Three-Dimensional Analysis of Definitive Secondary Unilateral Cleft Rhinoplasty Using Cartilage Graft

Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty

Secondary cleft rhinoplasty remains a challenging operation that requires an understanding of the aberrant anatomy in cleft lip nasal deformity as well as the ability to adapt various techniques suited to the needs of each patient. In this article, we review some of the classically described approaches in cleft rhinoplasty and different strategies to address the nasal subunits. Presurgical adjuncts, surgical interventions before facial skeletal maturity, and patient reported outcome measures are also discussed.

Rhinoplasty in Patients with Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity: Correcting the Alar Base

The characteristic cleft nasal deformity presents several challenges for the rhinoplasty surgeon attempting to provide the optimal nasal function and appearance for their patient. One of the difficulties with cleft rhinoplasty is how best to address the malposition alar base. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the various surgical approaches and techniques for properly repositioning the alar base for cleft patients. Outcomes are ultimately dependent on individual patient factors, anatomy, surgical technique, and surgeon experience. Below, we will review the variety of techniques used, the evidence supporting certain techniques, and our preferences.

Augmentation Rhinoplasty in Cleft Lip Nasal Deformity Using Alloplastic Material and Autologous Cartilage

Secondary cleft rhinoplasty typically requires large amounts of cartilage grafts for augmentation. The purpose of this study was to present our short-term experience with alloplastic implants in cleft rhinoplasty. This was a retrospective cohort study of cleft lip and palate patients treated with secondary rhinoplasty at Hanoi Medical University Hospital and Ruby Hospital between 2017 and 2020. All rhinoplasty procedures consisted of lower lateral cartilage repositioning, a dorsal augmentation with silicone implant, columellar strut implant or graft, and onlay tip grafts. Cartilage was obtained from the septum and concha, and no cartilage was harvested from the rib. The study outcomes included the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) survey, a modified Mortier scoring scale, 8 intranasal measures of symmetry, and 4 nasofacial measures of tip projection and nasal length. Changes in patient satisfaction and nasal esthetics were compared before and after surgery. A total of 38 patients were included in the final study sample, of whom 65.79% had unilateral clefts. The overall complication rate was 7.89%, and there were 2 cases of infection and 1 case of dorsal implant displacement. Following rhinoplasty, ROE satisfaction scores significantly increased (+39.36, P<0.01) and Mortier severity scores decreased (-3.06, P<0.01). Nostril symmetry nearly normalized in width, height, and inclination. Mean columellar deviation decreased from 8.82 to 2.08 degrees, and nasal projection increased as assessed on multiple analyses. Patients with bilateral clefts had similar improvements in ROE and Mortier scores. In our experience, synthetic implants simplified the correction of cleft nasal deformity and eliminated the need for costal cartilage. We found that our protocol produced acceptable and stable short-term clinical results without increasing the complication rate above what has been reported with autologous grafts.