these, the follow-up time ranged from 12 to 40 months. For the primary outcome, rituximab (RTX) was hierarchically superior, with the significant standardized mean difference versus azathioprine (-0.86; 95% confidence interval: -1.60, -0.11). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was ranked the most tolerable therapy, whereas cyclophosphamide was the least tolerable.

CONCLUSION

RTX and MMF may be recommended as optimal treatments to prevent relapse in NMOSD. Low-dose cyclosporine A could be a promising alternative therapy.

Low-dose cyclosporine for active lupus nephritis: a dose titration approach

OBJECTIVE

Achievement of complete renal remission (CR) is an important goal in lupus nephritis (LN) treatment. The use of cyclosporine (CsA) for active LN has been challenged because of variations in CsA doses and reports of adverse reactions (AR).

METHOD

A cohort of 62 patients with active LN (induction-resistant LN and flared LN) who were treated with CsA was evaluated. CsA was started at 50 mg/day and titrated up 25 mg/day every 2-4 weeks until CR was achieved or until treatment termination because of AR.

RESULTS

The range of CsA dosage was 50-200 mg/day, and mean CsA dose was 102.8 ± 50.43 mg/day (1.73 ± 0.91 mg/kg/day). CsA plus mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone was administered to 35.5% of patients, while the other 64.5% were treated with CsA and prednisolone. 90.32% had achieved CR and 4.84% had partial remission after 12 months of treatment. UPCR (urinary protein:creatinine ratio) decreased significantly in both groups (2.58 ± 3.37 to 0.36 ± 0.71 and 2.32 ± 1.45 to 0.29 ± 0.24 respectively) (P < 0.001). Non-renal activity including arthritis, alopecia, hematologic and cutaneous conditions improved in all patients. Patients whose prednisolone dose were increase received higher doses of prednisolone at baseline than patients who had stable prednisolone dose, but after 12 months the difference in dosage was insignificant (p = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

Patients with active LN can be effectively treated with low dose CsA, and the dose titration approach can lead to 90.32% CR with low AR rates. No difference in clinical response was observed among patients who received CsA plus prednisolone or CsA plus MMF and prednisolone.

Refractory lupus nephritis: When, why and how to treat

Refractory lupus nephritis indicates an inadequate response to lupus nephritis therapy. It implies persisting or worsening disease activity despite therapy, but the definition is complicated by the parameters of response, proteinuria and renal function, that do not discriminate clearly between activity and irreversible damage. Understanding the causes of refractory disease and developing treatment strategies is important because these patients are more likely to develop poor outcomes, especially end stage renal disease. This review explores current concepts and definitions of refractory disease and summarises treatment approaches that have been used in observational cohort studies and case series. We highlight the importance of optimising adherence to the prescribed immunosuppressive and supportive measures and avoidance of diagnostic delay. Treatment options include higher dose glucocorticoid, switching between cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate acid derivates, or addition of rituximab, the latter potentially in combination with belimumab. Less evidence supports extracorporeal treatment (plasma exchange or immunoadsorption), calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine A or tacrolimus), intravenous immunoglobulin and stem cell transplantation. Improvements in understanding what refractory disease is and how definitions can be integrated into treatment pathways has the potential to enhance lupus nephritis outcomes.

Current best practice management of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome

Introduction

Over the last 100 years, the terminology and diagnosis criteria for interstitial cystitis have evolved. Many therapeutic options have changed, but others have endured. This article will review the idea of separating 'classic' Hunner lesion interstitial cystitis (HL IC) from non-Hunner lesion interstitial cystitis and bladder pain syndrome (N-HL IC/BPS) and their respective treatment algorithms.

Methods/Results

A literature search was performed to identify articles and research on HL IC and N-HL IC/BPS including definitions, etiological theories, and treatments. This article is an overview of the existing literature. We also offer insight into how HL IC and N-HL IC/BPS are approached at our tertiary referral center. Additionally, American Urological Association guidelines have been integrated and newer treatment modalities and research will be introduced at the conclusion.

