Amphotericin B is incompatible with lipid emulsions

Role of diuretics and lipid formulations in the prevention of amphotericin B-induced nephrotoxicity

PURPOSE

To collect available clinical data to define the role of diuretics and lipid formulations in the prevention of amphotericin B (AmB)-induced nephrotoxicity (AIN) in human populations.

METHOD

A literature search was performed in the following databases: Scopus, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Co-administration of mannitol failed to show any clinically significant benefit in preventing AIN. Potassium-sparing diuretics, such as amiloride and spironolactone, have been shown to have beneficial effects as an alternative or adjunct to oral/parenteral potassium supplements in preventing hypokalemia due to AmB. Lipid-based formulations of AmB are clinically effective and safe in preventing AIN. However, due to their high cost and limited accessibility, these formulations are generally used as second-line antifungal therapy in cases of conventional AmB refractoriness and/or intolerance or pre-existing renal dysfunction. The potential effects of other nephroprotective agents, such as N-acetylcysteine, AIN merit further considerations and investigations.

New agents for the treatment of systemic fungal infections – current status

Systemic antifungal chemotherapy is enjoying its most dynamic era. More antifungal agents are under development than ever before, including agents in entirely new classes. Major goals of current investigations are to identify compounds with a wide spectrum of activity, minimal toxicity and a high degree of target specificity. The antifungal drugs in development include new azoles {voriconazole, posaconazole (formerly SCH-56592), ravuconazole (formerly BMS-207147)}, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, a lipid formulation of nystatin, echinocandins {anidulafungin (formerly, LY-303366, VER-002), caspofungin (formerly MK-991), micafungin (formerly FK-463)}, antifungal peptides other than echinocandins, and sordarin derivatives. This discussion reviews the currently available antifungal agents and summarises the developmental issues that surround these new systemic antifungal drugs.

Antifungal therapy--state of the art at the beginning of the 21st century

The most relevant information on the present state of the art of antifungal chemotherapy is reviewed in this chapter. For dermatomycoses a variety of topical antifungals are available, and safe and efficacious systemic treatment, especially with the fungicidal drug terbinafine, is possible. The duration of treatment can be drastically reduced. Substantial progress in the armamentarium of drugs for invasive fungal infections has been made, and a new class of antifungals, echinocandins, is now in clinical use. The following drugs in oral and/or intravenous formulations are available: the broad spectrum polyene amphotericin B with its new "clothes"; the sterol biosynthesis inhibitors fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole; the glucan synthase inhibitor caspofungin; and the combination partner flucytosine. New therapy schedules have been studied; combination therapy has found a significant place in the treatment of severely compromised patients, and the field of prevention and empiric therapy is fast moving. Guidelines exist nowadays for the treatment of various fungal diseases and maintenance therapy. New approaches interfering with host defenses or pathogenicity of fungal cells are being investigated, and molecular biologists are looking for new targets studying the genomics of pathogenic fungi.

A randomized prospective trial of amphotericin B lipid emulsion versus dextrose colloidal solution in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Amphotericin B is the agent of choice for most invasive fungal infections in critically ill patients. It is associated with at least a 50% incidence of nephrotoxicity, despite prophylactic measures such as sodium loading. Newer formulations of amphotericin B are available but are costly and have unknown bioavailability in critically ill patients. Previous trials in neutropenic and critically ill patients have demonstrated that mixing amphotericin B with 20% lipid solution (Intralipid; Clintec Nutrition, Deerfield, III) may decrease nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

In this randomized, prospective clinical trial, patients with positive fungal blood cultures, tracheal/sputum cultures or peritoneal cavity cultures were randomized to receive either 0.5 mg/kg per day of amphotericin B dextrose or 1.0 mg/kg per day of amphotericin B lipid emulsion. Duration of therapy was determined by the primary care team. Weekly 24-hour creatinine clearance was measured until 2 weeks after amphotericin B therapy was completed.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar based on age, white blood cell count, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance at the beginning of therapy. The group receiving amphotericin B lipid emulsion had significantly less decrease in creatinine clearance compared with controls, despite receiving significantly more amphotericin B.

CONCLUSION

Amphotericin B lipid emulsion can be given at a higher total cumulative dose than amphotericin B dextrose with less nephrotoxicity.

Amphotericin B in lipid emulsion: stability, compatibility, and in vitro antifungal activity

Newer formulations of amphotericin B (AmB) complexed with liposomes or lipid suspensions have been developed. Preliminary studies have suggested that AmB in Intralipid (IL) may be as effective as, but less toxic than, conventional formulations of AmB, but few data are available regarding its stability, compatibility, or in vitro antifungal activity. A compatibility study was done to evaluate the effects of AmB concentrations in IL containing either 10 or 20% soybean oil. The effects of temperature, shaking, and AmB and IL concentrations on the stability of AmB-IL suspensions were analyzed by visual inspection and liquid chromatography. The in vitro antifungal activity of AmB-IL, compared to that of AmB alone against reference strains of Candida species was determined by using a broth macrodilution method in accordance with National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines (M27-T). Samples of AmB-IL which were lightly shaken retained more than 90% of the AmB concentration over 21 days when stored at either 4 or 23 degrees C. Varying the AmB concentration did not appear to affect the stability of AmB-IL. However, a precipitate was formed when mixtures with more than 30% lipid as a proportion of the total volume were centrifuged. AmB-IL and AmB alone had similar in vitro antifungal activities against reference strains of yeasts. Further pharmacologic and clinical studies with AmB-IL are warranted, although AmB should not be combined with IL in concentrations capable of producing a precipitate.