Molecular targeted therapy for advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma

Can DNA Methylation Profiling Classify Histologic Subtypes and Grades in Soft Tissue Sarcoma?

BACKGROUND

A clear classification of the subtype and grade of soft tissue sarcoma is important for predicting prognosis and establishing treatment strategies. However, the rarity and heterogeneity of these tumors often make diagnosis difficult. In addition, it remains challenging to predict the response to chemotherapy and prognosis. Thus, we need a new method to help diagnose soft tissue sarcomas and determine treatment strategies in conjunction with traditional methods. Genetic alterations can be found in some subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma, but many other types show dysregulated gene expression attributed to epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation status. However, research on DNA methylation profiles in soft tissue sarcoma is still insufficient to provide information to assist in diagnosis and therapeutic decisions.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Do DNA methylation profiles differ between normal tissue and soft tissue sarcoma? (2) Do DNA methylation profiles vary between different histologic subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma? (3) Do DNA methylation profiles differ based on tumor grade?

METHODS

Between January 2019 and December 2022, we treated 85 patients for soft tissue sarcomas. We considered patients whose specimens were approved for pilot research by the Human Biobank of St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, as potentially eligible. Based on this, 41% (35 patients) were eligible; 1% (one patient) was excluded because of gender mismatch between clinical and genetic data after controlling for data quality. Finally, 39 specimens (34 soft tissue sarcomas and five normal samples) were included from 34 patients who had clinical data. All tissue samples were collected intraoperatively. The five normal tissue samples were from muscle tissues. There were 20 female patients and 14 male patients, with a median age of 58 years (range 19 to 82 years). Genomic DNA was extracted from frozen tissue, and DNA methylation profiles were obtained. Genomic annotation of DNA methylation sites and hierarchical cluster analysis were performed to interpret results from DNA methylation profiling. A t-test was used to analyze different methylation probes. Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted p value calculations were used to account for bias resulting from evaluating thousands of methylation sites.

RESULTS

The most common histologic subtypes were liposarcoma (n = 10) and leiomyosarcoma (n = 9). The tumor grade was Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre Le Cancer Grades 1, 2, and 3 in 3, 15, and 16 patients, respectively. DNA methylation profiling demonstrated differences between soft tissue sarcoma and normal tissue as 21,188 cytosine-phosphate-guanine sites. Despite the small number of samples, 72 of these sites showed an adjusted p value of < 0.000001, suggesting a low probability of statistical errors. Among the 72 sites, 70 exhibited a hypermethylation pattern in soft tissue sarcoma, with only two sites showing a hypomethylation pattern. Thirty of 34 soft tissue sarcomas were distinguished from normal samples using hierarchical cluster analysis. There was a different methylation pattern between leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma at 7445 sites. Using the data, hierarchical clustering analysis showed that liposarcoma was distinguished from leiomyosarcoma. When we used the same approach and included other subtypes with three or more samples, only leiomyosarcoma and myxofibrosarcoma were separated from the other subtypes, while liposarcoma and alveolar soft-part sarcoma were mixed with the others. When comparing DNA methylation profiles between low-grade (Grade 1) and high-grade (Grades 2 and 3) soft tissue sarcomas, a difference in methylation pattern was observed at 144 cytosine-phosphate-guanine sites. Among these, 132 cytosine-phosphate-guanine sites exhibited hypermethylation in the high-grade group compared with the low-grade group. Hierarchical clustering analysis showed a division into two groups, with most high-grade sarcomas (28 of 31) separated from the low-grade group and few (3 out of 31) clustered together with the low-grade group. However, three high-grade soft tissue sarcomas were grouped with the Grade 1 cluster, and all of these sarcomas were Grade 2. When comparing Grades 1 and 2 to Grade 3, Grade 3 tumors were separated from Grades 1 and 2.

