The IMBG Test for Evaluating the Pharmacodynamic Response to Immunosuppressive Therapy in Kidney Transplant Patients: Current Evidence and Future Applications

Immunosuppressive drugs are widely used to prevent rejection after kidney transplantation. However, the pharmacological response to a given immunosuppressant can vary markedly between individuals, with some showing poor treatment responses and/or experiencing serious side effects. There is an unmet need for diagnostic tools that allow clinicians to individually tailor immunosuppressive therapy to a patient’s immunological profile. The Immunobiogram (IMBG) is a novel blood-based in vitro diagnostic test that provides a pharmacodynamic readout of the immune response of individual patients to a range of immunosuppressants commonly used in kidney transplant recipients. Here, we discuss the current approaches used to measure the pharmacodynamic responses of individual patients to specific immunosuppressive drugs in vitro, which can then be correlated with patient’s clinical outcomes. We also describe the procedure of the IMBG assay, and summarize the results obtained using the IMBG in different kidney transplant populations. Finally, we outline future directions and other novel applications of the IMBG, both in kidney transplant patients and other autoimmune diseases.

Clinical significance of peripheral blood lymphocyte sensitivity to glucocorticoids for the differentiation of high-risk patients with decreased allograft function after glucocorticoid withdrawal in renal transplantation

PURPOSE

A reliable biomarker to differentiate high-risk recipients who will experience a decrease in allograft function after glucocorticoid withdrawal has not been established in renal transplantation. We examined the clinical significance of peripheral blood lymphocyte sensitivity to glucocorticoids in vitro for the differentiation of the high-risk patients after glucocorticoid reduction/withdrawal in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

The study included 44 renal transplant recipients with stable allograft function. Peripheral lymphocyte responses to suppressive effects of cortisol, methylprednisolone, cyclosporine, and tacrolimus in mitogen assay procedures in vitro were examined. Clinical outcome after glucocorticoid reduction/withdrawal was retrospectively compared between recipients with lymphocytes normally sensitive to the drugs and those with hyposensitivity. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was undertaken for setting the cutoff IC50 values of the drugs against the T cell mitogen-induced lymphocyte proliferation to differentiate the high-risk recipients with decreased allograft function after glucocorticoid withdrawal.

FINDINGS

The median (range) IC50 value for cortisol in the recipients who showed decreased renal function due to glucocorticoid withdrawal was 10,000 (570.9-72,279.3) ng/mL (n = 9), which was significantly higher than the value of 351.6 (2.0-10,000) ng/mL in the recipients who had not experienced glucocorticoid withdrawal symptoms (n = 35) (P < 0.001). Similarly, the median (range) IC50 value for methylprednisolone in the recipients who showed decreased renal function after glucocorticoid withdrawal was 69.1 (21.5-1442.7) ng/mL (n = 9), which was significantly higher than the value of 13.8 (0.7-1000) ng/mL in the recipients who had not experienced glucocorticoid withdrawal symptoms (n = 30) (P < 0.003). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the median IC50 values of cyclosporine and tacrolimus between the 2 recipient subgroups. The ROC curve analyses for the IC50 values of the immunosuppressive drugs estimated the cutoff value of cortisol and methylprednisolone to be 3580.0 and 21.5 ng/mL, respectively. The ROC AUCs for cortisol and methylprednisolone were 0.83 and 0.84, respectively. According to the cutoff IC50 value, the incidence of decreased allograft function in the low cortisol sensitivity (IC50 >3580.0 ng/mL) subgroup was 7 of 13 patients, which was significantly higher than that of the higher sensitivity subgroup of 2 of 31 (P = 0.0012). A similar case was observed using the cutoff IC50 value of methylprednisolone (P = 0.0012), whereas recipient grouping according to the cutoff IC50 values of cyclosporine and tacrolimus failed to differentiate the high-risk recipients with decreased allograft function after glucocorticoid withdrawal.

