1
|
Cully JA, Hundt NE, Fletcher T, Sansgiry S, Zeno D, Kauth MR, Kunik ME, Sorocco K. Brief Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Community Clinics: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial. Psychiatr Serv 2024; 75:237-245. [PMID: 37674395 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors examined whether brief cognitive-behavioral therapy (bCBT) for depression, delivered by mental health providers in community-based outpatient clinics (CBOCs) of the Veterans Health Administration, improved depression outcomes and was feasible and acceptable in clinical settings. METHODS The authors used a type-2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation, patient-randomized trial to compare bCBT with enhanced usual care. Participants (N=189) with moderate symptoms of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] score ≥10) were enrolled from CBOCs in the southern United States. bCBT (N=109) consisted of three to six sessions, delivered by mental health providers (N=17) as part of routine clinic practices. Providers received comprehensive training and support to facilitate bCBT delivery. Recipients of enhanced usual care (N=80) were given educational materials and encouraged to discuss treatment options with their primary care provider. The primary effectiveness outcome was PHQ-9-assessed depression symptoms posttreatment (4 months after baseline) and at 8- and 12-month follow-ups. Implementation outcomes focused on bCBT dose received, provider fidelity, and satisfaction with bCBT training and support. RESULTS bCBT improved depression symptoms (Cohen's d=0.55, p<0.01) relative to enhanced usual care posttreatment, and the improvement was maintained at 8- and 12-month follow-ups (p=0.004). bCBT participants received a mean±SD of 3.7±2.7 sessions (range 0-9), and 64% completed treatment (≥3 sessions). Providers delivered bCBT with fidelity and reported that bCBT training and support were feasible and effective. CONCLUSIONS bCBT had a modest treatment footprint of approximately four sessions, was acceptable to participants and providers, was feasible for delivery in CBOCs, and produced meaningful sustained improvements in depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A Cully
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Cully, Hundt, Fletcher, Sansgiry, Zeno, Kauth, Kunik); VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), virtual (Zeno); Oklahoma City VA Health Care System and University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City (Sorocco)
| | - Natalie E Hundt
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Cully, Hundt, Fletcher, Sansgiry, Zeno, Kauth, Kunik); VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), virtual (Zeno); Oklahoma City VA Health Care System and University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City (Sorocco)
| | - Terri Fletcher
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Cully, Hundt, Fletcher, Sansgiry, Zeno, Kauth, Kunik); VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), virtual (Zeno); Oklahoma City VA Health Care System and University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City (Sorocco)
| | - Shubhada Sansgiry
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Cully, Hundt, Fletcher, Sansgiry, Zeno, Kauth, Kunik); VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), virtual (Zeno); Oklahoma City VA Health Care System and University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City (Sorocco)
| | - Darrell Zeno
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Cully, Hundt, Fletcher, Sansgiry, Zeno, Kauth, Kunik); VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), virtual (Zeno); Oklahoma City VA Health Care System and University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City (Sorocco)
| | - Michael R Kauth
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Cully, Hundt, Fletcher, Sansgiry, Zeno, Kauth, Kunik); VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), virtual (Zeno); Oklahoma City VA Health Care System and University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City (Sorocco)
| | - Mark E Kunik
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Cully, Hundt, Fletcher, Sansgiry, Zeno, Kauth, Kunik); VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), virtual (Zeno); Oklahoma City VA Health Care System and University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City (Sorocco)
| | - Kristen Sorocco
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (Cully, Hundt, Fletcher, Sansgiry, Zeno, Kauth, Kunik); VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), virtual (Zeno); Oklahoma City VA Health Care System and University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City (Sorocco)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beehler GP, Funderburk JS, Possemato K, Dollar KM. Psychometric assessment of the Primary Care Behavioral Health Provider Adherence Questionnaire (PPAQ). Transl Behav Med 2013; 3:379-91. [PMID: 24294326 DOI: 10.1007/s13142-013-0216-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Adherence to protocol among behavioral health providers working in co-located, collaborative care or Primary Care Behavioral Health settings has rarely been assessed due to limited measurement options. Development of psychometrically sound measures of provider fidelity may improve the translation of these service delivery models into every day practice. One hundred seventy-three integrated behavioral health providers in VA primary care clinics responded to an online questionnaire to assess the reliability and validity of the Primary Care Behavioral Health Provider Adherence Questionnaire (PPAQ). Psychometric assessment resulted in a reliable 48-item measure with two subscales that specified essential and prohibited provider behaviors. The PPAQ demonstrated strong convergent and divergent validity when compared to another measure of health care integration. Known-group comparisons provided partial support for criterion validity. The PPAQ is a reliable and valid self-report of behavioral health provider fidelity with implications for improving provider training, program monitoring, and clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory P Beehler
- VA Center for Integrated Healthcare, VA WNY Healthcare System, 3495 Bailey Ave, Buffalo, NY 14215 USA ; School of Nursing, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY USA ; School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, NY USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
The veterans health care system administered by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) was established after World War I to provide health care for veterans who suffered from conditions related to their military service. It has grown to be the nation's largest integrated health care system. As the system grew, a number of factors contributed to its becoming increasingly dysfunctional. By the mid-1990s, VA health care was widely criticized for providing fragmented and disjointed care of unpredictable and irregular quality, which was expensive, difficult to access, and insensitive to individual needs. Between 1995 and 1999, the VA health care system was reengineered, focusing especially on management accountability, care coordination, quality improvement, resource allocation, and information management. Numerous systemic changes were implemented, producing dramatically improved quality, service, and operational efficiency. VA health care is now considered among the best in America, and the VA transformation is viewed as a model for health care reform.
Collapse
|