Myocardial Involvement in Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome during Pregnancy or Puerperium: A Case of a Young Breastfeeding Woman and Literature Review

Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome (CAPS) is a rare complication that can occur in patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). CAPS occurs even more rarely during pregnancy/puerperium and pregnant patients, even less likely to show cardiac involvement without signs of damage on ultrasound and angiography with non-obstructive coronary arteries. We present a case of a 26-year-old breastfeeding woman, the youngest described with CAPS and acute myocardial infarction, whose diagnosis was made with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). A literature review of pregnant patients with similar problems was performed. There are diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties in treating these patients. CMRI demonstrated a transmural late enhancement area. A combination of therapies led to rapid clinical improvement. CMRI is an underused tool that reaffirms the pathophysiology of CAPS and leads clinicians to the possibility of a diffuse thrombotic process. CAPS involves more organs with high mortality rates. CMRI could be optimized in order to reach an early diagnosis and the most effective treatment. This study provides real-world evidence of the feasibility of MRI in a primary care setting during pregnancy/puerperium. Evidence from this study may influence future APS screening and inform policymakers regarding the use of leading MRI technology in the detection of the thrombotic process in a primary care setting.

Cardiac involvement in the catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS): Lessons from the "CAPS registry"

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) patients with cardiac involvement, and to identify the factors associated with this cardiac involvement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Based on the analysis of the "CAPS Registry", the demographic, clinical, and serological characteristics of patients with cardiac involvement were analyzed. Cardiac involvement was defined as heart failure, valvular disease, acute myocardial infarction, pericardial effusion, pulmonary arterial hypertension, systolic dysfunction, intracardiac thrombosis, and microvascular disease. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

749 patients (293 [39 %] women and mean age 38.1 ± 16.2 years) accounting for 778 CAPS events were included, of them 404 (52 %) had cardiac involvement. The main cardiac manifestations were heart failure in 185/377 (55 %), valve disease in 116/377 (31 %), and acute myocardial infarction in 104/378 (28 %). Of 58 patients with autopsy/biopsy, 48 (83 %) had cardiac thrombotic microangiopathy, Stroke (29% vs. 21 %, p = 0.012), transient cerebral vascular accident (2% vs. 1 %, p = 0.005), pulmonary infarction (26% vs. 3 %, p = 0.017), renal infarction (46% vs. 35 %, p = 0.006), acute kidney injury (70% vs. 53 %, p < 0.001), and livedo reticularis (24% vs. 17 %, p = 0.016) were significantly more frequent during CAPS events with versus without heart involvement. Multivariate analysis identified acute kidney injury (OR 1.068, IC 95 % 1.8-4.8, p < 0.001) as the only clinical characteristics that were, independently, associated with cardiac involvement in CAPS events. Cardiac involvement was not related to higher mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac involvement is frequent in CAPS, with association with kidney involvement, and it is not related to higher mortality. The presence of cardiac microthrombosis was demonstrated in most biopsies/autopsies performed.

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome: challenging case and importance of multidisciplinary evaluation and management

Our case depicts a challenging diagnosis of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome in a young patient with a heterogenous presentation with extensive clinical course, a wide range of investigations, including multimodality imaging, and multidisciplinary expertise, to initiate prompt treatment addressing multiorgan thrombotic injury.

Biological therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus, antiphospholipid syndrome, and Sjögren's syndrome: evidence- and practice-based guidance

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), and Sjögren's syndrome (SS) are heterogeneous autoimmune diseases. Severe manifestations and refractory/intolerance to conventional immunosuppressants demand other options, namely biological drugs, and small molecules. We aimed to define evidence and practice-based guidance for the off-label use of biologics in SLE, APS, and SS. Recommendations were made by an independent expert panel, following a comprehensive literature review and two consensus rounds. The panel included 17 internal medicine experts with recognized practice in autoimmune disease management. The literature review was systematic from 2014 until 2019 and later updated by cross-reference checking and experts' input until 2021. Preliminary recommendations were drafted by working groups for each disease. A revision meeting with all experts anticipated the consensus meeting held in June 2021. All experts voted (agree, disagree, neither agree nor disagree) during two rounds, and recommendations with at least 75% agreement were approved. A total of 32 final recommendations (20 for SLE treatment, 5 for APS, and 7 for SS) were approved by the experts. These recommendations consider organ involvement, manifestations, severity, and response to previous treatments. In these three autoimmune diseases, most recommendations refer to rituximab, which aligns with the higher number of studies and clinical experience with this biological agent. Belimumab sequential treatment after rituximab may also be used in severe cases of SLE and SS. Second-line therapy with baricitinib, bortezomib, eculizumab, secukinumab, or tocilizumab can be considered in SLE-specific manifestations. These evidence and practice-based recommendations may support treatment decision and, ultimately, improve the outcome of patients living with SLE, APS, or SS.

