Description and Outcomes of a Palliative Care Pharmacist-Led Transitions of Care Program

Background: Patients with palliative care needs are at high risk of medication errors during transitions of care (TOC). Palliative Care Pharmacist Interventions surrounding Medication Prescribing Across Care Transitions (IMPACT) program was developed to improve the TOC process from hospital to community setting for cancer patients followed by palliative care. We describe (1) the program and (2) pilot study feasibility and effectiveness data. Methods: We recorded pharmacist time, medication errors, drug therapy problems (DTPs), and palliative care provider satisfaction and compared 7- and 30-day readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits between IMPACT and usual care patients. Results: Forty-four patients were reached by the pharmacist. The pharmacist spent an average of 65 minutes per patient. An average of 14.9 medication reconciliation discrepancies per patient and a total 76 DTPs were identified. Seven-day readmissions were lower in the IMPACT group versus usual care; there were no differences in 30-day readmission or 7- or 30-day ED visits. Conclusion: Our pilot study demonstrates that integrating a pharmacist in TOC for seriously ill patients is feasible and valuable.

Practicing and evaluating clinical pharmacy in oncology: Where are we now? A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Clinical pharmacy is a discipline structured around multiple activities whose objective is to secure patient care. Among all the specialties where it can be applied, oncology is a field of choice. More and more studies are being conducted on the impact of this activity, but their methodology and results seem at first sight very heterogeneous.

OBJECTIVE(S)

The objective of this literature review was to describe the clinical oncology pharmacy activities found in the literature, and analyze the methodology used and the outcomes measured by the authors for their evaluation.

METHODS

This literature review was based on the PRISMA-ScR criteria. The Embase, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and PsycINFO databases were searched. All studies reporting the evaluation of hospital-based clinical pharmacy activity in cancer patients were included based on a previously validated search equation. The search was conducted until the end of 2020. The quality of all studies was assessed using the MMAT.

RESULTS

Of the 2521 results of the initial query, 93 were selected for complete review. The main interventions implemented were pharmaceutical analysis as well as pharmaceutical interviews. The indicators assessed most often were the number of pharmaceutical interventions as well as treatment-related problems. The overall quality assessment score was 55%.

CONCLUSION

Clinical pharmacy activity in oncology still lacks robust studies, whether methodologically or of the measured indicator. Patient-centered impact indicators are still too rare. This area of research should focus on the homogenization of indicators and their relevance.

The role of the pharmacist in the hospital discharge of cancer patients: an integrative review

INTRODUCTION

Patients with cancer need care from a multidisciplinary team due to the complexity of the clinical picture and proposed treatment. Hospital discharge is a critical step, because pharmacotherapy changes may occur during hospitalization, leading to potential medication-related problems at home.

OBJECTIVE

To identify publications which describe the activities performed by the pharmacist at the hospital discharge of patients with cancer.

METHOD

This is an integrative systematic literature review. A search was carried out in the MEDLINE databases, via Pubmed, Embase, and Virtual Health Library, using the following descriptors: "Patient Discharge", "Pharmacists", "Neoplasms." Studies that reported activities performed by the pharmacist at the hospital discharge of patients with cancer were included.

RESULTS

Five hundred and two studies were identified, of which seven met the eligibility criteria. Most were conducted in the United States (n = 3), and the rest in Belgium, Brazil, Canada, and Italy. Among the services provided by the pharmacist at discharge, medication reconciliation was the most widely described. Other activities such as counseling, education, identification, and resolution of drug-related problems were also carried out.

CONCLUSION

In the scenario of hospital discharge of patients with cancer, the participation of pharmacists is still to be seen as of significance in regards to publications. Despite this, the results suggest that the actions of this professional contribute to patient orientation and the safe use of prescription drugs for use at home.

Perfil das Discrepâncias Obtidas por meio da Conciliação Medicamentosa em Pacientes Oncológicos: Revisão Integrativa da Literatura

