Greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and reduced response variability with prasugrel versus clopidogrel: an integrated analysis

[Evaluation of treatment adaptation for low response to ASA in vascular surgery]

Hintergrund

Eine verminderte antithrombozytäre Prophylaxe („Low-Response [LR]“/„high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HPR]“) mit Acetylsalicylsäure (ASS) ist mit einem erhöhten Risiko für thrombembolische Ereignisse assoziiert. Die Prävalenz einer Low-Response ist mit ca. 20 % häufig und ein Therapieregime wurde bisher noch nicht etabliert. Das Ziel dieser prospektiven Studie war es, die Effektivität eines Therapieschemas zur Therapieanpassung bei detektierter LR/HPR bei gefäßchirurgischen Patienten zu evaluieren.

Methodik

Insgesamt wurden 36 gefäßchirurgischen Patienten mit einer antithrombozytären Dauermedikation mit ASS 100 mg/Tag und einer nachgewiesenen ASS-Low-Response (ALR) in die Studie eingeschlossen. Entsprechend dem festgelegten Therapieplan wurde bei diesen Patienten eine Therapieanpassung durchgeführt und eine Kontrollaggregometrie zur Erfolgskontrolle durchgeführt. Das verwendete Therapieschema folgte dem Test-and-treat-Prinzip. Zur Beurteilung der Wirkung von ASS diente die Impedanzaggregometrie mittels Mehrelektrodenaggregometer (Multiplate).

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt konnten alle 36 Patienten erfolgreich in eine Response überführt werden. Bei 32 (88,89 %) Patienten erfolgte eine Dosiserhöhung auf 300 mg ASS, 2 (5,56 %) Patienten wurden von ASS auf Clopidogrel umgestellt. Bei weiteren 2 (5,56 %) Patienten wurde auf eine orale Antikoagulation mit Phenprocoumon aufgrund anderer Indikationen umgestellt. Blutungskomplikationen oder Nebenwirkungen traten nicht auf.

Schlussfolgerung

Das gewählte Therapieschema zur Behandlung einer Low-Response erwies sich als effektiv und sicher bei gefäßchirurgischen Patienten. Überwiegend führte eine leitliniengerechte Dosiserhöhung der Prophylaxe von 100 mg auf 300 mg ASS zu einer effektiven Thrombozytenaggregationshemmung in der Aggregometrie.

CYP3A4*22 Impairs the Elimination of Ticagrelor, But Has No Significant Effect on the Bioactivation of Clopidogrel or Prasugrel

CYP3A enzymes participate in the elimination of ticagrelor and the bioactivation of clopidogrel and prasugrel. We studied the effects of functional CYP3A genetic variants (CYP3A4*22; rs35599367 and CYP3A5*3; rs776746) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor, clopidogrel, and prasugrel. Six healthy volunteers with the CYP3A4*1/*22 and CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype (CYP3A4*22 carriers), eight with the CYP3A4*1/*1 and CYP3A5*1/*3 genotype (CYP3A5 expressors), and 11-13 with the CYP3A4*1/*1 and CYP3A5*3/*3 genotypes (controls) ingested single doses of ticagrelor, clopidogrel, and prasugrel on separate occasions. Ticagrelor area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was 89% (P = 0.004) higher in CYP3A4*22 carriers than in controls. CYP3A4*22 carriers also showed more pronounced platelet inhibition at 24 hours after ticagrelor ingestion than the controls (43% vs. 21%; P = 0.029). The CYP3A5 genotype did not affect ticagrelor pharmacokinetics. Neither CYP3A5 nor CYP3A4 genotypes significantly affected prasugrel or clopidogrel. In conclusion, the CYP3A4*22 allele markedly impairs ticagrelor elimination enhancing its antiplatelet effect.

Cytochrome P450 2B6 and 2C9 genotype polymorphism – a possible cause of prasugrel low responsiveness

The cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes are essential for the metabolic activation of the prodrug prasugrel. Little is known about the impact of polymorphism of these isoenzymes on the prevalence of prasugrel low responsiveness (PLR) in patients with coronary artery disease. We investigated the frequency of PLR and the question whether PLR is associated with decreased/non-function polymorphisms of the CYP isoenzymes (2C9*2, 2C9*3, 2C19*2, 2C19*3, and 2B6*6). Our study included 355 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary stenting. The patients were initially treated with either prasugrel (n=90; 60/10 mg: loading/daily maintenance dose) or 600/75 mg clopidogrel hydrogensulfate (n=265) in combination with 500/100 mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Platelet function was tested by impedance aggregometry 48 hours after taking the loading dose. Prasugrel achieved on the average significantly higher levels of platelet inhibition as compared to clopidogrel (mean 27.3 U vs 41.2 U). The frequencies of low response for prasugrel, clopidogrel and ASA were 9.8%, 35.1% and 14.9%, respectively. We identified only body mass index to be associated with PLR. PLR was not caused by a loss of ADP P2Y12-receptor function. Half of the patients with PLR were carriers of the reducedfunction allele CYP2B6*6, and 41.7% had the genetic variant CYP2C9*2. The allele CYP2C9*3 was detected in three patients with PLR (25%) and two patients with PLR (16.7%) carried the gene variant CYP2C19*2. In conclusion, the rate of low responders was significantly lower among patients treated with prasugrel than with clopidogrel. PLR are more often carriers of CYP2C9*2 (50% in PLR) than when compared to the prevalence described in literature. Also, there is a trend to an increased frequency of CYP2B6*6 in PLR. In conclusion, CYP2B6 and CYP2C9 polymorphisms seem to be associated with prasugrel low-response.

Decrease in high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) prevalence on switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel: Insights from the switching anti-platelet (SWAP) study

The prevalence of high platelet reactivity (HPR) in patients who have switched from clopidogrel to prasugrel during maintenance phase after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event is unknown. Therefore, the effect of switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel on the prevalence of HPR was evaluated. This analysis from the previously reported SWAP (SWitching Anti Platelet) study assessed HPR at baseline, 2 and 24 hours, and seven days after switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel maintenance dose (MD), with or without a prasugrel loading dose (LD) using four definitions: maximum platelet aggregation (MPA) >65% (primary endpoint), MPA >50%, P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) >235, and platelet reactivity index (PRI) ≥50%. A total of 95 patients were available for analysis; 56 patients provided DNA for genetic assessments of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19. There were 26 (27.4%) patients with HPR at the end of the clopidogrel run-in (defined as MPA >65%). The HPR prevalence varied by each definition and ranged from 19% (PRU >235) to 68% (PRI ≥50%). A significantly higher HPR prevalence was observed during clopidogrel versus the combined prasugrel therapy groups at seven days as measured by MPA >65% (21.2% vs. 4.5%, p>0.05), PRU >235 (18.8% vs. 0%, p=0.001), and PRI ≥50% (66.7% vs. 7.9%, p<0.0001). There was a significantly higher percentage of subjects carrying at least one reduced function allele with HPR measured by MPA >65% (p=0.02) or PRU >235 (p=0.05) than non-carriers with HPR. Switching ACS patients during maintenance clopidogrel therapy to prasugrel with or without an LD is associated with a reduced HPR prevalence and may provide an alternative strategy to treat patients with HPR, independent of CYP2C19 genotype.

Effect of grapefruit juice on the bioactivation of prasugrel

AIMS

The P2Y12 inhibitor prasugrel is a prodrug, which is activated after its initial hydrolysis partly by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. Grapefruit juice, a strong inactivator of intestinal CYP3A4, greatly reduces the activation and antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of grapefruit juice on prasugrel.

METHODS

In a randomized crossover study, seven healthy volunteers ingested 200 ml of grapefruit juice or water three times daily for 4 days. On day 3, they ingested a single 10 mg dose of prasugrel with an additional 200 ml of grapefruit juice or water. Plasma concentrations of prasugrel metabolites and the antiplatelet effect were measured.

RESULTS

Grapefruit juice increased the geometric mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-∞)) of the primary, inactive metabolite of prasugrel to 164% of the control value (95% confidence interval 122-220%, P = 0.008), without a significant effect on its peak plasma concentration (C(max)). The C(max) and AUC(0-∞) of the secondary, active metabolite were decreased to 51% (95% confidence interval 32-84%, P = 0.017) and 74% of the control value (95% confidence interval 60-91%, P = 0.014) by grapefruit juice (P < 0.05). The average platelet inhibition, assessed with the VerifyNow® method at 0-24 h after prasugrel intake, was 5 percentage points (95% confidence interval 1-10 percentage points) lower in the grapefruit juice phase than in the water phase (P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Grapefruit juice reduces the bioactivation of prasugrel, but this has only a limited effect on the antiplatelet effect of prasugrel.

