A comparative trial of imipenem versus ceftazidime in the release of endotoxin and cytokine generation in patients with gram-negative urosepsis. Urosepsis Study Group

Treatment of Bacterial Infections with β-Lactams: Cooperation with Innate Immunity

β-Lactams are the most widely prescribed antibiotics used for the control and treatment of bacterial infections. The direct effect of β-lactams on bacteria is well studied worldwide. In the context of infections and as a consequence of their direct activity against the pathogen, β-lactams also regulate antibacterial immune responses. This knowledge has led to the theorem that the effectiveness of β-lactam treatment results from the synergy between the drug and the immune response. Key players in this immune response, with an essential role in the clearance of live and dead bacteria, are the myeloid cells. In this review, we summarize the data that shed light on how β-lactams interact with myeloid cells during bacterial infection treatment.

Mode of bacterial killing affects the inflammatory response and associated organ dysfunctions in a porcine E. coli intensive care sepsis model

Background

Sepsis is often treated with penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP-3) acting β-lactam antibiotics, such as piperacillin-tazobactam, cefotaxime, and meropenem. They cause considerable bacterial structural changes and have in vitro been associated with an increased inflammatory response. In a clinically relevant large animal sepsis model, our primary aim was to investigate whether bacteria killed by a PBP-3-active antibiotic has a greater effect on the early inflammatory response and organ dysfunction compared with corresponding amounts of live or heat-killed bacteria. A secondary aim was to determine whether the addition of an aminoglycoside could mitigate the cefuroxime-induced response.

Method

Killed or live Escherichia coli were administrated as a 3-h infusion to 16 healthy pigs in a prospective, randomized controlled interventional experimental study. Cefuroxime was chosen as the PBP-3-active antibiotic and tobramycin represented the aminoglycosides. The animals were randomized to receive (I) bacteria killed by cefuroxime, (II) live bacteria, (III) bacteria killed by heat, or (IV) bacteria killed by the combination of cefuroxime and tobramycin. Plasma endotoxin, tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, leukocytes, and organ function were recorded at the start of the experiment and then hourly for 6 h.

Results

Differences in dynamics of concentration over time between the four treatment groups were found for the three cytokines (p < 0.001). Animals receiving cefuroxime-killed bacteria demonstrated higher responses than those receiving live (p < 0.05) or heat-killed bacteria (p < 0.01). The addition of tobramycin reduced the cefuroxime-induced responses (p < 0.001). The cytokine responses were associated with leucocyte activation that was further associated with pulmonary dysfunction and increases in lactate (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

In comparison with live or heat-killed bacteria, bacteria killed by a PBP-3-active antibiotic induced an increased inflammatory response that appears to be associated with deteriorated organ and cellular function. The addition of an aminoglycoside to the PBP-3-active antibiotic reduced that response.

Dynamics of Endotoxin, Inflammatory Variables, and Organ Dysfunction After Treatment With Antibiotics in an Escherichia coli Porcine Intensive Care Sepsis Model

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the dynamics of antibiotic-induced endotoxin liberation and inflammatory response in vivo in a clinically relevant large animal intensive care sepsis model and whether the addition of an aminoglycoside to a β-lactam antibiotic affects these responses.

DESIGN

Prospective, placebo-controlled interventional experimental study.

SETTING

University research unit.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-six healthy pigs administered Escherichia coli as a 3-hour infusion.

INTERVENTIONS

After 2 hours, during E. coli infusion, the animals were exposed to cefuroxime alone, the combination of cefuroxime and tobramycin, or saline.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Plasma endotoxin, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, leucocytes, and organ dysfunction were recorded for 4 hours after antibiotic treatment, and differences to the values before treatment were calculated. In vitro experiments were performed to ascertain whether endotoxin is released during antibiotic-induced bacterial killing of this E. coli strain. Despite differences between the treatment arms in vitro, no differences in plasma endotoxin were observed in vivo. Antibiotic-treated animals demonstrated a higher interleukin-6 response (p < 0.001), greater leucocyte activation (p < 0.001), and more pronounced deterioration in pulmonary static compliance (p < 0.01) over time than controls. Animals treated with the combination showed a trend toward less inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with antibiotics may elicit an increased inflammatory interleukin-6 response that is associated with leucocyte activation and pulmonary organ dysfunction. No observable differences were detected in plasma endotoxin concentrations. The reduction in cefuroxime-induced endotoxin release after the addition of an aminoglycoside in vitro could not be reproduced in this model.

