Severe minocycline-induced eosinophilic pneumonia: extrapulmonary manifestations and the use of in vitro immunoassays

Adverse Drug Reactions in the Intensive Care Unit

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are undesirable effects of medications used in normal doses [1]. ADRs can occur during treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU) or result in ICU admissions. A meta-analysis of 4139 studies suggests the incidence of ADRs among hospitalized patients is 17% [2]. Because of underreporting and misdiagnosis, the incidence of ADRs may be much higher and has been reported to be as high as 36% [3]. Critically ill patients are at especially high risk because of medical complexity, numerous high-alert medications, complex and often challenging drug dosing and medication regimens, and opportunity for error related to the distractions of the ICU environment [4]. Table 1 summarizes the ADRs included in this chapter.

Mesalazine-induced eosinophilic pneumonia with bone marrow infiltration: a case report and literature review

Mesalazine-induced eosinophilic pneumonia has been rarely reported. We reported a case of mesalazine-induced eosinophilic pneumonia in a 56-year-old female who took mesalazine without a prescription for suspected ulcerative colitis. She had an elevated eosinophil count in peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Eosinophil infiltration was also noted in bone marrow aspirates. Chest radiograph and computed tomography demonstrated bilateral upper lung predominant infiltrates and spirometry showed a restrictive ventilatory defect with a reduced diffusion capacity. The patient recovered after cessation of mesalazine therapy. Mesalazine-induced lung damage should be considered in patients who develop unexplained respiratory symptoms while taking this agent.

Safety of doxycycline and minocycline: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this review was to summarize the available literature covering the safety profiles of oral doxycycline and minocycline.

METHODS

Scientific literature published between 1966 and August 2003 was searched using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Biosis databases (search terms: minocycline or doxycycline, each paired with adverse reaction, adverse event, and side effect, and doxycycline or minocycline with the limits English language, human, and clinical trials). Safety information was collected from case reports and clinical trials. Adverse event (AE) rates in the United States were calculated by comparing data from the MedWatch AE reporting program used by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with the number of new prescriptions dispensed for each drug from January 1998 to August 2003.

RESULTS

Between 1966 and 2003, a total of 130 and 333 AEs were published in case reports of doxycycline and minocycline, respectively. In 24 doxycycline clinical trials (n = 3833) and 11 minocycline trials (n = 788), the ranges in incidence of AEs were 0% to 61% and 11.7% to 83.3%, respectively. Gastrointestinal AEs were most common with doxycycline; central nervous system and gastrointestinal AEs were most common with minocycline. From January 1998 to August 2003, the FDA MedWatch data contained 628 events for doxycycline and 1099 events for minocycline reported in the United States. Approximately 47,630,000 doxycycline and 15,234,000 minocycline new prescriptions were dispensed in the United States during that period, yielding event rates of 13 per million for doxycycline and 72 per million for minocycline, based on FDA data.

CONCLUSIONS

Between 1998 and 2003, doxycycline was prescribed 3 times as often as minocycline. The incidence of AEs with either drug is very low, but doxycycline had fewer reported AEs. Although more head-to-head clinical trials are needed for a direct comparison of AE frequency, these preliminary data from separate reports suggest the possibility that AEs may be less likely with doxycycline than minocycline.

Eosinophilic meningitis after implantation of a rifampin and minocycline-impregnated ventriculostomy catheter in a child. Case report

Eosinophilic meningitis has been defined as meningitis in which a total cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample is found to have more than 10 eosinophils per millimeter or is composed of greater than 10% eosinophils. The differential diagnosis is broad and the clinical presentation, lacking an internalized CSF diversion system, is often nonspecific. With respect to patients with shunt systems, a positive correlation exists between CSF eosinophilia and eventual shunt failure requiring revision. In this paper the authors present the highest reported level of CSF eosinophilia in conjunction with a rifampin and minocycline-impregnated ventriculostomy catheter recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

Relapsing acute respiratory failure induced by minocycline

The antibiotic minocycline, which is used in the treatment of acne, has been associated with various pulmonary complications such as pulmonary lupus and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. We now report a particularly severe case of minocycline-related pulmonary toxicity that was characterized by a relapsing form of hypersensitivity eosinophilic pneumonia complicated by acute respiratory failure.

Minocycline-induced pericardial effusion

OBJECTIVE

To describe a reversible hypersensitivity reaction characterized by pericardial effusion and acute mixed liver injury in a woman treated with minocycline.

CASE SUMMARY

A 39-year-old white woman developed dyspnea and chest pain with pericardial effusion on echocardiography approximately 20 days after starting minocycline treatment. Additional manifestations consisted of eosinophilia and liver injury. No lung, skin, or joint involvement was noted; antinuclear antibody testing was negative.

DISCUSSION

Minocycline has been associated with rare but severe hypersensitivity reactions and autoimmune disorders, generally involving the lungs, skin, or joints. We observed a patient with an unusual minocycline-induced reaction with pericardial effusion and acute mixed liver injury. The number of spontaneously reported cases in national and international databases indicates that minocycline-induced pericardial effusion is very rare as a main clinical manifestation.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of pericardial effusion without lung, skin, or joint involvement as an adverse effect of minocycline.

Benefits and risks of minocycline in rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting about 1% of the adult population. The pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis remains incompletely understood. An infectious aetiology of the disease has long been postulated, but not proved. Despite insufficient evidence for the infectious nature of this disorder, several antibacterials, such as sulfa compounds, tetracyclines and rifampicin, have been investigated in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. In the last few years, minocycline, a semi-synthetic derivative of tetracycline, has been extensively studied as a therapeutic agent for rheumatoid arthritis. The antirheumatic effect of minocycline can be related to its immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory, rather than to its antibacterial properties. Its efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis has been reported in 2 open trials and in 3 double-blind controlled studies. The first 2 double-blind studies, 1 in The Netherlands and 1 in the US, were performed in patients with advanced disease. Both studies showed a modest, but statistically significant improvement in the clinical parameters of disease activity and in the erythrocyte sedimentation rate in the minocycline-treated patients. The US study also reported that patients in the minocycline group developed fewer erosions than those in the placebo group. This finding supports the role of minocycline as a disease modifying agent. The common adverse effects of minocycline reported in these 2 studies included gastrointestinal adverse effects, dizziness, rash and headaches. Less common adverse effects were intracranial hypertension, pneumonitis, persistent skin and mucosal hyperpigmentation, lupus-like syndrome and acute hepatic injury. The third double-blind study enrolled only seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients with early disease (less than 1 year duration), and showed very encouraging results of significant improvement in the disease activity parameters in the minocycline treated group of patients. The same authors later reported that about half of these patients were in or near remission after 3 years of follow up. No adverse effects were reported in this study. Summarising the data of these 3 double-blind studies, we may conclude that minocycline may be beneficial in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, especially when given early in the disease course or in patients with a mild disease.