Cangrelor for treatment during percutaneous coronary intervention

Dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin and a P2Y12-receptor antagonist is important for preventing major adverse cardiovascular events in patients managed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The current P2Y12-receptor antagonists are only available for oral administration and exhibit a delayed onset of action. Furthermore, several days are required for platelet function to return to normal following cessation of therapy. Cangrelor is an intravenous ATP analog that directly, selectively and reversibly inhibits P2Y12 receptors on platelets. A 30-μg/kg bolus dose followed by a 4-μg/kg per minute continuous infusion of cangrelor achieves peak concentration and maximal platelet inhibition within minutes of administration. Cangrelor also demonstrates a fast offset as normal platelet function is restored 1-2 h after cessation of the infusion. Three large, double-blind, randomized trials - CHAMPION PLATFORM, CHAMPION PCI and CHAMPION PHOENIX - assessed the efficacy and safety of cangrelor compared with clopidogrel (during or immediately after PCI) or placebo in the setting of PCI. In the most recent CHAMPION PHOENIX trial, cangrelor was superior to clopidogrel for preventing adverse cardiovascular events with no significant increase in major bleeding. Based on the clinical trial results combined with unique properties such as intravenous administration and fast onset and offset, cangrelor may provide benefit in certain patients undergoing PCI.

Clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor? a practical guide to use of antiplatelet agents in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Aspirin is a cornerstone of therapy in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, dual antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of stent thrombosis and cardiovascular events compared with aspirin alone in the treatment of patients with ACS. Recently, there has been debate as to which antiplatelet agent should be added to aspirin in the ACS treatment regimen. This review summarizes the pharmacologic and clinical data comparing clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, and provides a practical guide to clinicians for determining which antiplatelet to use for patients with ACS.

Prasugrel is effective and safe for neurointerventional procedures

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel bisulfate and aspirin are routinely administered as dual antiplatelet agents for many neurointerventional procedures, especially for intravascular stent placement. Many patients are non-responsive to clopidogrel, either secondary to drug interactions or from variations of cytochrome P450 enzymes. Prasugrel (brand name Effient, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA) is a new antiplatelet agent that has been utilized extensively in patients undergoing cardiovascular procedures but its safety and efficacy during neurointerventional procedures have not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether prasugrel is a safe and effective alternative to clopidogrel for neurointerventional procedures, especially in those patients who are either non-responders or allergic to clopidogrel.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures at our institution who received prasugrel between January 2009 and July 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. A systematic chart review was performed and the following data were recorded: demographics, aneurysm location, endovascular techniques, peri- and post-procedural complications, hemorrhagic complications, clinical outcome and angiographic outcome.

RESULTS

16 patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures received prasugrel over a 2 year interval. All patients who had follow-up studies of P2Y12 inhibition had immediate therapeutic response to prasugrel. There were no complications related to ischemic or intracranial hemorrhage.

CONCLUSION

Prasugrel is a viable alternative to clopidogrel for patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures who are non-responders to clopidogrel. Further study is needed to evaluate the safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel for patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures.

Monitoring the effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy: opportunities and limitations

Previous clinical studies have shown heterogeneity in individual patient responses to antiplatelet therapy and high residual platelet reactivity is associated with increased risk of adverse clinical events. Monitoring response to antiplatelet therapy and tailoring treatment accordingly is currently not recommended in routine clinical practice largely due to the lack of a standardized definition of antiplatelet therapy hyporesponse and the need for a widely accepted point-of-care platelet function test that can be reliably utilized in frontline clinical practice. Recent data have shown that titrating the dose of clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduces the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and large-scale clinical trials are currently underway to investigate whether individually tailored treatment based on results of platelet function testing leads to improved clinical outcome. Furthermore, genetic testing has demonstrated a link between CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms, altered clopidogrel metabolite concentrations and adverse clinical events. Clinical studies are currently underway to investigate the potential clinical benefit associated with genotype-guided tailoring of antiplatelet therapy. With the advent of newer, more potent antiplatelet agents and their associated increased bleeding risks, it will become imperative in the future to select the most appropriate, safe and effective drug.

Peri-procedural myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention: an important target for cardioprotection

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the predominant procedure for coronary revascularization in patients with both stable and unstable coronary artery disease (CAD). Over the past two decades, technical advances in PCI have resulted in a better and safer therapeutic procedure with minimal procedural complications. However, about 30% of patients undergoing elective PCI sustain myocardial injury arising from the procedure itself, the extent of which is significant enough to carry prognostic importance. The peri-procedural injury which accompanies PCI might therefore reduce some of the beneficial effects of coronary revascularization. The availability of more sensitive serum biomarkers of myocardial injury such as creatine phosphokinase MB isoenzyme (CK-MB), Troponin T, and Troponin I has enabled the quantification of previously undetectable myocardial injury. Peri-procedural myocardial injury (PMI) can also be visualized by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, a technique which allows the detection and quantification of myocardial necrosis following PCI. The identification of CAD patients at greatest risk of sustaining PMI during PCI would allow targeted treatment with novel therapies capable of limiting the extent of PMI or reducing the number of patients experiencing PMI.

