Arthroscopic Subtalar Joint Arthrodesis: Topical Review

Prospective Outcomes of a Biological Resurfacing Arthroplasty with Fascia Lata Autograft (BioJoint) for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Midtarsal Joint Complex

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical, safety, and radiological outcomes after biological resurfacing arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of one or more joints of the midtarsal joint complex.

DESIGN

All prospectively followed patients with OA to one of or multiple joints of the midtarsal joint complex who were operated with a biological resurfacing arthroplasty with a fascia lata autograft (BioJoint procedure) were included. A total of 7 patients were included (5 males, 2 females), with a median age of 52 (interquartile range [IQR] 44-55) years. The primary outcome was the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain during walking 2 years postoperatively. Range of motion (ROM), revision rates, and complications were assessed. A postoperative MRI scan was performed to assess progression of OA, graft position and ingrowth, and the degree of bone marrow edema.

RESULTS

There was a 100% follow-up of the patients (median follow-up: 33 [IQR 26-33] months). The NRS during walking improved from 6 preoperatively to 2 at 2 years postoperatively (P < 0.05). There were no reoperations nor severe complications. The limitations in the ROM remained limited in the majority of the cases. MRI at 2 years of follow-up showed no progression of OA, reduced bone marrow edema, and no loosening of the grafts.

CONCLUSION

Biological resurfacing arthroplasty with a fascia lata autograft (BioJoint procedure) for OA to one or more joints in the midtarsal joint complex showed clinically relevant pain reduction during walking, improvement in clinical and radiological outcomes, and proved to be safe and durable.

Subtalar Arthrodesis Union Rates With and Without Adjacent Ankle Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Subtalar arthrodesis is the surgical procedure commonly performed to treat subtalar arthritis. Subtalar arthrodesis may have a higher nonunion rate if there is a preexisting adjacent joint arthrodesis. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the subtalar arthrodesis union rate of patients with native tibiotalar joints to that of patients with prior tibiotalar arthrodesis. The secondary aim was to assess risk factors for nonunion.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients that underwent a subtalar arthrodesis in a single center between 2010 and 2020. The primary outcome of union was determined based on bridging callus on radiographs and clinical symptoms. If there was uncertainty, then a nonweightbearing CT was acquired. Chi-squared test and Mann-Whitney tests compared differences in demographics and risk factors for nonunion between groups. A logistical regression model was performed to determine risk factors for nonunion.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients had an adjacent ankle arthrodesis and 53 patients did not. The successful subtalar arthrodesis union rate in those with a preexisting ankle joint arthrodesis (44.4%) was approximately half that in those without an ankle joint arthrodesis (86.8%) (P < .001). On multivariate logistic regression, an adjacent ankle arthrodesis was the only significant risk factor for nonunion. The odds ratio of nonunion of the subtalar joint with an adjacent ankle arthrodesis present was 4.90 (95% CI 1.02-23.56) compared to a subtalar arthrodesis with a native ankle joint. In addition, 9.4% of patients without an ankle arthrodesis underwent a revision subtalar arthrodesis compared with 44.4% of those with an adjacent ankle arthrodesis (P = .001).

CONCLUSION

In our study, we found that patients undergoing a subtalar arthrodesis with an adjacent ankle arthrodesis have a significantly increased risk of nonunion compared with those undergoing a subtalar arthrodesis with a native ankle. Patients with a previously fused ankle need counseling about the high risk of nonunion and potential additional surgery.