Implications of the study population in the early evaluation of anticholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's disease

Association of cognitive enhancers and incident seizure risk in dementia: a population-based study

Background

Although individuals with dementia have a high risk of developing seizures, whether seizures are associated with cholinesterase inhibitors, which are commonly prescribed to treat individuals with dementia, remains unknown. This study investigated the risk of incident seizure following cholinesterase inhibitor use in patients with dementia.

Methods

A nationwide, nested case-control study was conducted using data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) from 2014 through 2018. A total of 13,767 participants aged 65–95 years who experienced incident seizure were propensity score-matched for medical comorbidities and drug exposure at a 1:3 ratio with a control group of 39,084 participants. The study examined the incidence of seizures in patients diagnosed with dementia within one year after receiving cognitive enhancers. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for seizure incidence according to cholinesterase inhibitor use were analyzed using a multivariable conditional logistic regression model.

Results

There was no statistically significant association between duration of cholinesterase inhibitors use and seizure risk. Although there was slight increased seizure risk in patient after receiving donepezil for 1 year compared to memantine, subgroup analyses stratified age and sex did not reveal any significant association between cholinesterase inhibitors use and late-onset seizure.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest no immediate increase in seizure risk is associated with cholinesterase inhibitor use, although the risk of seizure in patients with dementia did increase after one year of continued medication intake. Further study is required to obtain confirmatory results on the seizure-related safety of cognitive enhancers in patients with dementia.

Brasofensine treatment for Parkinson's disease in combination with levodopa/carbidopa

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties of the dopamine transporter antagonist brasofensine (BMS-204756) in patients with Parkinson's disease receiving levodopa/carbidopa treatment.

METHODS

A 4-period crossover study was performed in 8 men (mean age 66 y) with moderate Parkinson's disease (Hoehn-Yahr stage II-IV). A dose escalation study was used in which each patient was given a single oral dose of brasofensine 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 mg, which was coadministered with the patient's usual dose of levodopa/carbidopa.

RESULTS

The maximum concentration (Cmax) values of brasofensine observed in plasma after oral administration were 0.35, 0.82, 2.14, and 3.27 ng/mL for the 0.5-, 1-, 2-, and 4-mg doses, respectively; these concentrations occurred 4 hours (time to Cmax) after administration in all cases. Exposure to brasofensine (based on AUC0-infinity) increased at a rate greater than proportional to dose. Based on the motor performance subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, no change in patient disability was observed at any dose level.

CONCLUSIONS

Brasofensine was safe and well tolerated in the patient cohort studied at daily doses of up to 4 mg. Adverse events were generally mild in intensity, and included headache, insomnia, phlebitis, dizziness, ecchymosis, and vomiting.

Safety and tolerability of metrifonate in patients with Alzheimer's disease: results of a maximum tolerated dose study

Metrifonate, a pro-drug that is transformed non-enzymatically into a potent inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), has been used in the tropics for over 30 years for the treatment of schistosomiasis. A pilot study, and Phase I and Phase II studies of metrifonate in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients conducted prior to the current study showed benign, dose-dependent adverse event profiles consisting primarily of gastrointestinal events, optimal daily dosing with a loading phase (in the absence of a loading dose phase, 6-8 weeks were required to attain steady-state AChE inhibition levels), and an improvement in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) scores. The current open-label study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of relatively high loading doses, followed by lower maintenance doses of metrifonate in the same patient population, and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of metrifonate. Accordingly, the first cohort of 8 probable AD patients (per National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association [NINCDS-ADRDA] criteria) were administered once-daily loading doses of 2.5 mg/kg (125-225 mg) for 14 days, followed by 4.0 mg/kg (200-360 mg) for an additional 3 days. These patients were maintained on once-daily doses of 2.0 mg/kg (100-180 mg) for 14 days. AChE inhibition for this cohort ranged from 88% to 94%. On Day 28 of 31, this cohort was discontinued due to moderate to severe side effects in 6 patients; consequently, the second cohort of 8 probable AD patients received a once-daily loading dose of 2.5 mg/kg (125-225 mg) for 14 days followed by a once-daily maintenance dose of 1.5 mg/kg (75-135 mg) for 35 days. This maintenance dose yielded an AChE inhibition level ranging from 89% to 91%. In spite of an AChE inhibition level comparable to that achieved with the higher dose, the reduced dose was associated with a more favorable adverse event profile which was mainly gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal in nature. The maximum tolerated dose was established at 1.5 mg/kg/day (75-135 mg/day) for maintenance dosing in AD patients.

