Hümer Hültl: the father of the surgical stapler

MECHANICAL ESOPHAGEAL ANASTOMOSES

This article gives an overview of mechanical esophageal anastomosis. The results of the esophageal anastomoses formation by using circular and linear stitching devices (staplers) by Russian and foreign authors are presented in chronological order. The faults of staplers, complications associated with them are described. The importance of the problem related to the choice of anastomotic technique to reduce the risks of specific complications such as leakage and stricture of esophageal anastomosis was remarked by authors. The advantages and disadvantages of the currently known esophageal anastomotic methods have been analyzed. It was noted that mechanical side-to-side anastomoses are associated with low frequency of leakage, stricture, postoperative mortality, that’s why they have become preferable, especially in the mini-invasive reconstructive surgery. The authors concluded that the question about the feasibility of mechanical esophageal anastomoses formation is not answered, the evaluation of the properties of modern staplers and the search for the best esophageal anastomotic method are relevant for modern surgery.

End-to-end intestinal anastomosis using a novel biodegradable stent for laparoscopic colonic surgery: a multicenter study

PURPOSE

Our animal studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of end-to-end intestinal anastomosis using a stent for laparoscopic colonic surgery. Therefore, we designed a non-inferiority trial to investigate the outcomes of stent anastomosis (SA) vs. those of conventional hand-sewn anastomosis (CA).

METHODS

A multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted between December, 2016 and April, 2018. The primary outcome was the healing condition of the anastomoses, evaluated by endoscopy 6 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were the anastomotic completion time, anastomotic leak, intestinal obstruction, peritoneal effusion, and bleeding. Quality of life (QOL) was evaluated by questionnaires.

RESULTS

The subjects of this study were 60 patients, randomly divided into a SA group (n = 30) and a CA group (n = 30). There were no differences in anastomotic healing conditions (P = 1.00). The stent procedure was associated with a significantly shorter anastomosis time than the hand-sewn anastomosis (13.517 ± 4.281 vs. 20.333 ± 2.998 min, respectively; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in anastomotic leakage, intestinal obstruction, peritoneal effusion, or bleeding between the groups. Questionnaires revealed almost no discrepancy between baseline QOL scores and those assessed 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intestinal anastomosis with a stent is a non-inferior strategy for laparoscopic colonic surgery, which requires less time for the anastomosis.

The History of Surgical Staplers: A Combination of Hungarian, Russian, and American Innovation

Since their development in 1908, surgical staplers have been used as a method of “mechanical suturing” in efforts to divide hollow viscera and create anastomoses in an efficient and sterile manner. The concept for the surgical stapler was first developed by Humér Hultl, a Hungarian professor and surgeon, and designed by Victor Fischer, a Hungarian businessman and designer of surgical instruments. The design was highly acclaimed; however, it was bulky, cumbersome, and expensive to manufacture. In 1920, Aladár Petz, a student of Hultl, incorporated two innovations to the Fischer-Hultl stapler to create a more lightweight model, which was named the Petz clamp. In 1934, Friedrich of Ulm designed what would be the predecessor to the modern-day linear stapler. In the 1950s, Russian and American staplers began to emerge. Throughout the 1960s, a variety of stapling instruments were developed in the United States, manufactured by the United States Surgical Corporation. In the 1970s, Johnson & Johnson Ethicon brand joined the market. The United States Surgical Corporation was later bought by Tyco Healthcare and became Covidien in 2007. Through the collaboration of Felicien Steichen, Mark Ravitch, and Leon Hirsch, surgical staplers were further modified to incorporate interchangeable cartridges with various designs. With the advent of minimally invasive surgery began production of laparoscopic surgical staplers. Since its inception, the surgical stapler has provided a means to efficiently create safe and effective visceral and vascular anastomoses. The surgical stapler design continues to evolve while still maintaining the basic principles that were implemented in the original design.

History of Hemostasis in Neurosurgery

Control of bleeding in the confined area of the skull is imperative for successful neurosurgery and the prevention of devastating complications such as postoperative hemorrhage. This paper reviews the historical evolution of methods to achieve successful hemostasis in neurosurgery from the early1800s to today. The major categories of hemostatic agents (mechanical, chemical and thermal) are delineated and discussed in chronological order. The significance of this article is in its detailed history of the kinds of hemostatic methods that have evolved with our accumulating medical and surgical knowledge, which may inform future innovations and improvements.

Beyond the "B": a new concept of the surgical staple enabling miniature staplers

Background

Surgical staplers currently all rely on the same staple form—the “B” which necessitates a high delivery profile (12 mm). A novel “D” shape staple allows for an extremely low profile of the applicator. The acute and long-term efficacy of a D-shaped staple (Cardica, Redwood City, CA, USA) was compared to conventional B-form staples (Covidien, Norwalk, CN, USA) in an animal model for intestinal transections and anastomoses.

