Validation of the Malay, English, and Chinese Translations of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in Breast Cancer Patients Making Treatment Decisions

Reliability and Validity of the Malay BREAST-Q in Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery in Malaysia

This study aims to translate the BREAST-Q into Malay and validate it in breast cancer patients undergoing surgery. The English BREAST-Q was translated to Malay using the back-translation method. A total of 144 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients were sampled conveniently between December 2015 and November 2016. Test-retest was done after two to three weeks. Data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS software. Content experts agreed the items in the Malay BREAST-Q were measuring the constructs appropriately. Internal consistencies were good for all items in each subscale (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83-0.95). The highest inter-item correlation for each item with at least one other item in the construct ranged from 0.47 to 0.90. The lowest corrected item-total correlation values ranged from 0.47 to 0.72. The test-retest analysis showed good reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.71-0.98). In exploratory factor analysis, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin values were excellent in all four subscales (0.76, 0.92, 0.91, and 0.86). For all subscales, the number of factors extracted cumulatively explained more than 50% of the variance. The Malay BREAST-Q demonstrated good reliability, face validity, content validity, and construct validity.

Making shared decisions with older men selecting treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH): a pilot randomized trial

Background

Making high-quality decisions when selecting treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) requires a shared decision-making approach. However, older people with lower health literacy face barriers. The pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of recruiting participants and evaluate the effectiveness of a multi-level intervention on decision quality for the treatment of LUTS/BPH.

Method

In this 2-arm, randomized controlled trial, multi-ethnic Asian men aged ≥ 50 years with moderate or severe symptoms (IPSS ≥ 8 and/or QOL ≥ 3) and physicians were recruited at a Singapore public primary care clinic. Men were randomized to either physicians trained in shared decision-making and used a pictorial patient-reported symptom score (Visual Analogue Uroflowmetry Score) during the consultation or to physicians untrained in shared decision-making who did not use the score. Decision quality was measured using SDMQ-9 scores from men and their physicians after the consultation.

Results

60 men (intervention [n = 30], control [n = 30]) receiving care from 22 physicians were recruited. Men’s mean age was 70 ± 9 years: 87% were Chinese, 40% had no formal education, and 32% were of lower socioeconomic status. No difference in decision quality from the men’s nor their physicians’ perspectives was noted [for men: mean score = 70.8 (SD 20.3) vs. 59.5 (SD 22.4); adjusted p = 0.352] [for physicians: mean score = 78.1 (SD 14.1) vs. 73.2 (SD 19.8); adjusted p > 0.999].

Conclusion

It was feasible to recruit the intended participants. There was no difference in decision quality between men who used shared decision-making and usual care for the treatment of LUTS/BPH.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00519-x.

Confucian Familism and Shared Decision Making in End-of-Life Care for Patients with Advanced Cancers

Shared decision-making (SDM) has been institutionally recognized as clinically effective by many Western healthcare systems. Nevertheless, it appears culturally unattractive in China, a country that adheres to Confucian familism which strongly prefers collective family decisions. This study examined this conflict and assessed the influence of Confucian familism on SDM in end-of-life (EOL) care for advanced cancer patients. Between August and November 2018, 188 EOL advanced-cancer patients were randomly recruited from 640 cancer hospital medical records at a Tertiary A-level hospital in Shandong province. Eventually, 164 (87.23%) sample patients were included in the statistical analysis after the non-responsive cases (4.79%) and missing value (7.98%) were removed. SDM was measured through SDM-Q-9, and the patient's siblings were used as indicators of Confucian Familism. Of the 164 patients, the mean SDM score was 38/100; 47.6% were thoroughly unfamiliar with their treatment plans and fell outside the decision-making procedure. Each patient had four siblings on average. Ceteris paribus, more siblings led to lower SDM. Moreover, being 56-65 years old and open-minded were associated with higher SDM, while higher satisfaction of the quality of EOL care yielded lower SDM. In conclusion, Confucian familism weakened patient-clinician SDM in EOL care for advanced cancer patients.