What is the risk of intensifying platelet inhibition beyond clopidogrel? A systematic review and a critical appraisal of the role of prasugrel

Thienopyridines are a class of drug targeting the platelet adenosine diphosphate 2 receptor. They have been shown to significantly reduce platelet activity exerting an important role in those clinical settings in which such an effect is beneficial. Ticlopidine was first to be introduced several years ago but it was quickly replaced by clopidogrel as it had a better risk/benefit profile. Recently, prasugrel has been developed and tested in several ex vivo studies and clinical trials showing able to provide a more powerful antiplatelet effect at the expense of a higher risk of bleeding complications. Great debate rose around its recent approval in the US as well as in Europe. This review aims at exploring the development and available clinical data of this third-generation thienopyridine while discussing its practical implementation in routine practice.

Comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Antiplatelet agents are the cornerstone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel, when added to aspirin, has demonstrated considerable success at reducing thrombotic complications of ACS and/or PCI compared to aspirin alone and is standard of care for the management of patients with ACS and in patients undergoing PCI. Prasugrel is a novel thienopyridine antiplatelet agent recently approved for the treatment of patients with ACS undergoing PCI. Prasugrel provides greater and more consistent platelet inhibition than clopidogrel due to earlier and more extensive formation of its active metabolite. The enhanced platelet inhibition with prasugrel led to a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with moderate to high risk ACS scheduled for PCI in the phase 3 TRITON-TIMI 38 trial. This benefit was seen more in patients suffering a STEMI and those with diabetes. However, this reduction in events was met with a significant increase in the risk of bleeding which overcame prasugrel’s benefit in certain groups. Future studies with prasugrel are needed to determine its optimal utilization to minimize bleeding risks and evaluate its outcomes in ACS and safety profile in special patient populations.

Considerable variability in platelet activity among patients with coronary artery disease in response to an increased maintenance dose of clopidogrel

BACKGROUND

Variable platelet response to clopidogrel has been widely observed. Studies have shown that the mean aggregation response to clopidogrel can be changed by a higher maintenance dose. However, these studies have not focused on individual changes.

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the platelet function effects of increasing the maintenance clopidogrel dose from 75 to 150 mg/day with a focus on inter-individual response.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Twenty patients with known coronary artery disease receiving 75 mg/day clopidogrel were recruited and given 150 mg/day clopidogrel for 30 days, then returned to 75 mg/day for an additional 30 days. Platelet function was assessed through light-transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay at baseline, 30 days, and 60 days.

RESULTS

Mean platelet inhibition was significantly improved with the increased maintenance dose when measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (P2Y12 reaction units: 191+/-15 vs. 158+/-17, P=0.013), but not when measured by LTA (LTA-adenosine diphosphate 5: 40+/-3 vs. 36+/-3, P = 0.11; LTA-adenosine diphosphate 20: 50+/-3 vs. 47+/-3, P = 0.23). However, only 50% of individual patients experienced improved platelet inhibition, as measured by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, when treated with the increased maintenance dose. Furthermore, poor baseline platelet response did not predict improved responsiveness at the increased dose.

CONCLUSION

Despite changing the population's mean antiplatelet response, an increased maintenance dose of clopidogrel did not improve antiplatelet response in a substantial number of patients; nor did baseline platelet function predict response to a higher maintenance dose.

Aggressive chronic platelet inhibition with prasugrel and increased cancer risks: revising oral antiplatelet regimens?

The TRITON-TIMI 38 was a head-to-head trial to assess the efficacy and safety of the experimental antiplatelet agent prasugrel vs. standard care with clopidogrel on top of aspirin. Besides some ischemic protection at expense of overwhelming bleeding disadvantage, prasugrel treated patients experienced three times higher rate of colonic neoplasms then after clopidogrel, and this difference was significant. Importantly, known gastrointestinal bleeding preceded the diagnosis of colonic neoplasms only in half of the patients. Three potential mechanisms responsible for such harmful association are reviewed, namely: (i) direct hazard of the experimental drug on cancer occurrence and progression; (ii) indirect modulation of tumor growth; and (iii) enhanced metastatic dissemination due to instability of platelet-tumor cell aggregates, or/and inability to keep the disease locally due by much more potent long-term platelet inhibition should be considered. Significant excess of cancer after prasugrel is alarming, and can be reasonably explained, with critical clinical implications not only for prasugrel further development, but also for existing and future chronic antiplatelet strategies. If the hypothesis that oral aggressive platelet inhibition cause higher cancer risks will turn out to be true, then intensity of platelet inhibition, and especially duration of chronic antiplatelet therapy should be reconsidered. More delicate platelet inhibition, and shorter exposure to oral antiplatelet agents will prevail.

