Integrating Clinical and Socio-Environmental Approaches in Managing Rheumatoid Arthritis With Social Determinants of Health: A Case Study of an Elderly Patient in Rural Japan

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) poses significant management challenges, especially in elderly patients living in rural areas with limited access to health care. This case report illustrates an integrative approach to managing RA, emphasizing the interplay of clinical, social, and environmental factors. A 72-year-old woman in a rural Japanese setting presented with progressive, widespread joint pain, initially self-managed with over-the-counter medications. Her condition, complicated by socioeconomic constraints and limited access to health care, necessitated a comprehensive management strategy. Clinical examination revealed bilateral joint tenderness, swelling, and high titers of rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, confirming RA. Treatment included methotrexate and prednisolone, complemented by lifestyle modifications. Interdisciplinary collaboration among healthcare professionals, including nutritionists and physiotherapists, facilitated her management. The patient's care was guided by the chronic care model and the ecological model, addressing her clinical needs and socio-environmental context. This holistic approach resulted in improved clinical outcomes and enhanced quality of life. This case highlights the importance of a patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach in managing RA in rural settings. Integrating clinical management with an understanding of social determinants and patient empowerment is crucial for effective treatment. The case underscores the need for adaptable healthcare strategies that are sensitive to the unique challenges faced by elderly patients in rural communities.

The 6-star doctor? Physicians' communication of poor prognosis to patients and their families in Cape Coast, Ghana

INTRODUCTION

Communication is considered a key skill for physicians globally and has formed a central part of medical curricula since the WHO identified it as a key attribute of the '5-star doctor'. Communication of poor prognosis to patients and caregivers is particularly challenging, yet an important example of physicians' clinical communication, and a priority within palliative care research. Knowledge is scarce regarding the different positions physicians adopt during poor prognosis communication, especially in sub-Saharan countries.

METHODS

This qualitative study took place at the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital in Ghana's Central Region. Physicians in the internal medicine department, with experience in communicating poor prognosis to patients and families on a weekly basis were purposively sampled. Based on the concept of information power, a maximum variation of participants, in terms of age, sex, seniority and experience was achieved after conducting 10 semistructured interviews in March 2019. Positioning theory was used as a theoretical lens to inform study design. The data were analysed through a constructivist thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

Physicians adopted six positions, considered as six different themes, during their communication of poor prognosis: clinical expert, educator, counsellor, communicator, protector and mentor. Physicians' choice of position was fluid, guided by local context and wider health system factors. Physicians' desire to communicate with patients and families in a way that met their needs highlighted three key challenges for communication of poor prognosis: linguistic difficulties, pluralistic health beliefs and the role of family. These challenges presented ethical complexities in relation to autonomy and non-maleficence.

CONCLUSION

Context is key to physicians' communication of poor prognosis. Communication of poor prognosis is multifaceted, complex and unpredictable. Physicians' communication training should be developed to emphasise contextual circumstances and physician support, and international policy models on physicians' roles developed to include a greater focus on social accountability.

How Online Reviews and Services Affect Physician Outpatient Visits: Content Analysis of Evidence From Two Online Health Care Communities

Background

Online healthcare communities are changing the ways of physician-patient communication and how patients choose outpatient care physicians. Although a majority of empirical work has examined the role of online reviews in consumer decisions, less research has been done in health care, and endogeneity of online reviews has not been fully considered. Moreover, the important factor of physician online services has been neglected in patient decisions.

Objective

In this paper, we addressed the endogeneity of online reviews and examined the impact of online reviews and services on outpatient visits based on theories of reviews and channel effects.

Methods

We used a difference-in-difference approach to account for physician- and website-specific effects by collecting information from 474 physician homepages on two online health care communities.

Results

We found that the number of reviews was more effective in influencing patient decisions compared with the overall review rating. An improvement in reviews leads to a relative increase in physician outpatient visits on that website. There are channel effects in health care: online services complement offline services (outpatient care appointments). Results further indicate that online services moderate the relationship between online reviews and physician outpatient visits.

Conclusions

This study investigated the effect of reviews and channel effects in health care by conducting a difference-in-difference analysis on two online health care communities. Our findings provide basic research on online health care communities.

Health literacy of future healthcare professionals: a cross-sectional study among health sciences students in Nepal

Background

There is an assumption that health literacy is higher among health professionals, allowing them to improve the health literacy of their patients. This study explored health literacy profiles of health science students in Nepal, the future health professionals and educators of health literacy.

Methods

The multidimensional Health Literacy Questionnaire and demographic questions were administered online to medical and other health science students at the B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.

Results

More than half (55.8%) of the participants were male, 68.3% were ≤19 y of age, 62.2% had parents with a university degree, 73.5% were studying undergraduate courses and 61.6% were pursuing medicine. Students reported having moderate support and skills to manage their health. Health was regarded as important to them. They reported a moderate ability to engage with health professionals and the healthcare system. Medical students reported higher scores for all scales except social support for health, which was similar across the groups.

Conclusions

Universities should target interventions to improve students' access to health information and to develop students' ability to engage actively with healthcare providers. This will likely produce health professionals with improved health literacy levels who are sensitive to the health literacy needs of their patients from different population groups.