The Burden of Atrial Fibrillation: Should We Abandon Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy?

β-Adrenergic Blockers as Antiarrhythmic and Antifibrillatory Compounds: An Overview

β-Adrenergic blockers have a wide spectrum of action for controlling cardiac arrhythmias that is larger than initially thought. Data from the past several decades indicate that, as an antiarrhythmic class, β-blockers remain among the very few pharmacologic agents that reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac death, prolong survival, and ameliorate symptoms caused by arrhythmias in patients with cardiac disease. As a class of compounds, β-blockers have a fundamental pharmacologic property that attenuates the effects of competitive adrenergic receptors. However, the net clinical effects of the different β-receptor blockers may vary quantitatively because of variations in associated intrinsic sympathomimetic agonism and in their intrinsic potency for binding to β-receptors. These individual compounds also differ in their selectivity for β1- and β2-receptors. Metoprolol is a β1-selective blocker, whereas carvedilol is a nonselective β1- and β2-blocker, an antioxidant, and has a propensity to inhibit α1-receptors and endothelin. Evolving data from controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials suggest that there are clinically significant differences among this class of drugs. Recent evidence also suggests that the antiarrhythmic actions of certain β-receptor blockers such as carvedilol and metoprolol extend beyond the ventricular tissue to encompass atrial cells and help maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation, especially in combination with potent antifibrillatory agents such as amiodarone. This introduction provides a current perspective on these newer developments in the understanding of the antiarrhythmic and antifibrillatory actions of β-blockers.

Costs and clinical consequences of suboptimal atrial fibrillation management

Atrial fibrillation (AF) places a considerable burden on the US health care system, society, and individual patients due to its associated morbidity, mortality, and reduced health-related quality of life. AF increases the risk of stroke, which often results in lengthy hospital stays, increased disability, and long-term care, all of which impact medical costs. An expected increase in the prevalence of AF and incidence of AF-related stroke underscores the need for optimal management of this disorder. Although AF treatment strategies have been proven effective in clinical trials, data show that patients still receive suboptimal treatment. Adherence to AF treatment guidelines will help to optimize treatment and reduce costs due to AF-associated events; new treatments for AF show promise for future reductions in disease and cost burden due to improved tolerability profiles. Additional research is necessary to compare treatment costs and outcomes of new versus existing agents; an immediate effort to optimize treatment based on existing evidence and guidelines is critical to reducing the burden of AF.

Update on the clinical management of atrial fibrillation: guidelines and beyond

In clinical practice, atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly encountered arrhythmia. With the aging of the US population, the number of patients with AF that physicians encounter will increase. Atrial fibrillation management involves a combination of rate- and rhythm-control strategies with thromboprophylaxis, a complicated endeavor given side effect profiles of treatments, patient comorbidities, and anticoagulation treatment requirements. Early treatment discontinuation and poor compliance with anticoagulation treatment are frequent and result in increased mortality, a 5-fold increased risk of ischemic stroke, decreased health-related quality of life, and decreased exercise capacity. In 2006, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology (ACC/AHA/ESC) provided guidelines for the management of patients with AF. Recently, the ACC Foundation, AHA, and Heart Rhythm Society released updates to these guidelines (January and February 2011). This article aims to assist physicians in improving the management of patients with AF by focusing on the main components of therapy as reflected in the guidelines, and by providing an update on new US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments.

Amiodarone: A multifaceted antiarrhythmic drug

Synthesized as an antianginal compound 40 years ago, amiodarone has emerged as a uniquely effective antiarrhythmic compound in recent years. It has numerous properties, the most prominent being the ability to lengthen repolarization in the atria and ventricles associated with bradycardia without the significant potential for torsades de pointes. Amiodarone effectively controls a wide spectrum of atrial and ventricular antiarrhythmic disorders, but its limiting side effects, such as thyroid dysfunction, pulmonary fibrosis, and dermatologic changes, may limit its long-term use in some patients. What aspects of the multiplicity of the properties of amiodarone are relevant to its unusual efficacy is not known. Deiodination and other structural changes in the amiodarone molecule have has led to a the loss of thyroid and pulmonary effects in the resulting derivative, dronedarone, which is in advanced clinical development.

