Translation and Psychometric Validation of the German Version of the Family Nursing Practice Scale (FNPS)

Family-oriented care and health-related quality of life for women with gynaecological cancer: A cross-sectional mixed-method study

AIMS

This study aims to describe the experiences of women with gynaecological cancer regarding family-oriented care (FOC) and how they rated their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using a 15D instrument (15D©).

DESIGN

A cross-sectional mixed-method study.

METHODS

The data were collected by electronic surveys of two Finnish cancer associations from gynaecological cancer patients (n = 53). The qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis. The HRQoL answers were analysed statistically using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 27).

RESULTS

The results emphasized that FOC is not yet part of the care process. Furthermore, comprehensive encounters are lacking, and the experience of being a woman is forgotten during the care process. The results of the HRQoL analysis suggest that distress and the discomfort and symptoms of cancer patients are perceived as significant factors affecting their quality of life during different phases of treatment. Family status also has an impact on perceived quality of life, whereby those living alone gave worse ratings for the depression and vitality dimensions.

CONCLUSION

In part, the quantitative and qualitative data supported each other, but the descriptions provided a more comprehensive view of issues that affect women in a more multidimensional way, such as sexual health issues. More research on the effectiveness of FOC is needed to develop the capacity for effective healthcare.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

This study was able to identify important areas for improvement in clinical practice from the perspective of patients and their families.

REPORTING METHOD

This study was prepared and reported according to the STROBE checklist.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Adoption of evidence-based end-of-life and bereavement support to families in cancer care: A contextual analysis study with health professionals

AIMS

To investigate the level of adoption of evidence-based family engagement and support during end-of-life cancer care and subsequent bereavement and its contextual facilitators and barriers from health professionals' perspectives, and to explore differences between professional groups.

DESIGN

Contextual analysis using an online cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

This study was conducted in four Swiss hospitals and three home care oncology and palliative care services. Non-parametric testing was used to investigate the level of adoption and differences between nurses, physicians, occupational- and physiotherapists and psychosocial professionals (chaplains, onco-psychologists and social workers). The STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was followed.

RESULTS

The majority of the 111 participating health professionals were nurses. Adoption was statistically significantly higher during end-of-life care than bereavement, with nurses and physicians reporting higher levels than the other professional groups. Guidance on end-of-life family care was available in about half of the cases, in contrast to a quarter for bereavement care. Self-perceived knowledge, skills and attitudes were moderate to high, with nurses and physicians reporting higher levels than others, except for general skills in working with families. Organisational structures were experienced as rather supportive, with the psychosocial group appraising the organisational context as significantly less conducive to fully implementing end-of-life and bereavement care than others, particularly during the end-of-life phase.

CONCLUSION

Evidence-based family engagement and support were better adopted during end-of-life care than bereavement. Overall, nurses and physicians felt better enabled to care for families compared to other professional groups.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

https://osf.io/j4kfh.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Implementation and quality improvement efforts should focus particularly on the bereavement phase and be tailored to professional groups.

IMPACT

The findings show that evidence-based family engagement and support practices during end-of-life were rather well adopted in contrast to subsequent bereavement care, with nurses and physicians better enabled than other professionals to provide care. A better understanding of health professionals' contributions and roles in family care is important to build interprofessional capacity for evidence-based end-of-life and bereavement support.

REPORTING METHOD

The STROBE checklist for reports of cross-sectional studies was followed (von Elm et al., 2007).

Contextual determinants of guideline-based family support during end-of-life cancer care and subsequent bereavement care: A cross-sectional survey of registered nurses

PURPOSE

In end-of-life cancer care, 10-20% of bereaved family members experience adverse mental health effects, including prolonged grief disorder. Despite great efforts, evidence-based recommendations to support their grieving process and well-being are often not successfully adopted into routine clinical care. This study identified facilitators and barriers using implementation science methodology.

METHODS

81 registered nurses working in cancer care from four hospitals and three home care services in Switzerland assessed their current family support practices in end-of-life care and bereavement care. They then assessed organisational attributes of their institution and their own individual characteristics and skills regarding literature-based factors of potential relevance. Facilitators and barriers to guideline-based family support were determined using fractional logistic regression.

RESULTS

Service specialisation in palliative care, a culture that supports change, the availability of family support guidelines, billing/reimbursement of bereavement support services, and individual knowledge of family support and skill were systematically associated with higher adoption of guideline-based family support practices. Lack of privacy with families and insufficient training acted as significant barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

While several potentially relevant factors have emerged in the literature, certain organisational and individual determinants actually empirically predict guideline-based family support according to nurses in end-of-life cancer care, with some determinants having much stronger implications than others. This provides crucial guidance for focussing quality improvement and implementation efforts through tailored strategies, especially with scarce resources. Furthermore, adoption is lower in bereavement care than in end-of-life care, suggesting a particular need for supportive organisational cultures including specific training and billing/reimbursement options.

Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the European Portuguese Version of the Iceland-Expressive Family Functioning Questionnaire (ICE-EFFQ)

A family's experience of mental illness can change the family's functioning. In clinical contexts, valid and reliable instruments that assess family functioning, therapeutic changes, and the effects of family nursing interventions are needed. This study focuses on the linguistic and cultural adaptation of the Iceland-Expressive Family Functioning Questionnaire (ICE-EFFQ) to European Portuguese and examines the psychometric properties of this instrument. A non-random sample of 121 Portuguese depressed patients and their relatives completed the questionnaire. Principal components analysis extracted 4 factors, explaining 55.58% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed acceptable adjustment quality indices. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was adequate for the global scale α = .86 and for the 4 subscales: communication α = .79, expression of emotions α = .68, problem-solving α = .71, and cooperation α = .61. The Portuguese version of ICE-EFFQ is a sensitive, valid, and reliable instrument for use with Portuguese families with adult members with depression and can be valuable in assessing these families' expressive functioning, before and after intervention.

Cultural adaptation and validation of the Family Nursing Practice Scale (FNPS) for use with Spanish-speaking Nursing Degree students

AIM

The task proposed was to conduct a cultural adaptation of the Family Nursing Practice Scale and to assess the psychometric properties of the resulting instrument.

BACKGROUND

Nursing students must obtain sufficient personal competence and confidence to act with patients and their families. For this purpose, an assessment scale is needed to inform teachers of the student's progress and to determine whether further training or changes in teaching methods are required.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study design was used.

METHODS

The researchers conducted this study with 202 students of nursing at two Spanish universities. In the cultural adaptation, the following steps were followed: definition of concepts, translation, back translation, expert group review and implementation by a pilot group with a subsequent cognitive interview. Internal consistency was determined by Cronbach's alpha. Reliability was verified by an initial application of the scale, followed by a repetition after seven days, analysing the results obtained in terms of the intraclass correlation coefficient, the construct validity (by Spearman's non-parametric correlation test) and confirmatory factor analysis (using JASP 0.16.4 statistical software).

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha resulted in 0.95. Spearman's correlation coefficient Family Nursing Practice Scale total with the course year was -0.26 < 0.001. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the total score of the scale was 0.91. The confirmatory factor analysis was performed on a model in which the total score for the scale was considered in relation to the two subscales, and each subscale in relation to its constituent items. The p-value associated with the chi-square was 0.550. The root mean square error of approximation and comparative fit indices presented values of <0.001 (90 % C.I. <0.001-0.048) and 1.000, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the Spanish version presents good internal consistency, construct validity and reliability. Moreover, the confirmatory factor analysis confirms that it presents a good fit to the model initially proposed for this scale for Nursing Degree students.

Participatory development and implementation of a dementia care pathway with intervention bundles in acute care during the coronavirus pandemic: A process evaluation study

AIMS

To explore the implementation of a dementia care pathway in an acute care setting.

BACKGROUND

Dementia care in acute settings is often constrained by contextual factors. We developed an evidence-based care pathway with intervention bundles, and implemented it on two trauma units, with the aim to empower staff and improve quality care.

DESIGN

Process evaluation using quantitative and qualitative methods.

METHODS

Pre-implementation, unit staff completed a survey (n = 72) assessing family and dementia care skills and level of evidence-based dementia care. Post-implementation, champions (n = 7) completed the same survey, with additional questions on acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility, and participated in a focus group interview. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

REPORTING GUIDELINE

Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research Checklist.

RESULTS

Pre-implementation, staff's perceived skills in family and dementia care were moderate overall, with high skills in 'building relationships' and 'sustaining personhood'. Evidence-based interventions were delivered seldom to frequent, with 'individualized care' scoring lowest and 'assessing cognition' scoring highest. Implementation of the care pathway/intervention bundles was overshadowed by the pandemic, and failed due to major organisational- and process-related barriers. Acceptability scored highest and feasibility lowest, with concerns relating to complexity and compatibility of pathways/bundles when introduced into clinical routines.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study implies that organisational and process factors are the most influential determinants to the implementation of dementia care in acute settings. Future implementation efforts should draw on the evolving evidence within implementation science and dementia care research to ensure effective integration and improvement process.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Our study provides important learning around improving care for persons with dementia and their families in hospitals.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

A family caregiver was involved in the development of the education and training programme.