Conclusion

The AUA guidelines have mapped out a stepwise fashion to treat IC/BPS; at our institution we separate patients with HL IC from those with N-HL IC/BPS prior to them entering a treatment pathway. We identify the rarer patient with HL as having classic 'IC'; this cystoscopic finding is critical in guiding treatment. We believe HL IC is a distinct disease from N-HL IC/BPS and therapy should focus on the bladder. The vast majority of patients with N-HL IC/BPS need management of their pelvic floor muscles as the primary therapy, complemented by bladder-directed therapies as needed as well as a multidisciplinary team to manage a variety of other regional/systemic symptoms. Ongoing research into IC/BPS will help us better understand the pathophysiology and phenotypes of this complex disease while exciting and novel research studies are developing promising treatments.

The Use of Cyclosporine A in Rheumatology: a 2016 Comprehensive Review

Cyclosporine A, an inhibitor of calcineurin, exerts an immunomodulator action interfering with T cell activation. Even though novel therapeutic tools have emerged, CyA still represents a suitable option in several clinical rheumatology settings. This is the case of refractory nephritis and cytopenias associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Furthermore, CyA is a valued therapeutic tool in the management of uveitis and thrombophlebitis in course of Behçet's disease. Topical CyA has been proven to be beneficial in the dry eye of Sjogren's syndrome, whereas oral treatment with CyA can be considered for the severe complications of adult onset Still's disease. CyA provides a therapeutic option in psoriatic arthritis, being rather effective in skin disease. CyA is currently regarded as a second-line option for patients with inflammatory myopathies refractory to standard regimen. CyA is used even in paediatric rheumatology, in particular in the management of juvenile dermatomyositis and macrophage activation syndrome associated with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Importantly, CyA has been shown to suppress the replication of HCV, and it can thus be safely prescribed to those patients with chronic hepatitis C. Noteworthy, CyA can be administered throughout the gestation course. Surely, caution should be paid to CyA safety profile, in particular to its nephrotoxicity. Even though most evidence comes from small and uncontrolled studies with few randomised controlled trials, CyA should be still regarded as a valid therapeutic tool in 2016 rheumatology.

Calcineurin inhibitors in systemic lupus erythematosus

The calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) belong to a group of immunosuppressive agents that block T-cell activation through the suppression of the calcium/calcimodulin-dependent phosphatase calcineurin. Agents such as cyclosporine A (CSA) and tacrolimus (TAC) have long been used in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). TAC is preferred to CSA in SLE because of the lower frequency of cosmetic, hypertensive and dyslipidemic adverse effects. Recent randomised controlled trials have demonstrated noninferiority of TAC to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or cyclophosphamide (CYC) for induction therapy of lupus nephritis. Low-dose combination of TAC and MMF has also been shown to outperform CYC pulses in inducing remission of lupus nephritis in Chinese patients. TAC does not affect fertility and is relatively safe in pregnancy. In SLE patients who are intolerant or refractory to conventional immunosuppressives, or where contraindications to other immunosuppressive agents exist, TAC is an alternative option. However, the therapeutic window of TAC is narrow, and drug level monitoring is required to ensure drug exposure and minimise toxicities. Current evidence of TAC in lupus nephritis is limited to 6 months, and its long-term safety as maintenance therapy of SLE is yet to be determined. Newer chemical analogues of CNIs, such as voclosporin, with less variable plasma concentration are being tested in lupus nephritis.

EFFECTIVITY AND RENAL SAFETY OF CYCLOSPORINE AND METHYLPREDNISOLONE COMBINATION THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (SLE)

