The Relationship Between Circulating Fibrinogen and Lipoprotein (a) Levels in Patients With Primary Dyslipidemia

Gender-Specific Coagulation Profiles of Peripheral and Portal Blood May Help to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Pancreatic Tumour-Pilot Study

Objective: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and mass forming chronic pancreatitis (CP) can be easily misdiagnosed due to their resemblances in clinical, radiological, and biochemical criteria. In our previous study, we reported a very high concentration of D-Dimers in portal blood in patients with pancreatic cancer which may help to differentiate malignant from benign pancreatic tumours. In this study, we aim to describe other portal and peripheral coagulation profiles of PDAC in comparison to CP patients, as well to test the hypothesis; thus, it is possible to distinguish pancreatic malignancy and benign tumour based on these parameters. Methods: We included retrospectively 115 patients with the absence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), qualified to surgical treatment due to pancreatic tumours, both PDAC and CP. Patients underwent surgery in General and Transplant Surgery Unit of Medical University of Lodz between December 2011 and February 2014. Patients with distant metastases diagnosed before or during the surgery were excluded. The coagulation profile, which includes fibrinogen, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time (PT), and thrombin time (TT), was determined in blood samples from the portal and peripheral vein taken intraoperatively. Results: The fibrinogen level was higher and the aPTT index shortened in the peripheral and portal blood of the PDAC group, which reflects the well-known link between PDAC and general hypercoagulability. Furthermore, these effects are sex-specific. The mean age in the CP group was lower than in the PDAC group (54.63 ± 12.37 vs. 63.77 ± 3.23, p < 0.001) and correlated with the fibrinogen distribution in male patients with CP (portal r = 0.34; p = 0.07; peripheral r = 0.39; p = 0.04). We calculated sex-specific logistic regression models (male: peripheral aPTT and age, AUC: 0.795, female: portal fibrinogen and age, AUC: 0.805), both maintaining the good discrimination properties after V-fold cross validation (0.759, 0.742). Conclusions: Our study shows that the differences between coagulation profiles in PDAC and CP patients not only seems to be a reflection of gender-specific biological features, but also helps to discriminate between them. The main goal of the study was to explore the biology of pancreatic cancer and lay a solid base for further investigations of PDAC biomarkers. This paper is the first to describe the detailed coagulation profile in portal blood in patients with pancreatic solid tumors. At present, the clinical application of our results is not clear; however, we hope that it may improve our understanding of this complex disease.

Plasma lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with slow coronary flow

Introduction

Slow coronary flow (SCF) is a microvascular disorder characterized by delayed opacification of coronary vessels with normal coronary angiogram. It may be due to endothelial dysfunction and diffuse atherosclerosis. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is related to cardiovascular events. Plasma Lp(a) levels have not been studied previously in SCF patients.

Aim

We investigated plasma Lp(a) and fibrinogen levels, and their relation to coronary flow rate in patients with SCF.

Material and methods

This cross-sectional study included 50 patients with SCF and 30 age- and sex-matched controls who had normal coronary arteries and normal flow. Coronary flow rates of patients and controls were counted with the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame count. Plasma Lp(a) and fibrinogen levels were measured in SCF patients and controls, with routine biochemical tests.

Results

There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to plasma Lp(a) (21 mg/dl vs. 14 mg/dl, p = 0.11) and fibrinogen (278 mg/dl vs. 291 mg/dl, p = 0.48) levels. The TIMI frame count was not correlated with plasma Lp(a) (r = 0.13, p = 0.25) or fibrinogen (r = –0.14, p = 0.28) levels.

Conclusions

Our results show that there is no significant association between SCF and Lp(a) and fibrinogen levels.

Lipoprotein a: where are we now?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update of the literature describing the link between lipoprotein a and vascular disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is evidence that elevated plasma lipoprotein a levels are associated with coronary heart disease, stroke and other manifestations of atherosclerosis. Several mechanisms may be implicated, including proinflammatory actions and impaired fibrinolysis.

