Placement of Plantar Plates for Lapidus Arthrodesis: Anatomical Considerations

Indications and possible limitations using medio-plantar plate systems in tarsometatarsal 1 fusions - A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

The tarsometatarsal 1 arthrodesis is an adequate treatment for moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity and instability of the first ray. Plantar plating arthrodesis has been shown to provide better mechanical stability and fewer postoperative complications than screw fixation or medial plating. The medio-plantar plate is a new plate design for Lapidus arthrodesis. It could combine the biomechanical advantages of the plantar plate and the anatomical overview of a medial plate. However, the implanted material can cause irritation of the tibialis anterior, which in some cases may require removal of the material. The purpose of this study was to examine the possibility of tendon irritation following medio-plantar first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis using cadaveric specimens.

METHODS

The study involved the simulated surgical procedure of medio-plantar plate arthrodesis on 30 lower extremities. After the plates were fixed, a thorough examination of the feet was conducted to assess any tendon irritation and to determine a recommendation for placement of the medio-plantar plate based on the Olewnik classification.

RESULTS

Irritation of the tibialis anterior tendon components with the medio-plantar plate depends mainly on the anatomic norm variant, classified according to Olewnik et al. A medio-plantar plate is particularly recommended in TA tendon Olewnik type 3 and type 5. The positioning of a medio-plantar plate in Olewnik type 1 and type 2 tendons depends on the anatomic fit of the medio-plantar plate and the bony configuration of the TMT 1 joint. A large portion of the TA tendon must be detached, so a different plate design may be preferred in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

TMT 1 arthrodesis with medio-plantar plating of the first tarsometatarsal joint should be performed considering the anatomic TA tendon variations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, Expert Opinion includes Case Reports and Technique Tips.

Biomechanical Comparison of Medio-Plantar and Plantar Plate Fixation for First Tarsometatarsal Joint Arthrodesis

Plantar plate positioning has been demonstrated as biomechanically superior. However, some operators remain resentful about the morbidity of the surgical approach. To provide improved plate fixation for first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis with respect to the tibialis anterior tendon, a medio-plantar plate was developed. The purpose of this biomechanical study was to compare its construct stability to that of a plantar plate construct. Twelve pairs of fresh frozen human specimens were used in a matched pair test. Each pair was fixed with a 4 mm compression screw and either a plantar locking plate or a medio-plantar locking plate. A cantilever beam test was performed in dorsiflexion. Before and after cyclic loading (5000 cycles; 40 N), bending stiffness and relative movements at the joint space were monitored in a quasi-static test including optical motion tracking. Maximum load and bending moment to failure were investigated in a load-to-failure ramp test. The bending stiffness of both groups did not significantly differ before (plantar 49.9 N/mm ± 19.2; medio-plantar 53.9 N/mm ± 25.4, p = 0.43) or after (plantar 24.4 N/mm ± 9.7; medio-plantar 35.3 N/mm ± 22.0, p = 0.08) cyclic loading but decreased significantly in both groups (p < 0.01) after cyclic loading. Relative movement increased significantly during cyclic testing in both groups (p < 0.01) but did not differ significantly between the groups before (p = 0.29) or after (p = 0.16) cyclic loading. Neither load nor bending moment to failure were significantly different (plantar 225 N ± 78, 10.8 Nm; medio-plantar 210 N ± 86, 10.1 Nm, p = 0.61). Both plate constructs provided equivalent construct stability, both being well suited for Lapidus arthrodesis.

Union Rates With the Use of Structural Allograft in Lapidus Arthrodesis: A Comparison Between Two Fixation Constructs

Although structural allograft has been previously described as acceptable practice for reconstructive foot and ankle surgery, results for an allograft bone wedge in Lapidus arthrodesis are unknown. Additionally, there is no consensus on the superiority of a single fixation construct in Lapidus cases. Our objective was (1) to report union rates for Lapidus arthrodesis with and without the use of an allograft bone wedge and (2) to determine if fixation construct impacts rates of union when using structural allograft. A review was performed for Lapidus cases with fixation constructs of 2 crossed compression screws (CS) and a medial locking plate with single transarticular screw (MPS), both with and without use of an allograft bone wedge. Inclusion required a CT scan to evaluate bony union. There was no significant difference in union rates (p = .41) between the use (90%) and the nonuse (97%) of an allograft bone wedge. Union rates were significantly different (p = .04) when comparing CS fixation (85%) and MPS fixation (98%). The comparative results between the fixation constructs highlight the importance of compression across the arthrodesis site as part of a robust fixation construct. Our findings demonstrate that the use of an allograft bone wedge in Lapidus arthrodesis may mitigate complications due to metatarsal shortening while providing satisfactory rates of union.

