1
|
Rubano M, Kieffer E, Larson E, Colline N, Portillo C. The development of a long-term care infection prevention compendium during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Infect Control 2023; 51:1356-1359. [PMID: 37245601 PMCID: PMC10212793 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term care (LTC) facilities experienced significant morbidity and mortality rates among both residents and staff during the COVID-19 pandemic, for which they were ill-prepared to practice adequate infection prevention and control (IPC). METHODS Our team developed a process for creating a compendium of curated IPC resources. This process harnessed the experience and expertise of nurses actively working in LTC during the pandemic. RESULTS The publicly available online compendium of IPC resources is relevant to all departments found within LTC settings. The compendium contains a wide array of IPC tools, research, reports, international resources, and customizable educational slide decks. DISCUSSION Online repositories of curated IPC resources can equip direct care workers with accurate, easily accessible resources to support the maintenance of proper IPC practice and protocol in LTC settings. CONCLUSIONS Future research should evaluate the effectiveness and usefulness of this model and explore its utility in additional medical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Rubano
- Center for Healthy Aging, The New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Elana Kieffer
- Center for Healthy Aging, The New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Elaine Larson
- Center for Healthy Aging, The New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY; School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rubano MD, Kieffer EF, Larson EL. Infection prevention and control in nursing homes during COVID-19: An environmental scan. Geriatr Nurs 2021; 43:51-57. [PMID: 34808421 PMCID: PMC8810224 DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2021.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
To examine processes and programmatic elements of infection prevention and control (IPC) efforts and identify themes and promising approaches in nursing homes (NHs), an environmental scan was conducted. Data sources included a literature search, relevant listservs and websites, and expert consensus based on a virtual summit of leaders in IPC in long-term care settings. Three thematic areas emerged which have the potential to improve overall IPC practices in the long-term care setting: staffing and resource availability, training and knowledge of IPC practices, and organizational culture. If improved IPC practices and reduced cross-transmission of infections in NHs are to be sustained, both short-term and long-term changes in these areas are essential to fully engage staff, build trust, and enhance a 'just' organizational culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario D Rubano
- New York Academy of Medicine, 1216 5th Avenue - Office #441, New York, NY 10029, United States.
| | - Elana F Kieffer
- New York Academy of Medicine, 1216 5th Avenue - Office #441, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Elaine L Larson
- New York Academy of Medicine, 1216 5th Avenue - Office #441, New York, NY 10029, United States; Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Braun BI, Chitavi SO, Suzuki H, Soyemi CA, Puig-Asensio M. Culture of Safety: Impact on Improvement in Infection Prevention Process and Outcomes. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2020; 22:34. [PMID: 33288982 PMCID: PMC7710367 DOI: 10.1007/s11908-020-00741-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Safety culture is known to be related to a wide range of outcomes, and measurement of safety culture is now required for many hospitals in the U.S.A. In previous reviews, the association with outcomes has been limited by the research design and strength of the evidence. The goal of this review was to examine recent literature on the relationship between safety culture and infection prevention and control-related (IPC) processes and healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in U.S. healthcare organizations. We also sought to quantitatively characterize the challenges to empirically establishing these relationships and limitations of current research. Recent Findings A PubMed search for U.S. articles published 2009–2019 on the topics of infection prevention, HAIs, and safety culture yielded 448 abstracts. After screening, 55 articles were abstracted for information on purpose, measurement, analysis, and conclusions drawn about the role of safety culture in the outcome. Approximately ½ were quality improvement (QI) initiatives and ½ were research studies. Overall, 51 (92.7%) concluded there was an association between safety culture and IPC processes or HAIs. However, only 39 studies measured safety culture and 26 statistically analyzed safety culture data for associations. Though fewer QI initiatives analyzed associations, a higher proportion concluded an association exists than among research studies. Summary Despite limited empirical evidence and methodologic challenges to establishing associations, most articles supported a positive relationship between safety culture, improvement in IPC processes, and decreases in HAIs. Authors frequently reported experiencing improvements in safety culture when not directly measured. The findings suggest that associations between improvement and safety culture may be bi-directional such that positive safety culture contributes to successful interventions and implementing effective interventions drives improvements in culture. Greater attention to article purpose, design, and analysis is needed to confirm these presumptive relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara I Braun
- Department of Research, The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, IL USA
| | - Salome O Chitavi
- Department of Research, The Joint Commission, Oakbrook Terrace, IL USA
| | - Hiroyuki Suzuki
- Department of Internal Medicine - Infectious Diseases, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA
| | - Caroline A Soyemi
- Neihoff School of Nursing, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Mireia Puig-Asensio
- Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA USA.,Present Address: Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge: L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Catalunya Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pogorzelska-Maziarz M, Chastain AM, Mangal S, Stone PW, Shang J. Home Health Staff Perspectives on Infection Prevention and Control: Implications for Coronavirus Disease 2019. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21:1782-1790.e4. [PMID: 33256957 PMCID: PMC7584445 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The role of home healthcare (HHC) services in providing care to vulnerable, often frail individuals with chronic conditions is critical. Effective infection prevention and control (IPC) in HHC is essential to keeping both healthcare workers and patients safe, especially in the event of an emerging infectious disease outbreak. Prior to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, we explored successes and challenges with IPC from the perspectives of HHC staff. Design Qualitative descriptive study. Setting and Participants From May to November 2018, we conducted in-depth telephone interviews with 41 staff from 13 agencies across the nation. Methods Transcripts were coded by a multidisciplinary coding team, and several primary and subcategories were identified using directed content analysis. Results Four primary categories were generated including (1) uniqueness of HHC; (2) IPC as a priority; (3) importance of education; and (4) keys to success and innovation. Participants perceived that IPC plays a big part in patient safety and reducing rehospitalizations, and protection of patients and staff was a major motivator for compliance with IPC. The identified challenges included the unpredictability of the home environment, patient/family dynamics, the intermittent nature of HHC, and staffing issues. Education was seen as a tool to improve staff, patient, caregiver and families' compliance with IPC. Keys to success and innovation included a leadership focus on quality, using agency infection data to improve quality, and a coordinated approach to patient care. Conclusions and Implications This qualitative work identified barriers to effective IPC in HHC, as well as important facilitators that HHC agencies can use to implement policies and procedures to improve patient care and keep staff safe. Leadership prioritization of IPC is key to implementing appropriate IPC policies and may be especially important in midst of a crisis such as coronavirus disease 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ashley M Chastain
- Center for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sabrina Mangal
- Center for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
| | - Patricia W Stone
- Center for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jingjing Shang
- Center for Health Policy, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mitchell BG, Russo PL, Kiernan M, Curryer C. Nurses' and midwives' cleaning knowledge, attitudes and practices: An Australian study. Infect Dis Health 2020; 26:55-62. [PMID: 33011114 PMCID: PMC7526607 DOI: 10.1016/j.idh.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background As frontline providers of care, nurses and midwives play a critical role in controlling infections such as COVID-19, influenza, multi-drug resistant organisms and health care associated infections. Improved cleaning can reduce the incidence of infection and is cost effective but relies on healthcare personnel to correctly apply cleaning measures. As nurses and midwives have the most contact with patients and as an important first step in improving compliance, this study sought to explore nurses' and midwives’ knowledge on the role of the environment in infection prevention and control and identify challenges in maintaining clean patient environments. Methods Cross-sectional online survey of 96 nurses (RN/EN) and midwives (RW) employed in clinical settings (e.g. hospital, aged care, medical centre, clinic) in Australia. Results Nurses and midwives broadly stated that they understood the importance of cleaning. However, cleaning responsibilities varied and there was confusion regarding the application of different disinfectants when cleaning after patients with a suspected or diagnosed infection post-discharge. Most would not be confident being placed in a room where a previous patient had a diagnosed infection such as multi-drug resistant organism. Conclusion Greater organisational support and improving applied knowledge about infection control procedures is needed. This includes correct use of disinfectants, which disinfectant to use for various situations, and cleaning effectively following discharge of a patient with known infection. The cleanliness of shared medical equipment may also pose current risk due to lack of cleaning. Improved cleaning reduces incidence of healthcare associated infection but relies on correct application. Nurses and midwives expressed confusion regarding disinfectant use and cleaning responsibility. Most would not be confident being placed in a room where a previous patient had a diagnosed infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett G Mitchell
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, New South Wales, Australia; School of Nursing, Avondale College of Higher Education, Wahroonga, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Philip L Russo
- Department of Nursing Research, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, VIC, Australia; Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Martin Kiernan
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, New South Wales, Australia; Richard Wells Research Centre, University of West London, Brentford, UK
| | - Cassie Curryer
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Buijtene A, Foster D. Does a hospital culture influence adherence to infection prevention and control and rates of healthcare associated infection? A literature review. J Infect Prev 2018; 20:5-17. [PMID: 30719083 DOI: 10.1177/1757177418805833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Over 4 million patients acquire a healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) in Europe every year, indicating possible shortcomings in hospitals converting evidence-based infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies into universal adherence. We present a literature review exploring whether insufficient adherence could be culturally based. Aim To find empirical evidence if and how specific traits of organisational culture improve adherence to IPC strategies utilising HCAI rates as the marker of system failures or successes. Methods PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and the British Nursing index database were searched from January 2007 to June 2018. Hand-searching, Google Scholar and the snowball effect completed the investigation. The quality of the studies was assessed with the guidance of CASP and Cochrane tools. Results Twenty papers were eligible for data extraction and thematic analysis. Studies predominantly report positive findings for the association, but none were determined high quality due to multiple methodological concerns. Analysing both quantitative and qualitative research revealed eight major themes: hospital cultures with better HCAI rates foster safety culture; have a generative leadership style; embrace innovation; ensure interventions fit local context; accept long-term orientation; engage and empower health professionals; promote collaboration and communication; and see the benefits of a non-punitive climate. Interpretation The literature linking organisational culture and HCAI rates is suggestive, but not conclusive, indicating caution about their inferences. Leaving cultural growth to chance or allowing for weak or toxic cultures impedes on our IPC strategies and equivalently our HCAI rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dona Foster
- Oxford Brookes University and University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hall L, Halton K, Macbeth D, Gardner A, Mitchell B. Roles, responsibilities and scope of practice: describing the ‘state of play’ for infection control professionals in Australia and New Zealand. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015. [DOI: 10.1071/hi14037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|