CONCLUSION

We observed a different DNA methylation pattern between soft tissue sarcomas and normal tissues. Liposarcoma was distinguished from leiomyosarcoma using methylation profiling. High-grade soft tissue sarcoma samples showed a hypermethylation pattern compared with low-grade ones. Our findings indicate the need for research using methylation profiling to better understand the diverse biological characteristics of soft tissue sarcoma. Such research should include studies with sufficient samples and a variety of subtypes, as well as analyses of the expression and function of related genes. Additionally, efforts to link this research with clinical data related to treatment and prognosis are necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Comprehensive Analysis of Tumor Microenvironment Reveals Prognostic ceRNA Network Related to Immune Infiltration in Sarcoma

PURPOSE

Sarcoma is the second most common solid tumor type in children and adolescents. The high level of tumor heterogeneity as well as aggressive behavior of sarcomas brings serious difficulties to developing effective therapeutic strategies for clinical application. Therefore, it is of great importance to identify accurate biomarkers for early detection and prognostic prediction of sarcomas.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this study, we characterized three subtypes of sarcomas based on tumor immune infiltration levels (TIIL), and constructed a prognosis-related competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network to investigate molecular regulations in the sarcoma tumor microenvironment (TME). We further built a subnetwork consisting of mRNAs and lncRNAs that are targets of key miRNAs and strongly correlated with each other in the ceRNA network. After validation using public data and experiments in vivo and in vitro, we deeply dug the biological role of the miRNAs and lncRNAs in a subnetwork and their impact on TME.

RESULTS

Altogether, 5 miRNAs (hsa-mir-125b-2, hsa-mir-135a-1, hsa-mir92a-2, hsa-mir-181a-2, and hsa-mir-214), 3 lncRNAs (LINC00641, LINC01146, and LINC00892), and 10 mRNAs (AGO2, CXCL10, CD86, CASP1, IKZF1, CD27, CD247, CD69, CCR2, and CSF2RB) in the subnetwork were identified as vital regulators to shape the TME. On the basis of the systematic network, we identified that trichostatin A, a pan-HDAC inhibitor, could potentially regulate the TME of sarcoma, thereby inhibiting the tumor growth.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identifies a ceRNA network as a promising biomarker for sarcoma. This system provides a more comprehensive understanding and a novel perspective of how ceRNAs are involved in shaping sarcoma TME.

A rare case report of paratesticular spindle cell tumor: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Spindle cell tumors in the paratesticular region are infrequent. Accurate diagnosis requires clinical assessment, pathological analysis, and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis.

CASE PRESENTATION

The present study reports a 33-year-old male who presented with a painless mass in his right testis. The mass grew from the size of a marble to that of a tennis ball in two years. Physical examination and ultrasonography revealed a solid mass in the right paratesticular area. The patient underwent a right paratesticular tumor excision, without interfering the right testis. Histopathologic analysis showed spindle cell tumor appearance referring to inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT).

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

IMT, also known as inflammatory pseudotumor, is a rare and benign neoplasm that can occur anywhere. Diagnosis is challenging, because it mimics other neoplasms. Immunohistochemical profiles were decisive in concluding a definitive diagnosis. Treatment, on the other hand, depends on tumor burden and connectivity to other region.

CONCLUSION

Spindle cell tumors are very rare and can be treated with simple excision if no organ adhesion is detected. Therefore, right orchidectomy was not required in our case.

Undifferentiated soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in a 34-year-old woman: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a type of cancer that can affect connective tissue. Diagnosis of this malignant tumor is difficult, and complications are related to the pressure it can exert on surrounding body organs. Up to 50 % of STS patients develop metastatic disease, which greatly affects the prognosis and is challenging for the treating physician.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case report is about a 34-year-old woman who was found to have significant growth of malignant tumor in her lower back due to misdiagnosis and negligence about her disease. After the cancer invaded the abdominal cavity, she died from related complications.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

STS are among the rare malignant tumors, and the mortality rate of these cancers is very high because they are often not properly diagnosed.

CONCLUSION

Educating medical personnel, especially primary care physicians, about the symptoms and manifestations of STS can make a significant contribution to successful treatment. Due to the complexity of treatment, any soft-tissue swelling suspected of malignancy is best referred directly to a sarcoma center, where therapeutic management is carefully planned by an experienced multidisciplinary team.

