Construction of a novel Staphylokinase (SAK) mutant with low immunogenicity and its evaluation in rhesus monkey

The heterologous nature of SAK, a thrombolytic drug, elicits high titers of neutralizing antibodies, which limits its clinical use. Here, we aim to establish a SAK mutant with equivalent activity to the wild type but reduced antigenicity, which may allow for multiple injections. Biosun software was used to predict SAK antigenic epitopes, and several main epitopes were modified by gene deletion and mutation. Ten SAK mutants were constructed, and their thrombolytic activity and immunogenicity were analyzed in vitro. SAK6, with a high expression level (45%), similar thrombolytic activity, and lower antibody reaction, was chosen for in vivo analysis in rhesus monkey. In the nearly 8-month experimental period, the antibody level of the SAK6 group was significantly lower than that of the SAK group. Moreover, only 5% of SAK activity was retained, whereas 75.6% of SAK6 activity was retained after incubating with respective antiserum. Overall, these results demonstrated that SAK6, established through comprehensive site-directed mutagenesis program, had identical thrombolytic activity to SAK, low immunogenicity, and less side effects, demonstrating its efficient clinical potential for thrombus disease.

Interventional Therapy for Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

Approximately 10% of all deep vein thromboses occur in the upper extremity, and that number is increasing due to the use of peripherally inserted central catheters. Sequelae of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) are similar to those for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LEDVT) and include postthrombotic syndrome and pulmonary embolism. In addition to systemic anticoagulation, there are multiple interventional treatment options for UEDVT with the potential to reduce the incidence of these sequelae. To date, there have been no randomized trials to define the optimal management strategy for patients presenting with UEDVT, so many conclusions are drawn from smaller, single-center studies or from LEDVT research. In this article, the authors describe the evidence for the currently available treatment options and an approach to a patient with acute UEDVT.

In-Hospital Management and Follow-Up Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism: Focus on New and Emerging Treatments

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT), is a major cause of morbidity and mortality of particular relevance for intensivists and hospitalists. Acute VTE is usually managed with parenteral unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin, followed by an oral vitamin K antagonist. Data are lacking for optimal treatment of less common occurrences, such as upper extremity DVT, and for approaches such as thrombolysis for PE associated with early signs of hemodynamic compromise or inferior vena cava filters when anticoagulation is contraindicated. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) including apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are now added to the armamentarium of agents available for acute management of VTE and/or reducing the risk of recurrence. This review outlines an algorithmic approach to acute VTE treatment: from aggressive therapies when anticoagulation may be inadequate, to alternative choices when anticoagulation is contraindicated, to anticoagulant options in the majority of patients in whom anticoagulation is appropriate. Evidence-based guidelines and the most recent DOAC clinical trial data are discussed in the context of the standard of care. Situations and treatment approaches for which data are unavailable or insufficient are identified. VTE therapy in care transitions is discussed, as are choices for secondary prevention.