Goal-Directed Use of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates in Liver Transplantation: Is a Plasma-Free Procedure Feasible?

Background: Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions have been the mainstay of hemostatic intervention for the treatment of bleeding and coagulation abnormalities arising during liver transplantation (LT) for decades. However, numerous clinical studies showed that FFP has many side effects, including the risk of pathogen transmission, transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO), transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM), and transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). These adverse events are particularly challenging in patients undergoing LT, who often suffer from severe portal hypertension, poor renal function and coexisting cardiac disease.The aims of this review are to summarize the pharmacological properties of currently available PCCs, to represent the theoretical benefits and the possible risks related to the use of these drugs in patients undergoing LT, and, finally, to review the current literature on the topic in order to highlight the evidence that currently supports PCC use in LT patients. Methods: The current literature on the topic was reviewed in order to highlight the evidence that currently supports PCC use in LT patients. Results: Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) may offer several advantages when compared to FFP. Indeed, PCCs have been shown to reduce the risk of TACO, which during liver transplantation may deteriorate portal hypertension, increase intraoperative bleeding, and possibly reduce survival rates. One of the major concerns for PCC use is thrombogenicity. However, currently available PCCs are much safer as they contain inactivated forms of the vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors and protein C, protein S, antithrombin and/or heparin. Nowadays, the use of PCCs to correct coagulation abnormalities that occur during LT is an increasingly widespread practice. However, it is not yet clear what level of evidence supports this practice, and what the risks associated with it are. Conclusions: Administration of PCC in LT patients to correct haemostatic abnormalities seems to be well-tolerated, but the relationship between PCC use and thromboembolic events in the postoperative period remains unclear. Adequately powered, methodologically sound trials are urgently required for more definitive conclusions about the efficacy and safety of PCCs in a broad phenotype of LT recipients.

Use of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for management of bleeding not associated with therapeutic anticoagulant use

INTRODUCTION

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) may be an option for patients with bleeding unrelated to therapeutic anticoagulation to help with bleeding cessation and reduce blood component requirements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective, observational study of adult patients who received 4F-PCC for bleeding not associated with therapeutic anticoagulation between June 2019 and July 2021. Primary outcome was to describe off-label 4F-PCC use in patients not on therapeutic anticoagulation for bleeding management in surgical and non-surgical patients. Additional outcomes evaluated were blood product use, chest tube and drainage output, and coagulation studies before and after 4F-PCC administration as well as other hemostatic agent use and thromboembolic events.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were included; median age 64 years (IQR 50-69), 66% of bleeding events were associated with surgery, and the majority of 4F-PCC doses ordered by cardiac surgery (68.4%). A total of 110 4F-PCC doses were administered; median 1 dose/patient (IQR 1-2), median total dose 1000 units (IQR 500-1484). Other hemostatic agents commonly administered were protamine (59%), desmopressin (43%), and tranexamic acid (42%). Packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelet, and cell saver blood administration and prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), and partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were significantly reduced following 4F-PCC administration. Eight patients (11%) experienced thromboembolic complications.

CONCLUSION

Relatively low doses of 4F-PCC (median total dose 1000 units) were associated with decreased blood component requirements and improved PT, INR, and aPTT values in patients with bleeding unrelated to therapeutic anticoagulation. Other hemostatic agent use was common and thromboembolic complications occurred.

How I approach bleeding in hospitalized patients

Excessive bleeding is relatively common in adult inpatients, whether as the primary reason for admission or as a development during the hospital stay. Common causes include structural issues, medication effects, and systemic illnesses; occasionally, unexpected bleeding can develop as a result of an undiagnosed or newly acquired bleeding disorder. The first step in caring for the inpatient who is bleeding is to determine whether the bleeding symptom is truly new or whether the patient has a history of abnormal bleeding. Patients with a history of abnormal bleeding may warrant evaluation for inherited bleeding disorders, such as platelet function disorders, von Willebrand disease, hemophilia, or rare factor deficiencies. Patients with no history of bleeding, for whom other causes, such as liver dysfunction, medication effect, disseminated intravascular coagulation, or certain vitamin deficiencies have been ruled out may require evaluation for acquired coagulopathies, such as acquired hemophilia or acquired von Willebrand disease. Here, we present 3 cases to discuss the diagnosis and management of the 2 most common acquired bleeding disorders as well as a patient with a congenital bleeding disorder with a historical diagnosis.

