Quality of Transition From Hospital to Home: The Influence of Nurse- and Patient-Reported Readiness

Theoretical concepts and instruments for measuring hospital discharge readiness: A scoping review

Background

The Discharge Readiness of adult patients in a hospital setting is a multidimensional concept which is becoming increasingly important internationally as part of discharge planning. To date, there has been a lack of reviews of existing measurement instruments as well as theoretical concepts of discharge readiness.

Objective

To provide an overview of existing measurement instruments and theoretical concepts regarding readiness for hospital discharge in adult patients.

Design and methods

A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodological manual and PRISMA ScR reporting principles. A literature search was conducted using the CINAHL and LIVIVO databases (including MEDLINE and PSYINDEX) in October 2021. After test screening, all identified articles were screened by two independent reviewers using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria before the content was extracted and mapped.

Results

Of the 1823 records identified, 107 were included in this review. Of these, 30 studies were included as development or validation studies of measurement instruments assessing discharge readiness, 68 were included as empirical studies with readiness for hospital discharge as the primary outcome or key concept, and nine publications were included as theoretical papers or reviews. Five dimensions of readiness for hospital discharge were extracted:1) Physical, 2) Psychological, 3) Education and Knowledge, 4) Adequate Individual Support, and 5) Social and Organisational Determinants. Of the 47 instruments identified for measuring discharge readiness, 33 were validated. The Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS) was the most frequently used instrument.

Conclusions

The systematic measurement of readiness for hospital discharge, particularly from the patient's perspective combined with the nurse's perspective, might be useful in reducing negative outcomes such as readmissions. This review provides an overview of existing and validated instruments for the systematic assessment of discharge readiness in acute inpatient care, as well as an overview of the theoretical concepts of readiness for hospital discharge. Further research is needed on the relationship between organisational determinants and readiness for discharge.

Nurse-to-patient ratios and readiness for hospital discharge: A moderated mediation model

AIM

To explore whether and to what extent, nurse-patient assessment differences mediate the association between nurse-to-patient ratios and readiness for hospital discharge, and examine whether nurse-patient characteristics moderate the indirect and/or direct effect of mediation model.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study was carried out from March 2021 to December 2022.

METHODS

A total of 523 pairs of gastrointestinal cancer patients with PICC and their nurses were recruited. All the participants were invited to complete the general information questionnaire and the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale. Outcome measure was patient-reported readiness for hospital discharge. This study was reported according to the STROBE checklist.

RESULTS

The patients reported a low level of readiness for hospital discharge. Nurse-patient assessment differences were positively associated with nurse-to-patient ratios but negatively associated with readiness for hospital discharge. Furthermore, nurse-patient assessment differences fully mediated the effect of nurse-to-patient ratios on readiness for hospital discharge, and age and gender of patients only moderated the indirect path of mediation model.

Comparison of Nurses' and Patients' Readiness for Hospital Discharge: A Multicenter Study

Decision to discharge is often based solely on clinical criteria but readiness for discharge is multifactorial and perceived differently by patients, families, nurses, and physicians. This is an analytical cross-sectional study aimed to compare perceptions of readiness to discharge 452 patients and their assigned nurses on the day of hospital discharge. To compare perceptions of readiness to discharge patients and their assigned nurses on the day of hospital discharge via readiness for hospital discharge (RHD) self-reported questionnaire. The biggest difference between nurses and patients’ perception scores was in the knowledge subscale. The results of linear regression model showed that patients’ gender, education, occupation, ward, nurse’s age, and marital status predict the difference between nurses and patients’ perception of readiness. Hospitalization in ear, nose, and throat (ENT) department with increasing difference and the older age of nurses is associated with a decrease in the difference between the perception. Assessment of nurse’s self-readiness can help with the development of care and education planning tailored to patients’ needs before discharge.

Nurses' heart failure discharge planning part I: The impact of interdisciplinary relationships and patient behaviors

AIM

The purpose of this interpretive descriptive study was to understand bedside nurses' motivation and decision-making during discharge planning for adult patients with HF on a 48-bed telemetry step-down unit.

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) discharge planning interventions have largely excluded the contributions of bedside nurses.

METHODS

Fifteen bedside nurses were interviewed. Coding was done using NVivo and thematic analysis was completed.

RESULTS

This paper is the first in a two-part series which presents separate results of the interpretive descriptive study delineating the factors that impact bedside nurses' motivation and decision-making during HF discharge planning. This paper presents the major finding of nurses' high levels of motivation to do effective discharge planning despite many barriers, such as poor physician-nurse communication and patient behaviors. These nurses described being motivated when they had good communication from the interdisciplinary team and time to establish a personal connection with patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, findings of this study emphasized a need for interdisciplinary relationship-building between bedside nurses, patients, and physicians to be factored into the organizational culture.

Social resource assessment: Application of a novel communication tool during hospital discharge

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate an interactive tool designed to help patients communicate their social resources supportive of home recovery to health care providers.

METHODS

Seventy medical and surgical inpatients completed the D-CEGRM social resource interview, demographic queries, and discharge readiness surveys (RHDS) at discharge. Two weeks later, patients completed post-discharge coping difficulty surveys (PDCDS). Nurses unassociated with patients' clinical care reviewed structured clinical notes created from the D-CEGRM and categorized patients as likely to have "inadequate" or "adequate" supportive resources for home self-management. Nurse decision making was tracked using an adjudication process, and post-hoc comparisons in patient characteristics, RHDS, and PDCDS were conducted.

RESULTS

Nurses categorized 36 patients (51%) as having inadequate resources. Number and accessibility of supports, presence of negative relationships, and previous struggles meeting health-related needs were important decision-making factors. Post-hoc comparisons revealed significant differences in demographic risk factors and discharge readiness ratings for those with inadequate vs. adequate resources.

CONCLUSION

The D-CEGRM may be an efficient tool for patients to communicate access to social resources, and an effective facilitator of transitional care planning.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The D-CEGRM may provide a useful assessment of patients' home context and guide for transitional care planning.