IMPLICATIONS

Glucocorticoid pharmacodynamics in lymphocytes of individual patient origin is a reliable biomarker for differentiation of renal transplant recipients who will experience a safe reduction/withdrawal of glucocorticoid.

Clinical Significance of the Pharmacological Efficacy of Tacrolimus Estimated by the Lymphocyte Immunosuppressant Sensitivity Test (LIST) Before and After Renal Transplantation

The lymphocyte immunosuppressant sensitivity test (LIST) with the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay procedure can predict the pharmacological efficacy of immunosuppressive agents. A previous study reported the pharmacological efficacy of tacrolimus evaluated by LIST just before renal transplantation significantly correlated with the incidence of acute rejection episodes. However, the pharmacological efficacy of tacrolimus has not been estimated after renal transplantation. Therefore, the present study evaluated the pharmacological efficacy of tacrolimus by LIST using the MTT assay procedure before and 1, 3, and 12 months after transplantation in 17 renal transplant recipients that received tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy. The tacrolimus pharmacological efficacies before and after the procedure were also compared with incidence of acute rejection and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection episodes. The individual values of tacrolimus 50% inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation (IC50) varied widely before transplantation, and the mean value of the IC50 was 126.4 ± 337.7 ng/ml. The patients were divided into two groups according to the tacrolimus IC50 values evaluated before transplantation. The rate of acute rejection episodes in the tacrolimus high-sensitivity group was significantly lower than that in the tacrolimus low-sensitivity group (p = 0.005). The tacrolimus IC50 deviation between patients expanded further at one and three months after surgery. However, the sensitivity deviation almost converged at 1 year after surgery. Moreover, the pharmacological efficacy of tacrolimus evaluated at 1, 3, and 12 months after transplantation did not significantly correlate with the incidence of acute rejection episodes. The pharmacological efficacies of tacrolimus evaluated at both before and after surgery were not significantly correlated with the episodes of CMV infection. These findings suggest that the pharmacological efficacy of tacrolimus evaluated with LIST before surgery is a useful biomarker for predicting the occurrence of acute allograft rejection in renal transplantation.

Comparative Study of the Cellular Pharmacodynamics of Tacrolimus in Renal Transplant Recipients Treated with and without Basiliximab

Basiliximab is a recently developed immunosuppressive agent for the prevention of acute allograft rejection in renal transplant recipients. The combination use of basiliximab and a calcineurin inhibitor was suggested to be more effective in comparison to immunosuppressive therapy using calcineurin inhibitor without basiliximab. Cyclosporine has been generally administered with basiliximab for renal transplant recipients. However, in cases of tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen, the clinical efficacy and safety of combined use of tacrolimus and basiliximab remains to be elucidated. This study evaluated the tacrolimus pharmacological efficacy using a lymphocyte immunosuppressant sensitivity test (LIST) with MTT assay procedures in 16 cases of renal transplant recipients treated by tacrolimus without basiliximab and in 13 cases treated by tacrolimus in combination with basiliximab. The rate of acute rejection episodes in the recipients treated with tacrolimus plus basiliximab was 1/13 (7.7%), whereas the rate in the recipients treated with tacrolimus without basiliximab was 6/16 (37.5%). The recipients were divided into two groups according to their peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) sensitivity to tacrolimus [i.e., including a tacrolimus high sensitivity group (IC50 <1.0 ng/ml) and a low sensitivity group (IC50 >1.0 ng/ml). In the recipients treated with tacrolimus without basiliximab, the rate of acute rejection episodes in the tacrolimus high sensitivity group was 1/10 (10.0%), which was significantly lower than the rate in the low sensitivity group of 5/6 (83.3%; p = 0.008). The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was not significantly different between the tacrolimus high and the low sensitivity groups of the recipients treated with tacrolimus with and without basiliximab. Therefore, in the case of selected tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant recipients, the tacrolimus pharmacological efficacy should be evaluated using LIST at a time just before the transplant procedure in order to accurately predict allograft rejection. The data also suggested that low tacrolimus sensitivity recipients should be treated with tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy in combination with basiliximab.