Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis in People with Hemophilia Experiencing Orthopedic Surgery: What Does the Literature Say in 2023?

This narrative review of the literature, consisting of papers found in PubMed and The Cochrane Library published up to 31 July 2023, analyzed those that were deemed to be closely related to the title of this paper. It was encountered that the peril of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in people with hemophilia (PWH) after orthopedic surgery is very small, such that pharmacological thromboprophylaxis is not necessary in most cases. The hemophilia literature states that the use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis should only be performed in PWH undergoing major orthopedic surgery (total-knee arthroplasty, total-hip arthroplasty, ankle arthrodesis) who have additional venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk factors, such as old age, prior VTE, varicose veins, general anesthesia, cancer, factor V (Leiden) mutation, overweight, and treatment with the oral contraceptive pill (in females with von Willebrand's illness). If we notice various risk factors for VTE in PWH who experience orthopedic surgery, theoretically, we should perform the identical type of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis advised for non-hemophilia patients: low-molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), such as enoxaparin (40 mg subcutaneous/24 h); or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), either thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran, 150 mg oral/12 h) or activated factor X (FXa) inhibitors (rivaroxaban, 20 mg oral/24 h; apixaban, 5 mg oral/24 h), or subcutaneous fondaparinux (2.5 mg/24 h subcutaneously). However, the review of the literature on hemophiliac patients has shown that only a few authors have used pharmacological prophylaxis with LMWH (subcutaneous enoxaparin) for a short period of time (10-14 days) in some patients who had risk factors for VTE. Only one group of authors used a low dose of DOAC in the dusk after the surgical procedure and the next day, specifically in individuals at elevated risk of VTE and elevated risk of bleeding after the surgical procedure.

Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients With Hemophilia: an EHA-ISTH-EAHAD-ESO Clinical Practice Guidance

Cardiovascular disease is an emerging medical issue in patients with hemophilia (PWH) and its prevalence is increasing up to 15% in PWH in the United States. Atrial fibrillation, acute and chronic coronary syndromes, venous thromboembolism, and cerebral thrombosis are frequent thrombotic or prothrombotic situations, which require a careful approach to fine-tune the delicate balance between thrombosis and hemostasis in PWH when using both procoagulant and anticoagulant treatments. Generally, PWH could be considered as being naturally anticoagulated when clotting factors are <20 IU/dL, but specific recommendations in patients with very low levels according to the different clinical situations are lacking and mainly based on the anecdotal series. For PWH with baseline clotting factor levels >20 IU/dL in need for any form of antithrombotic therapy, usually treatment without additional clotting factor prophylaxis could be used, but careful monitoring for bleeding is recommended. For antiplatelet treatment, this threshold could be lower with single-antiplatelet agent, but again factor level should be at least 20 IU/dL for dual antiplatelet treatment. In this complex growing scenario, the European Hematology Association in collaboration with the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, the European Association for Hemophilia and Allied Disorders, the European Stroke Organization, and a representative of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis has produced this current guidance document to provide clinical practice recommendations for health care providers who care for PWH.

Postoperative bleeding adversely affects total knee arthroplasty outcomes in hemophilia

BACKGROUND

Hemophilic arthropathy can result in severe degenerative arthritis and functional limitations in the knees of relatively young patients. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides pain relief and gain of function in advanced-stage hemophilic arthropathy cases. However, little is known about the long-term effects of early major postoperative bleeding (MPOB) in people with hemophilia (PWH). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of early MPOB on the final functional outcome, complications, and implant survival of TKA in a single-center hemophilia cohort.

