Mechanisms of action of antiarrhythmic drugs relative to the origin and perpetuation of cardiac arrhythmias

The impact of time to amiodarone administration on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Aim

To examine the impact of time to amiodarone administration on survival from shock-refractory Ventricular Fibrillation/pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia (VF/pVT) following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of adult (≥16 years) OHCA patients in shock-refractory VF/pVT (after 3 consecutive defibrillation attempts) of medical aetiology who arrested between January 2010 and December 2019. Time-dependent propensity score matching was used to sequentially match patients who received amiodarone at any given minute of resuscitation with patients eligible to receive amiodarone during the same minute. Log-binomial regression models were used to assess the association between time of amiodarone administration (by quartiles of time-to-matching) and survival outcomes.

Results

A total of 2,026 patients were included, 1,393 (68.8%) of whom received amiodarone with a median (interquartile range) time to administration of 22.0 (18.0-27.0) minutes. Propensity score matching yielded 1,360 matched pairs. Amiodarone administration within 28 minutes of the emergency call was associated with a higher likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (≤18minutes: RR = 1.03 (95%CI 1.02, 1.04); 19-22minutes: RR = 1.02 (95%CI 1.01, 1.03); 23-27minutes: RR = 1.01 (95%CI 1.00, 1.02)) and event survival (pulse on hospital arrival) (≤18 minutes: RR = 1.05 (95%CI 1.03, 1.07); 19-22 minutes: RR = 1.03 (95%CI 1.01, 1.05); 23-27 minutes: RR = 1.02 (95%CI 1.00, 1.03). Amiodarone administration within 23 minutes of the emergency call was associated with a higher likelihood of survival to hospital discharge (≤18minutes: RR = 1.17 (95%CI 1.09, 1.24; 19-22 minutes: RR = 1.10 (95%CI 1.04, 1.17).

Conclusion

Amiodarone administered within 23 minutes of the emergency call is associated with improved survival outcomes in shock-refractory VF/pVT, although prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.

A review of the investigational antiarrhythmic agent dronedarone

Arrhythmias are a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and atrial fibrillation is the most widespread disorder of cardiac rhythm. Amiodarone is an effective antiarrhythmic agent that has been in clinical use for about 20 years. It is effective for multiple types of arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, and has a low incidence of cardiac adverse events, including Torsade de Pointes. It has many noncardiac adverse effects that are serious and limit its long-term use. Dronedarone is an investigational antiarrhythmic agent that is designed to have similar cardiac effects to amiodarone but with fewer adverse effects. This review presents some of the animal and human studies that evaluate the effects of dronedarone.

In Vivo and In Vitro Characterization of the Novel Antiarrhythmic Agent SSR149744C

SSR149744C (SSR, 2-butyl-3-[4-[3-(dibutylamino)pro-pyl]benzoyl]-1-benzofuran-5-carboxylate isopropyl fumarate), is a new non-iodinated benzofuran derivative. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vivo its electrophysiological, hemodynamic, and anti-adrenergic properties and to determine its mechanism of action using in vitro studies. In chloralose-anesthetized dogs, SSR149744C (1-10 mg/kg i.v.) prolonged the sinus cycle length, A-H interval, Wenckebach cycle length, atrial effective refractory period (ERP), and atrio-ventricular node ERP in a dose-dependent manner without change of ventricular ERP and HV, QRS, or QTc intervals. Arterial blood pressure and ventricular inotropism were slightly decreased. SSR149744C, which has no or low affinity for alpha 1 and beta 1 adrenergic and angiotensin II AT1 receptors, reduced isoproterenol-induced tachycardia and phenylephrine- or angiotensin II-induced hypertension in anaesthetized dogs. In guinea pig papillary muscle, SSR149744C did not modify the resting potential, action potential amplitude and duration, but reduced the dV/dt max of the depolarization phase in a frequency-dependent manner. In isolated guinea pig cardiomyocytes and transfected CHO cells, SSR149744C (0.01-30 microM) inhibited several potassium currents: IKr (IC50 approximately 10 microM), IKs (IC50 approximately 30 microM), IK(ACh) (IC50 = 0.09 microM), and IKv1.5 (IC50 = 2.7 microM), the L-type calcium current: ICa(L) (IC50 approximately 5 microM) and also the amplitude of [Ca2+]i transient and cell shortening. Therefore, SSR149744C appears to have a multifactorial mechanism of action, which combines the blockade of several ion channels with the inhibition of responses of alpha 1 and beta 1 adrenergic as well as AT1 receptor stimulation. Like amiodarone, SSR149744C possesses the pharmacological effects of class I, II, III, and IV antiarrhythmic agents, which may confer upon this new drug a strong antiarrhythmic potential without ventricular proarrhythmia and iodine-related amiodarone-like side-effects.

