Pregnancy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus after cyclophosphamide therapy

Successful pregnancy after cyclophosphamide therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report

Introduction and importance

The use of cyclophosphamide in women of childbearing age with severe systemic lupus erythematosus is normally indicated. However, cyclophosphamide is generally avoided during pregnancy due to the risk of teratogenicity, especially since its effect on fetal survival is poorly understood. This is a case report of a lupus patient exposed to cyclophosphamide during pregnancy.

Case presentation

A 35-year-old woman with a history of lupus presented to our outpatient clinic in the 12th week of pregnancy for her sixth routine cyclophosphamide bolus. The fetal echocardiogram result with the gynecology consultation was normal with the recommendation for a medical termination of pregnancy, which has been refused by the patient. Shared decision-making with the patient included a discussion of the maternal risks of continuation of pregnancy in the setting of worsening systemic function and the fetal risks of definitive treatment with cyclophosphamide for a lupus flare and the patient decided to proceed with the pregnancy. Treatment with immunosuppressants, including azathioprine was initiated replacing cyclophosphamide with close monitoring of her and the fetus every month.

Clinical discussion

The first trimester of pregnancy seems to be particularly susceptible to fetal malformations, although CPA effects on fetuses in later stages of pregnancy are also reported occasionally. Nonetheless, its repercussions on fetal survival remain poorly comprehended.

Conclusion

In conclusion, exposing pregnancy to cyclophosphamide could end with pregnancy loss. Based on our experience, the survival of the fetus is strongly in doubt when cyclophosphamide is required to treat lupus in the mother. However, in rare cases, it could be without complications.

Non-Infectious Uveitis and Pregnancy, is There an Optimal Treatment? Uveitis Course and Safety of Uveitis Treatment in Pregnancy

In pregnancy, a plethora of factors causes changes in maternal immunity. Uveitis flare-ups are more frequent in the first trimester and in undertreated patients. Management of non-infectious uveitis during pregnancy remains understudied. A bibliographic review to consolidate existing evidence was performed by a multidisciplinary group of Ophthalmologists, Gynaecologists and Rheumatologists. Our group recommends initial management with minimum-required doses of corticosteroids, preferably locally, to treat intraocular inflammation whilst ensuring good neonatal outcomes. If ineffective, clinicians should consider addition of Cyclosporine, Azathioprine or Certolizumab pegol, which are seemingly safe in pregnancy. Other therapies (such as Methotrexate, Mycophenolate Mofetil and alkylating agents) are teratogenic or have a detrimental effect on the foetus. Furthermore, careful multidisciplinary preconception discussions and close follow-up are recommended, monitoring for flare-ups and actively tapering medication doses, with a primary endpoint focused on protecting ocular tissues from inflammation, whilst giving minimal risk of poor pregnancy and foetal outcomes.

Tripterygium glycosides for safely controlling disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Background: Tripterygium glycosides have been used to treat systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) for a long time, showing the effects of immune regulation. We aimed to evaluate the benefits and risks of Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets (TGT) for patients with SLE. Methods: We searched electronic databases and clinical trial registries for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We identified eligible RCTs and assessed risk of bias. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the pooled effects. The Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) 0.9.5.10 software was used to verify the reliability of the results. Results: Eight RCTs encompassing 538 patients with SLE were included. TGT combined with conventional treatments (CTs) was superior to CTs alone in reducing lupus activity (MD = -1.66, 95% CI = -2.07 to -1.26, p < 0.00001, low-certainty evidence) and improving overall response rate (ORR) (RR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.32, p < 0.0001, moderate-certainty evidence). The robustness of the results was confirmed by TSA. Regarding safety, there was no statistical difference in the overall incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups. Conclusion: In patients with SLE, TGT might safely reduce disease activity. However, further high-quality studies are needed to firmly establish the clinical efficacy of TGT. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022300474; Identifier: CRD42022300474.

Total Glucosides of Paeonia lactiflora for Safely Reducing Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Total glucosides of paeony (TGP), extracted from the dried roots of Paeonia lactiflora Pall., are proven to regulate immune function in various rheumatic diseases. We aim to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of TGP in reducing disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods: We searched trials in seven electronic databases and two clinical trail registries. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating efficacy and safety of TGP for SLE were identified. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 was used for quality assessment of the included trials, and RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis.

Results: A total of 14 RCTs were included, including 978 participants, 492 in the intervention group and 486 in the control group. Regarding the efficacy of TGP for SLE, results showed that TGP plus conventional treatments (CTs) was superior to CTs alone in reducing disease activity (MD_SLEDAI-1m = −3.54, 95% CI = −4.08 to −3.00, p < 0.00001; MD_SLEDAI-2m = −3.80, 95% CI = −4.51 to −3.09, p < 0.00001; MD_SLEDAI-3m = −1.62, 95% CI = −2.60 to −0.64, p < 0.0001; MD_SLEDAI-6m = −1.97, 95% CI = −3.18 to −0.76, p = 0.001). The results also showed that TGP contributed to a betterment in improving other outcomes related to lupus activity, such as ESR, CRP, complement proteins (C3, C4), and immunoglobulins (IgA, IgM). In addition, TGP significantly decreased average daily glucocorticoid dosage and cumulative cyclophosamide dosage, as well as disease recurrence rate. In terms of safety, TGP may reduce the incidence of adverse reactions (RR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.88, p = 0.01). The certainty of the evidence were assessed as moderate to low.

Conclusion: TGP appears potentially effective and generally safe in reducing disease activity in SLE. However, in view of high risk of bias, the findings need to be confirmed in high-quality trials.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42021274850

Pregnancy outcomes between pregnant systemic lupus erythematosus patients with clinical remission and those with low disease activity: A comparative study

Objectives

This study aims to compare pregnancy outcomes between systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients who attained clinical remission based on the Definition of Remission in SLE (DORIS) and those with lupus low disease activity based on Low Lupus Disease Activity State (LLDAS).

Patients and methods

Between January 1993 and June 2017, a total of 90 pregnancies (one twin pregnancy) from 77 patients (mean age: 26.9±4.8 years; range, 17.9 to 37.3 years) were included in the study. The clinical remission and the LLDAS groups were modified into modified clinical remission and LLDAS groups, respectively by omitting Physician Global Assessment (PGA). The clinical SLE disease activity index (cSLEDAI) score was used for LLDAS.

Results

Pregnancies in 49 patients occurred, when they were in modified clinical remission and in 57 in modified LLDAS. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics, disease activity, or medication received at conception between the two groups. Pregnancy outcomes were similar between the modified clinical remission and the modified LLDAS groups in terms of successful pregnancy (83.67% vs. 84.21%), full-term births (38.78% vs. 38.60%), fetal losses (16.33% vs. 15.79%), spontaneous abortions (14.29% vs. 14.04%), small for gestational age infants (18.37% vs. 19.30%), low birth weight infants (42.86% vs. 40.35%), maternal complications (46.94% vs. 49.12%), and maternal flares (36.73% vs. 40.35%). The agreement of pregnancy outcomes was very high between the two groups (91.11% agreement).

Conclusion

Pregnancy outcomes in SLE patients who achieved modified clinical remission and modified LLDAS were comparable.