1
|
Mzeihem M, El Bachour J, Hemdanieh M, El Baba B, Tamim H, Nassereddine M. Achilles tendon rupture primary repair technique: A comparative retrospective study between graft versus no-graft. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2024; 51:102417. [PMID: 38751750 PMCID: PMC11092883 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Achilles tendon rupture is one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries and accounts to 20 % of all large tendon ruptures The surgical choice of a procedure might play a role in the incidence of postoperative complications. This study aimed to estimate and compare the incidence of complications occurring within a 30-day window following primary surgical repair of the Achilles tendon with or without a graft. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the ACS NSQIP database from 2005 to 2021. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts (primary surgical repair with and without graft). Results A total of 7010 patients were included in the analysis. Among the graft group, 10.9 % reported any complication which was double the percentage of complications in the no graft group. Only 3.8 % of the no graft patients had reported systemic complications compared to 8.3 % in the graft group. Chronic steroid use was found to be an effect modifier in the incidence of any complications after primary surgical repair when comparing graft versus no graft (P-value 0.016). Conclusion Surgical repairwith tendon graft develops more complications than repairing without graft. Therefore, it is imperative for physicians to strive for an early diagnosis, as any delay in treatment significantly raises the likelihood of complications. Levels of evidence III, Retrospective Cohort Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majd Mzeihem
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | | - Maya Hemdanieh
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Bachar El Baba
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hani Tamim
- Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohamad Nassereddine
- Department of Orthopedics Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Diniz P, Ferreira AS, Figueiredo L, Batista JP, Abdelatif N, Pereira H, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Finkelstein SN, Ferreira FC. Early analysis shows that endoscopic flexor hallucis longus transfer has a promising cost-effectiveness profile in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 31:2001-2014. [PMID: 36149468 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07146-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current options for treating an Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) include conservative and surgical approaches. Endoscopic flexor hallucis longus (FHL) transfer has been recently proposed to treat acute ruptures, but its cost-effectiveness potential remains to be evaluated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to perform an early cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic FHL transfer for acute ATRs, comparing the costs and benefits of current treatments from a societal perspective. METHODS A conceptual model was created, with a decision tree, to outline the main health events during the treatment of an acute ATR. The model was parameterized using secondary data. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to gather information on the outcomes of current treatments. Data related to outcomes of endoscopic FHL transfers in acute Achilles ruptures was obtained from a single prospective study. Analysis was limited to the two first years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was the main outcome used to determine the preferred strategy. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year was used. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine whether changes in input parameters would cause significant deviation from the reference case results. Specifically, a probability sensitivity analysis was conducted using Monte Carlo simulations, and a one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted by sequentially varying each model parameter within a given range. RESULTS For the reference case, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold for all the surgical approaches. Overall, primary treatment was the main cost driver. Conservative treatment showed the highest direct costs related to the treatment of complications. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000, open surgery was cost-effective in 50.9%, minimally invasive surgery in 55.8%, and endoscopic FHL transfer in 72% of the iterations. The model was most sensitive to parameters related to treatment utilities, followed by the costs of primary treatments. CONCLUSION Surgical treatments have a moderate likelihood of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000, with endoscopic FHL transfer showing the highest likelihood. Following injury, interventions to improve health-related quality of life may be better suited for improved cost-effectiveness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Diniz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital de Sant'Ana, Rua de Benguela, 501, 2775-028, Parede, Lisbon, Portugal. .,Department of Bioengineering and iBB, Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. .,Associate Laboratory i4HB, Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. .,Fisiogaspar, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - André Soares Ferreira
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital de Sant'Ana, Rua de Benguela, 501, 2775-028, Parede, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lígia Figueiredo
- Clinical Department Club Atletico Boca Juniors, CAJB Centro Artroscopico, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jorge Pablo Batista
- Head of Orthopedic Department, Dr Nasef OrthoClinic, Private Practice, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Nasef Abdelatif
- Orthopaedic Department, Centro Hospitalar Póvoa de Varzim, Vila Do Conde, Portugal
| | - Hélder Pereira
- Ripoll y De Prado Sports Clinic: FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Murcia/Madrid, Spain.,PT Government Associate Laboratory, University of Minho ICVS/3B's, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Academic Center for Evidence Based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
- Institute for Data, Systems and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Stan N Finkelstein
- Division of Clinical Informatics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Bioceramed - Cerâmicos para Aplicações Médicas S.A., Loures, Portugal
| | - Frederico Castelo Ferreira
- Department of Bioengineering and iBB, Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.,Associate Laboratory i4HB, Institute for Health and Bioeconomy, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|