Evaluation of cycloserine in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease

This multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cycloserine and measured its effects on explicit and implicit memory tests in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Four hundred ten patients with AD, aged 50 years or older, were enrolled in this parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of 5, 15, or 50 mg cycloserine or placebo twice daily, and 403 entered the double-blind treatment phase. Two hundred sixty-five patients completed the entire 26-week treatment phase. There were no baseline differences among the four treatment groups. Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) efficacy assessments showed no differences between active treatments and placebo from baseline to study weeks 2, 6, 14, or 26. Patients receiving 15 mg of cycloserine improved significantly on one section of an implicit memory test. No differences among treatments were observed for any other assessment scales evaluated. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar across treatment groups. Cycloserine was well tolerated but did not demonstrate consistent evidence of efficacy during the course of therapy. Higher doses may be necessary to achieve efficacy in the AD population and do not appear to be precluded by the adverse event profile seen in this study.

The safety and tolerance of xanomeline tartrate in patients with Alzheimer's disease

Xanomeline tartrate (active ingredient xanomeline) is a muscarinic agonist that has demonstrated specificity for the M1 receptor in preclinical studies and has been well tolerated at dosages up to 50 mg three times a day in healthy elderly subjects. To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of xanomeline tartrate in patients with Alzheimer's disease, 48 patients (20 men, 28 women) with probable Alzheimer's disease were enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled inpatient study to determine the safety and tolerability of 8 fixed dosages of xanomeline tartrate (25, 35, 50, 60, 75, 90, 100, and 115 mg, all three times a day) given for 7 days. For each dosage the treatment panel consisted of six patients (four taking xanomeline tartrate and two taking placebo). With the discontinuation of two patients because of severe intolerable adverse events, a minimum intolerated dose was reached at 115 mg three times a day, and 100 mg three times a day was defined as the MTD. This MTD in patients was two-fold greater than the MTD previously determined in healthy elderly volunteers.

Safety and tolerability of CI-979 in patients with Alzheimer's disease

CI-979 ((E)-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-1-methyl-3-pyridinecarboxaldehyde, O-methyloxime monohydrochloride), a novel muscarinic agonist, is being investigated as a potential treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD). The objective of the present study was to determine the safety and tolerance of multiple, rising, oral doses of CI-979 in patients with AD. Ten male patients aged 59 to 74 years (mean 65 years) who met NINCDS criteria for AD were randomized to receive either CI-979 (eight patients) or placebo (two patients) according to a double-blind, parallel-group, rising-dose design. Doses were 0.5-mg q6h, 1-mg q12h, 1-mg q6h, 2-mg q12h, 2-mg q6h, 2.5-mg q6h, and 3-mg q6h. All doses were to be administered sequentially for 3 days each with the exception of the 2.5-mg q6h dose, which was to be administered for 1.5 days. Five patients receiving CI-979 discontinued study medication because of adverse events; two after receiving 2-mg q6h (10 doses), two after 2.5-mg q6h (5 doses), and one after 3-mg q6h (4 doses). The study was terminated following administration of the fourth 3-mg dose due to the nature and intensity of adverse events. Cholinergic symptoms including diaphoresis, hypersalivation, nausea, diarrhea, hypotension, chills, headache, flatulence, and urinary frequency and signs suggestive of parkinsonism (cogwheeling, tremor, pillrolling, posturing, and shuffling gait) were dose-limiting. The frequency and intensity of adverse events increased with increasing CI-979 dose. No other clinically significant CI-979-related changes occurred in physical examinations, clinical laboratory measurements, electrocardiograms, or ophthalmologic examinations. Steady-state trough plasma CI-979 concentrations increased in proportion to dose. In summary, CI-979 doses of 1-mg q6h were well tolerated by all patients; 2-mg q6h was tolerated by most patients, and 2.5-mg and 3-mg doses were poorly tolerated, Dose titration to a maximum of 2-mg q6h will therefore be used in initial efficacy trials of CI-979 in patients with AD.