Cyclosporine and methylprednisolone combination are second line therapy for moderate to severe systemic lupus erythemathosus. Some study suggest that the combination were effective to decrease of systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity. But record from the study, cyclosporine cause nephrotoxicity side effect. Therefore, this study should be considered to monitore therapy effect on disease activity and renal side effect. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of cyclosporine and methylprednisolone combination therapy on disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) assessed by MEX-SLEDAI and renal side effect assessed by creatinine, ureum and proteinuria. A cohort, observational prospective study was conducted to determine the effect of cyclosporine and methylprednisolone combination therapy on disease activity of SLE and renal side effect of this combination. Patients who met criteria were given cyclosporine and methylprednisolone combination that normally renal function tests. MEX-SLEDAI score, creatinine, ureum and proteinuria were measured for fourth times (one time in one mounth), before study, 1st mounth, 2nd mounth, and 3rd mounth. The study comprised 9 patients SLE were given cyclosporine and methylprednisolone combination that normally renal function tests. All patients were female and had productive age. At 3rd mounth, there was increase patients who had MEX-SLEDAI score <2 (55,6%) and one patient (11,1%) had increase of creatinine, ureum and proteinuria. In conclusion, cyclosporine and methylprednisolone combination therapy showed the effectiveness and safety in 88,9% patients and renal dysfunction in 11,1% patients.

Population Pharmacokinetic Approach to the Use of Low Dose Cyclosporine in Patients with Connective Tissue Diseases

This study describes the population pharmacokinetics and dose personalization of cyclosporine in 36 patients with connective tissue diseases. A one-compartment open model with absorption was adopted as a pharmacokinetic model, and a nonlinear mixed effects model was used to analyze the population pharmacokinetic models. In the final model, age (AGE) and total body weight (TBW) were influential covariates on clearance (CL/F), which was expressed as CL/F (L/h)=17.8×(AGE/60)(-0.269)×(TBW/46.9)(0.408), in addition to the volume of distribution (Vd/F), (L)=98.0 and absorption rate constant (Ka) (h(-1))=0.67 (fixed). The results of the present study provide novel insights into factors involved in determining the most suitable dose and dosing strategy for individual patients with connective tissue disease.

Treatment effect of cyclosporine A in patients with painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis: A systematic review

Cyclosporine A (CyA) is emerging as a potential therapeutic strategy for painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis (PBS/IC), which is currently an incurable disease. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the treatment effects of CyA in PBS/IC. Electronic and manual retrieval procedures were carried out to identify eligible references for the systematic review. The entire contents of the included articles were assessed, from study design to reported results. Eight studies, comprising three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), four prospective studies and one retrospective cohort study, were included, involving a total of 298 subjects. Meta-analysis was not implemented due to heterogeneity of the manner of reporting the outcome parameters. All studies reported an improvement in symptoms following treatment with CyA. The results of the three RCTs implied that the treatment effects of CyA were better than those of pentosan polysulfate sodium. Some adverse events, for example, elevation of serum creatinine levels and an increase in blood pressure, were noted in five studies. In conclusion, the evidence from the studies implied that treatment of CyA can result in a long-term benefit in patients of PBS/IC; however, further evidence is required to verify this.

Efficacy and safety of nonbiologic immunosuppressants in the treatment of nonrenal systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the efficacy and safety of nonbiologic immunosuppressants in the treatment of nonrenal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

We conducted a sensitive literature search in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to October 2011. The selection criteria were studies including adult patients with SLE, a treatment intervention with nonbiologic immunosuppressants, a placebo or active comparator group, and outcome measures assessing efficacy and/or safety. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, clinical trials, and cohort studies were included. The quality of each study was evaluated using Jadad’s scale and the Oxford Levels of Evidence.

RESULTS

In total, 158 of the 2,827 initially found articles were selected for detailed review; 65 studies fulfilled the predetermined criteria. Overall, the studies were low quality, with only 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Cyclophosphamide demonstrated efficacy for neuropsychiatric SLE, preventing relapses with an additional steroid sparing effect, although its use was associated with cumulative damage, development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,and ovarian failure. Other immunosuppressants (azathioprine, methotrexate, leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil,and cyclosporin A) demonstrated efficacy in reducing nonrenal activity and flares with a steroid-sparing effect, although only on occasion in non–placebo-controlled RCTs of small numbers of patients.