Efficacy and Safety of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates in Liver Transplantation: Evidence from Observational Studies

The risk/benefit ratio of using prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) to correct coagulation defects in patients with end-stage liver disease is still unclear. The primary aim of this review was to assess the clinical effectiveness of PCCs in reducing transfusion requirements in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). This systematic review of non-randomized clinical trials was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The protocol was previously registered (PROSPERO:CRD42022357627). The primary outcome was the mean number of transfused units for each blood product, including red blood cells (RBCs), fresh frozen plasma, platelets, and cryoprecipitate. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of arterial thrombosis, acute kidney injury, and haemodialysis, and hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. There were 638 patients from 4 studies considered for meta-analysis. PCC use did not affect blood product transfusions. Sensitivity analysis, including only four-factor PCC, showed a significant reduction of RBC effect size (MD: 2.06; 95%CI: 1.27-2.84) with no true heterogeneity. No significant differences in secondary outcomes were detected. Preliminary evidence indicated a lack of PCC efficacy in reducing blood product transfusions during LT, but further investigation is needed. In particular, future studies should be tailored to establish if LT patients will likely benefit from four-factor PCC therapy.

The use of prothrombin complex concentrate in chronic liver disease: A review of the literature

Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and cirrhosis present a rebalanced hemostatic system in the three phases of haemostasis. This balance is however unstable and can easily tip towards bleeding or thrombosis. Management of both spontaneous bleeding and bleeding during invasive procedures remains a challenge in this patient population. Transfusion of blood products can result in circulatory overload and thereby worsen portal hypertension. As an alternative to fresh frozen plasma (FFP), prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) may have merit in patients with liver disease because of their low volume. The impact of PCC in in-vitro spiking experiments of cirrhotic plasma is promising, but also warrants cautious use in light of thromboembolic risk. The majority of existing studies carried-out in CLD patients are retrospective or do not have an adequate control arm. A prospective study (the PROTON trial) was set up in 2013 to investigate the utility of PCC in patients undergoing liver transplantation. However, the study has never recruited the planned number of patients. Robust data on PCC safety in CLD is also required. The limited existing evidence does not seem to indicate an excessive thromboembolic risk. Currently, the utilisation of PCC in CLD cannot be routinely recommended but can provide an option for carefully selected cases in which other measures were not sufficient to control bleeding and after delicately weighing risks and benefits.

Prothrombinex®-VF in chronic liver disease: Friend or foe?

OBJECTIVE

Management of coagulopathy in chronic liver disease (CLD) poses a challenge for critical care physicians. Prothrombinex®-VF is a low-volume product with rapid onset of action. Evidence for its efficacy and safety in CLD is limited and cases of acute intravascular coagulation and fibrinolysis (AICF) and/or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) have been reported. Our objective was to evaluate the role of Prothrombinex®-VF in reversal of coagulopathy and the incidence AICF/DIC, thromboembolic events and mortality.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multi-centre study of Prothrombinex®-VF use in CLD across 11 hospitals over a 2-year period, excluding those on therapeutic anticoagulation. Patients were subclassified into acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF), acute decompensation (ADC) and compensated cirrhosis. Reversal of coagulopathy was defined as international normalised ratio (INR) <1.5× upper limit normal (ULN), prothrombin time <1.5× ULN, activated partial thromboplastin time <1.5× ULN and fibrinogen >1 g/L. Markers of AICF/DIC were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty CLD patients were included, and the median model for end-stage liver disease score was 23.5. Acute bleeding was the most common indication for Prothrombinex®-VF (60%). All had baseline coagulopathy and the majority did not achieve reversal. Key indicators of AICF/DIC were mainly observed in those with ACLF; bleeding from mucosa or lines (53%), worsening hypofibrinogenaemia (60%), worsening thrombocytopaenia (60%). The ADC and compensated cirrhosis groups were relatively unaffected. Incidence of venous thromboembolism was 6%. Overall mortality was 43% and 70% in ACLF.

