Effects of timely antibiotic administration and culture acquisition on the treatment of urinary tract infection

Report on 8th International Conference on Emergency Medicine

The following is a series of reports on the 8th International Conference on Emergency Medicine from our colleagues from the Hong Kong College of Emergency Medicine and the Hong Kong Society for Emergency Medicine and Surgery after they have attended this conference in Boston, USA in May 2000.

Appropriate antibiotic use reduces length of hospital stay

Objectives

To define appropriate antibiotic use in hospitalized adults treated for a bacterial infection, we previously developed and validated a set of six generic quality indicators (QIs) covering all steps in the process of antibiotic use. We assessed the association between appropriate antibiotic use, defined by these QIs, and length of hospital stay (LOS).

Methods

An observational multicentre study in 22 hospitals in the Netherlands included 1890 adult, non-ICU patients using antibiotics for a suspected bacterial infection. Performance scores were calculated for all QIs separately (appropriate or not), and a sum score described performance on the total set of QIs. We divided the sum scores into two groups: low (0%-49%) versus high (50%-100%). Multilevel analyses, correcting for confounders, were used to correlate QI performance (single and combined) with (log-transformed) LOS and in-hospital mortality.

Results

The only single QI associated with shorter LOS was appropriate intravenous-oral switch (geometric means 6.5 versus 11.2 days; P  < 0.001). A high sum score was associated with a shorter LOS in the total group (10.1 versus 11.2 days; P  = 0.002) and in the subgroup of community-acquired infections (9.7 versus 10.9 days; P  =   0.007), but not in the subgroup of hospital-acquired infections. We found no association between performance on QIs and in-hospital mortality or readmission rate.

Conclusions

Appropriate antibiotic use, defined by validated process QIs, in hospitalized adult patients with a suspected bacterial infection appears to be associated with a shorter LOS and therefore positively contributes to patient outcome and healthcare costs.

Antibiotic policy

There is a clear association between antibiotic use and resistance both on individual and population levels. In the European Union, countries with large antibiotic consumption have higher resistance rates. Antibiotic resistance leads to failed treatments, prolonged hospitalisations, increased costs and deaths. With few new antibiotics in the Research & Development pipeline, prudent antibiotic use is the only option to delay the development of resistance. Antibiotic policy consists of prescribing strategies to optimise the indication, selection, dosing, route of administration, duration and timing of antibiotic therapy to maximise clinical cure or prevention of infection whilst limiting the unintended consequences of antibiotic use, including toxicity and selection of resistant microorganisms. A secondary goal is to reduce healthcare costs without adversely affecting the quality of care. The purpose of this paper is to provide the evidence base of prudent antibiotic policy. Special emphasis is placed on urinary tract infections. The value and support of antibiotic committees, guidelines, ID consultants and/or antimicrobial stewardship teams to prolong the efficacy of available antibiotics will be discussed.

[Local guidelines and quality of antibiotic treatment in urinary tract infections: a clinical audit in two departments of a university hospital]

AIM

To assess the effect of local guidelines implemented at the Nantes University Hospital regarding antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infections.

DESIGN

Before/after study of one medical ward and one urologic surgery ward. Quality was measured by two principal criteria: compliance with guidelines and medical justification in the specific clinical situation. Both criteria considered simultaneously the choice of drug, dose and duration of treatment. Deviations from the guidelines were described.

RESULTS

1086 UTI cases were identified over two 12-month periods, before and after the dissemination of guidelines (for prostatitis, pyelonephritis, indwelling catheter-associated UTIs, and other undefined UTIs). The guidelines were applicable in 313 (30%) cases. Overall, after implementation of the guidelines, the percentage of justified prescriptions did not change significantly (41.8% compared with 38.7%, p=0.299), but the percentage of correct (conforming) prescriptions fell (from 30.4% to 15.7%, p=0.0022). The percentages of correct and justified prescriptions differed in the medical (respectively 45.0% and 46.6%,) and surgical units (13.1% and 36.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Issuing guidelines does not necessarily improve the quality of antibiotic therapy for UTIs in hospitals.

Bonnes pratiques de prescription des antibiotiques pour la prise en charge des infections urinaires en milieu hospitalier : identification des écarts aux recommandations et actions correctrices

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed the adequacy of antibiotic therapy prescribed for urinary tract infections (UTI): prostatitis, pyelonephritis, indwelling catheter-associated UTIs, or other undefined UTIs.

DESIGN

The adequacy of prescriptions to local guidelines was assessed retrospectively in two wards (Internal Medicine and Surgical Urology) of the Nantes University Hospital. The principal criteria involved simultaneously: choice of the molecule, dose, and treatment duration. Non-observances of guidelines were major (non-adequacy of the molecule, prescription of a non-active molecule according to in vitro susceptibility tests, non-appropriate treatment abstention), or minor (non-justified treatment, non-justified bitherapy, no prescription of bitherapy when requested, no treatment adaptation when requested, too short or too long treatment length, dosage mistakes).

RESULTS

One thousand eighty-six infections were collected over a 24-month period. The overall rate of adequate prescriptions was 40.1% (46.6% in Internal Medicine and 36.5% in Surgical Urology). In Internal Medicine (226 non observance among 389 prescriptions), the ratio of major non-observance of guidelines was 9.8%. Among them, 44.7% were non-appropriate treatment abstentions. In Surgical Urology (539 non observance out of 695 prescriptions), non-observance related to treatment length were the most frequent. The ratio of major non-observance was 19.9%. Among them, non-adequacy of the molecule reached 60.7%. Non-justified treatment and non-appropriate bitherapies were frequent.

CONCLUSIONS

For both units, indwelling catheter-related UTIs and other UTIs accounted for more than 50% of the infections although not detailed in the local guidelines. Identifying and analyzing Non observance may lead to targeted correcting actions to improve prescription quality.