Postoperative Application of Dexmedetomidine is the Optimal Strategy to Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Delirium After Cardiac Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Impact of perioperative dexmedetomidine treatment on 1-year mortality in patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation

Background

Heart transplantation remains the gold standard treatment of end stage heart failure. The prognosis of heart transplantation has continuously improved, with a 10-yr survival of 53%. Dexmedetomidine is commonly used as a sedative in cardiac patients. Recently its clinical use has been limited because it was associated with increased mortality in the SPICE 3 trial. The impact of perioperative dexmedetomidine treatment on patients undergoing heart transplantation has not been examined yet. Therefore, this study investigated the influence of dexmedetomidine treatment on 1-yr mortality in patients undergoing heart transplantation.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent heart transplantation at the University Hospital Duesseldorf between 2011 and 2021. The main exposure was perioperative dexmedetomidine treatment. The primary endpoint was 1-yr mortality after surgery. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate cox regression with adjustment for risk index for mortality prediction after cardiac transplantation (IMPACT) and packed red blood cells were performed.

Results

A total of 267 patients were screened. To avoid a potential selection bias, patients who needed postoperative treatment with extracorporeal life support system were excluded, leaving 169 patients included in the analysis. Out of 169 patients, 85 received perioperative dexmedetomidine treatment and 84 were not treated with dexmedetomidine. Overall, 1-yr mortality was 10.3% (dexmedetomidine 4.9% vs no dexmedetomidine 15.5%, P=0.025). After adjustment for IMPACT score and packed red blood cells, dexmedetomidine treatment was independently associated with lower 1-yr mortality after heart transplantation (hazard ratio: 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.93, P=0.03).

Conclusion

Perioperative dexmedetomidine treatment appears to be safe regarding 1-yr mortality in patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation.

Perioperative neurocognitive dysfunction and role of dexmedetomidine in radical colon cancer surgery in elderly patients

This article explored the application of dexmedetomidine (Dex), a highly selective alpha-2 agonist, in managing postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in elderly patients undergoing radical colon cancer surgery. Aging is associated with a progressive decline in physiological functions and an increased risk of adverse surgical outcomes, including POCD, which encompasses many neurocognitive disorders that manifest during the perioperative period. The aging population is at a higher risk for POCD, which can lead to prolonged hospital stays, delayed recovery, and increased healthcare costs. Dex has neuroprotective, opioid-sparing, and sympatholytic properties, which reduces the incidence and severity of POCD. Dex was introduced for sedation in patients receiving mechanical ventilation but has since been adopted in anesthesia due to its multifaceted benefits. Its application extends to sedation, analgesia, maintenance of anesthesia, and controlling delirium. Its neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects have been explored in managing POCD. This article discussed the broad range of patient and procedure-related risk factors for POCD. Early identification and intervention are crucial to prevent the progression of POCD, which can have severe physical, psychological, and economic consequences. The article underscored the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in managing POCD, involving the optimization of comorbidities, depth of anesthesia monitoring, hemodynamic stability, and cerebral oxygenation monitoring.

Remifentanil vs. dexmedetomidine for cardiac surgery patients with noninvasive ventilation intolerance: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The optimal sedative regime for noninvasive ventilation (NIV) intolerance remains uncertain. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of remifentanil (REM) compared to dexmedetomidine (DEX) in cardiac surgery patients with moderate-to-severe intolerance to NIV.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled study, adult cardiac surgery patients with moderate-to-severe intolerance to NIV were enrolled and randomly assigned to be treated with either REM or DEX for sedation. The status of NIV intolerance was evaluated using a four-point NIV intolerance score at different timepoints within a 72-h period. The primary outcome was the mitigation rate of NIV intolerance following sedation.