Rationale and patient selection for "hybrid" drug and device therapy in atrial and ventricular arrhythmias

Three quite different forms of direct antiarrhythmic therapy are available for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias: antiarrhythmic drugs, cardiac ablation and implantable devices (pacemakers and defibrillators). None of these therapies is fully effective and consequently they are increasingly combined. This combination therapy is often described as "hybrid" a term that implies fundamental different qualities of treatment which together provide some form of synergism. The mechanisms for the initiation and perpetuation of most cardiac arrhythmias are complex and multiple. It is therefore not surprising that single therapies are not completely effective. Theoretically the use of multiple different therapies allows more specific mechanisms of arrhythmia to be directly addressed. However, this is largely a theoretical concept that has only been strictly evaluated in a small number of studies. Studies of multiple therapies are difficult to perform unless the combination therapy is regarded as a strategy which can be compared to baseline, conventional treatment or one or more single constituent therapies from the combination. Despite the lack of formal studies there is a very substantial clinical experience which testifies to the value of hybrid therapy for the management of both atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation.

The effect of isoproterenol on the class III effect of azimilide in humans

BACKGROUND

Many class III antiarrhythmic agents lose efficacy under beta-adrenergic stimulation and at high heart rates (reverse rate dependence). This effect is thought to be due to selective blockade of the rapidly (I(Kr)), but not the slowly (I(Ks)), activating component of the delayed inward rectifier potassium current. Azimilide is an investigational class III antiarrhythmic agent that blocks both IKr and IKs.

METHODS

We investigated the electrophysiologic effect of azimilide with and without beta-adrenergic stimulation in humans. Right ventricular effective refractory period at cycle lengths of 600 and 400 milliseconds and monophasic right ventricular action potential duration at 90% repolarization at cycle lengths of 250, 300, 400, 500 and 600 milliseconds were measured in 13 patients at baseline. Isoproterenol was then infused to increase the heart rate to 125% of baseline, and the pacing protocol was repeated. Patients then received, in a single-blind randomized manner, azimilide dihydrochloride (4.5 mg/kg intravenous loading dose followed by 0.625 mg/kg/h) plus either isoproterenol at the previous dose, or saline. After measurements were taken, treatment groups were crossed over, the azimilide infusion was continued and the procedure repeated.

RESULTS

Azimilide significantly (P < 0.05) prolonged monophasic action potential duration compared to baseline at all cycle lengths except for the 250 millisecond cycle length. In the presence of isoproterenol, azimilide maintained its class III effect, prolonging the action potential duration at 90% repolarization by a mean of 8.7 +/- 3.9 milliseconds, (3.7 +/- 1.7%), whereas isoproterenol alone shortened the action potential duration at 90% repolarization by -2.6 +/- 3.2 milliseconds (-1.2 +/- 1.4%) (P = 0.0051). Isoproterenol alone shortened the right ventricular effective refractory period by -13.6 +/- 3.4 milliseconds, whereas with isoproterenol in the presence of azimilide, the right ventricular effective refractory period was essentially unaffected (-1.4 +/- 3.4 milliseconds, P = 0.0085).

CONCLUSIONS

Azimilide maintained its class III effect in the presence of isoproterenol and at increased heart rates, suggesting that IKs block may be of particular benefit in these circumstances.

Azimilide inhibits multiple cardiac potassium currents in human atrial myocytes

BACKGROUND

Studies in animal cell preparations suggest that azimilide may produce a more desirable rate-dependent profile of class III action as a result of its effects on both the slowly (I(Ks)) and rapidly (I(Kr)) activating components of potassium current (I(K)). However, relatively little is known about the effects of azimilide on K(+) currents in human atrial cells. The present study investigated the effect of azimilide on the inward rectifier potassium current (I(K1)), delayed rectifier potassium current (I(K)), ultrarapid delayed rectifier current (I(Kur)), and transient outward potassium current (I(to)) in isolated single human atrial myocytes.

METHODS

The tight-seal, whole-cell voltage clamp technique was used to investigate the acute effects of azimilide on K(+) currents in single human atrial myocytes. The cells were isolated enzymatically from atrial tissues that were obtained from patients undergoing open-heart surgeries, with the approval of the local Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

The average cell capacitance of the human atrial myocytes was 77.5 +/- 2.8 pF (Mean +/- standard error of mean, total 28 cells from 17 patients). We found that 100 microM of azimilide in the extracellular solution significantly inhibited the inward rectifier potassium current (12.3 +/- 3.1 vs 6.7 +/- 2.0 pA/pF, n = 12, P < 0.05) at the testing potential of -100 mV. Superfusion with 100 microM of azimilide for 10 minutes inhibited I(K) by 51.7 +/- 5.1% (from 3.4 +/- 0.5 to 1.6 +/- 0.2 pA/pF, n = 9, P < 0.01) at the clamping membrane potential of +40 mV. Human atrial cell I(Kur) was inhibited with 100 microM of azimilide by 38.6 +/- 4.4% (from 3.9 +/- 0.5 to 2.3 +/- 0.2 pA/pF, n = 9, P < 0.01, test potential = 40 mV). We also found that the average peak current amplitude of I(to) in these cells was significantly inhibited with 100 microM of azimilide by 60.3 +/- 5.9% (from 10.3 +/- 1.5 to 3.6 +/- 0.3 pA/pF, n = 6, P < 0.01, test potential = 50 mV).

CONCLUSION

The present study provides direct evidence that azimilide inhibits multiple cellular transmembrane K(+) currents in freshly isolated human atrial myocytes. Inhibition of these K(+) currents by azimilide, especially of I(Ks) and I(Kur) is likely to be the electrophysiologic basis for the prolongation of the action potential duration in the human atria which mediates its known antifibrillatory effects in atrial fibrillation and flutter.