Effect of Lateral Gutter Osteophyte Resection on Correction of Varus Deformity in Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis

Effect of a compression staple on correction of varus deformity during arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) has become popular because of its higher rate of bone union, lower invasiveness, and shorter hospital stays compared to those of open arthrodesis. However, postoperative malalignment is often observed for severe varus deformity, which can cause nonunion, pain, and adjacent joint arthrosis. A compression staple can provide a persistent, strong compressive force on the bone surface. This study aimed to clarify the difference in alignment correction in AAA by comparing a compression staple and screws fixation with screws-only fixation pre- and postoperatively.

METHODS

Seventy ankles in 67 patients undergoing AAA were retrospectively reviewed. AAA with three screws through the distal tibia was performed in 53 ankles, and 17 ankles underwent AAA with a compression staple and two screws. After the preparation of the joint surface arthroscopically, patients in the S group had three canulated cancellous screws inserted through the medial tibia. Patients in the CS group had a compression staple placed at the lateral aspect of the tibiotalar joint and two screws inserted through the medial side. Clinical scores and pre-and postoperative alignment on plain radiographs were compared between the two procedures.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the pre-and postoperative Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot scale. One ankle in the S group exhibited nonunion. There were no significant differences in talar tilt and tibiotalar angles between the groups. The tibial plafond angle in the CS group was significantly lower than that in the S group (p < 0.05). Postoperatively, talar tilt and tibiotalar angles on the coronal image, and the lateral tibiotalar angle in the CS group were significantly lower than those in the S group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

AAA with a compression staple and two-screw fixations could obtain more optimal alignments than AAA with screw-only fixation, even in cases with severe varus deformity.

Developing a core outcome set for foot and ankle disorders in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: A scoping review and report from the OMERACT 2022 foot and ankle special interest group session

OBJECTIVES

Foot and ankle involvement is common in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, yet high-quality evidence assessing the effectiveness of treatments for these disorders is lacking. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Foot and Ankle Working Group is developing a core outcome set for use in clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies in this area.

METHODS

A scoping review was performed to identify outcome domains in the existing literature. Clinical trials and observational studies comparing pharmacological, conservative or surgical interventions involving adult participants with any foot or ankle disorder in the following rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) were eligible for inclusion: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), spondyloarthropathies, crystal arthropathies and connective tissue diseases. Outcome domains were categorised according to the OMERACT Filter 2.1.

RESULTS

Outcome domains were extracted from 150 eligible studies. Most studies included participants with foot/ankle OA (63% of studies) or foot/ankle involvement in RA (29% of studies). Foot/ankle pain was the outcome domain most commonly measured (78% of studies), being the most frequently specified outcome domain across all RMDs. There was considerable heterogeneity in the other outcome domains measured, across core areas of manifestations (signs, symptoms, biomarkers), life impact, and societal/resource use. The group's progress to date, including findings from the scoping review, was presented and discussed during a virtual OMERACT Special Interest Group (SIG) in October 2022. During this meeting, feedback was sought amongst delegates regarding the scope of the core outcome set, and feedback was received on the next steps of the project, including focus group and Delphi methods.

CONCLUSION

Findings from the scoping review and feedback from the SIG will contribute to the development of a core outcome set for foot and ankle disorders in RMDs. The next steps are to determine which outcome domains are important to patients, followed by a Delphi exercise with key stakeholders to prioritise outcome domains.

Larger sagittal inter-screw distance/tibial width ratio reduces delayed union or non-union after arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) has risks of complications, such as delayed union and non-union. The number and direction of the inserted screws have been reported as important factors affecting the time to union of AAA. However, the ratio of inter-screw distance (ISD) to tibial width (TW) in different planes has not been investigated. Therefore, we aimed to explore the effect of this ratio on bone union following AAA.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 63 patients (64 ankles) undergoing AAA from 2013 to 2019. Then, their age, body mass index (BMI), sex, diabetes mellitus (DM) status, Takakura-Tanaka classification, number of screws and radiographic parameters were analysed.

RESULTS

The patients had a mean age of 70.3 (range, 45-91) years. Bone fusion was achieved in 57 ankles (89%) in a mean period of 3.3 (range, 2-6) postoperative months. There were four cases of delayed union and three of non-union. No significant differences in age, BMI, sex, DM, Takakura-Tanaka classification, and number of screws could be detected between the groups. However, the sagittal ISD/TW ratio was significantly larger in the union group than in the delayed/non-union group with a cut-off value of 57.0%.

CONCLUSION

Larger sagittal ISD/TW ratios result in reduced post-AAA delayed union or non-union. The surgeon should be aware that the anterior and posterior screw widths should be approximately 60% or more of the anteroposterior width of the tibia.