New antiplatelet drugs: beyond aspirin and clopidogrel

Antiplatelet therapy remains a cornerstone of modern management of atherothrombotic vascular disease. For many years, aspirin has been the mainstay of initial antiplatelet drug management in coronary heart disease, while the need for inhibition of other platelet activation pathways has led to the development of various other antiplatelet drugs, such as clopidogrel. An improved understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in thrombogenesis has paved the way for further development of newer antiplatelet drug therapies. Various clinical studies have probed the effectiveness and risk profile of the newer antiplatelet drugs, such as prasugrel, in comparison with currently available drugs. Some newer agents such as prasugrel are close to being approved for clinical use, whereas other agents such as cangrelor and AZD6140 are in phase 3 clinical trials. New drug classes, such as the thromboxane receptor antagonists (such as NCX-4016 and S18886), as well as platelet adhesion antagonists and thrombin receptor antagonists are similarly being evaluated for their efficacy and risk profile in phase I and II trials.

Prasugrel: A New Thienopyridine Inhibitor

The objective of this review is to report the pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties of prasugrel, the potential advantages and disadvantages over the other agent in its class, clopidogrel, and the clinical data establishing its efficacy in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes receiving stent implantation. A MEDLINE (1966 to May 2008) search using the key word prasugrel was performed to identify pertinent literature. Additional references were selected from the bibliographies of the articles cited. Searches were not limited by time or human subject. Preclinical studies evaluating the pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties of prasugrel in humans were selected for review. Clinical trials assessing the efficacy of prasugrel for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes receiving percutaneous coronary intervention were included as long as they were randomized, blinded, and controlled. The authors concluded that prasugrel is a thienopyridine antiplatelet agent with a faster onset of action and increased potency, in terms of inhibiting platelet aggregation, than clopidogrel. It has been shown in one major clinical trial that this enhanced pharmacological effect of prasugrel reduces the combined incidence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke when compared with clopidogrel. However, this enhanced effect of prasugrel did result in an increased risk of bleeding.

Effects of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel and clopidogrel

Prasugrel and clopidogrel, thienopyridine prodrugs, are each metabolized to an active metabolite that inhibits the platelet P2Y(12) ADP receptor. In this open-label, 4-period crossover study, the effects of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel and clopidogrel were assessed in healthy subjects given single doses of prasugrel 60 mg and clopidogrel 300 mg with and without concurrent lansoprazole 30 mg qd. C(max) and AUC(0-tlast) of prasugrel's active metabolite, R-138727, and clopidogrel's inactive carboxylic acid metabolite, SR26334, were assessed. Inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) was measured by turbidimetric aggregometry 4 to 24 hours after each treatment. Lansoprazole (1) decreased R-138727 AUC(0-tlast) and C(max) by 13% and 29%, respectively, but did not affect IPA after the prasugrel dose, and (2) did not affect SR62334 exposure but tended to lower IPA after a clopidogrel dose. A retrospective tertile analysis showed in subjects with high IPA after a clopidogrel dose alone that lansoprazole decreased IPA, whereas IPA was unaffected in these same subjects after a prasugrel dose. The overall data suggest that a prasugrel dose adjustment is not likely warranted in an individual taking prasugrel with a proton pump inhibitor such as lansoprazole.

Lipophilic modifications to dinucleoside polyphosphates and nucleotides that confer antagonist properties at the platelet P2Y12 receptor

Platelet P2Y12 receptors play a central role in the regulation of platelet function and inhibition of this receptor by treatment with drugs such as clopidogrel results in a reduction of atherothrombotic events. We discovered that modification of natural and synthetic dinucleoside polyphosphates and nucleotides with lipophilic substituents on the ribose and base conferred P2Y12 receptor antagonist properties to these molecules producing potent inhibitors of ADP-mediated platelet aggregation. We describe methods for the preparation of these functionalized dinucleoside polyphosphates and nucleotides and report their associated activities. By analysis of these results and by deconstruction of the necessary structural elements through selected syntheses, we prepared a series of highly functionalized nucleotides, resulting in the selection of an adenosine monophosphate derivative (62) for further clinical development.