KI-67 Antigen Expression Predicts Survival and Correlates with Histologic Subtype in the WHO Classification of Thymic Epithelial Tumors

Thymic Epithelial Tumors: An Evolving Field

Despite their rarity, thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) have attracted much interest over the years, leading to an impressive number of histological and staging classifications. At present, TETs are divided by the WHO classification into four main subtypes: type A, type AB, and type B thymomas (subdivided into B1, B2, and B3), and thymic carcinomas, going from the more indolent to the most aggressive ones. Among many debated staging proposals, the TNM and the Masaoka-Koga staging systems have been widely accepted and used in routine practice. The four-tiered histological classification is symmetrically mirrored by the molecular subgrouping of TETs, which identifies an A-like and an AB-like cluster, with frequent GTF2I and HRAS mutations; an intermediate B-like cluster, with a T-cell signaling profile; and a carcinoma-like cluster comprising thymic carcinomas with frequent CDKN2A and TP53 alterations and a high tumor molecular burden. Molecular investigations have opened the way to tailored therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting KIT, mTOR, and VEGFR, and immune-checkpoints that have been adopted as second-line systemic treatments. In this review, we discuss the crucial events that led to the current understanding of TETs, while disclosing the next steps in this intriguing field.

Expression patterns for Bcl-2, EMA, β-catenin, E-cadherin, PAX8, and MIB1 in thymomas

The expression of immunohistochemical markers has been extensively investigated in thymomas to assist in the differential diagnosis. We have studied six select markers to determine their utility in the evaluation of these tumors. A series of 126 thymomas including 33 type A, 27 type AB, 20 type B1, 22 type B2, and 24 type B3, were examined utilizing a tissue microarray (TMA) technique with antibodies to e-cadherin, β-catenin, PAX8, bcl-2, EMA, and MIB-1. Keratin AE1/AE3 and p63 were used for quality control. A significant finding was strong and consistent positivity for bcl-2 in type A (90%) and type AB (88.8%) thymoma, while 100% of B1, B2, and B3 were negative. The distribution of e-cadherin and β-catenin was not useful for differential diagnosis. E-cadherin and β-catenin were expressed in a high proportion of all the tumors (92-100%), except for B2 thymoma which showed only 45% expression. A significant increase in the expression of the MIB-1 proliferation marker (mean: 12.8% nuclear positivity) was also observed in B3 thymoma compared with the other histologic types. Statistical significance was confirmed using Kruskal's non-parameterized test for distribution. EMA was generally negative except for spindle cells in the fibrous septa in types A and AB thymoma. PAX8 showed less consistent nuclear staining than p63 and was only widely expressed in 55.7% of cases. Bcl-2 may serve as a useful marker to separate spindle cell thymomas (Type A and AB) from the other types, and the MIB1 proliferation index may be of use to differentiate type B2 from type B3 thymoma.

Thymoma and thymic carcinomas

Thymomas (Ts) and thymic carcinomas (TCs) are rare tumours of the mediastinum with an incidence rate of 1.7/million per year in Europe. Histological classification is based on rate of non-malignant-appearing thymic epithelial cells and proportions of lymphocytes (A, AB, B1, B2, B3, and C), while staging system concerns localisation of the involved areas. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment with a 10-year survival of 80%, 78%, 75%, and 42% for stages I, II, III and IV, respectively, with an R0 resection. Radiotherapy has a role in selected cases (stage III patients or R1-2 residual) and platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard of care for patients with advanced disease. A multimodality approach would be advisable when surgery is not recommended. Since molecular aberrations are poorly understood and few responses are reported, targeted therapies are yet being studied. In this review, we describe key aspects of clinical management for Ts and TCs.

Diagnostic significance of cell kinetic parameters in World Health Organization type A and B3 thymomas and thymic carcinomas

The prognostic importance of histologic classifications of thymic epithelial neoplasms is controversial. Evidence suggests that difficulties in reproducibility affect prognostic studies. Two thoracic pathologists independently classified 80 cases of type A or B3 thymoma and thymic carcinoma according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Ki-67 labeling index (LI) was used to identify cutoff points between WHO types. Recursive partitioning (Rpart) and ad hoc methods separated the data points. The pathologists agreed on type A (n = 31), type B3 (n = 21), and thymic carcinoma (n = 14). Ki-67 LI differed between types A and B3 (P < .001) and between thymic carcinoma and type A (P < .001) or type B3 (P = .001). Mitotic activity differed between thymic carcinoma and type A (P < .001) or type B3 (P < .001). Rpart revealed Ki-67 LI greater than 14.0% only in thymic carcinoma; cases with Ki-67 LI less than 5.1% did not represent thymic carcinoma. Ad hoc analysis showed Ki-67 LI greater than or equal to 13.5% represents thymic carcinoma; only type A had Ki-67 LI less than 2%. The pathologists disagreed on histologic type in 14 cases. In 11 of 14 cases with available Ki-67, the Rpart method predicted the WHO type; in 7 of 14 cases, the ad hoc method predicted the WHO type. In conclusion, Ki-67 LI is helpful in differentiating thymic epithelial neoplasms, with Ki-67 LI less than 2% and greater than or equal to 13.5% distinguishing type A thymoma and thymic carcinoma, respectively.

Thymic malignancies: from clinical management to targeted therapies

PURPOSE

A key challenge in the treatment of thymoma and thymic carcinoma (TC) is in improving our understanding of the molecular biology of these relatively rare tumors. In recent years, significant efforts have been made to dissect the molecular pathways involved in their carcinogenesis. Here we discuss the results of large-scale genomic analyses conducted to date and review the most active chemotherapies and targeted treatments.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature for chemotherapeutic trials in the last 20 years and trials involving targeted therapies between 1999 and 2010. The search was supplemented by a review of abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (from 1999 to 2010), at the first International Conference on Thymic Malignancies in 2009, and at a follow-up meeting of the newly formed International Thymic Malignancies Interest Group in 2010.

RESULTS

Surgery remains the treatment of choice for operable tumors, whereas chemotherapy is standard in locally advanced and metastatic disease. Thus far, targeted therapies have been developed empirically. Histone deacetylase inhibitors have shown some activity in thymoma whereas sunitinib may be active in TC. There are no data to support the use of HER2- or EGFR-targeted therapies in thymic malignancies.

CONCLUSION

Drug development for the treatment of thymic malignancies is difficult because of the rarity of these tumors. Ethnic differences are becoming apparent, with aggressive subtypes being observed in Asians and African Americans. Incremental improvements in our understanding of tumor biology suggest that molecular profiling-directed therapies may be the preferred route of investigation in the future.

Molecular pathology of thymic epithelial neoplasms

The etiology and molecular pathogenesis of thymic tumors are unknown. However, during the last two decades there has been some progress on elucidating the genetic abnormalities present and molecular pathways altered in thymic tumors. These abnormalities, while bearing distinctions and similarities to those described in other tumors, can be organized under the "hallmarks of cancer," as proposed by Hanahan and Weinberg. These changes include self-sufficiency in growth signaling, insensitivity to antigrowth signals, ability to evade apoptosis, limitless replicative potential, ability to sustain angiogenesis, and tissue invasion and metastasis. However, this progress is still limited and has not led to better tumor classifications, prognostication of outcome, and design of molecular targeted therapy.