Effectiveness of Ilizarov Ankle Arthrodesis in the Treatment of End-Stage Varus Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study

Objective

To evaluate the outcomes of Ilizarov ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of end‐stage varus ankle osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 63 patients with varus ankle OA who underwent Ilizarov ankle arthrodesis between June 2013 and December 2018. There were 24 males and 39 females with an average age of 56.57 ± 4.45 years (range, 47–64 years). Thirty‐six cases were affected on the left side, and 27 were affected on the right side. The patients' mean body mass index (BMI) was 25.18 ± 2.93 kg/m². According to the modified Takakura staging criteria, there were 18 cases of stage 3b (28.57%) and 45 cases of stage 4 (71.43%). Nine patients were primary (14.29%), 48 were traumatic (76.19%), and six were caused by rheumatoid OA (9.52%). Functional assessments were performed according to the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle‐hindfoot score, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS), and visual analogue scale (VAS). The tibial anterior surface angle (TAS), coronal plane tibial‐talar angle (CPT), talar tilt angle (TT), deformity angle (DA), and tibial lateral surface angle (TLS) were assessed on X‐ray films.

Results

The average operation time was 147.84 ± 13.67 min (range, 135–168 min). The average follow‐up time was 34.24 ± 8.72 months (range, 24–61 months). Bony fusion was achieved in all ankles, and the fusion time was 12.43 ± 1.99 weeks on average. The average AOFAS score at the final follow‐up increased from 42.14 ± 8.66 to 80.90 ± 6.80. The average VAS score and AOS pain and disability scores at the final follow‐up decreased from 7.29 ± 1.27 to 2.24 ± 0.94, from 67.94 ± 7.68 to 27.92 ± 5.82, and from 71.64 ± 9.37 to 41.32 ± 8.99, respectively. The average TAS, CPT, and TLS at the final follow‐up increased from 77.76° ± 4.44° to 89.81° ± 1.25°, from 69.04° ± 3.73° to 90.43° ± 1.80°, and from 82.14° ± 3.77° to 88.67° ± 2.50°, respectively. The average TT and DA at the final follow‐up decreased from 8.76° ± 4.30° to 2.05° ± 1.28° and from 20.95° ± 3.73° to 1.57° ± 0.93°, respectively. Three patients developed superficial pin tract infections, all settled with local dressing and antibiotic treatment. Two patients were found to have subtalar arthritis and underwent conservative treatment.

Conclusion

Ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov technique is efficient in treating end‐stage varus ankle OA.

Relationship between talofibular impingement and increased talar tilt in incongruent varus ankle osteoarthritis

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the relationship between talofibular impingement and increased talar tilt in incongruent varus ankle osteoarthritis. Methods: Incongruent varus ankle osteoarthritis was defined as a talar tilt of more than 4° on standard ankle anteroposterior radiographs. We retrospectively reviewed 30 patients with unilateral incongruent varus ankle osteoarthritis with normal alignment of the contralateral ankle. All patients underwent bilateral weightbearing computed tomography and standing plain radiographs. The talar tilt and the distance between the talar lateral process and lateral malleolar tip were measured from a standing ankle anteroposterior radiograph of both sides. Talar and fibular spurs were assessed on the coronal and axial views of weightbearing computed tomography. After simulating the correction of the talar tilt in varus ankle osteoarthritis, talofibular bony impingement was reassessed. Results: On the varus side, the distance between the talar lateral process and the lateral malleolar tip was significantly shorter than that on the contralateral side (p < .001). Talar spur was present in the varus side of all 30 patients on the axial view of weightbearing computed tomography and in the control side of 10 patients. After the simulation of talar tilt correction, talofibular impingement (overlap) occurred in all 30 patients with a larger extent in the severe talar tilt subgroup (p < .001). Conclusion: Talofibular impingement by lateral gutter osteophytes is closely related to increased talar tilt in patients with incongruent varus ankle osteoarthritis. Therefore, lateral gutter osteophytes should be resected to stabilize mortise and improve clinical outcomes.

Comparison of Mechanical Axis of the Limb Versus Anatomical Axis of the Tibia for Assessment of Tibiotalar Alignment in End-Stage Ankle Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Coronal plane ankle joint alignment is typically assessed using the tibiotalar angle (TTA), which relies on the anatomical axis of the tibia (AAT) and the articular surface of the talus as landmarks. Often, the AAT differs from the mechanical axis of the lower limb (MAL). We set out to test our hypothesis that the TTA using the MAL would differ from the TTA measured using the AAT in patients with ankle osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Standardized standing long leg radiographs of 61 ankles with end-stage osteoarthritis were analyzed. We measured the MAL and the AAT. A line was drawn along the talar articular surface (TA) and the TTA was calculated using both the MAL (MAL-TA) and the AAT (AAT-TA). The mechanical axis of the tibia (MAT) was also recorded and the MAL-MAT angle calculated. The difference between MAL-TA and AAT-TA and its correlation with the MAL-MAT angle were assessed. Intra- and interobserver agreement were measured for MAL-TA and AAT-TA.

RESULTS

The mean MAL-TA was 91.4 degrees (95% CI, 88.5-94.4) and the mean AAT-TA was 91.2 degrees (95% CI, 88.6-93.9). The difference ranged from -8.1 to 7.8 degrees, and was greater than 2 and 3 degrees in 42% and 18% of the patients, respectively. The difference, as an absolute value, also strongly correlated with the MAL-MAT angle (r = 0.91, P < .001). Intra- and interobserver reliability were excellent for both MAL-TA (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.93 and 0.91, respectively) and AAT-TA (ICC, 0.91 and 0.89, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We recommend that surgeons consider using the MAL-TA, which relies on long leg radiographs, especially with proximal deformity, to more accurately measure coronal plane ankle joint alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.