Introdução: O cuidado ao paciente oncológico demanda ações de uma equipe multiprofissional em virtude da complexidade do seu tratamento. Um dos serviços oferecidos pelo farmacêutico, visando a contribuir para segurança do paciente, é a conciliação medicamentosa capaz de detectar discrepâncias nas prescrições e prevenir erros de medicação. Objetivo: Traçar o perfil das principais discrepâncias encontradas na literatura em pacientes oncológicos durante a prática da conciliação medicamentosa realizada por farmacêuticos. Adicionalmente, visa-se a uma abordagem descritiva sobre as intervenções farmacêuticas realizadas nos estudos. Método: Revisão integrativa da literatura. Foram utilizados os descritores: “Medication Reconciliation”, “Neoplasms”, “Pharmacists”, “Medication Errors” para as estratégias de busca. As bases de dados selecionadas foram: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase e Scopus. Resultados: Inicialmente, identificaram-se 141 artigos. Destes, foram selecionados 11 trabalhos para serem discutidos. A conciliação medicamentosa foi realizada em pacientes na admissão hospitalar (27,3%), alta hospitalar (18,2%), e acompanhamento ambulatorial (54,5%). A maior parte era de estudos observacionais (72,7%) seguidos dos estudos de intervenção (27,3%). A principal discrepância relatada foi a de omissão/necessidade de adição de um medicamento (81,5%). As intervenções farmacêuticas estavam descritas mais detalhadamente em 36,4% das publicações. Conclusão: O estudo demonstrou a necessidade de mais trabalhos que correlacionem a prática da conciliação medicamentosa com a detecção de discrepâncias e intervenções farmacêuticas em Oncologia. Os farmacêuticos, objetivando a segurança do paciente, devem estruturar essa prática na vivência clínica dos pacientes oncológicos.

Role of clinical pharmacist in the palliative care of adults and elderly patients with cancer: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

We conducted this scoping review to map and summarize scientific evidence on the role of clinical pharmacists in the palliative care of adults and elderly patients with cancer.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, PubMed Central, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and BVS/BIREME for studies published until November 22nd, 2020. Studies that reported work experiences adopted by clinical pharmacists in the palliative care of adults and elderly patients with cancer were included. Two independent authors performed study selection and data extraction. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion with the third and fourth authors. The pharmacist interventions identified in the included studies were described based on key domains in the DEPICT v.2.

DATA SUMMARY

A total of 586 records were identified, of which 14 studies fully met the eligibility criteria. Most of them were conducted in the United States of America (n  =  5) and Canada (n  =  5) and described the workplace of the pharmacist in clinic/ambulatory (n  =  10). Clinical pharmacists performed several activities and provided services, highlighting medication review (n  =  12), patient and caregivers education (n  =  12), medication histories and-or medication reconciliation (n  =  6). The pharmacist interventions were mostly conducted for patients/caregivers (n  =  13), by one-on-one contact (n  =  14), and by face-to-face (n  =  13). Pharmacists were responsible mainly for change or suggestion for change in therapy (n  =  12) and patient counselling (n  =  12). Pharmacist interventions were well accepted by the clinical team. Overall, studies showed that pharmacists, within an interdisciplinary team, had significant impacts on measured outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In recent years, there have been advances in the role of the pharmacist in palliative care of patients with cancer and there are great opportunities in this field. They play an important role in managing cancer pain and other symptoms, as well as resolving drug related problems. We encourage more research to be carried out to strengthen this field and to benefit patients with advanced cancer with higher quality of life.

Importance of medication reconciliation in cancer patients

Cancer patients are a complex and vulnerable population whose medication history is often extensive. Medication reconciliations in this population are especially essential, since medication discrepancies can lead to dire outcomes. This commentary aims to describe the significance of conducting medication reconciliations in this often-forgotten patient population. We discuss additional clinical interventions that can arise during this process as well. Medication reconciliations provide the opportunity to identify and prevent drug-drug and herb-drug interactions. They also provide an opportunity to appropriately adjust chemotherapy dosing according to renal and hepatic function. Finally, reconciling medications can also provide an opportunity to identify and deprescribe inappropriate medications. While clinical impact appears evident in this landscape, evidence of economic impact is lacking. As more cancer patients are prescribed a combination of oral chemotherapies, intravenous chemotherapies and non-anticancer medications, future studies should evaluate the advantages of conducting medication reconciliations in these patient populations across multiple care settings.

International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) position statement: Role of the oncology pharmacy team in cancer care

The Oncology Pharmacy Team (OPT), consisting of specialty-trained pharmacists and/or pharmacy technicians, is an integral component of the multidisciplinary healthcare team (MHT) involved with all aspects of cancer patient care. The OPT fosters quality patient care, safety, and local regulatory compliance. The International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) developed this position statement to provide guidance on five key areas: 1) oncology pharmacy practice as a pharmacy specialty; 2) contributions to patient care; 3) oncology pharmacy practice management; 4) education and training; and 5) contributions to oncology research and quality initiatives to involve the OPT. This position statement advocates that: 1) the OPT be fully incorporated into the MHT to optimize patient care; 2) educational and healthcare institutions develop programs to continually educate OPT members; and 3) regulatory authorities develop certification programs to recognize the unique contributions of the OPT in cancer patient care.