CONCLUSION

Prothrombinex®-VF did not lead to meaningful reversal of coagulopathy and should be used with caution in CLD. Patients with ACLF were more likely to develop AICF/DIC following Prothrombinex®-VF, although the association is uncertain. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Prothrombinex®-VF use in CLD.

Outcomes of 4-factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Patients With Liver Disease and Nonvitamin K Antagonist-Related Coagulopathy: A Retrospective Study

The administration of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) has expanded beyond its Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indication for the emergent reversal of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the risks and benefits associated with the expanded use of 4F-PCC. We conducted a single-center retrospective review of 4F-PCC administrations at our university hospital. Of the 159 patients who received 4F-PCC, 76% (n = 121) and 24% (n = 38) received it for the FDA-approved indication in the vitamin K-related coagulopathy (VKA) group and for expanded use in the nonvitamin K-related coagulopathy (nVKA) group, respectively. The expanded use of 4F-PCC was associated with a less robust reduction in the international normalized ratio (INR) (INR of -0.7 ± 1.3 vs INR of -1.6 ± 1.8, P = .002), and fewer patients in the nVKA group achieved a postadministration INR of less than1.5 (11% vs 79%, P = .001) than those in the VKA group. Furthermore, the 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the nVKA cohort than in the VKA cohort (42% vs 20%, P = .04). Notably, based on our data, underlying differences in the patient's comorbidities, particularly advanced liver disease, may have contributed to the observed outcome variations, including mortality rate. Therefore, factors, including comorbidities and the underlying etiology of coagulopathy, should be considered when deciding on the expanded use of 4F-PCC. Further research is needed to better understand the potential risks and benefits of 4F-PCC in expanded use scenarios, and the clinical decision to use 4F-PCC outside its FDA-approved indication should be made carefully, considering this information.

Fibrin clot quality in acutely ill cirrhosis patients: Relation with outcome and improvement with coagulation factor concentrates

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with liver disease may acquire substantial changes in their hemostatic system, which are most pronounced in patients who are critically ill. Changes in the quality of the fibrin clot in critically ill patients have not been studied in detail. Here we assessed markers of fibrin clot quality and effects of coagulation factor concentrates in patients with acutely decompensated (AD) cirrhosis and acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF).

METHODS

We measured plasma levels of fibrinogen, factor XIII, prothrombin and performed thrombin generation assays in 52 AD patients, 58 ACLF patients and 40 controls. In addition, we examined the effects of coagulation factor concentrates on functional assays of fibrin quality.

RESULTS

We found increased thrombin generating capacity in both AD and ACLF in comparison with healthy controls. Plasma levels of prothrombin, fibrinogen, and factor XIII were lower in patients compared to controls, appeared lower in ACLF compared to AD patients, and were related to clinical outcomes. Fibrinogen concentrate, but not factor XIII or prothrombin complex concentrate, improved clot quality in vitro. Prothrombin complex concentrate increased the resistance of the clot to break down.

CONCLUSIONS

We have demonstrated elevated thrombin generation but decreased plasma levels of prothrombin, fibrinogen and FXIII in acutely ill patients with cirrhosis. In addition, we showed that fibrinogen concentrate and PCCs, but not factor XIII concentrate, improve clot properties in patient plasma. Whether there is true clinical benefit from coagulation factor concentrates in prevention or treatment of bleeding requires further study.

