An Interprofessional Approach to Advance Care Planning

Patients' spiritual concerns and needs and how to address them during advance care planning conversations: Healthcare chaplains' perspectives

OBJECTIVES

Advance care planning (ACP) conversations require the consideration of deeply held personal values and beliefs and the discussion of uncertainty, fears, and hopes related to current and future personal healthcare. However, empirical data are limited on how such spiritual concerns and needs are supported during ACP. This study explored board-certified healthcare chaplains' perspectives of patients' spiritual needs and support in ACP conversations.

METHODS

An online survey of 563 board-certified chaplains was conducted from March to July 2020. The survey included 3 open-ended questions about patients' hopes and fears and about how the chaplains addressed them during ACP conversations. Written qualitative responses provided by 244 of the chaplains were examined with content analysis.

RESULTS

The majority of the 244 chaplains were White (83.6%), female (59%), Protestant (63.1%), and designated to one or more special care units (89.8%). Major themes on patients' hopes and fears expressed during ACP were (1) spiritual, religious, and existential questions; (2) suffering, peace, and comfort; (3) focus on the present; (4) hopes and fears for family; and (5) doubt and distrust. Major themes on how chaplains addressed them were (1) active listening to explore and normalize fears, worries, and doubts; (2) conversations to integrate faith, values, and preferences into ACP; and (3) education, empowerment, and advocacy.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

ACP conversations require deep listening and engagement to address patients' spiritual needs and concerns - an essential dimension of engaging in whole-person care - and should be delivered with an interdisciplinary approach to fulfill the intended purpose of ACP.

A shared decision-making model in pediatric palliative care: a qualitative study of healthcare providers

BACKGROUND

Pediatric shared decision-making (SDM) is a fundamental part of family-centered care. Pediatric palliative care (PPC) is one of the more difficult fields for healthcare providers when choosing to utilize SDM. However, to our knowledge, there are still few structured approaches of SDM in PPC. We aimed to build a model of SDM in PPC that achieves better care and outcomes for children and their family members.

METHODS

This study is a descriptive phenomenology study. Participants included physicians, nurses, and social workers in the PPC team. Participants were individually interviewed face-to-face or via an online meeting software. Data were collected in semi-structured interviews and analyzed using a thematic framework analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 27 healthcare providers were interviewed. The model of SDM in PPC identified three themes, including the participants, the principle and the process of SDM. Decision participants involved the children, parents, the PPC team and others. The decision principle had three sub-themes including type, standard and precondition. The decision process describes the fundamental process of SDM and provides suggestions for mobilizing patients and parents to engage in decision-making and seeking conflict resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to develop a SDM model in PPC. This model can provide guidance to PPC teams on SDM practices. In addition, the model contributes to the existing body of knowledge by providing a conceptual model for SDM in the context of PPC.

Social workers' perspectives about advance directives: A qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

The study explores medical social workers' perceptions on the importance of and purpose for documenting Advance Directives (ADs) in the United States and their views of the benefits for engaging patients and families in dialogue about ADs and Advance Care Planning (ACP).

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study using free-text responses from a survey of 142 social workers who work in the medical field in various in-patient hospital and out-patient medical/healthcare settings. Participants were asked, "What is the purpose of documenting an advance directive?" and "Why do you think advance directives are important?" and "What benefits have you experienced in educating patients about advance directives?" Thematic analysis informed themes about the purpose, importance, and benefits of supporting patients in completing an AD.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged: 1) The purpose of documenting an AD, 2) Facilitating communication, 3) Creating a plan involves relationship building, and 4) Having an AD reduces suffering and uncertainty.

CONCLUSION

Social workers have expertise in relationship building which is an essential element of the partnering process with patients and their support systems towards AD completion.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Social workers who work in medical settings provide ACP education for patients and families and create interprofessional linkages to support patient care. It is clear that social workers add value to care provision to improve communication and provide assistance towards AD completion.