Plantar Plating in the Modified Lapidus Procedure: Evaluation of Function and Impairment of the Tibialis Anterior Tendon

The modified "Lapidus" procedure (MLP) describes the arthrodesis of the first tarsometatarsal joint. We investigate if there are detectable changes of the tendon or the function of the muscle and clinical outcome after MLP. We reviewed 22 feet. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at an average of 27 (range, 12-49) months. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the European Foot and Ankle Society score. Strength was measured and complications were assessed. MRI revealed signs of tendinopathy of the tibialis anterior tendon in 13 feet (59%). The mean total European Foot and Ankle Society score at final follow-up was 17 (range, 6-24) points. The mean postoperative Visual Analog Scale score was 1.4 (range, 0-5). Range of motion and force data were not significantly different to the contralateral side. In conclusion, MRI showed signs of tendinopathy in 59%, which does not seem to affect clinical outcome, but has to be considered when choosing the desired implant and placement. MLP leads to high patient satisfaction rates and significant improvement at midterm follow up.

Anatomical reconstruction of first ray instability hallux valgus with a medial anatomical TMTJ1 plate

BACKGROUND

First tarsometatarsal joint (TMTJ1) arthrodesis is a powerful tool for hallux valgus correction. Past criticism of the TMTJ1 arthrodesis has focused on high non-union rates, and consequent need for delayed weightbearing as prevention. In this study we present a selection and treatment protocol to minimise non-union while allowing early weightbearing.

METHODS

All TMTJ1 arthrodesis procedures for hallux valgus performed by the senior surgeon over the period June, 2016 to July, 2019 were included. An anatomically-designed, medial TMTJ1 plate and screw compression was utilised for TMTJ1 arthrodesis. The construct was augmented with synthetic intermetatarsal stabilisation. All patients were kept non-weightbearing for 2 weeks, followed by progressive weightbearing as tolerated for 4 weeks. Minimum follow-up was 1 year.

RESULTS

300 modified Lapidus procedures were performed for hallux valgus with mean IMA 17° (Range: 14-29). Mean age was 58 years, with 93% female. 284 (94%) had an Akin osteotomy, while 222 cases (74%) were associated with another forefoot procedure. Patients began progressive weight bearing as tolerated from 2 weeks. All were fully weight bearing by 8 weeks post-operatively. There was a 100% union rate in this group. Mean AOFAS Hallux MTP-IP scores rose from 59 pre-operatively to 97 post-operatively. One plate was removed due to tibialis anterior impingement. There were no recurrences at final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a selection and treatment protocol for TMTJ1 arthrodesis for hallux valgus. This yields high union rates while allowing early weight bearing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Radiographic Outcomes, Union Rates, and Complications Associated With Plantar Implant Positioning for Midfoot Arthrodesis

Background:

Midfoot arthrodesis has long been successfully included in the treatment paradigm for a variety of pathologic foot conditions. A concern with midfoot arthrodesis is the rate of nonunion, which historically has been reported between 5% and 10%. Plantar plating has also been noted to be more biomechanically stable when compared to traditional dorsal plating in previous studies. Practical advantages of plantar plating include less dorsal skin irritation and the ability to correct flatfoot deformity from the same medial incision. The purpose of this study is to report the arthrodesis rate, the success of deformity correction, and the complications associated with plantar-based implant placement for arthrodesis of the medial column.

Methods:

A retrospective review was undertaken of all consecutive patients between 2012 and 2019 that underwent midfoot arthrodesis with plantar-positioned implants. Radiographic outcomes and complications are reported on 62 patients who underwent midfoot arthrodesis as part of a correction for hallux valgus deformity, flatfoot deformity, degenerative arthritis, Lisfranc injury, or Charcot neuroarthropathy correction.

