1
|
Borgonovo F, Quici M, Gidaro A, Giustivi D, Cattaneo D, Gervasoni C, Calloni M, Martini E, La Cava L, Antinori S, Cogliati C, Gori A, Foschi A. Physicochemical Characteristics of Antimicrobials and Practical Recommendations for Intravenous Administration: A Systematic Review. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1338. [PMID: 37627758 PMCID: PMC10451375 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12081338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Most antimicrobial drugs need an intravenous (IV) administration to achieve maximum efficacy against target pathogens. IV administration is related to complications, such as tissue infiltration and thrombo-phlebitis. This systematic review aims to provide practical recommendations about diluent, pH, osmolarity, dosage, infusion rate, vesicant properties, and phlebitis rate of the most commonly used antimicrobial drugs evaluated in randomized controlled studies (RCT) till 31 March 2023. The authors searched for available IV antimicrobial drugs in RCT in PUBMED EMBASE®, EBSCO® CINAHL®, and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical trials. Drugs' chemical features were searched online, in drug data sheets, and in scientific papers, establishing that the drugs with a pH of <5 or >9, osmolarity >600 mOsm/L, high incidence of phlebitis reported in the literature, and vesicant drugs need the adoption of utmost caution during administration. We evaluated 931 papers; 232 studies were included. A total of 82 antimicrobials were identified. Regarding antibiotics, 37 reach the "caution" criterion, as well as seven antivirals, 10 antifungals, and three antiprotozoals. In this subgroup of antimicrobials, the correct vascular access device (VAD) selection is essential to avoid complications due to the administration through a peripheral vein. Knowing the physicochemical characteristics of antimicrobials is crucial to improve the patient's safety significantly, thus avoiding administration errors and local side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Borgonovo
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Quici
- Internal Medicine Unit, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Gidaro
- Internal Medicine Unit, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Davide Giustivi
- Emergency Department and Vascular Access Team ASST Lodi, 26900 Lodi, Italy
| | - Dario Cattaneo
- Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Gervasoni
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Calloni
- Internal Medicine Unit, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Martini
- Internal Medicine Unit, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Leyla La Cava
- Internal Medicine Unit, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Spinello Antinori
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Cogliati
- Internal Medicine Unit, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Gori
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonella Foschi
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Luigi Sacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, University of Milan, 20157 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Logman JFS, Stephens J, Heeg B, Haider S, Cappelleri J, Nathwani D, Tice A, van Hout BA. Comparative effectiveness of antibiotics for the treatment of MRSA complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Curr Med Res Opin 2010; 26:1565-78. [PMID: 20429820 DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2010.481251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With a growing number of studies and comparators in MRSA skin infections, a unified framework for comparing treatments is needed for health technology assessment (HTA). The objective was to systematically assess the success rates of common antimicrobial agents for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) caused by MRSA. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify published clinical trials in which dalbavancin, daptomycin, linezolid, telavancin, teicoplanin, tigecycline, and vancomycin were used to treat cSSTIs. Pooled efficacy estimates were generated from clinical and microbiological determinations of success for the MRSA-subgroups in cSSTI clinical trials using a Bayesian meta-analytic approach. Success rates for each antibiotic were reported with 95% Bayesian confidence intervals (called credible intervals [CrI]). In sensitivity analyses the impact of different model parameters and article quality were investigated. RESULTS Out of 36 identified studies, 14 studies on six antibiotics with 28 treatment arms (n = 1840) were included in the analysis. No MRSA data in cSSTI were found for teicoplanin. The pooled success rate and CrI(95%) for each agent was: vancomycin (74.7%; CrI(95%): 64.1%-83.5%), dalbavancin (87.7%; CrI(95%): 74.6%-95.4%), linezolid (84.4%; CrI(95%): 76.6%-90.6%), telavancin (83.5%; CrI(95%): 73.6%-90.8%), daptomycin (78.1%; CrI(95%): 54.6%-93.2%) and tigecycline (70.4%; CrI(95%): 48.0%-87.6%). Comparisons between antibiotics suggested differences versus vancomycin for linezolid (+9.7%; CrI(95%): 4.4%-15.8%), dalbavancin (+13.1%; CrI(95%): 1.0%-23.8%), and telavancin (+8.8%; CrI(95%): 1.5-16.7%). The finding of lower vancomycin efficacy in MRSA cSSTI did not change in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION The results of this meta-analysis suggest higher success rates for linezolid and the new glycopeptides (dalbavancin and telavancin) in MRSA-confirmed cSSTIs. The uncertainty margins reflect the study limitations including number of cases and indirect nature of the comparisons. This example of Bayesian meta-analysis for MRSA cSSTI provides a potential framework for comparisons that is useful for HTA and formulary decision-making.
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cellulitis and erysipelas are now usually considered manifestations of the same condition, a skin infection associated with severe pain and systemic symptoms. A range of antibiotic treatments are suggested in guidelines. OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and safety of interventions for non-surgically-acquired cellulitis. SEARCH STRATEGY In May 2010 we searched for randomised controlled trials in the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the ongoing trials databases. SELECTION CRITERIA We selected randomised controlled trials comparing two or more different interventions for cellulitis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS We included 25 studies with a total of 2488 participants. Our primary outcome 'symptoms rated by participant or medical practitioner or proportion symptom-free' was commonly reported. No two trials examined the same drugs, therefore we grouped similar types of drugs together.Macrolides/streptogramins were found to be more effective than penicillin antibiotics (Risk ratio (RR) 0.84, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.97). In 3 trials involving 419 people, 2 of these studies used oral macrolide against intravenous (iv) penicillin demonstrating that oral therapies can be more effective than iv therapies (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.98).Three studies with a total of 88 people comparing a penicillin with a cephalosporin showed no difference in treatment effect (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.43).Six trials which included 538 people that compared different generations of cephalosporin, showed no difference in treatment effect (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to1.06).We found only small single studies for duration of antibiotic treatment, intramuscular versus intravenous route, the addition of corticosteroid to antibiotic treatment compared with antibiotic alone, and vibration therapy, so there was insufficient evidence to form conclusions. Only two studies investigated treatments for severe cellulitis and these selected different antibiotics for their comparisons, so we cannot make firm conclusions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We cannot define the best treatment for cellulitis and most recommendations are made on single trials. There is a need for trials to evaluate the efficacy of oral antibiotics against intravenous antibiotics in the community setting as there are service implications for cost and comfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally A Kilburn
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, University of Portsmouth, James Watson West, 2 King Richard 1st Road, Portsmouth, Hampshire, UK, PO1 2FR
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lindbeck G, Powers R. Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. Management of serious infections. Part II: Amenable infections and models for delivery. Cellulitis. HOSPITAL PRACTICE (OFFICE ED.) 1993; 28 Suppl 2:10-4; discussion 57. [PMID: 8325921 DOI: 10.1080/21548331.1993.11442940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Most patients with cellulitis can be managed on an outpatient basis, frequently with a single dose of parenteral antibiotic followed by oral therapy. Cellulitis must first be differentiated from more serious soft tissue infections that require aggressive inpatient therapy and perhaps surgery. Patients with preexisting medical conditions, such as diabetes, need to be carefully followed if treated as outpatients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Lindbeck
- University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville
| | | |
Collapse
|