CONCLUSION

Several immunosuppressants demonstrated their safety and efficacy in nonrenal SLE. A specific drug for each particular manifestation cannot be recommended, although cyclophosphamide may be used in more severe cases, and methotrexate may be the first option in most cases of moderately active SLE. High-quality RCTs of larger numbers of patients are needed.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: a therapeutic challenge for the XXI century

Despite significant advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), there are only a few drugs approved by the regulatory agencies across the world for the treatment of these patients; in fact, many of the compounds subjected to clinical trials have failed in achieving their primary endpoints. Current therapeutic options include antimalarials which should be used in all SLE patients unless they are strongly contraindicated, glucocorticoids which should be used at the lowest possible dose and for the shortest possible time, and immunosuppressive drugs which should be used judiciously, mainly in patients with severe organ involvements or receiving high doses of steroids to control their disease. Despite improvement on the survival of SLE patients, damage accrual has not varied over the last few decades, reflecting a gap between these therapeutic options and the expectations of these patients and their treating physicians. Biologic compounds can be used in some refractory cases. However, their cost is of great concern for both the patients and the health system. Cost is of special importance in low-income countries, because low-income SLE patients tend to experience a more severe disease having an overall worse prognosis which is compounded by their limited access to the health system. Although a treatment to target based on defined molecular pathways for specific disease subsets is appealing, this is not yet a reality. This review addressed current therapeutic options for SLE patients and the state of the art of investigational drugs targeting pathogenic pathways identified in these patients.

Lupus nephritis: review of the literature

Physicians in practice should be knowledgeable regarding several aspects of autoimmune disorders, especially systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis. These disorders can present to the clinician's clinic and private office regardless of their specialty. This review will discuss various aspects of SLE, its mechanisms of disease, role of accelerated atherosclerosis, proinflammatory cytokines, and therapeutic approaches. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in which and plasma levels have been associated with disease activity, classification of severity, and diagnosis of lupus nephritis is addressed. Current treatment options, prognosis, and future therapeutic approaches and common side effects are also discussed.

Refractory Proliferative Lupus Nephritis

Objective: To review the literature available regarding treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) refractory to cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and glucocorticoids. Data Sources: PubMed-MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases were searched through June 2013 using the terms lupus nephritis, refractory, induction, systemic lupus erythematosus, diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis, rituximab, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, leflunomide, mizoribine, intravenous immunoglobulin, and belimumab. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Included studies were limited to human studies that evaluated clinical efficacy and English language articles. Articles assessing treatment with first-line agents such as glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate, and azathioprine were excluded from this review. Data Synthesis: There are an increasing number of medications being used in refractory LN, making the selection of an appropriate agent more difficult. Thirty studies evaluating the treatment of LN with alternative agents were identified. Although rituximab and calcineurin inhibitors have demonstrated the ability to induce remission in approximately 60% of patients with LN, large randomized trials have not confirmed these results. Leflunomide, mizoribine, and intravenous immunoglobulin have revealed potential benefits in some patient populations; however, there is not enough data to support the regular use of these agents for refractory LN. Conclusions: Rituximab and calcineurin inhibitors have the most evidence to support their use and should be the preferred agents in the treatment of refractory LN at this time. Further studies may elucidate the efficacy of other agents for refractory LN.

NFAT gene family in inflammation and cancer

Calcineurin-NFAT signaling is critical for numerous aspects of vertebrate function during and after embryonic development. Initially discovered in T cells, the NFAT gene family, consisting of five members, regulates immune system, inflammatory response, angiogenesis, cardiac valve formation, myocardial development, axonal guidance, skeletal muscle development, bone homeostasis, development and metastasis of cancer, and many other biological processes. In this review we will focus on the NFAT literature relevant to the two closely related pathological systems: inflammation and cancer.

Successful treatment of class IV+V lupus nephritis with combination therapy of high-dose corticosteroids, tacrolimus and intravenous cyclophosphamide

A substantial number of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) are refractory to conventional glucocorticoid (GC) treatment. Although many of these patients respond to immunosuppressive drugs such as intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY), azathioprine (AZA), mizoribine, tacrolimus, cyclosporine A (CSA) and mycofenolate mofetil (MMF), some remain refractory to such therapies. Recent studies of multi-target therapies have reported effective outcomes for immunosuppression following renal transplantation and refractory LN when therapy consists of two or more immunosuppressive drugs with different mechanisms of action. We herein report a case of LN unresponsive to IVCY that was successfully treated with the addition of tacrolimus and discuss the usefulness of multi-target therapy for LN.

