Evaluation of Intravenous Phenytoin and Fosphenytoin Loading Doses: Influence of Obesity and Sex

Optimizing Status Epilepticus Management in the Emergency Department: It's About Time

Status epilepticus (SE) is a frequent medical emergency that requires expedited treatment to avoid the ensuing high incidence of morbidity and mortality associated with prolonged seizures. Protracted seizure duration itself has the potential to result in maladaptive neuronal responses that can not only further increase seizure duration and worsen clinical outcomes but also lead to reduced responsiveness to pharmacotherapy. Benzodiazepines are consistently recommended as first-line treatment due to their rapid onset and efficacy in terminating seizures, followed by the emergent administration of an antiepileptic drug (AED). Various benzodiazepine and AED options are recommended and can be utilized in this setting, all with their own unique advantages and challenges. With time at a premium, agents should be selected that can be rapidly administered and have an advantageous pharmacokinetic profile in order to limit seizure duration and optimize outcomes. The intent of this review is to provide an outline of the importance of time-to-treatment implementation in this setting, assess the landscape of options that may provide timing advantages, and examine potential strategies for deploying expeditious therapy.

Evaluation of phenytoin loading doses in overweight patients using actual versus adjusted body weight

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The appropriate loading dose strategy for phenytoin/fosphenytoin in overweight patients is unknown. A small pharmacokinetic study indicated that overweight patients have a higher volume of distribution and potentially would benefit from using adjusted body weight (AdjBW) instead of actual body weight (ABW) to calculate the loading dose. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal loading dose strategy of phenytoin in patients whose ABW is greater than 120% of their ideal body weight (IBW) using either ABW or AdjBW for calculation of the loading dose.

METHODS

This was a single center, retrospective study which included patients who received a loading dose of phenytoin of at least 10 mg/kg based on ABW, had a phenytoin level drawn <6 h after the end of the dose, and weighed ≥120% of their IBW. Patients were excluded if they received intramuscular phenytoin or fosphenytoin or were prescribed phenytoin prior to the loading dose. Patients were divided into two groups, those who were dosed using their AdjBW versus those dosed using ABW. The primary outcome was achievement of therapeutic phenytoin level of 10-20 mcg/mL. Secondary outcomes included achievement of a subtherapeutic or supratherapeutic level.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients (128 in AdjBW group and 67 in ABW group) met criteria for inclusion. Patients in the AdjBW group weighed more (96.2 kg vs. 91.2 kg, p = 0.04) and received a lower dose in milligrams (1364 vs. 1760, p < 0.0001) and in mg/kg of ABW (14.2 vs. 19.3, p < 0.0001). The primary outcome was achieved in 74% of patients in the AdjBW group and 57% of patients in the ABW group (p = 0.02). Patients in the ABW group were more likely to have a supratherapeutic level (43% vs. 22%, p = 0.003), although adverse reactions did not differ between the groups.

DISCUSSION

Patients weighing >120% of their IBW (average body mass index 33.5 kg/m²) who received a 20 mg/kg loading dose based on AdjBW were more likely to achieve a therapeutic phenytoin concentration compared to those dosed based on ABW. Further research is needed to correlate this finding with clinical outcomes, such as resolution of status epilepticus.

Evaluation of Fosphenytoin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in the Neurocritical Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether the current method of calculating a fosphenytoin reloading dose results in a therapeutic free phenytoin level on subsequent days.

METHODS

Medical records of patients receiving fosphenytoin in the neurocritical care unit between July 2017 and June 2018 were screened. Included patients were those who had received at least three doses of fosphenytoin and required reloading doses according to concentrations obtained through therapeutic drug monitoring. Free phenytoin levels were categorized based on the prespecified patient-specific target range, generally between 1.5 and 2.5 mcg/mL.

RESULTS

Of the fosphenytoin reloading doses administered, 48% (73/152) resulted in a therapeutic free phenytoin concentration on the subsequent day, with the remaining 52% resulting in nontherapeutic levels (39% subtherapeutic, 13% supratherapeutic). Our evaluation of reloading dose calculation strategies indicated that patients were two times as likely to obtain a therapeutic level when a modified pharmacokinetic equation omitting the use of volume of distribution or salt formulation was used (58%, n = 39) than they were with doses calculated using the current pharmacokinetic model (41%, n = 20) or doses based on provider preference (39%, n = 14).

CONCLUSION

The current method of calculating a fosphenytoin reloading dose in the critically ill population does not consistently result in therapeutic concentrations. With multiple factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of critically ill patients, the creation of a new pharmacokinetic model with less emphasis on volume of distribution may more consistently result in therapeutic concentrations.

Critical Care Management of Status Epilepticus at a Tertiary Care University Hospital

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to review the critical care management of patients with SE focusing on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as well as to determine the optimal dosing strategies of phenytoin (PHT) and predictors of its effectiveness.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of adult patients with SE admitted to the University of Alberta Hospital, Canada, was conducted.

RESULTS

Fifty-six admissions were included. Benzodiazepines (BDZs) were initially given in 89% of our patients. Following BDZs, PHT and levetiracetam were the most commonly initiated AEDs as first- and second-line agents and were deemed effective in 30/44 and 5/11 patients, respectively. Patients who received a PHT loading dose (LD) of 1000 mg were less likely to reach target levels compared with a weight-based LD ≥15 mg/kg (29% vs. 60%). Likewise, patients who received a maintenance dose (MD) of 300 mg/day were less likely to reach target compared with 400 mg/day or >5 mg/kg per day; however, this did not reach statistical significance. Three variables were found to be associated with PHT effectiveness: tonic-clonic SE (OR 5.01, 95% CI 1.02-24.7, p = 0.048), history of seizures and BMI <30 kg/m2 (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-1.07, p = 0.059).

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies of the predictors of PHT effectiveness, specifically obesity, are necessary to help individualize care. Finally, we suggest that PHT should be loaded according to the guidelines as 20 mg/kg followed by an MD of at least 400 mg/day or >5 mg/kg per day.

Phenytoin Serum Concentrations in Patients With Left Ventricular Support Devices: A Case Series

PURPOSE

Achieving therapeutic levels of phenytoin is critical to its efficacy and safety. Free serum levels represent pharmacologically active phenytoin due to the high protein binding of the drug. Predicting free serum levels in patients with left ventricular support devices can be challenging, as the pharmacokinetics (PK) can be significantly altered, and equations to correct total levels have not been validated in this population. The aim of this case series was to describe serum phenytoin concentrations in critically ill patients requiring left ventricular support devices.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed including patients who received phenytoin therapy and had at least 1 set of simultaneously measured free and total serum phenytoin levels during left ventricular support with a mechanical device. Corrected total phenytoin levels were calculated using Sheiner-Tozer equations.

RESULTS

Three patients were included in this case series. Patients 1 and 2 required venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during phenytoin therapy, and patient 3 had a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Measured phenytoin levels ranged from 4.1 to 11.4 µg/mL, and calculated corrected levels were 6.8 to 18.4. Measured free phenytoin levels ranged from 1.2 to 3.6 µg/mL, which correlated with free fractions of 15.8% to 37.9%.

CONCLUSION

This case series demonstrates a higher percentage of free phenytoin compared to the total serum level than would be predicted and an inability to rely on corrected total phenytoin level to predict whether it is within therapeutic range. Monitoring of free serum phenytoin concentrations should be strongly considered in critically ill patients requiring LVAD or ECMO support.