New trends in the surgical management of soft tissue sarcoma: The role of preoperative biopsy

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) accounts for 1% of all malignant neoplasms in adults. Their diagnosis and management constitute a challenging target. They originate from the mesenchyme, and 50 subtypes with various cytogenetic profiles concerning soft tissue and bones have been recognized. These tumors mainly affect middle-aged adults but may be present at any age. Half of the patients have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and require systemic therapy. Tumors above 3-5 cm in size must be suspected of potential malignancy. A thorough history, clinical examination and imaging that must precede biopsy are necessary. Modern imaging techniques include ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography/CT. MRI findings may distinguish low-grade from high-grade STS based on a diagnostic score (tumor heterogeneity, intratumoral and peritumoral enhancement). A score ≥ 2 indicates a high-grade lesion, and a score ≤ 1 indicates a low-grade lesion. For disease staging, abdominal imaging is recommended to detect early abdominal or retroperitoneal metastases. Liquid biopsy by detecting genomic material in serum is a novel diagnostic tool. A preoperative biopsy is necessary for diagnosis, prognosis and optimal planning of surgical intervention. Core needle biopsy is the most indicative and effective. Its correct performance influences surgical management. An unsuccessful biopsy means the dissemination of cancer cells into healthy anatomical structures that ultimately affect resectability and survival. Complete therapeutic excision (R0) with an acceptable resection margin of 1 cm is the method of choice. However, near significant structures, i.e., vessels, nerves, an R2 resection (macroscopic margin involvement) preserving functionality but having a risk of local recurrence can be an acceptable choice, after informing the patient, to prevent an unavoidable amputation. For borderline resectability of the tumor, neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapy has a place. Likewise, after surgical excision, adjuvant therapy is indicated, but chemotherapy in nonmetastatic disease is still debatable. The five-year survival rate reaches up to 55%. Reresection is considered after positive or uncertain resection margins. Current strategies are based on novel chemotherapeutic agents, improved radiotherapy applications to limit local side effects and targeted biological therapy or immunotherapy, including vaccines. Young age is a risk factor for distant metastasis within 6 mo following primary tumor resection. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy lasting 5-6 wk and surgical resection are indicated for high-grade STS (grade 2 or 3). Wide surgical excision alone may be acceptable for patients older than 70 years. However, locally advanced disease requires a multidisciplinary task of decision-making for amputation or limb salvage.

Treatment Pathways and Prognosis in Advanced Sarcoma with Peritoneal Sarcomatosis

Sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal malignancies that most commonly occur in the extremities, retroperitoneum, and head and neck. Intra-abdominal manifestations are rare and prove particularly difficult to treat when peritoneal sarcomatosis is present. Because of the overall poor prognosis of the disease, a tailored approach to surgical management is essential to achieve satisfactory outcomes with limited morbidity. We present the perioperative and long-term outcomes of 19 cases of sarcoma with peritoneal sarcomatosis treated surgically at our hospital. Treatment pathways were reviewed and clinical follow-up was performed. Patient characteristics, medical history, tumor subtype, surgical approach, hospital stay, complications, follow-up, and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Our patients were 9 women and 10 men with a median age of 45.9 years (18-88) and a median survival of 30 months (0-200). In most cases, peritoneal sarcomatosis was either discovered during surgery or the procedure was performed with palliative intent from the beginning. The surgical approach in these cases is very heterogeneous and should consider a variety of factors to tailor an approach for each patient. Sharing our experiences will help to increase knowledge about this rare disease and provide insight into the management of future cases.

Accuracy of core needle biopsy for histologic diagnosis of soft tissue sarcoma

The biopsy technique of choice in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) diagnosis is controversial. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) and compared it to open incisional biopsy. A retrospective study included 91 incisional biopsies and 102 CNBs. A pair-match investigation was conducted on 19 patient pairs, comparing sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, we investigated the role of molecular pathology in sarcoma diagnostics. In 81/91 (89%) patients with incisional biopsy, the entity was confirmed by definitive pathology, whereas this was the case in 89/102 (87%) CNB patients (p = 0.52). Grading remained unchanged in 46/55 (84%) of incisional and 54/62 (87%) of CNBs (p = 0.61). The pair matched analysis showed that the correct entity was determined in 96% of incisional and 97.6% of core needle biopsies. The time between the initial consultation and the interdisciplinary tumor board's treatment recommendation was shorter in core needle biopsies (8.37 vs. 15.63 days; p < 0.002). Incisional biopsies led to two wound infections and one hematoma, whereas wound infection occurred in one patient after CNB. CNB leads to faster diagnosis while reaching the same histological accuracy and is less burdensome for patients. Still, surgeons need to remain aware of the possibility of biopsy failure.