METHOD

PWH who underwent TKA between 1998 and 2019 in a single center were reviewed. Demographic data, clinical data, and radiographic images were evaluated. Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Knee Society Function Score (KSS-F) scores were used to determine function. Patients with early bleeding complications (wound dehiscence, ecchymosis, hemarthrosis, hematoma formation, prolonged or recurrent bleeding attacks) were defined as the bleeding group. Patients who did not experience these complications were assigned to the control group. The bleeding group was compared with controls. Survival of the primary arthroplasty was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Forty-five TKAs in 29 patients were included in the study. TKA led to an increase in the mean range of motion from 46.08° to 84.59° (P < 0.01). HSS scores increased from 48.33 preoperatively to 82.67 postoperatively (P < 0.01). There were improvements in both KSS and KSS-F scores from 34.22 and 53.3 preoperatively to 82.00 and 84.63 (P < 0.01), respectively. Ten patients (10 TKAs) (34%) experienced major bleeding during the postoperative period. Six of these patients had moderate hemophilia, and four had severe hemophilia. Three of these patients had hemarthroses (10.2%), one patient had a hematoma (3.4%), one patient had hemorrhagic bullae formation (3.4%), and five had excessive/prolonged bleeding from the wound (17%). The bleeding group (34%) had significantly worse HSS (63.78 vs 92.75, P < 0.001), KSS (61.78 vs 93.25, P < 0.001), and KSS-F (60.71 vs 96.25, P = 0.005) scores compared with controls. Preoperative and postoperative flexion contractures were positively correlated (+0.33, P = 0.003). One of the patients with postoperative hemarthrosis also had an accompanying transient common peroneal nerve palsy, and one patient (3.4%) had a periprosthetic fracture. Three knees (6.6%), two of whom were in the bleeding group, developed periprosthetic infections. Four knees (8.8%) in three patients underwent revision surgery, and two knees (4.4%) ended up in arthrodeses. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a mean survival duration of 17.04 years for the bleeding group and 22.15 years for the control group (P = 0.83). Survival rates were 80.0% for the bleeding group and 96.4% for the control group (P = 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, MPOB after TKA in PWH was common and led to significantly worse function. MPOB after TKA in PWH was associated with a higher rate of complications and lower survival rates, although the differences were not statistically significant. Efforts must be made to avoid MPOB after TKA in PWH.

Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolic Events in Elective Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication after major orthopaedic operations, such as a total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty. Therefore, perioperative VTE prophylaxis is recommended; a multitude of modern options are available, including both pharmacologic (aspirin, unfractionated and lowmolecular-weight heparin, vitamin K antagonists, and novel oral anticoagulants) and/or mechanical interventions (early mobilization, graduated compression stockings, intermittent pneumatic compression devices, and venous foot pumps). However, because of the abundance of these possibilities, it is crucial to understand the benefits and drawbacks of each VTE prophylaxis option to ensure that the optimal treatment plan is developed for each patient. The American College of Chest Physicians (AACP) and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) have both published individual guidelines on VTE prophylaxis regimens, alongside numerous studies evaluating the efficacy and outcomes of the different prophylaxis modalities. The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of the evidence on VTE prophylaxis after elective total hip and knee arthroplasty based on current guidelines and highlight the major concerns and potential complications.

Low rate of subclinical venous thrombosis in patients with haemophilia undergoing major orthopaedic surgery in the absence of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a common postoperative complication in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery of the lower limbs, such as total hip or knee replacement (THR, TKR). Routine pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or a direct oral anticoagulant agent is strongly recommended in this setting. THR and TKR as well as ankle arthrodesis are frequently performed in people with haemophilia (PWH) and chronic haemophilic arthropathy. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in this population remains controversial.

METHODS

We report the results of a single-centre prospective study initiated in 2002 evaluating by systematic Doppler ultrasound the incidence of subclinical DVT in consecutive PWH referred for major orthopaedic surgery and not receiving pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.

RESULTS

We included 46 different PWH (39 Haemophilia A, 7 Haemophilia B, 27 severe, 15 moderate and 4 mild forms) undergoing 67 orthopaedic procedures. Most (89.5%) were performed with continuous infusion of clotting factor concentrates. Rehabilitation was usually started on day 1 post-op. No clinical DVT or pulmonary embolism was suspected. In total, there were 5 cases (3 severe, 1 moderate HA and 1 moderate HB) of subclinical DVT which were all distal. Two patients were treated with a short course (10-14 days) of LMWH. The overall incidence of DVT was 7.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide imaging-based evidence that the risk of DVT following major orthopaedic surgery among PWH is low. Identified DVTs were distal and resolved spontaneously in most cases. Systematic pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in this specific population is probably for most patients not required.

Vascularized Free Tissue Transfer in a Patient with Hemophilia B: Case Report and Literature Review

Hemophilia is a blood disorder characterized by impairment of the coagulation cascade leading to an increased bleeding risk (Kauffman, 2014). As such, surgical management of these patients can become difficult and well-defined surgical guidelines are not yet in place (Assoumane et al., 2017). Close monitoring of perioperative factor levels may be even more crucial for those undergoing microvascular free tissue transfer. This is because either a hypercoagulable or hypocoagulable bleeding state has the potential to further increase the risk of vascular compromise to the flap. We report a successful case of mandibular reconstruction using a free fibular flap in a patient with severe hemophilia B and the protocols we used, as well as a review of the literature of similar cases. In the literature, we identified 6 cases of microvascular free tissue transfer in patients with hemophilia; two of these cases had complications which were both related to excess bleeding. It is crucial that these cases be managed in a multidisciplinary fashion in close consultation with a hematologist. The role of venothromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in the hemophilic patient undergoing free tissue transfer is discussed.