RESULTS

A total of 179 patients were enrolled, with 89 assigned to the REM group and 90 to the DEX group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups, including NIV intolerance score [3, interquartile range (IQR) 3-3 vs. 3, IQR 3-4, p = 0.180]. The chi-squared test showed that mitigation rate, defined as the proportion of patients who were relieved from their initial intolerance status, was not significant at most timepoints, except for the 15-min timepoint (42% vs. 20%, p = 0.002). However, after considering the time factor, generalized estimating equations showed that the difference was statistically significant, and REM outperformed DEX (odds ratio = 3.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.35-8.12, p = 0.009). Adverse effects, which were not reported in the REM group, were encountered by nine patients in the DEX group, with three instances of bradycardia and six cases of severe hypotension. Secondary outcomes, including NIV failure (5.6% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.564), tracheostomy (1.12% vs. 0%, p = 0.313), ICU LOS (7.7 days, IQR 5.8-12 days vs. 7.0 days, IQR 5-10.6 days, p = 0.219), and in-hospital mortality (1.12% vs. 2.22%, p = 0.567), demonstrated comparability between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, our study demonstrated no significant difference between REM and DEX in the percentage of patients who achieved mitigation among cardiac surgery patients with moderate-to-severe NIV intolerance. However, after considering the time factor, REM was significantly superior to DEX. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04734418), registered on January 22, 2021. URL of the trial registry record: https://register.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S000AM4S&selectaction=Edit&uid=U00038YX&ts=3&cx=eqn1z0 .

The effect of perioperative dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine is considered to have neuroprotective effects and may reduce postoperative delirium in both cardiac and major non-cardiac surgeries. Compared with non-cardiac surgery, the delirium incidence is extremely high after cardiac surgery, which could be caused by neuroinflammation induced by surgical stress and CPB. Thus, it is essential to explore the potential benefits of dexmedetomidine on the incidence of delirium in cardiac surgery under CPB.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials studying the effect of perioperative dexmedetomidine on the delirium incidence in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB were considered to be eligible. Data collection was conducted by two reviewers independently. The pre-specified outcome of interest is delirium incidence. RoB 2 was used to perform risk of bias assessment by two reviewers independently. The random effects model and Mantel-Haenszel statistical method were selected to pool effect sizes for each study.

RESULTS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to June 28, 2023. Sixteen studies including 3381 participants were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. Perioperative dexmedetomidine reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB compared with the other sedatives, placebo, or normal saline (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.41-0.79; P = 0.0009; I2 = 61%).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative administration of dexmedetomidine could reduce the postoperative delirium occurrence in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. However, there is relatively significant heterogeneity among the studies. And the included studies comprise many early-stage small sample trials, which may lead to an overestimation of the beneficial effects. It is necessary to design the large-scale RCTs to further confirm the potential benefits of dexmedetomidine in cardiac surgery with CPB.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023452410.

Effects of dexmedetomidine on postoperative pain and early cognitive impairment in older male patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on postoperative pain and early cognitive impairment in old male patients, who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). A total of 97 old patients, subjected to LC at the 980 Hospital of the Joint Service Support Force of the People's Liberation Army of China, were randomly divided into two groups, namely the DEX and normal saline groups. Patients in the DEX group received an intravenous infusion of 0.8 µg/kg DEX within 10 min following general anesthesia, followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.5 µg/(kg/h). Furthermore, patients in the normal saline group were treated with an equivalent volume of normal saline. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) tests at 6 h, 1, 2 and 3 days, postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and postoperative adverse events were recorded for both groups. In addition, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score was utilized to assess the pain level of all patients, while the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale was employed to analyze the postoperative recovery results. Therefore, the MoCA score was higher in the DEX group compared with the normal saline group at 6 h and day 1 postoperatively. Additionally, the MMSE score was higher at 6 h postoperatively in the DEX group compared with the normal saline group. Correspondingly, the incidence of POCD was lower in the DEX group compared with the normal saline group at 6 h and day 1, after LC (P<0.05). VAS score in resting state for patients in the DEX group was significantly lower compared with the normal-saline group (P<0.05). Furthermore, the QoR-15 scale score in patients in the DEX group was notably increased compared with the normal saline group on the first and second days after the operation (P<0.05). Overall, the present study verified that the continuous infusion of DEX at a rate of 0.5 µg/(kg/h) during LC could effectively reduce the incidence of early POCD and alleviate postoperative pain in old male patients, thus facilitating postoperative recovery.