LAY SUMMARY

Patients with liver diseases are at risk of bleeding, but mechanisms involved in this bleeding risk are incompletely understood. We studied components that determine the stability of the blood clot and found that concentrations of certain proteins involved in clot stability are present in low levels in acutely ill patients with liver disease. We furthermore demonstrated that some clinically available drugs improve the stability of blood clots from these patients in a test tube.

The utility and complications of plasma administration in cirrhotic patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures

Patients with cirrhosis have coagulopathy often necessitating correction with blood products, such as plasma products (fresh frozen plasma and plasma frozen within 24 h) prior to certain invasive procedures. However, plasma administration has the potential for substantial negative adverse effects such as volume overload, transfusion-related lung injury and allergic/anaphylactic reactions. In addition, its effectiveness in preventing bleeding is similarly unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of plasma administration in cirrhotic patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures, specifically vascular access placement, transjugular liver biopsies, renal biopsies and thoracenteses. In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients receiving plasma products in preparation for an invasive procedure, with the primary outcomes of volume overload and bleeding. Of the 145 transfusion events that met the criteria from 2015 to 2018, the median INR decreased from 2.7 to 2.2 pre and post plasma administration and 13.8% of recipients had complications of volume overload. The cost of acquisition of plasma administered below clinically impactful doses accumulates to an estimated 19 000 dollars over this time period, not including nursing preparation or production costs. Plasma products minimally, if at all, improved laboratory values of coagulation and in some patients led to adverse effects.

Roles of Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in the Management of Critical Bleeding

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is the term used to describe a pathogen-reduced, lyophilized concentrate that contains therapeutic amounts of at least 4 coagulation factors: Factor II (FII), Factor VII (FVII), Factor IX (FIX), and Factor X (FX). 4F-PCC has proven to be an effective hemostatic agent compared to plasma transfusion in several prospective randomized trials in acute warfarin reversal. In recent years, 4F-PCC has been used in various acquired coagulopathies including post-cardiopulmonary bypass bleeding, trauma-induced coagulopathy, coagulopathy in liver failure, and major bleeding due to anti-FXa (anti-Xa) inhibitors (eg, rivaroxaban and apixaban). As transfusion of frozen plasma (FP) has not been found efficacious in the above critical bleeding scenarios, there is increasing interest in expanding the use of 4F-PCC. However, efficacy, safety, and clinical implications of expanded use of 4F-PCC have not been fully elucidated. Prothrombin time and international normalized ratio are commonly used to assess dose effects of 4F-PCC. Prothrombin time/international normalized ratio are standardly use for warfarin titration, but they are not suited for real-time monitoring of complex coagulopathies. Optimal dosing of 4F-PCC outside of the current approved use for vitamin K antagonist reversal is yet to be determined. In this review, we will discuss the use of 4F-PCC in four critical bleeding settings: cardiac surgery, major trauma, end-stage liver disease, and oral anti-Xa reversal. We will discuss recent studies in each area to explore the dosing, efficacy, and safety of 4F-PCC.

Clinical utilization of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate: a retrospective single center study

OBJECTIVE

Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2013 for management of severely bleeding patients on warfarin therapy. We describe use of 4F-PCC at a large, suburban academic center.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients receiving 4F-PCC from its introduction through 2016 at a large level 1 trauma center. Clinical and demographic data were obtained, including indications for anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents, comorbidities, concomitant medications, etiology and site of bleeding, as well as disposition, length of stay, mortality, and thrombotic events.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-four patients received 4F-PCC. Mean age was 72 years; 40.8% were female. Indications for 4F-PCC administration included: active bleeding (74%), reversal prior to a procedure (14%), and elevated international normalized ratio (12%). Warfarin was the most common concomitant medication (71.1%). Most patients were receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (63%). Concomitant treatments for bleeding included vitamin K (58.2%), packed red blood cells (50%), fresh frozen plasma (38%), and platelets (26.1%), amongst others. Median length of hospital stay was 8.4 days. Nine patients (4.9%) developed thrombosis within 90 days of 4F-PCC. Mortality was 24.5%, with notably higher rates amongst those who received 4F-PCC for off-label indications (19.1% on-label mortality vs. 37.7% off-label mortality on chi-square analysis, P=0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that 4F-PCC is being utilized for indications other than the reversal of warfarin-induced coagulopathy. Further investigation is warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of 4F-PCC for these potential indications.

Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Use in Intracranial Hemorrhage Patients With Cirrhosis Not on Prior Anticoagulation

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) have a 30-day mortality rate up to 52%, and the risk of mortality is increased in patients with disease-induced coagulopathy such as cirrhosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether 4F-PCC administration mitigates hematoma expansion in ICH patients with cirrhosis not currently receiving anticoagulation therapy compared to standard of care therapies.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study comparing adult patients with ICH and history of cirrhosis who received 4F-PCC versus standard of care therapies. The primary outcome was rate of ICH expansion within 24 hours after admission.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients were included with 21 who received 4FPCC vs 37 who received standard of care therapies. The 4F-PCC group had a significantly higher number of patients with Child Pugh Class C cirrhosis (85.7% vs. 48.6%, P = 0.006), higher baseline INR (1.7 vs. 1.4, P = 0.001) and more patients with a spontaneous cause of hemorrhage (61.9% vs. 29.7%, P = 0.01). Stable follow-up head CT was achieved in 68.4% of patients who received 4F-PCC versus 72.7% of patients treated with standard of care therapies (P = 0.11). Patients who received 4F-PCC had a significantly greater change in INR within 24 hours (-0.2 vs. 0, P = 0.02) and higher rate of mortality (61.9% vs. 18.9%, P = 0.001). Baseline INR > 2 and surgical evacuation for ICH were associated with decreased odds of stable follow-up head CT in the multivariate logistic regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of 4F-PCC did not significantly improve the rate of stable head CT at 24 hours in patients with ICH and cirrhosis. Randomized clinical trials with larger patient populations are warranted to fully determine the role of 4F-PCC in this unique population.

Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for coagulopathy reversal secondary to ischemic hepatic injury due to cardiac tamponade: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Correction of coagulopathy is needed before invasive procedures. However, there is limited evidence to support using Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (PCC) to reverse coagulopathy secondary to liver disease.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 68-year-old male patient a known case of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, who developed cardiac tamponade, resulting in hemodynamic instability and ischemic liver injury leading to coagulopathy of INR 2.3. Activated PCC (FEIBA) was used to reverse coagulopathy. INR dropped to 1.9 and the procedure was performed uneventfully with successful elimination of tamponade signs evidenced by echocardiography.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

In this case, the patient required an urgent pericardiocentesis. Activated PCC used successfully to reverse coagulopathy, which was important prior to the procedure.

CONCLUSION

In view of the need for urgent pericardiocentesis, coagulopathy due to ischemic liver injury could be reversed with the use of activated PCC.

Association of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate with subsequent plasma transfusion: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether patients prescribed four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPC) received less plasma during the following 24-hour period than those treated for the same indications who received only plasma.

INTRODUCTION

It is unclear whether 4FPC is associated with a reduction in subsequent plasma transfusion. This is important for minimising transfusion-associated risks and for inventory management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients treated for bleeding or coagulopathy. Individuals receiving 4FPC were matched by indication to patients treated with only plasma. Blood products received during 24-hour follow up were compared between 4FPC and plasma-only patients.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the number of patients receiving additional plasma (19 (21%) 4FPC patients vs 31 (34%) plasma-only patients, P = .07) nor in the median number of additional plasma units received (0 units for both groups, interquartile range [0, 0] for 4FPC patients vs [0, 1] for plasma-only patients, P = .09). Subgroup analysis comparing patients who received 4FPC for on-label vs off-label indications found no difference in the number of patients receiving plasma nor in the median number of plasma units received.

CONCLUSION

4FPC was prescribed to a diverse set of patients, and administration was not associated with reduced plasma transfusion at our institution.

