Risk of Gastrointestinal Bleeding on Treatment With Statin Alone or With Concomitant Administration of Warfarin: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 5.3 Million Participants

Impact of statins on incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding events among patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND

Patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) are at increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). Statins are commonly prescribed in LVAD patients for cardiovascular disease prevention. However, their impact on GIB events is controversial. Importantly, literature regarding statins impact on GIB in CF-LVAD patients is lacking.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective review of adult patients who underwent CF-LVAD implantation between May 2016 and January 2020 was performed. Patients were categorized based on statin use throughout the study period. The primary outcome was the composite of arteriovenous malformation confirmed GIB and major GIB events for up to 1-year post-LVAD implantation.

RESULTS

Of 123 patients included in the final analysis, 66 (54%) received statin therapy during the study period. No difference was observed in the primary outcome between the statin and control groups (RR: 1.73; 95% CI: 0.75-3.98; p=0.20). Multivariable Cox regression revealed that older age and higher baseline creatinine were associated with an increased risk of GIB within 1-year of CF-LVAD implantation.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with CF-LVADs, there was no significant difference in the incidence of major GIB events associated with the use of statin therapy. Further studies are needed to assess whether a true association exists.

To treat or not to treat: a comparative effectiveness analysis of oral anticoagulant outcomes among U.S. nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Nursing home residents with atrial fibrillation are at high risk for ischemic stroke, but most are not treated with anticoagulants. This study compared the effectiveness and safety between oral anticoagulant (OAC) users and non-users.

METHODS

We conducted a new-user retrospective cohort study by using Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments linked with Medicare claims. The participants were Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with atrial fibrillation residing in US nursing homes between 2011 and 2016, aged ≥ 65 years. The primary outcomes were occurrence of an ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (effectiveness), occurrence of intracranial or extracranial bleeding (safety) and net clinical outcome (effectiveness or safety outcomes). Secondary outcomes included total mortality and a net clinical and mortality outcome. Cox proportional hazards and Fine and Grey models estimated multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and sub-distribution hazard ratios (sHRs).

RESULTS

Outcome rates were low (effectiveness: OAC: 0.86; non-users: 1.73; safety: OAC: 2.26; non-users: 1.75 (per 100 person-years)). OAC use was associated with a lower rate of the effectiveness outcome (sHR: 0.69; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.61-0.77), higher rates of the safety (sHR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.58-1.84) and net clinical outcomes (sHR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.13-1.28) lower rate of all-cause mortality outcome (sHR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.59-0.61), and lower rate of the net clinical and mortality outcome (sHR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.59-0.61). Warfarin users, but not DOAC users, had a higher rate of the net clinical outcome versus OAC non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the benefits of treatment with OACs to prevent ischemic strokes and increase longevity, while highlighting the need to weigh apparent benefits against elevated risk for bleeding. Results were consistent with net favorability of DOACs versus warfarin.