Decision Algorithms for Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Practical Guide for Neurologists

Management of oral anticoagulation in very old patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation related acute ischemic stroke

The optimal management of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in the acute phase of non valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF)-related acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains controversial, especially in very old patients. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the practical management of OAC in this context. We conducted an observational retrospective study on patients 85-years old and older admitted to two Italian hospitals for NVAF-related AIS. For each patient, clinical and brain computed tomography data were recorded. Type of OAC (vitamin K antagonists, VKAs or Direct Oral Anticoagulants, DOACs), dosage and starting day after AIS were registered. For each patient 90-day all cause mortality, stroke recurrence, any bleeding and modified Rankin scale (mRS) were reported. One-hundred-seventeen patients, with mean age 89.2 ± 3.4 years, were enrolled. In-hospital and 90-day mortality (out of 109 patients) were 6% and 19.7%, respectively. OAC was started in 93 patients (80.5%), on average after 6 ± 3 days from the acute event. Of them, 88 patients (94.6%) received DOACs, while 5 (5.4%) received VKAs. Patients receiving OAC were significantly younger and suffering from less severe stroke compared with patients who did not receive OAC. Patients receiving OAC presented a reduced in-hospital (2.2% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.004) and 90-day all-cause mortality (9.4% vs. 62.5%, p < 0.001). In patients receiving DOACs, low dosages were used in 87.5% of patients. The use of OAC was not associated with an increased rate of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) during hospitalization (13.2% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.54) or any bleeding at 90-day follow-up. Severe dysphagia and mRS ≥ 4 were found to be independent risk factors for not prescribing OAC. The optimal management of OAC in very old patients suffering from NVAF-related AIS remains a dilemma. In our real world study the majority of patients received OAC as secondary prevention treatment without increase in bleeding risk. Dysphagia and severe disability were independent factors for not prescribing OAC. Further investigations aimed at identifying the optimal approach to OAC during the acute phase of NVAF-related ischemic stroke in this subgroup of patients are warranted.

Patterns and factors influencing oral anticoagulant prescription in people with atrial fibrillation and dementia: Results from UK primary care

AIMS

Oral anticoagulant (OAC) is recommended for preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the OAC utilisation in AF patients with dementia or cognitive impairment (CI) is limited. This study aimed to examine the prevalence of OAC prescriptions in AF patients with dementia/CI and to identify factors associated with OAC treatment within 180 days after dementia/CI diagnosis.

METHODS

Using The Health Improvement Network database, the annual trends of OAC between 2000 and 2015 were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with OAC treatment.

RESULTS

The prevalence rate of OAC prescriptions increased from 6.1% in 2000 to 45.9% in 2015. Among OAC users, the proportion of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) use increased significantly from 0.1% in 2011 to 33.8% in 2015 (P-trend < 0.001), while the proportion of vitamin K antagonist use decreased by 28.6% from 100% in 2000 to 71.4% in 2015 (P-trend < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, younger age, very old age, female sex, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, having a HAS-BLED score ≥3, a history of intracranial bleeding, falls and polypharmacy were significantly associated with lower odds of receiving OAC.

CONCLUSIONS

In UK primary care, OAC use increased from 2000 to 2015 in AF patients with dementia/CI, with a substantial increase in use of DOACs. Characteristics related to frailty are associated with lower odds of OAC prescription. Given the increasing use of DOACs in patients with dementia/CI, further studies are needed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of DOACs in this important patient group.