Methods

Jejunojejunal anastomoses (JJ) were performed via mini-laparotomy in a swine model. White & blue D- and B-shaped staples were studied in three groups (planned survival 14–84 days). Intraoperative assessment included completeness of staple line, hemostasis, and need for intervention. Postoperatively, animals were evaluated for complications. At the time of sacrifice, gross pathological and histological assessments were performed.

Results

Twenty-three animals had 40 anastomoses (23 “D” and 17 “B” staple anastomoses) with no intraoperative mortalities. One “D” staple application required a manual extension of the cut. Acute hemostasis was 100 %. Group 1 (n = 5) compared white staples in JJs (D staple n = 5; B staple n = 5; 14-day survival = 100 %). Group 2 (n = 12) compared white staples in JJs (D staple n = 12; B staple n = 6; 34-day survival = 92 %). One animal died on day 4 for a non-staple related cause. Group 3 (n = 6) compared blue staples in JJs (D staple n = 6; B staple n = 6; 84 day survival = 84 %). One animal died on day 18 due to an obstruction at the B staple JJ caused by stricture. There were no other bleeding, leaks or strictures in any of the groups. Gross pathology and histology were unremarkable in all JJs.

Conclusions

This study showed no difference in intraoperative performance and the chronic healing response in JJs between D- and B-shaped staples. Based on these findings, the D-shaped staple elicits a normal healing response in jejunostomies and offers the possibility of clinical use of this advance in staple design.

Morbidity and mortality in 1,174 patients undergoing hepatic parenchymal transection using a stapler device

BACKGROUND

Transection of liver parenchyma using staplers is now commonly performed. Large studies are needed to assess the usefulness of the technique as well as perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database. A total of 1,174 patients undergoing liver resections in routine surgical practice, using a stapler device at MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 1, 1994 and November 10, 2011 were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 900 major resections (3 segments or more) (77 %) and 274 minor resections (<3 segments or wedge resections) (23 %). A vast majority, 1,133 (96.5 %), were indicated for an underlying malignancy (24 % primary liver or gall bladder and 72.5 % metastatic) compared with benign disease, 41 (3.5 %), with the most common indication being metastatic colorectal cancer 584 (49.7 %). Of the total 1,174 patients 128 (10.9 %) had a prior liver resection. Median OR time and blood loss was 206 min and 300 mL, respectively, with 11 % of patients requiring transfusion in the perioperative or postoperative period. Overall morbidity and mortality rate was 14 and 3.2 %, respectively, with a median hospital stay of 7 days (interquartile range [IQR], 4 days). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated blood loss and extent of liver resection to be independent predictors of adverse outcome. A total of 13 instances (1.1 %) of misfired staplers were noted and were associated with higher blood loss (p < 0.001) and mortality (15 vs. 3.1 %, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of stapler device for hepatic resection is safe and effective, but rare instances of a misfired stapler device are associated with an adverse outcome.

Esophageal anastomosis

This review gives an overview of the esophageal anastomosis. The history, various techniques and substitution organs, their advantages and disadvantages, healing mechanism, complications, and actual trend of this essential part of esophageal surgery are described. The history of the esophageal anastomosis extending from the first anastomosis in 1901 to today has undergone more than one century. In the early days, the success rate of the anastomosis was extremely low. As the technology progressed, the anastomosis got significant achievement. Various anastomotic techniques are currently being used. However, controversies exist on the choice of anastomotic method concerning the success rate, postoperative complication and quality of life. How to choose the method, no one can give the best answer. We searched the manuscripts about the esophageal anastomoses in recent years and studied the controversy questions about the anastomosis. Performing an esophageal anastomosis is a technical matter, and suture healing is independent of the patient's biologic situation. Every anastomosis technique has its own merit, but the outcomes were different if it was performed by different surgeons, and we also found that the complication rate of the anastomosis was mainly associated with the surgeons. So the surgeons should learn from their previous experience and others to avoid technical errors.

Reverse Transrectal Stapling Technique Using the EEA Stapler: An Alternative Approach in Difficult Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure

The introduction of circular end-to-end stapling devices (CEEA OR EEA stapler) into colorectal surgery have revolutionised anastomotic techniques. The EEA stapler is generally regarded as an instrument that is safe, reliable, and simple to operate. Despite it’s popularity, very little information is available regarding the technical difficulties encountered during surgery. The routine technique to perform an end-to-end circular colonic anastomosis is to introduce the instrument distally through the anus (transrectal/transanal approach) and attach it to the anvil which is purse stringed at the distal end of the proximal bowel to be anastomosed. Two cases of reversal of Hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticulitis are described in the present study, where difficulty was experienced while using the EEA stapler in the routine method. Hence, an alternative reverse technique which was used is presented.

Circular vascular stapling in coronary surgery

Stapling devices have been clinically applied to connect blood vessels. The early application of these staplers in cardiovascular surgery, including coronary bypass surgery, was encouraging. With further refinement of suture material, however, vascular staplers became impractical and soon fell into oblivion. With advancement in robotic surgery, these devices might become valuable tools once again. Herein early experience with vascular circular stapling devices is reviewed.