Results:

Statistically significant improvement was seen in the lateral talus–first metatarsal angle (Meary angle) and medial arch sag angle for patients treated for flatfoot deformity correction. In patients treated for hallux valgus deformity, there was a reduction in the intermetatarsal angle from 15.4 to 6.8 degrees. The overall nonunion rate was 6.45% in all patients. The rate of nonunion was higher at the NC joint compared to the TMT joint and with compression claw plates. One symptomatic nonunion required revision surgery (1.7%). There were no nonunions when excluding neuroarthropathy patients and smokers. The odds ratio (OR) for nonunion in patients with neuroarthropathy was 6.05 ( P < .05), and in active smokers the OR was 2.33 ( P < .05).

Conclusion:

Plates placed on the plantar bone surface for midfoot arthrodesis achieved and maintained deformity correction with rare instances of symptomatic hardware for a variety of orthopedic conditions. An overall clinical and radiographic union rate of 94% was achieved. The radiographic union rate improved to 100% when excluding both neuroarthropathy patients and smokers. The incidence of nonunion was higher in smokers, neuroarthropathy patients, naviculocuneiform joint fusions, use of compression claw plates, and when attempting to fuse multiple joints. Incisional healing complications were rarely seen other than in active smokers.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV, case series.

Early Results of Immediate Weightbearing Following First Tarsometatarsal Joint Arthrodesis With Plantar Locking Plate and Dorsal Compression Screw

Arthrodesis of the first tarsometatarsal joint (TMT1) reduces pathologic angles at the anatomic center of rotation of angulation and presents a substantial correction potential in 3 planes in the treatment of hallux abductovalgus. The optimal fixation method remains unclear since prevailing dorsomedial locking plates and/or compression screws depict elevated implant-associated complications. Medical records of 49 patients that underwent 53 TMT1 arthrodeses in hallux abductovalgus interventions were included. Median average visual analog scale scores decreased (p < .001) from 6.8 (range 4-10) to 2.7 (range 0-10), first intermetatarsal angles were reduced (p < .001) from 17.39° (range 12°-28°) to 7.16° (range 3°-12°), standing lateral first metatarsal angles improved (p < .001) from 21.66° (range 12°-29°) to 23.94° (range 14°-31°) and tibial sesamoid positions were plantarized (p < .001) from 6.02° (range 4°-7°) to 2.79° (range 1°-6°). Plantar plating allowed immediate weightbearing with transition to normal shoe gear at 6 weeks. Complications occurred in 6 (11.34%) feet including 1 (1.89%) nonunion, 1 (1.89%) delayed union, 1 (1.89%) hallux varus, 1 (1.89%) incomplete recurrence, 1 (1.89%) minor dehiscence, and 1 (1.89%) hardware irritation. Plantar locking plates combined with a dorsal compression screw presented a favorable tension-side implant location that closed the fusion site under load. This facilitated substantial reductions in complications, pathologic angles, and pain.

Anatomical study of Lapidus arthrodesis using two different plantar plate systems

BACKGROUND

First tarsometatarsal arthrodesis (modified Lapidus procedure) constitutes a sufficient treatment for moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity and first ray instability. The plantar plate arthrodesis was shown to provide superior mechanical stability and less postoperative complications than screw fixation or dorsal plating. Nevertheless, the in-brought hardware may cause irritation of the tibialis anterior or peroneus longus tendon requiring explantation of the material in some cases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of tendon irritation after plantar first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis in a cadaver study.

METHODS

Plantar plate arthrodesis was performed as in real surgery on twelve pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric feet. Two different plate systems were randomly allocated to each pair of feet. After plate fixation careful dissection of the feet followed to analyze potential tendon irritation and to determine a "safe zone" for plantar plate placement.

RESULTS

A "safe zone" between the insertion sties of tibialis anterior and peroneus longus tendon was found and proven to be sufficiently exposed using a standard medio-plantar approach. Both plates were fixed in this zone without compromising central tendon parts. Peripheral tendon parts were irritated in 42% using Darco Plantar Lapidus Plating System® (Wright Medical, Memphis, TN) and in 8% using the Plantar Lapidus Plate® (Arthrex, Naples, FL). Bending of the anatomically preshaped plates is often necessary to ensure optimal fit on the bone surface.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified Lapidus procedure with plantar plating of the first tarsometatarsal joint can be performed safely without compromising central tendon parts via standard medio-plantar approach.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

5, Cadaver Study.

