A Peripheral Dentinogenic Ghost Cell Tumor With Immunohistochemical Investigations and a Literature Review-Based Clinicopathological Comparison Between Peripheral and Central Variants

Useful diagnostic histogenetic features of ectopic odontogenic ghost cell tumours

BACKGROUND

Ectopic odontogenic tumours are rare and difficult to diagnose. Consequently, they are occasionally misdiagnosed as other tumours and overtreated. Dentinogenic ghost cell tumours (DGCTs) are odontogenic neoplasms characterised by a CTNNB1 mutation, ghost cell appearance, and dentinoid-like calcification. Herein, we present a case of ectopic DGCT on the floor of a patient's mouth, providing reliable clinicopathological and genetic evidence of its odontogenicity for the first time.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 72-year-old man presented with painless sublingual swelling. Imaging revealed a multi-lobulated, solid-cystic mass on the floor of his mouth. Cytological evaluation showed folded epithelial clusters composed of basaloid cells, keratinised material, and calcification. Histological analysis revealed a multi-cystic, cribriform to solid nest, with an odontogenic satellate reticulum-like epithelium, including ghost cells and dentinoid matrix deposition. Immunohistochemical analysis found that CK19, CK5/6, bcl-2, and p63 were diffuse positive, β-catenin was focal positive in the nuclei, and the cells in the dentinoid matrix were positive for DMP1. The CTNTTB1 mutation was detected, leading to the final diagnosis of ectopic DGCT. There was no recurrence during the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we have presented a comprehensive clinical overview of DGCT and identified its pathological and genetic features. This report will aid in the recognition of this rare disease in the future and help to avoid misdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Comparative Analysis Between Dentinogenic Ghost Cell Tumor and Ghost Cell Odontogenic Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

Dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT) and ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma (GCOC) form a spectrum of rare benign and malignant odontogenic neoplasms, respectively. The aim of this study was to perform a comparative systematic review of the clinicopathological, genetic, therapeutic, and prognostic features of DGCT and GCOC. The electronic search was performed until December 2020 on seven electronic databases. Case reports, series, and research studies with enough histopathological criteria for diagnosis and all genomic studies were included. Both DGCT and GCOC showed a male prevalence (p = 0.043), with mandibular and maxillary predilections, respectively (p = 0.008). Peripheral DGCT (DGCTp) affected most elderly people (p < 0.001), and central DGCT (DGCTc) and GCOC occurred mainly in younger individuals. Unilateral enlargement of maxilla or mandible was the most common clinical sign associated with a radiolucent or mixed image. Ameloblastomatous epithelium was often present in both neoplasms. Basaloid and large cells with vesicular nuclei were also frequently seen in GCOC. β-catenin expression and mutations (CTNNB1 gene) were found in DGCT and GCOC. Conservative surgery was mostly used for DGCTp, while radical resection was chosen for DGCTc and GCOC. High recurrence rates were found in DGCTc and GCOC. Metastasis occurred in 16.7% of GCOC cases and the 5-year survival rate was 72.6%. DGCT and GCOC share numerous clinicopathological features and demand a careful histopathological evaluation, considering the overlap features with other odontogenic tumors and the possibility of malignant transformation of DGCT. A strict regular post-operative follow-up is mandatory due to high recurrence rates and metastatic capacity in GCOC.

Dentinogenic Ghost Cell Tumor in a Sumatran Rhinoceros

Simple Summary

A dentinogenic ghost cell tumor is an odontogenic ghost cell lesion of the maxilla and mandible. It is a rare tumor that has been described in humans. This work describes the clinical and pathological findings of an advanced stage of a dentinogenic ghost cell tumor, a type that has not previously been described in veterinary medicine. The advanced stage of this tumor led to the observation of aberrant keratinization, characterized by ghost cells and numerous islands of dentinoid formation. Diagnosis was made with the aid of routine histology, special histochemistry, immunohistochemistry, and classification and features from human oncology as a reference.

Abstract

An adult female Sumatran rhinoceros was observed with a swelling in the left infraorbital region in March 2017. The swelling rapidly grew into a mass. A radiograph revealed a cystic radiolucent area in the left maxilla. In June 2017, the rhinoceros was euthanized. At necropsy, the infraorbital mass measured 21 cm × 30 cm. Samples of the infraorbital mass, left parotid gland, and left masseter muscle were collected for histopathology (Hematoxylin & Eosin, Von Kossa, Masson’s trichrome, cytokeratin AE1/AE3, EMA, p53, and S-100). Numerous neoplastic epithelial cells showing pleomorphism and infiltration were observed. Islands of dentinoid material containing ghost cells and keratin pearls were observed with the aid of the two special histochemistry stains. Mitotic figures were rarely observed. All the neoplastic odontogenic cells and keratin pearls showed an intense positive stain for cytokeratin AE1/AE3, while some keratin pearls showed mild positive stains for S-100. All samples were negative for p53 and S-100 immunodetection. The mass was diagnosed as a dentinogenic ghost cell tumor.