Influence of perceived benefits, barriers and activities of family engagement in care on family nursing practice: A cross-sectional correlational study

AIMS

To describe nurses' perceptions of family nursing practice and to explore the influence of their perceptions of the benefits, barriers and activities of family engagement in care on family nursing practice.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional correlational study.

METHODS

In total, 460 nurses from two tertiary hospitals in the central region of Uganda participated. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected between August 2020 and January 2021 using the Family Nursing Practice Scale. Analyses included descriptive statistics, t-test, Pearson correlation, analysis of variance and ordinal logistics regression. Quantitative content analysis was carried out on the textual data.

RESULTS

Nurses who perceived that family engagement in care improves patient and family outcomes were more likely to rate family nursing practice highly. Perceived barriers to family engagement in care particularly time constraints, work overload and family-related conflicts have a negative and significant influence on family nursing practice. Nurse characteristics such as education, usual shift pattern and personal experience of having a family member in hospital are significantly associated with family nursing practice; nurses who work morning shifts were likely to report higher family nursing practice.

CONCLUSION

The study reveals that several parameters (perceived barriers, perceived benefits and nurse characteristics) influence nursing practice with families. Thus, bearing in mind the diversity of healthcare contexts, the findings show that multiple interacting factors are important for advancing family nursing interventions and practice.

IMPACT

Probabilistic factor-specific predictions of nursing practice with families are provided in this study - this addresses a gap in the evidence regarding the elements that should be optimized when designing well-informed policies and interventions to advance family nursing practice. A comparison of results in the literature with the present study's findings suggests a need to broaden the scope and context perspective in future research and broaden the understanding of how nurses´ perceptions influence family engagement in care.

REPORTING METHOD

The study adheres to the STROBE reporting guidelines.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Family members/caregivers were involved in the design of the study particularly in assessment of validation of the tools used in the study.

Implementation of a multicomponent family support intervention in adult intensive care units: study protocol for an embedded mixed-methods multiple case study (FICUS implementation study)

BACKGROUND

The implementation of complex interventions is considered challenging, particularly in multi-site clinical trials and dynamic clinical settings. This study protocol is part of the family intensive care units (FICUS) hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. It aims to understand the integration of a multicomponent family support intervention in the real-world context of adult intensive care units (ICUs). Specifically, the study will assess implementation processes and outcomes of the study intervention, including fidelity, and will enable explanation of the clinical effectiveness outcomes of the trial.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This mixed-methods multiple case study is guided by two implementation theories, the Normalisation Process Theory and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Participants are key clinical partners and healthcare professionals of eight ICUs allocated to the intervention group of the FICUS trial in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. Data will be collected at four timepoints over the 18-month active implementation and delivery phase using qualitative (small group interviews, observation, focus group interviews) and quantitative data collection methods (surveys, logs). Descriptive statistics and parametric and non-parametric tests will be used according to data distribution to analyse within and between cluster differences, similarities and factors associated with fidelity and the level of integration over time. Qualitative data will be analysed using a pragmatic rapid analysis approach and content analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained from the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Zurich BASEC ID 2021-02300 (8 February 2022). Study findings will provide insights into implementation and its contribution to intervention outcomes, enabling understanding of the usefulness of applied implementation strategies and highlighting main barriers that need to be addressed for scaling the intervention to other healthcare contexts. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conferences.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Open science framework (OSF) https://osf.io/8t2ud Registered on 21 December 2022.

The influence of nurse characteristics on practice skills and attitudes towards working with families in critical care: A regression analysis

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to identify nurse characteristics that influence their self-perceived practice skills in working with families and their attitudes towards engaging families in adult and neonatal intensive care units.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY/DESIGN

Secondary data analysis using a descriptive, cross-sectional design.

SETTING

An online survey was completed by 256 nurses from six adult intensive (73% response rate) and two neonatal intensive and one intermediate care unit (27% response rate) in a Swiss, university affiliated hospital.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Nurses' self-perceived practice skills in working with families were assessed with the "Family Nursing Practice Scale". Attitudes towards families were measured with the "Families' Importance in Nursing Care - Nurses' Attitudes Scale". Data were analysed with multiple linear regression models.

RESULTS

Prior education in family nursing significantly influenced nurses' self-perceived practice skills in working with families. Nurses' clinical speciality had a significant influence on their attitudes towards overall, and on the subscale "family as a burden". Neonatal intensive care nurses showed more open attitudes towards families overall, but perceived family more often as a burden than nurses in adult intensive care. Nurses' perceived skills and attitudes in family engagement significantly influenced each other.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that nurses' prior education in family nursing and clinical speciality determine their ability to work with and engage families in critical care. Our study suggests that integration of family nursing engagement practices in critical care requires educational implementation strategies combined with culture change efforts.