Biomechanical Characteristics of Biplane Multiplanar Tension-Side Fixation for Lapidus Fusion

Although plating on the plantar, tension-side of the metatarsocuneiform joint provides an inherent biomechanical advantage for Lapidus arthrodesis, it has not been widely adopted owing to the morbidity associated with plantar application. To overcome these limitations, a modification to 90-90 locked biplanar plating was developed to provide the biomechanical advantages of multiplanar fixation and tension-side fixation, allowing application through a conventional incision. We tested the hypothesis that biplanar plating with tension-side fixation (low-profile straight dorsal plate and anatomic medial-plantar plate) would demonstrate improved mechanical stability compared with a previously tested 90-90 biplanar construct (small straight plate dorsally and medially) under cyclic loading. Both constructs were tested in static load to failure (3 pairs) and cyclic loading (10 pairs) with plantar cantilever bending using surrogate anatomic bone models. With static ultimate failure, the biplanar plate construct with tension-side fixation failed at a significantly greater failure load than did the straight biplanar plate construct (247.3 ± 18.4 N versus 210.9 ± 10.4 N; p = .04). With cyclic failure testing, the biplanar plate construct with tension-side fixation endured a significantly greater number of cycles (206,738 ± 49,103 versus 101,780 ± 43,273; p < .001) and a significantly greater dynamic failure load (207.5 ± 24.3 N versus 162.5 ± 20.6 N; p < .001) compared with the straight biplanar plate construct. These results have demonstrated that under simulated static and cyclic Lapidus arthrodesis loading, biplanar plating with tension-side fixation provides superior strength compared with the straight biplanar construct. Thus, this construct shows promise for clinical application as a practical approach to tension-side fixation and an early return to weightbearing after Lapidus fusion.

Surgical Treatment of Lisfranc Injury With Plantar Plate Approach

Midfoot injuries are the second most common athletic foot injury documented in the published data. High-energy Lisfranc dislocations are commonly seen secondary to traumatic etiologies and disrupt the strong midfoot ligaments supporting the arch. These injuries require immediate surgical intervention to prevent serious complications such as compartment syndrome and amputation. The present case series reports a new Lapidus plate system used in 3 patients who underwent arthrodesis procedures for Lisfranc joint dislocation. Three patients in their fourth to fifth decade of life presented with a traumatic injury at the Lisfranc joint and subsequently underwent open reduction and internal fixation using the plantar Lapidus Plate System (LPS; Arthrex, Naples, FL). The LPS was placed in a predetermined safe zone, with measures taken to avoid the insertional points of the tibialis anterior and peroneus longus tendons. Radiographs were obtained for ≤6 months postoperatively and revealed consolidation across the fusion site, intact hardware, and satisfactory alignment. On examination, the corrections were well maintained and free of signs of infection. Clinical evaluation showed no indication of motion within the tarsometatarsal joint and no tenderness to palpation surrounding the fusion sites. All 3 patients successfully returned to their activities of daily living without discomfort or pain. Modern surgical treatment of Lisfranc injuries most commonly includes open reduction and internal fixation, accompanied by arthrodesis. The present case series has demonstrated that the LPS provides relief, stability, and compression of the joint in our small cohort of patients who experienced a traumatic injury to the Lisfranc joint.

Appropriate Area for Operative Procedures Near Tibialis Anterior Tendon Insertion: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

The tibialis anterior tendon has its insertion sites on both the medial and plantar surfaces of the medial cuneiform and the base of the first metatarsal. Operative procedures near those areas, especially at the first metatarsocuneiform joint, may disturb tendon insertions and cause irritation or functional impairment of the tendon.