Phage Therapy in the Twenty-First Century: Facing the Decline of the Antibiotic Era; Is It Finally Time for the Age of the Phage?

Burgeoning problems of antimicrobial resistance dictate that new solutions be developed to combat old foes. Use of lytic bacteriophages (phages) for the treatment of drug-resistant bacterial infections is one approach that has gained significant traction in recent years. Fueled by reports of experimental phage therapy cases with very positive patient outcomes, several early-stage clinical trials of therapeutic phage products have been launched in the United States. Eventual licensure enabling widespread access to phages is the goal; however, new paths to regulatory approval and mass-market distribution, distinct from those of small-molecule antibiotics, must be forged first. This review highlights unique aspects related to the clinical use of phages, including advantages to be reaped as well as challenges to be overcome.

Urosepsis: Overview of the Diagnostic and Treatment Challenges

Urosepsis is defined as sepsis caused by an infection in the urogenital tract. In approximately 30% of all septic patients the infectious focus is localized in the urogenital tract, mainly due to obstructions at various levels, such as ureteral stones. Urosepsis may also occur after operations in the urogenital tract. In urosepsis, complete bacteria and components of the bacterial cell wall from the urogenital tract trigger the host inflammatory event and act as exogenous pyrogens on eukaryotic target cells of patients. A burst of second messenger molecules leads to several different stages of the septic process, from hyperactivity to immunosuppression. As pyelonephritis is the most frequent cause for urosepsis, the kidney function is therefore most important in terms of cause and as a target organ for dysfunction in the course of the sepsis.Since effective antimicrobial therapy must be initiated early during sepsis, the empiric intravenous therapy should be initiated immediately after microbiological sampling. For the selection of appropriate antimicrobials, it is important to know risk factors for resistant organisms and whether the sepsis is primary or secondary and community or nosocomially acquired. In addition, the preceding antimicrobial therapies should be recorded as precisely as possible. Resistance surveillance should, in any case, be performed locally to adjust for the best suitable empiric treatment. Treatment challenges arise from the rapid increase of antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria, especially extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria. Treatment of urosepsis comprises four basic strategies I) supportive therapy (stabilizing and maintaining blood pressure), II) antimicrobial therapy, III) control or elimination of the complicating factor, and IV) specific sepsis therapy.

Urosepsis--from the view of the urologist

Urosepsis accounts for approximately 25% of all sepsis cases and may develop from a community-or nosocomial-acquired urinary tract infection (UTI). The underlying UTI is almost exclusively a complicated one with involvement of parenchymatous urogenital organs (e.g. kidneys, prostate). In urosepsis, as in other types of sepsis, the severity of sepsis depends mostly upon the host response. The urological management of urosepsis comprises early diagnosis, early fluid and oxygen treatment, early antibiotic therapy and early control of the complicating factor in the urinary tract. Time from admission to therapy is critical. The shorter the time to effective treatment, the higher is the success rate. This aspect has to become incorporated into the organisational process, including urologists, radiologists and intensive care specialists amongst others. Adequate initial antibiotic therapy has to be insured. This goal implies, however, a wide array of measures over time to ensure a rational antibiotic policy, including microbiologists and clinical pharmacologists. Dosage of an antibiotic in the septic patient generally has to be high to ensure adequate pharmacological exposure in the individual patient.

Optimal management of urosepsis from the urological perspective

Urosepsis in adults comprises approximately 25% of all sepsis cases and in most cases is due to complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs). In this paper we review the optimal management of urosepsis from the urological point of view. Urosepsis is often due to obstructed uropathy of the upper or lower urinary tract. The treatment of urosepsis comprises four major aspects: 1. Early goal-directed therapy; 2. Optimal pharmacodynamic exposure to antimicrobials both in blood and in the urinary tract; 3. Control of complicating factors in the urinary tract; 4. Specific sepsis therapy. Early tissue oxygenation, appropriate initial antibiotic therapy and rapid identification and control of the septic focus in the urinary tract are critical steps in the successful management of a patient with severe urosepsis. To achieve this goal an optimal interdisciplinary approach encompassing the emergency unit, urological specialties and intensive-care medicine is necessary.