Peripheral dentinogenic ghost cell tumor-report of two cases and review of the literature

Peripheral dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT) is a rare and non-aggressive benign odontogenic tumor. They usually affect the elderly and are predominantly located in the anterior region of the jaws. Their differential diagnosis includes reactive/inflammatory gingival lesions. We report here two cases of peripheral DGCT in a 73-year-old female and a 48-year-old male patient and review the cases published in the literature. Both lesions presented as a nodular lesion in the mandible, and panoramic radiography showed no abnormalities. Microscopically, it was observed to be an ameloblastomatous epithelial proliferation associated with clusters of ghost cells and dysplastic dentin. Immunohistochemistry revealed positivity for cytokeratin 19 and a low Ki-67 proliferative index. Based on histopathological features and the absence of radiographic findings, a diagnosis of peripheral DGCT was rendered. The low number of cases published of peripheral DGCT makes case reports important in providing information that helps in their diagnoses and management.

Peripheral dentinogenic ghost cell tumor of the ethmoid sinus: A case report

RATIONALE

The dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT), a locally invasive benign neoplasm, is one of the rarest odontogenic tumors, usually developing in the maxilla or mandible. It can be classified into 2 types: intraosseous (central) and extraosseous (peripheral). Here, we describe the first case of a peripheral DGCT located in the ethmoid sinus.

PATIENT CONCERNS

An 8-year-old boy presented to our department with a longer than 7-month history of nasal obstruction, purulent secretion, and reduction in sense of smell in the right nasal cavity.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient was diagnosed with peripheral DGCT of the ethmoid sinus based on computed tomography scan and pathology.

INTERVENTIONS

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery was performed.

OUTCOMES

With 2 years of follow-up, there was no evidence of recurrence.

LESSONS

Peripheral DGCT can occur in the paranasal sinus and the need to consider this entity as a possible diagnosis by the clinicians.

Giant dentinogenic ghost cell tumor: A case report

Dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT), a rare, benign odontogenic tumor with aggressive behavior, causes bone destruction and cortical expansion. We report here a case of DGCT in a 38-year-old male, presenting with enormous extraoral protrusion, which radiographically was predominantly radiolucent with radiopaque areas. Microscopically, it was observed to be a solid ameloblastomatous proliferation with pseudoglandular structures associated with clusters of ghost cells. Abundant dentinoid material adjacent to the epithelial sheets containing entrapped epithelial tumor cells was also evident. Immunohistochemistry revealed positivity for pan-cytokeratin (CK), CK-14, CK-7, and CK-19; CD138; and β-catenin. The Ki-67 proliferative index was very low (<1%). The clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical features led to the diagnosis of DGCT. The patient underwent partial mandibulectomy, and no recurrences have occurred. To our knowledge, this is the largest DGCT described in the English language literature.

Peripheral calcifying cystic odontogenic tumour and peripheral dentinogenic ghost cell tumour: an updated systematic review of 117 cases reported in the literature

PURPOSE

To integrate the available data published on peripheral calcifying cystic odontogenic tumour (CCOT) and peripheral dentinogenic ghost cell tumour (DGCT) into a comprehensive analysis of its clinical and radiologic features.

METHODS

An electronic search was undertaken in May, 2016. Eligibility criteria included publications reporting cases of peripheral CCOTs/DGCTs having enough clinical, radiological and histological information to confirm a definite diagnosis. Demographic data, lesion site and size, treatment approach and recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

Hundred and thirty-eight lesions were found (65 publications), and 117 lesions (63 publications) with enough information were analyzed (55 CCOTs, 50 DGCTs, 12 unknown). Mean age of patients was 51.3 ± 23.4 (min-max, 1-92), with higher mean age for the DGCTs variant. The lesions were more prevalent in the mandible, anterior region of the jaws, and in the second, sixth and eighth decades, with an equal sexual distribution. About 20% of all lesions showed signs of erosion of the underlying bone, with a higher rate for DGCTs. The mean lesion size was 1.3 ± 0.8 (min-max, 0.4-3.0). Time of follow-up was informed for 37 lesions, with a mean ± SD of 30.2 ± 21.0 months (min-max, 6-84). Almost all lesions were treated by conservative surgery; only three recurrences were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral CCOTs/DGCTs are rare lesions. Most of the lesions were treated by simple excision with or without curettage of the underlying bone. As the recurrence rate is very low, a conservative approach seems to be enough for the great majority of cases.