Lupus myocarditis: review of current diagnostic modalities and their application in clinical practice

Lupus myocarditis (LM) is a potentially fatal manifestation of SLE, occurring in 5-10% of patients. Clinical manifestations may vary from an unexplained tachycardia to fulminant congestive cardiac failure (CCF). With no single clinical or imaging modality being diagnostic, a rational and practical approach to the patient presenting with possible LM is essential. Markers of myocyte injury (including troponin I and creatine kinase) may be unelevated and do not exclude a diagnosis of LM. Findings on ECG are non-specific but remain essential to exclude other causes of CCF such as an acute coronary syndrome or conduction disorders. Echocardiographic modalities including wall motion abnormalities and speckle tracking echocardiography may demonstrate regional and/or global left ventricular dysfunction and is more sensitive than conventional echocardiography, especially early in the course of LM. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is regarded as the non-invasive diagnostic modality of choice in myocarditis. While more sensitive and specific than echocardiography, CMRI has certain limitations in the context of SLE, including technical challenges in acutely unwell and uncooperative patients, contraindications to gadolinium use in the context of renal impairment (including lupus nephritis) and limited literature regarding the application of recommended diagnostic CMRI criteria in SLE. Both echocardiography as well as CMRI may detect subclinical myocardial dysfunction and/or injury of which the clinical significance remains uncertain. Considering these challenges, a combined decision-making approach by rheumatologists and cardiologists interpreting diagnostic test results within the clinical context of the patient is essential to ensure an accurate, early diagnosis of LM.

Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Case Series

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is the rare but most severe form of antiphospholipid syndrome with multiple organ ischemia developing over a short period of time. CAPS should be considered when imaging suggests an acute and concurrent multiorgan ischemia, associated with positive antiphospholipid antibodies. As CAPS can have fulminant irreversible complications, its early recognition is important to initiate the treatment promptly. We present three patients of CAPS who were managed at our institution.

Case 294: Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome

History A 50-year-old woman presented to the emergency department of our hospital with a 2-day history of lower limb pain associated with unusual asthenia and diffuse arthralgia over the past 3 weeks. She was a native of Guinea and had lived in France for most of her life, working as a personal care assistant. Her only medical history of note was an occurrence of fetal death at 12 weeks gestation when she was 35 years old. She had bilateral lower limb swelling, without changes in skin temperature or color. All proximal and distal arterial pulses were felt. General physical examination findings were otherwise unremarkable. Her laboratory tests showed a decreased hemoglobin concentration of 8.9 g/dL (normal range, 12-16 g/dL), a decreased platelet count of 45 × 10⁹/L (normal range, [150-400] × 10⁹/L), a C-reactive protein level of 158 mg/L (normal range, <5 mg/L), and a d-dimer level of 2000 mg/L (normal range, <500 mg/L]). Compression US of the lower limbs revealed bilateral calf vein thrombosis involving the fibular and posterior tibial veins. Curative anticoagulation using low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin, subcutaneous injection of 100 units per kilogram of body weight twice a day) was started. The day after the start of anticoagulation therapy, the patient reported dyspnea and acute chest and abdominal pain. Her vital signs were assessed, and she had elevated blood pressure and increased heart rate and respiratory rate, but she remained afebrile. Her cardiac auscultation was unremarkable, besides tachycardia. Skin examination revealed small areas of necrosis on the fingertips of her right hand. Laboratory studies were repeated and showed an increase in serum creatinine level from a baseline value of 0.49 mg/dL to a new value of 1.01 mg/dL (normal range, 0.6-1.1 mg/dL), an apparition of low-grade proteinuria of 0.43 g per day (normal range, <0.3 g/ day), and a high serum troponin level of 1066 ng/L (normal range, <14 ng/L), whereas electrocardiography showed no ST segment modification and echocardiography revealed a moderately altered left ventricular ejection fraction (45%). There was no coronary occlusion seen at emergency coronarography. Contrast-enhanced CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis was performed (Figs 1, 2) together with cardiac MRI (Figs 3, 4).

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome presented as ruptured papillary muscle during puerperium in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a rare and serious phenomenon that requires prompt recognition and treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION

The authors present the case of a puerperal woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) admitted to the emergency room with headache, blurred vision, thoracic pain, and purpuric lesions on both ears. Echocardiogram revealed global decrease in left ventricular function while cardiac and inflammatory markers were elevated. Three days after admission she developed cardiogenic shock due to rupture of mitral papillary muscle which required emergent cardiac surgery, with replacement of the mitral valve; treatment with anticoagulation, high-dose glucocorticoids, and intravenous immunoglobulins were initiated. Cardiac and brain MRI revealed signs of ischemic lesions in both organs. Histopathology analysis of the placenta and papillary muscle showed signs of ischemia secondary to microvascular thrombosis. Based on the clinical demonstration of thrombosis in three organs, and the presence of lupus anticoagulant antibodies, a diagnosis of probable CAPS was established.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the importance of a high level of suspicion of CAPS, particularly in patients with risk factors, and the value of immediate adequate treatment. Moreover, the rupture of a papillary muscle with histologically consistent signs of antiphospholipid syndrome expands the spectrum of involvement of this disease and should be considered as a rare but life-threatening possibility in patients with myocardial injury.