Bacteriophages: an appraisal of their role in the treatment of bacterial infections

Bacteriophages were first used successfully to treat bacterial infections a decade before penicillin was discovered. However, the excitement that greeted those initial successes was short-lived, as a lack of understanding of basic phage biology subsequently led to a catalogue of clinical failures. As a consequence, bacteriophage therapy was largely abandoned in the West in favour of the newly emerging antibiotics. Now, as the problem of antibiotic resistance becomes ever more acute, a number of scientists and clinicians are looking again at bacteriophages as a therapeutic option in the treatment of bacterial infections. The chances of success second time round would appear to be much better given our current extensive knowledge of bacteriophage biology following their important role in underpinning the advances in molecular biology. We also have available to us the experience of nearly 80 years of clinical usage in the countries of the former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe as well as a political climate that encourages sharing of that knowledge. This review outlines those features of bacteriophages that contribute to their utility in therapy and explores the potential for their re-introduction into Western medicine. An abundance of clinical evidence is available in the Soviet literature but much of this is technically flawed and a more realistic appraisal of the clinical value of phages can be obtained from animal studies conducted in the West. As interest in bacteriophages increases, a number of companies throughout the world have begun investing in phage technology and this has led to novel approaches to therapy, some of which will be discussed.

Variation in the propensity to release endotoxin after cefuroxime exposure in different gram-negative bacteria: uniform and dose-dependent reduction by the addition of tobramycin

An aminoglycoside in combination with a beta-lactam antibiotic is often recommended for the treatment of severe infections. The aim of the present study was to study whether cefuroxime-induced endotoxin release could be reduced by addition of tobramycin in different Gram-negative bacteria and how endotoxin release was affected by bacterial killing rate and number of killed bacteria. Three Escherichia coli strains, 1 Klebsiella, 1 Salmonella and 1 Neisseria strain were exposed in vitro to 2, 10 and 50 x minimum inhibitory concentration of cefuroxime, tobramycin or a combination of both. The cefuroxime-induced endotoxin release in the 6 strains varied from 0.1 to 9.9 x 10(-3) EU/killed bacterium. By adding tobramycin, highly significant reductions of 96%, 93%, 97%, 86% and 85% were seen in the 3 E. coli strains and in the Klebsiella and the Salmonella strain, respectively. In the Neisseria strain, the reduction was less. Increasing doses of tobramycin or the combination led to significant endotoxin release reduction in 4/6 strains. In conclusion, addition of tobramycin reduced penicillin-binding protein-3-beta-lactam binding-induced endotoxin release in all tested Gram-negative strains, despite a large interspecies variation in the propensity to release endotoxin. Besides broadening the spectrum and increasing the killing rate, this might be of benefit in the most severe forms of sepsis.

Time- and dose-dependent effect of fosfomycin on suppression of infection-induced endotoxin shock in mice

Therapeutic effects of fosfomycin (FOF) and imipenem (IPM) were investigated in a novel model for endotoxin shock that was caused by intraperitoneal (i.p.) infection with 10(8) colony forming units of attenuated Salmonella typhimurium. Acute lethal shock was observed in BALB/c and ddY but not in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-nonresponder BALB/lps(d) mice. Effects of FOF, but not its enantiomer, and IPM were dose- and time-dependent, since therapeutic efficacy was demonstrated in mice injected i.p. or orally at doses of more than 20 mg/kg 15 min before or 1 h after infection. Treatment with FOF 1 h postinfection (p.i.) resulted in significant decreases in bacterial numbers in spleen and liver, suggesting that the antimicrobial activity of FOF seems to closely correlate to suppression of infection-induced lethal shock. Regarding coagulation systems, FOF inhibited increase in the prothrombin time but upregulated fibrinogen concentration. Plasma levels of LPS released from bacilli were significantly higher in FOF- than IPM-treated mice and infection controls, but both antibiotics showed similar efficacy in protection.