Management of Hepatic Coagulopathy in Bleeding and Nonbleeding Patients: An Evidence-Based Review

Patients with varying degrees of hepatic dysfunction often present with presumed bleeding diathesis based on interpretation of routine measures of coagulation (prothrombin time [PT], international normalized ratio [INR], and activated partial thromboplastin time). However, standard markers of coagulation do not reflect the actual bleeding risk in this population and may lead to inappropriate administration of hemostatic agents and blood products. The concept of "rebalanced hemostasis" explains both the risk of bleeding and clotting seen in patients with liver dysfunction. The role of pharmacologic agents and blood products for prevention of bleeding during high-risk procedures and treatment of clinically significant bleeding remains unclear. Viscoelastic measurements of the clotting cascade provide information about platelets, fibrinogen/fibrin polymerization, coagulation factors, and fibrinolysis that might better represent hemostasis in vivo and may better inform management strategies. Due to the paucity of available data, firm recommendations for the use of blood products and pharmacologic agents in patients with hepatic coagulopathies are lacking, and thus, these products should not be routinely administered. Traditional laboratory tests such as PT/INR should not be the sole determinant of potential interventions. Rather, clinicians should assess factors such as the severity of bleed or bleeding risk of the procedure, the patient's risk of thromboembolism, and the strength of available evidence for specific agents and blood products to guide decision-making.

Perioperative management of antithrombotic treatment

End-stage liver disease is characterized by multiple and complex alterations of hemostasis that are associated with an increased risk of both bleeding and thrombosis. Liver transplantation further challenges the feeble hemostatic balance of patients with decompensated cirrhosis, and the management of antithrombotic treatment during and after transplant surgery, which is particularly difficult. Bleeding was traditionally considered the major concern during and early after surgery, but it is increasingly recognized that transplant recipients may also develop thrombotic complications. Pathophysiology of hemostatic complications during and after transplantation is multifactorial and includes pre-, intra-, and postoperative risk factors. Risk stratification is important, as it helps the identification of high-risk recipients in whom antithrombotic prophylaxis should be considered. In recipients who develop thrombosis during or after surgery, prompt treatment is indicated to prevent graft failure, retransplantation, and death.

Perioperative hemostatic management in the cirrhotic patient: a position paper on behalf of the Liver Intensive Care Group of Europe (LICAGE)

Recent data demonstrated that amongst patients undergoing elective surgery the prevalence of cirrhosis is 0.8% equating to approximately 25 million cirrhotic patients undergoing surgery each year worldwide. Overall, the presence of cirrhosis is independently associated with 47% increased risk of postoperative complications and over two and a half-increased risk of in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing elective surgery. In particular, perioperative patients with chronic liver disease have long been assumed to have a major bleeding risk on the basis of abnormal results for standard tests of hemostasis. However, recent evidence outlined significant changes to traditional knowledge and beliefs and, nowadays, with more sophisticated laboratory tests, it has been shown that patients with chronic liver disease may be in hemostatic balance as a result of concomitant changes in both pro- and antihemostatic pathways. The aim of this paper endorsed by the Liver Intensive Care Group of Europe was to provide an up-to-date overview of coagulation management in perioperative patients with chronic liver disease focusing on patient blood management, monitoring of hemostasis, and current role of hemostatic agents.

Prothrombin Complex Concentrates for Coagulopathy in Liver Disease: Single-Center, Clinical Experience in 105 Patients