Cardiogenic shock in autoimmune rheumatologic diseases: an insight on etiologies, management, and treatment outcomes

Autoimmune rheumatological disorders are known to have an increased risk for cardiovascular diseases including coronary artery disease (CAD), myocarditis, pericarditis, valvulopathy, and in consequence cardiogenic shock. Data on cardiogenic shock in rheumatological diseases are scarce; however, several reports have highlighted this specific entity. We sought to review the available literature and highlight major outcomes and the management approaches in each disease. Systematic literature search, including PubMed, Ovid/Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, was conducted between January 2000 and December 2009. We reviewed all cases reporting cardiogenic shock with rheumatologic conditions, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Takayasu's arteritis (TA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), giant cell arteritis (GCA), and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We selected 45 papers reporting a total of 48 cases. Mean age was 39 ± 7.3 years and 68.8% were females. Most common rheumatologic conditions associated with cardiogenic shock were SLE (31%), GPA (23%), TA (14.6%), APA (10.4%), and RA (8.3%). Cardiogenic shock was found to be caused by eosinophilic myocarditis in 58% of cases, CAD in 19% of cases, and valvulopathy in 6% of cases. Most patient required high-dose steroids and second immunosuppressant therapy. Mechanical circulatory supported was required in 23 cases, IABP in 16 cases, and ECMO in 12 cases. Complete recovery occurred in 37 patients while 9 patients died and 2 required heart transplant. Responsible for two-thirds of cases, eosinophilic myocarditis should be suspected in young cardiogenic shock patients with underlying rheumatologic conditions. Lupus and GPA are the two most common conditions.

The rheumatology/hematology interface: CAPS and MAS diagnosis and management

Catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (CAPS) and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) are both life-threatening hematologic disorders that infrequently afflict patients with rheumatologic disease. CAPS is characterized by fulminant multiorgan damage related to small vessel thrombosis in the setting of persistent antiphospholipid antibodies. It can occur in patients with rheumatologic diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus but can also affect patients who do not have rheumatologic disease. By contrast, the term MAS is applied when patients with rheumatologic disease develop hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH); therefore, patients with MAS have an underlying rheumatologic disease by definition. Similar to CAPS, HLH/MAS can have a fulminant presentation, but the pathogenesis and manifestations are different. In both CAPS and MAS, management generally includes but is not limited to immunosuppression with steroids. Fatalities are relatively common and morbidity is often significant. Early recognition of these disorders and initiation of timely treatment are important. More effective therapies for both syndromes are urgently needed.

Post-partum catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome presenting with shock and digital ischaemia - A diagnostic and management challenge

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome is a rare multisystem autoimmune condition characterised by rapid development of widespread thrombotic disease and subsequent multi-organ failure. It is the most severe complication of antiphospholipid syndrome, carrying significant morbidity and mortality. We report a patient with post-partum catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome with cardiac, hepatic, renal and cutaneous manifestations. The diagnostic challenges in establishing a definitive diagnosis in catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome is discussed, along with the difficulties in managing these patients in the intensive care unit.

The treatment of anti-phospholipid syndrome: A comprehensive clinical approach

Anti-phospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired pro-thrombotic autoimmune disease that predisposes to thrombotic events and/or obstetric complications, in the persistent presence of anti-phospholipid antibodies (aPL). Life long moderate-intensity anticoagulation is the option of choice for aPL-positive patients with a previous thrombosis; critical issues concern the management of those with a history of arterial event due to the high rate of recurrence. Alternatives comprise anti-platelet agents and high-intensity anticoagulation. Low dose aspirin (LDASA) and low molecular weight heparin provide the mainstay of the treatment of obstetric APS, allowing a birth rate in 70% of cases. The management of refractory APS, thrombotic as well as obstetric, is highly debated, but an increasing burden of evidence points towards the beneficial effects of multiple treatments. Similarly, a management envisaging multiple drugs (anticoagulation, steroids, plasma exchange and/or intravenous immunoglobulins) is the most effective approach in catastrophic APS. Asymptomatic aPL carriers are at higher risk of thrombotic and obstetric complications compared to the general population, thus potentially benefitting of a pharmacological intervention. LDASA and hydroxychloroquine can be considered as options, in particular in case of high risk aPL profile, concomitant cardiovascular risk factors or associated autoimmune disease. APS is apparently a simple condition, but its multifaceted nature requires a complex and tailored treatment.