Modulation of release of proinflammatory bacterial compounds by antibacterials: potential impact on course of inflammation and outcome in sepsis and meningitis

Several bacterial components (endotoxin, teichoic and lipoteichoic acids, peptidoglycan, DNA, and others) can induce or enhance inflammation and may be directly toxic for eukaryotic cells. Bactericidal antibiotics which inhibit bacterial protein synthesis release smaller quantities of proinflammatory/toxic bacterial compounds than B-lactams and other cell wall-active drugs. Among the B-lactams, compounds binding to penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP-2) release smaller amounts of bacterial substances than antibacterials inhibiting PBP-3. Generally, high antibiotic concentrations (more than 10 times the MIC) induce the release of fewer bacterial proinflammatory/toxic compounds than concentrations close to the MIC. In several in vitro and in vivo systems, bacteria treated with protein synthesis inhibitors or B-lactams inhibiting PBP-2 induce less inflammation than bacteria treated with PBP-3-active B-lactams. In mouse models of Escherichia coli peritonitis sepsis and of Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis, lower release of proinflammatory bacterial compounds was associated with reduced mortality. In conclusion, sufficient evidence for the validity of the concept of modulating the release of proinflammatory bacterial compounds by antibacterials has been accumulated in vitro and in animal experiments to justify clinical trials in sepsis and meningitis. A properly conducted study addressing the potential benefit of bacterial protein synthesis inhibitors versus B-lactam antibiotics will require both strict selection and inclusion of a large number of patients. The benefit of this approach should be greatest in patients with a high bacterial load.

Antibiotic induced endotoxin release and clinical sepsis: a review

Sepsis and peritonitis have not lost much of their danger for patients. The mortality rate in peritonitis has only marginally decreased during the last 30 years despite aggressive surgical and sophisticated intensive care treatment. In intra-abdominal infection and peritonitis source control remains the mainstay of treatment, although general principles and denominators of successful source control need to be established. Endotoxin has been recognized as a major player in the pathogenesis of sepsis and its significance in clinical disease has been investigated in clinical studies for more than 20 years. Since the Sixties there is a growing interest in the effect of antibiotics and other compounds on the release of endotoxin. The effect of antibiotics on the release of endotoxin and inflammatory parameters, e.g., cytokines, remains to be clarified despite a growing body of in-vitro studies, animal studies and a few clinical studies. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the evidence of endotoxin release in clinical studies and the effect that antibiotic treatment may have in-vitro, in-vivo and in clinical studies on endotoxin and cytokine release. In-vitro antibiotic-induced endotoxin release may depend on antibiotic class, presence of serum, type of organism, site of antibiotic action and Gram-stain. Endotoxin release may be different in late or early lysis, proportional to the number of killed pathogens. Morphology of bacteria may have an impact on endotoxin release and phagocytosis. Antibiotic-treated animals may show higher endotoxin levels with a higher survival rate than untreated animals. Plasma endotoxin may increase despite decreasing bacteremia. There may be a similar killing rate by different antibiotics but a difference in endotoxin release. Intestinal endotoxin does not necessarily correlate to the level of gram-negative bacteria. However, the alteration of the gut content by pretreatment may be associated with reduced endotoxemia and increased survival. Antibiotic-induced endotoxin release may be different depending on the type of infection, the location of infection, the virulence of strains, Gram-stain, mode of application and dosage of antibiotic. Different antibiotics may induce the release of different forms of endotoxin which may be lethal for sensitized animals. The combination of antibiotics with inhibitors of endotoxin or the pro-inflammatory response may be responsible for increased survival by decrease of endotoxin release. The clinical significance of antibiotic-induced endotoxin release is documented only in a few clinical disorders, e.g., meningitis, urosepsis. The difference in endotoxin release by PBP 2-specific antibiotics, e.g., imipenem, and PBP 3-specific antibiotics, e.g., ceftazidime, may not be visible in each study. Patients with increased multi-organ failure (MOF) scores may profit from treatment with antibiotics known to decrease endotoxin. In conclusion, the clinical significance of antibiotic-induced endotoxin release remains to be clarified. Type of pathogen and its virulence may be more important than recently suggested. gram-positive pathogens were just recently recognized as an important factor for the development of the host response. In case of fever of unknown origin in intensive care patients either failure of treatment, e.g., failure of source control in intra-abdominal infection, or a side effect of antibiotic treatment, e.g., endotoxin release, should be considered as a cause of the fever.