[Not Available]

BACKGROUND

The pharmacist's role within the multidisciplinary team is often poorly understood. Various interventions can be put into place to promote the role of the pharmacist in the hospital setting with families, patients, and other health care professionals. Few studies have described the feasibility and assessed the impact of such interventions, particularly in pediatrics.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the implementation of a 3-part intervention aimed at increasing the visibility of pharmacists and their role on the treatment team, with the goal of optimizing the pharmaceutical care of hospitalized patients in the general pediatric units of CHU Sainte-Justine, in Montréal, Quebec, and to compare the perceptions and satisfaction of patients' parents and of health care professionals with exposure to either usual pharmaceutical care or to pharmaceutical care incorporating the intervention.

METHODS

This single-blind, randomized, controlled experimental study involved patients admitted to general pediatric units between March 5 and August 8, 2019. In addition to usual care, the intervention included delivery of an information brochure about pharmaceutical services and care, access to a telephone line (which allowed families and patients to contact a pharmacy resident during their stay in hospital and up to 1 month after discharge), and completion of a standardized discharge form by the pharmacist responsible for the patient. The participants and health professionals concerned were surveyed to determine their perceptions and level of satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 641 participants were included in the study, 321 in the intervention group and 320 in the control group. The brochure was given to all parents in the intervention group. Twelve phone calls were made through the dedicated telephone line. The standardized discharge form was completed for 46.7% (150/321) of the participants in the intervention group. Most of the parents and patients who responded to the survey, in either group (81.2%, 298/367), reported satisfaction with the pharmaceutical services and care received. Of participants in the intervention group, 83.9% were satisfied with the pharmaceutical care and services received, compared with 78.5% of those in the control group (p = 0.18). In addition, 60.3% (111/184) of participants in the intervention group said that the information about medications that was provided during the hospital stay gave them new knowledge, compared with 48.1% (87/181) of those in the control group (p = 0.019). The results of the survey showed that care providers were in agreement with the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3 components of the intervention were implemented in the pediatric units over a period of 5 months. The intervention was perceived as positive by the parents and care providers concerned, and the respondents were mostly satisfied with the services and pharmaceutical care offered.

Pharmacist-driven medication reconciliation reduces oral oncolytic medication errors during transitions of care

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to characterize medication errors associated with oral oncolytics as patients with cancer were admitted to the inpatient setting and identify contributing factors that lead to errors.

METHODS

A review of patients prescribed a cyclic oral oncolytic who were then admitted to the inpatient setting at a large, academic medical center from July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2018, was conducted.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were included in the analysis. Thirty-five errors (43%) related to transcription of the oral oncolytic regimen from the outpatient to the inpatient setting were identified. Categorization of errors revealed that 46% were due to delays in treatment. Within this error subset, 75% of the delays were related to unavailability of nonformulary oral oncolytics. There was a significant decrease in error for patients who received medication reconciliation by a pharmacist (P = 0.032) after admission. There were no other significant differences observed among variables that may have led to increased error rates. Three percent of errors were reported to the internal medication safety reporting system at our institution.

CONCLUSION

The inability to fully confirm patients' home regimen via chart review poses great risk to accurate medication ordering upon hospital admission. Completion of medication reconciliations by pharmacists serves to decrease rates of errors that may occur during hospital admission in cancer patients undergoing treatment with oral oncolytic therapies.

Clinical and economic impact of medication reconciliation in cancer patients: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Medication reconciliation can reduce drug-related iatrogenesis by facilitating exhaustive information transmission at care transition points. Given the vulnerability of cancer patients to adverse drug events, medication reconciliation could provide a significant clinical benefit in cancer care. This review aims to synthesize existing evidence on medication reconciliation in cancer patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, associating the keywords "medication reconciliation" and "cancer" or "oncology."

RESULTS

Fourteen studies met the selection criteria. Various medication reconciliation practices were reported: performed at admission or discharge, for hospitalized or ambulatory patients treated with oral or parenteral anticancer drugs. In one randomized controlled trial, medication reconciliation decreased clinically significant medication errors by 26%. Although most studies were non-comparative, they highlighted that medication reconciliation led to identification of discrepancies and other drug-related problems in up to 88% and 94.7% of patients, respectively. The impact on post-discharge healthcare utilization remains under-evaluated and mostly inconclusive, despite a trend toward reduction. No comparative economic evaluations were available but one study estimated the benefit:cost ratio of medication reconciliation to be 2.31:1, suggesting its benefits largely outweigh its costs. Several studies also underlined the extended pharmacist time required for the intervention, highlighting the need for further cost analysis.

CONCLUSION

Medication reconciliation can reduce adverse drug events in cancer patients. More robust and economic evaluations are still required to support its development in everyday practice.