Treatment of young patients with lupus nephritis using calcineurin inhibitors

Recent advances in the management of lupus nephritis, together with earlier renal biopsy and selective use of aggressive immunosuppressive therapy, have contributed to a favorable outcome in children and adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Nevertheless, we believe that a more effective and less toxic treatment is needed to attain an optimal control of the activity of lupus nephritis. Recent published papers and our experiences regarding treatment of young patients with lupus nephritis using calcineurin inhibitors are reviewed. Although it has been reported that intermittent monthly pulses of intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY) are effective for preserving renal function in adult patients, CPA is a potent immunosuppressive agent that induces severe toxicity, including myelo- and gonadal toxicity, and increases the risk of secondary malignancy. Thus, treatment for controlling lupus nephritis activity, especially in children and adolescents, remains challenging. Cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus (Tac) are T-cell-specific calcineurin inhibitors that prevent the activation of helper T cells, thereby inhibiting the transcription of the early activation genes of interleukin (IL)-2 and suppressing T cell-induced activation of tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-1β and IL-6. Therefore, both drugs, which we believe may be less cytotoxic, are attractive therapeutic options for young patients with lupus nephritis. Recently, a multidrug regimen of prednisolone (PDN), Tac, and mycophenolate mofetile (MMF) has been found effective and relatively safe in adult lupus nephritis. Since the mechanisms of action of MMF and Tac are probably complementary, multidrug therapy for lupus nephritis may be useful. We propose as an alternative to IVCY, a multidrug therapy with mizoribine, which acts very similarly to MMF, and Tac, which has a different mode of action, combined with PDN for pediatric-onset lupus nephritis. We also believe that a multidrug therapy including CsA and Tac may be an attractive option for young patients with SLE and lupus nephritis.

Efficacy of weekly mizoribine pulse therapy in refractory lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the efficacy of a high-dose intermittent dosing treatment method (weekly mizoribine pulse therapy) conceived in the hope of achieving better efficacy by increasing the peak blood levels of mizoribine in patients with refractory lupus nephritis.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with lupus nephritis who had been resistant to corticosteroid and immunosuppressant therapy received weekly mizoribine pulse therapy. Mizoribine (350 mg) was administered three times at 12 h intervals over 2 consecutive days (700 mg for day 1 and 350 mg for day 2), followed by a washout period from day 3 to day 7.

RESULTS

This therapeutic strategy enabled the peak blood levels of mizoribine to be increased to more than 3 μg/mL in most of the patients. Although SLEDAI, anti-ds-DNA antibody titer, CH-50, and serum albumin level did not significantly improve, urinary protein levels decreased, and it was possible to taper the dose of concomitant steroids. Using our definition of clinical response, 10 of the 17 patients were responders and 4 of them were nonresponders. The average peak serum mizoribine concentration of the responders was as high as 3.5 μg/mL. Elevation of serum liver enzymes was seen in 1 patient, and hyperuricemia occurred in 4 cases, but none of these adverse events were serious.

CONCLUSION

Intermittent administration of mizoribine can increase blood levels and may be effective for refractory lupus nephritis.

Bronchial asthma developing after 15 years of immunosuppressive treatment following renal transplantation

A 42-year-old woman who underwent renal transplantation from her mother at the age of 26 due to IgA nephropathy had since been treated with immunosuppressive agents, including prednisolone (PSL), azathioprine (AZA) and cyclosporine (CsA). The patient had remained clinically stable for 15 years. However, in the middle of May 2010, she developed bronchial asthma for the first time after performing house-cleaning activities and was treated with corticosteroids and antiasthmatic agents. The use of immunosuppressive agents as a treatment for severe bronchial asthma might have been related to the manifestation of bronchial asthma in this case.