Broström Repair With and Without Augmentation: Comparison of Outcomes at Median Follow-up of 5 Years

The ankle instability severity score. A simple preoperative score to select patients for ankle ligament repair or reconstruction Surgery

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no established preoperative clinical tool for determining whether to opt for surgical reconstruction or repair in cases of chronic ankle instability.

HYPOTHESIS

This study aimed to develop a predictive score for the likelihood of instability recurrence after surgical repair.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter case-control study was conducted, comparing patients who experienced recurrence of instability after surgical repair of the lateral ankle ligament (ATFL) to those who did not experience recurrence within 2 years post-surgery. Preoperative risk factors associated with instability recurrence at the 2-year mark were identified. Utilizing these datas along with existing literature, the Ankle Instability Severity Score (AISS) for predicting the risk of recurrence after ATFL repair was formulated. Subsequently, this score was calculated for all patients in the study cohort to evaluate its predictive capability.

RESULTS

Gender (p = 0.03), age (p = 0.02), BMI (p = 0.02), and participation in pivot sports (p = 0.04) were identified as risk factors for recurrence. The 9-point AISS score was applied to the patient cohort. When the score was three or lower, the recurrence rate after ATFL repair stood at 10.6% (OR 0.11 [0.04;0.28], p < 0.001). Conversely, if the score exceeded five, the recurrence rate was substantially higher at 80.0% (OR 11.9 [1.67;237.0], p = 0.03). Using ROC analysis, a threshold value of AISS score at 3.5 (sensitivity = 77.4%, specificity = 72.8%, AUC = 0.78) was identified to develop a instability recurrence after surgical repair.

DISCUSSION

This study introduces the AISS score, which relies on straightforward preoperative criteria to assist in deciding whether patients with chronic ankle instability should undergo ligament repair surgery or explore alternative treatment options.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Augmentation with the inferior extensor retinaculum may facilitate earlier recovery in all-inside arthroscopic management of chronic lateral ankle instability

BACKGROUND

To compare the clinical outcomes of inferior extensor retinaculum (IER) augmentation following repair of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) with isolated ATFL repair in patients with an arthroscopically confirmed grade 3 lesion of the ATFL.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) patients who underwent arthroscopic ATFL repair between March 2018 and August 2022. The average age of the patients was 31.5 ± 7.4 years (range, 16-50 years). All patients underwent all-inside arthroscopic repair, and were divided into two groups based on the ligament repair method: the Broström-Gould group (n = 64) and the Broström group (n = 67). At 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, ankle inversion stress tests and anterior drawer tests were employed to assess the stability of the ankle joint. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle hindfoot scale(AOFAS-AH) and Karlsson ankle function score (KAFS) were employed to assess ankle function; the Tegner score was employed to assess the patient's level of exercise; the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score [FAOS, including score of symptoms-diseases, pain, function-daily living score, function in sports and recreational activities, and quality of life] was used to assess the patient's daily activity ability.

RESULTS

The Tegner score, FAOS-function-daily living score, and FAOS-function in sports and recreational activities in the Broström-Gould group consistently outperformed the Broström group at 3 months and 6 months post-surgery, with the differences being statistically significant (all P < 0.05). However, although the differences are statistically significant, the clinical relevance of this statistical significance remains uncertain. At 12 and 24 months, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For CLAI patients with arthroscopic grade 3 lesion of the ATFL, both the all-inside arthroscopic Broström-Gould procedure and the Broström procedure provide stability and enhance ankle joint function, resulting in similar functional outcomes at a 2-year follow-up. IER augmentation following ATFL repair may facilitate earlier recovery exercises compared to isolated all-inside ATFL repair.

Current Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Ignores Functional Demand

INTRODUCTION

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used in orthopaedic surgery to measure aspects of musculoskeletal function that are important to patients, such as disability and pain. However, current assessments of function using PROMs do not necessarily consider a patient's functional demands in detail. A patient's functional demands could serve as a confounder to their perception of their functional ability. Hence, functional demands may need to be adjusted for when PROMs are used to measure musculoskeletal function.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study in which new orthopaedic patients completed a questionnaire regarding demographics, function [Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System], functional demand (Tegner Activity Level Scale), pain self-efficacy, and symptoms of depression. 169 eligible patients with diverse orthopaedic conditions were enrolled in the study from an orthopaedic clinic, and 19 were excluded for incomplete questionnaires.