High mechanical efficiency of left ventricular arrhythmic contractions during atrial fibrillation

We analyzed the frequency distribution of the left ventricular (LV) mechanical efficiency of individual arrhythmic beats during electrically induced atrial fibrillation (AF) in normal canine hearts. This efficiency is the fraction of the external mechanical work (EW) in the total mechanical energy measured by the systolic pressure-volume area (PVA). The mean, median, and mode of this efficiency (EW/PVA) were as high as 78%, 80%, and 81%, respectively, on average in six hearts. These high efficiencies were comparable to that of the regular beats in these hearts. The frequency distribution of the EW/PVA during AF tended to skew to the higher side in all the hearts. Since the EW/PVA is directly related to both the ventriculo-arterial (or afterload) coupling ratio (E(a)/E(max); E(a) = effective arterial elastance, E(max) = end-systolic ventricular elastance) and the ejection fraction on a per-beat basis, we also analyzed their frequency distributions. We found them to skew enough to account for the rightward skewed frequency distribution of the EW/PVA during AF with the unexpectedly high mean EW/PVA. These results indicate that the LV arrhythmia during AF per se does not directly suppress the mean level of LV mechanical efficiency in normal canine hearts.

Cardiovascular effects of (R)- and (S)-verapamil and racemic verapamil in humans: a placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To characterise the comparative potency of optically pure (R)- and (S)-verapamil as regards negative dromotropic effects on atrioventricular (AV) node conduction and to compare the hemodynamic effects of single doses of the enantiomers in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Eight healthy volunteers received a single oral dose of 120 mg (S)-verapamil, 480 mg (R)-verapamil, 240 mg racemic verapamil (rac-verapamil) or placebo on 4 separate occasions. Serum concentrations of (R)- and (S)-verapamil were measured up to 24 h. Cardiovascular effects were assessed by electrocardiography, measurement of blood pressure and transthoracic impedance cardiography (cardiac output and total peripheral resistance). The comparative potency of (R)- and (S)-verapamil with regard to prolongation of the PR interval in the surface ECG was estimated by use of the areas under the effect-time and serum concentration-time curves and linear regression analyses of per cent change in PR interval from baseline versus the logarithm of serum (R)- or (S)-verapamil concentration.

RESULTS

The PR interval was significantly prolonged after all verapamil treatments as compared with placebo. (S)-verapamil was 20.6-21.8 times more potent than (R)-verapamil with regard to negative dromotropic effects. (R)-verapamil caused a significantly greater maximum reduction in the mean arterial pressure (MAP) than placebo [15.9+/-6.8 versus 8.7+/-3.2 mmHg (mean+/-SD); 95% CI on the difference, 0.79-13.7 mmHg; p<0.05], whereas MAP was not affected by the other verapamil treatments. No significant changes were observed in heart rate, cardiac output and total peripheral resistance after any verapamil treatment as compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

(S)-verapamil was about 20 times more potent than (R)-verapamil with regard to negative dromotropic effects on AV node conduction. (R)-verapamil but not (S)-verapamil significantly reduced the MAP as compared with placebo.

Characterization of the in vivo and in vitro electrophysiological effects of the novel antiarrhythmic agent AZD7009 in atrial and ventricular tissue of the dog

This study evaluated the effects of the novel antiarrhythmic agent AZD7009 on atrial and ventricular repolarization and on the Na+-current system, using Vmax as an index. Anesthetized dogs were infused with AZD7009 or azimilide to produce three pseudo steady-state plasma concentrations in vivo. Microelectrode techniques were used to record action potentials and effective refractory period (ERP) in vitro. Whereas AZD7009 concentration-dependently increased atrial ERP (AERP, by 48 +/- 7 milliseconds maximum, P < 0.001 versus vehicle), the increases in ventricular ERP (VERP, 8 +/- 4 milliseconds) and QT interval (2 +/- 5.5 milliseconds) were small and not concentration-dependent. For azimilide, the AERP increase was less, whereas VERP and QT increases were substantially larger than with AZD7009. In vitro, AZD7009 concentration-dependently reduced Vmax and increased action potential duration (APD). ERP was increased through APD lengthening and post-repolarization refractoriness. The suppression of Vmax, but not APD prolongation, showed frequency-dependence. APD and ERP increases were more pronounced in atrial than ventricular tissue: in atria, 2 microM AZD7009 increased APD90 and ERP from 224 +/- 7 to 318 +/- 7 milliseconds and 241 +/- 7 milliseconds to 378 +/- 17 milliseconds; versus 257 +/- 5 to 283 +/- 7 milliseconds and 253 +/- 12 to 300 +/- 11 milliseconds respectively in ventricles. Thus, AZD7009 potently and predominantly increases atrial refractoriness in the dog, with actions mediated by combined effects on repolarization and the Na+-current system.