Patients with liver disease frequently develop coagulopathy, and fresh frozen plasma is traditionally used for correction of coagulopathy to manage and prevent bleeding. Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) offer an attractive alternative because they are more readily available and avoid large-volume transfusion. This retrospective, single-center study reviewed clinical use of PCC in patients with acute/chronic liver disease. A total of 105 patients with 194 episodes of PCC administration were reviewed. Data pertaining to indication, dosing, effectiveness, and safety were collected. The effect of PCC on coagulation was analyzed in patients for whom coagulation results were available 7 hours before and after PCC. Data on thromboembolic events and mortality within 4 weeks of PCC administration were captured. Most patients (77%) had chronic liver disease; the remainder had acute liver failure. Indications for PCC were preprocedure prophylaxis and treatment for active/recent bleeding in 48% and 52% of 194 treatment episodes, respectively. The median dose of PCC administered was 22 IU/kg (interquartile range, 16-29 IU/kg). Before PCC administration, 45% of patients had an international normalized ratio (INR) greater than 2.0, and 36% had fibrinogen levels of at least 1.5 g/L. PCC produced statistically significant reductions in prothrombin time and INR (coadministration with fibrinogen or cryoprecipitate: 3.1 versus 1.9; P < 0.001; no coadministration: 2.3 versus 1.8; P < 0.001). Three patients with multiple risk factors developed thrombotic events (hepatic artery thrombosis, incidental bilateral pulmonary embolism, nonocclusive portal vein thrombosis); there were no cardiovascular or cerebrovascular adverse events. Overall, 46 patients died of causes unrelated to PCC treatment. Conclusion: In patients with liver disease, PCC therapy was effective in improving coagulation test results without an excess of thrombotic events. Further assessment of PCC as hemostatic therapy in this setting is required.

Utility of prothrombin complex concentrate as first-line treatment modality of coagulopathy in patients undergoing liver transplantation: A propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

Transfusion management during liver transplantation (LT) is aimed at reducing blood loss and allogeneic transfusion requirements. Although prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) has been used satisfactorily in various bleeding disorders, studies on its safety, and efficacy during LT are limited.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of adult patients who underwent living donor LT at a single institute between October 2016 and January 2018 was carried out. The safety and efficacy of PCC in reducing transfusion requirements intraoperatively in patients who received PCC were compared with patients who did not receive PCC. A propensity score-matching technique was used, at a 1:1 ratio, to remove selection bias.

RESULTS

After completing the 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis, 60 pairs of patients were identified. The use of PCC was associated with significantly decreased red blood cell transfusion requirements (6.2 ± 4.1 vs 8.23 ± 5.18, P < 0.001) and fresh frozen plasma transfusion requirements (2.6 ± 2 vs 6.18 ± 4.1, P < 0.001). The number of patients developing postoperative hemorrhagic complications was higher in the non-PCC group.

CONCLUSIONS

During LT, the use of PCC led to decreased transfusion requirements. No thromboembolic complications related to PCC were noted in this series.

Acute liver failure: A review for emergency physicians

INTRODUCTION

Acute liver failure (ALF) remains a high-risk clinical presentation, and many patients require emergency department (ED) management for complications and stabilization.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review provides an evidence-based summary of the current data for the emergency medicine evaluation and management of ALF.

DISCUSSION

While ALF remains a rare clinical presentation, surveillance data suggest an overall incidence between 1 and 6 cases per million people every year, accounting for 6% of liver-related deaths and 7% of orthotopic liver transplants (OLT) in the U.S. The definition of ALF includes neurologic dysfunction, an international normalized ratio ≥ 1.5, no prior evidence of liver disease, and a disease course of ≤26 weeks, and can be further divided into hyperacute, acute, and subacute presentations. There are many underlying etiologies, including acetaminophen toxicity, drug induced liver injury, and hepatitis. Emergency physicians will be faced with several complications, including encephalopathy, coagulopathy, infectious processes, renal injury, and hemodynamic instability. Critical patients should be evaluated in the resuscitation bay, and consultation with the transplant team for appropriate patients improves patient outcomes. This review provides several guiding principles for management of acute complications. Using a pathophysiological-guided approach to the management of ALF associated complications is essential to optimizing patient care.

CONCLUSIONS

ALF remains a rare clinical presentation, but has significant morbidity and mortality. Physicians must rapidly diagnose these patients while evaluating for other diseases and complications. Early consultation with a transplantation center is imperative, as is identifying the underlying etiology and initiating symptomatic care.