RESULTS

The mean Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System score was 36.5 ± 9.1, and the mean Tegner score was 2.6 ± 2.0. In the multivariable regression model, patient-reported function was significantly associated with functional demand (β = 0.17, P < 0.001). Significant associations were observed for pain self-efficacy (β = 0.15, P < 0.001), acuity (β = -0.10, P = 0.004), and age 80 years or older (β = -0.16, P = 0.004). No notable association was observed with depression or age 65 to 79 years.

DISCUSSION

Higher patient-reported physical function is associated with higher levels of functional demand when controlling for psychosocial factors, acuity, and age. Because of its confounding effect on measuring physical function, functional demand should be assessed and included in models using PROMs before and after surgery. For example, payment models using improvements in PROMs, such as the short form of the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score after joint arthroplasty, should include functional demand in the model when assessing quality of care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Clinical Outcomes for Arthroscopic Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair After Suture Anchor Insertion Through the Anterolateral Portal vs the Lateral Accessory Portal

BACKGROUND

Two types of suture anchor insertion pathways (anterolateral portal vs lateral accessory portal) are used in arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) repair. However, it is not clear which one is the better choice. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of these 2 suture anchor insertion pathways when performing arthroscopic ATFL lasso-loop repair for the treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI).

METHODS

From 2019 to 2021, patients with CLAI who underwent arthroscopic ATFL lasso-loop repair were retrospectively reviewed and divided into the anterolateral portal (ALP) group and the lateral accessory portal (LAP) group. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to control confounding factors based on age, sex, body mass index, follow-up duration, preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, and Tegner score (ALP group, n = 26; LAP group, n = 26). Karlsson score, VAS score, Tegner score, operation time, anterior drawer test results, patient symptoms, and magnetic resonance (MR) evaluation of ATFL quality were used to describe the outcomes.

RESULTS

The patient characteristics and follow-up durations were similar between the 2 groups. After a mean follow-up duration of 28.8 ± 2.3 months, the ALP group had significantly better Karlsson score, VAS score, and Tegner score improvement than the LAP group, with fewer symptoms. Seven patients in the LAP group still had a feeling of ankle instability, and 3 of them exhibited ankle laxity.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found that inserting the suture anchor through the anterolateral portal was associated with better outcomes compared to that through the lateral accessory portal when performing arthroscopic ATFL lasso-loop repair for CLAI patients. The improvement was greater for pain relief and function and was associated with a lower frequency of subjective ankle instability.

Arthroscopic all-inside ligament repair has similar or superior clinical outcomes compared to open repair for chronic ankle instability without concomitant intra-articular pathology at 5 years follow-up

PURPOSE

Open ligament repair is widely considered the gold standard treatment for chronic ankle instability. Nevertheless, arthroscopic treatment of ankle instability has gained popularity becoming the preferred technique for many surgeons. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of all-inside arthroscopic versus open lateral ligament repair for chronic ankle instability at 5 years follow-up.

METHODS

Ninety consecutive patients were surgically treated for chronic ankle instability without concomitant intra-articular pathology observed on MRI: 41 patients [median age 28 (range 15-54) years] underwent an open lateral ligament repair (OLR); 49 patients [median age 30 (range 19-47) years] underwent an all-inside arthroscopic ligament repair (ALR). Functional outcomes using the Foot Functional Index (FFI), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Hindfoot Score, and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Sports Subscale (FAAM-SS) were assessed preoperatively and at the latest follow-up. At the latest follow-up, the satisfaction rate and complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 58 ± 17.6 (range 47-81) months. In both groups FFI, AOFAS and FAAM-SS score significantly improved compared to preoperative values (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative outcomes between groups in the AOFAS (n.s) and FAAM-SS (n.s), but the FFI results were significantly better in the ALR group (p < 0.05). No major complications were reported in either group.

CONCLUSION

Open and arthroscopic ligament repair to treat chronic ankle instability without concomitant intra-articular pathology produced excellent comparable clinical outcomes at 5 years follow-up. The complications were minimal in both study groups with no significant differences in AOFAS and FAAM-SS scores. However, arthroscopic repair showed significantly better results on the FFI. Therefore, when treating chronic lateral ankle instability, surgeons should consider arthroscopic ligament repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.