SUMMARY

Lipoprotein a potentially represents a useful tool for risk stratification in the primary and secondary prevention setting. However, there are still unresolved methodological issues regarding the measurement of lipoprotein a levels. Targeting lipoprotein a in order to reduce vascular risk is hampered by the lack of well tolerated and effective pharmacological interventions. Moreover, it has not yet been established whether such a reduction will result in fewer vascular events. The risk attributed to lipoprotein a may be reduced by aggressively tackling other vascular risk factors, such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Kidney function and estimated vascular risk in patients with primary dyslipidemia

Background:

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased vascular risk. Some studies suggested that considering markers of CKD might improve the predictive accuracy of the Framingham risk equation.

Aim:

To evaluate the links between kidney function and risk stratification in patients with primary dyslipidemia.

Methods:

Dyslipidemic patients (n = 156; 83 men) who were non-smokers, did not have diabetes mellitus or evident vascular disease and were not on lipid-lowering or antihypertensive agents were recruited. Creatinine clearance (CrCl) was estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. We estimated vascular risk using the Framingham equation.

Results:

In both men and women, there was a significant negative correlation between estimated Framingham risk and both eGFR and CrCl (p < 0.001 for all correlations). When men were divided according to creatinine tertiles, there were no significant differences in any parameter between groups. When men were divided according to either eGFR or CrCl tertiles, all estimated Framingham risks significantly increased as renal function declined (p<0.001 for all trends). When women were divided according to creatinine tertiles, all estimated Framingham risks except for stroke significantly increased as creatinine levels increased. When women were divided according to either eGFR or CrCl tertiles, all estimated Framingham risks significantly increased as renal function declined.

Conclusions:

Estimated vascular risk increases as renal function declines. The possibility that incorporating kidney function in the Framingham equation will improve risk stratification requires further evaluation.

Predicting coronary heart disease risk using the Framingham and PROCAM equations in dyslipidaemic patients without overt vascular disease

AIM

To compare the Framingham and Prospective Cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) risk calculations.

METHODS

We calculated the risk in 234 dyslipidaemic patients without overt vascular disease and in different subgroups. For example, the proportion of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) risk >or= 20%, the effect of including the family history (FaHist) and of adjusting raised triglyceride (TG) levels.

RESULTS

The Framingham risk was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher than the PROCAM risk (with and without including the FaHist) in different subgroups and when the TGs were adjusted to 1.7 mmol/l. The percentage of patients with CHD risk >or= 20% calculated by the Framingham (based on systolic or diastolic blood pressure) and PROCAM equations was 21.4% or 23.1% and 16.2% respectively. In the tertile with the highest PROCAM risk, the Framingham score was significantly greater than the PROCAM risk only when the FaHist was included in the Framingham calculation. When we analysed risk by gender, the Framingham score did not differ but the PROCAM risk was significantly (p < 0.0001) greater in men. When TG values were adjusted to 1.7 mmol/l, the predicted risk using PROCAM changed by 0% to -2% in all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

In dyslipidaemic patients without overt vascular disease the Framingham model predicted a higher risk than PROCAM. Thus, the Framingham equation probably leads to substantial overtreatment compared with PROCAM. However, according to the literature, even the PROCAM equation may overestimate risk. This has considerable cost implications. New more accurate risk engines are needed to calculate risk in dyslipidaemic patients without overt vascular disease.

The role of fibrinogen and fibrinolysis in peripheral arterial disease

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with high rates of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events; PAD is a marker of systemic atherosclerosis. As a result, standard therapy for all PAD patients should be directed at both peripheral and systemic atherosclerosis. Modification of established risk factors in the form of smoking cessation, correcting hypertension, optimizing diabetic control and normalizing lipids is essential. Furthermore, novel risk factors have emerged including fibrinogen and other hemostatic factors. Fibrinogen is a coagulation factor and a marker of the acute phase response (inflammation), a platelet activator, a major determinant of plasma viscosity and a component of the atherosclerotic plaque. Fibrinogen appears not only to predict the severity of PAD, but also serves as a marker for future development of PAD. Whether reducing the levels of fibrinogen and other coagulation factors will decrease the incidence and progression of PAD remains to be resolved. This review summarizes the role of fibrinogen in the pathogenesis of PAD and its association with other hemostatic factors. The role of fibrinolysis in patients with PAD is also considered.