METHODS

Tibialis anterior tendons and their insertion sites were dissected and examined from 46 cadaveric feet (19 female and 27 male cadavers, aged between 33 and 86 years, with a mean of 68.5 ± 14.3 years). The greatest lengths and widths of the tendon attachments on the bony surface of the medial cuneiform and base of the first metatarsal, on both the medial and plantar surfaces, were measured and analyzed. The measurement reliability was evaluated by using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Most of the tibialis anterior tendon insertions were found to be longer at the medial cuneiform than at the base of the first metatarsal (mean, 8.3 and 5.4 mm; P < .001), but the widths were almost similar (mean, 11.0 and 10.4 mm; P = .079). When focusing on each bone, the widths of the tendon attachments on the medial and plantar surfaces of the medial cuneiform were equivalent (mean, 5.4 and 5.6 mm; P = .584). At the base of the first metatarsal, the tendon attachment on the plantar surface was found to be wider than on the medial surface (mean, 7.0 and 3.4 mm; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The widths of the tibialis anterior tendon insertions on the medial and plantar surfaces of the medial cuneiform were equal, as were the total widths of insertions on the medial cuneiform and on the base of the first metatarsal. However, the width of insertions on the medial surface of the first metatarsal was significantly smaller than on the plantar surface, and the total length of insertions at the medial cuneiform was longer than at the first metatarsal.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides information about characteristics of the tibialis anterior tendon insertions, particularly details of the dimensions on each surface of the bones. This knowledge enables surgeons to minimize the risk of irritation or tendon injuries during operations near the base of the first metatarsal and medial cuneiform area.

Anatomical Footprint of the Tibialis Anterior Tendon: Surgical Implications for Foot and Ankle Reconstructions

This study aimed to analyze precisely the dimensions, shapes, and variations of the insertional footprints of the tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) at the medial cuneiform (MC) and first metatarsal (MT1) base. Forty-one formalin-fixed human cadaveric specimens were dissected. After preparation of the TAT footprint, standardized photographs were made and the following parameters were evaluated: the footprint length, width, area of insertion, dorsoplantar location, shape, and additional tendon slips. Twenty feet (48.8%) showed an equal insertion at the MC and MT1, another 20 feet (48.8%) had a wide insertion at the MC and a narrow insertion at the MT1, and 1 foot (2.4%) demonstrated a narrow insertion at the MC and a wide insertion at the MT1. Additional tendon slips inserting at the metatarsal shaft were found in two feet (4.8%). Regarding the dorsoplantar orientation, the footprints were located medial in 29 feet (70.7%) and medioplantar in 12 feet (29.3%). The most common shape at the MT1 base was the crescent type (75.6%) and the oval type at the MC (58.5%). The present study provided more detailed data on the dimensions and morphologic types of the tibialis anterior tendon footprint. The established anatomical data may allow for a safer surgical preparation and a more anatomical reconstruction.

Comparison of Locking Plate with Interfragmentary Screw Versus Plantarly Applied Anatomic Locking Plate for Lapidus Arthrodesis: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

Arthrodesis of the first metatarsal cuneiform joint, or Lapidus procedure, is a widely accepted treatment for hallux valgus. Recent studies have focused on comparing various constructs for this procedure both in the laboratory and clinical settings. The current study compared in a cadaveric model the strength of 2 constructs. The first construct utilized a medially applied low-profile locking plate and an interfragmentary screw directed from plantar-distal to dorsal-proximal. The second construct consisted of a plantarly applied plate with a compression screw placed through the plate from plantar-distal to dorsal-proximal. The ultimate load to failure for the 2 groups tested was 255.38 ± 155.38 N and 197.48 ± 108.61 N, respectively (P = .402). There was no significant difference found between the 2 groups with respect to ultimate load to failure, stiffness of the construct, or moment at time of failure. In conclusion, the medially applied plate with plantar interfragmentary screw appears to be stronger than the plantar Lapidus plate tested for first metatarsal cuneiform arthrodesis, though this difference did not reach statistical significance.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level V: Biomechanical Study.

[Lapidus arthrodesis]

The tarso-metatarsal 1 joint (TMT-I) arthrodesis is a treatment option or moderate to severe hallux valgus (HV) deformities. Instability of the TMT1 joint is still a debatable indication. Using stable osteosynthesis techniques allows early postoperative weight bearing. Plantar plating combined with a lag screw is the biomechanical most stable construct. An additional intermetatarsal screw can improve the horizontal stability. Clinical results are good and radiological parameters stay constant, even in the long term.