Therapists' Perceived Competence in Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Client Outcomes: Findings From a Community-Based Learning Collaborative

Therapists' Perceived Competence in Delivering Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy During Statewide Learning Collaboratives

The learning collaborative (LC), a multi-component training and implementation model, is one promising approach to address the need for increased availability of trauma-focused evidence-based practices. The current study used data from four cohorts of a statewide LC on Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) to 1) evaluate pre- to post-LC changes in therapists' perceived competence in delivering TF-CBT and 2) explore therapist and contextual factors related to therapists' perceived TF-CBT competence. Therapists (N = 237) completed pre- and post-LC measures of practice information, interprofessional collaboration, organizational climate, and TF-CBT knowledge, perceived competence, and use. Findings indicated therapists' perceived TF-CBT competence significantly increased, pre- to post-LC (d = 1.31), with greater use of trauma-focused practices at pre-training and more TF-CBT training cases completed predicting greater pre- to post-LC gains in perceived TF-CBT competence. These findings highlight the need to assist therapists in identifying and completing training cases to promote competence and implementation.

Longitudinal changes in mental health professionals' perceived trauma care competencies after participation in a brief online training programme

BACKGROUND

Further developments in trauma care training for mental health staff are needed to ensure that trauma survivors are recognised and get the most effective care. The evaluation of the effects of trauma care training programs would enable the untangling of the most efficient ways of building the competence of clinicians who encounter trauma-exposed patients in their routine clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyse longitudinal changes in mental health professionals' perceived trauma care competencies after a brief online trauma care training, and to examine associations between these changes and specific work-related characteristics.

METHOD

In total, 223 mental health professionals, 96.4% women, 42 years on average, and 51.6% with more than 10 years of clinical practice, participated in a brief online trauma care training programme. The Readiness to Work with Trauma-Exposed Patients Scale (RTEPS) was used to measure perceived trauma care competencies at the pre-training, post-training, and at a 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Training had a significant effect on all measured perceived trauma care competencies of assessment, treatment and affect tolerance at post-training and 3-month follow-up. We also found that many years of unspecific clinical practice did not contribute to perceived trauma care competencies, and the training was perceived equally beneficial by professionals with more or less clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that brief training can have lasting effects on clinicians' self-confidence in trauma care. Further investigation of factors associated with the effects of training might help to increase the effectiveness of the training programs.

Predictors of nonresponse and drop-out among children and adolescents receiving TF-CBT: investigation of client-, therapist-, and implementation factors

Background

There is a paucity of evidence about effective implementation strategies to increase treatment response and prevent drop-out among children receiving evidence-based treatment. This study examines patient, therapist, and implementation factors and their association to nonresponse and drop-out among youth receiving Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT).

Methods

Youth (n = 1240) aged 6–18 (M = 14.6) received TF-CBT delivered by 382 TF-CBT therapists at 66 clinics. Odds ratio analyses were used to investigate whether pretreatment child (age, gender, number of trauma experiences, post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), therapist (education), and implementation strategy factors (high-low, low-low, low–high intensity therapist and leadership training respectively) or tele-mental health training during the Covid-19 pandemic are associated with nonresponse (above clinical PTSS level post-treatment) and drop-out (therapist-defined early termination). Fidelity checks were conducted to ensure that TF-CBT was used consistently.

Results

One fourth of the children (24.4%) were nonresponders and 13.3 percent dropped out. Exposure to three or more traumatic experiences were related to nonresponse and drop-out. Higher baseline PTSS was related to a higher probability of nonresponse. There was no effect of therapist education or child gender on nonresponse and drop-out, whereas children over 15 years had a higher likelihood of both. After controlling for baseline PTSS, the effect of age on nonresponse was no longer significant. Drop-out was related to fewer sessions, and most dropped out during the first two phases of TF-CBT. Fidelity was high throughout the different implementation phases. High-intensity therapist training was related to a lower probability of both nonresponse and drop-out, whereas low therapist and leadership training were related to a higher likelihood of both. Multivariate analysis revealed higher child age and higher PTSS baseline scores as significant predictors of nonresponse, and number of trauma experiences (> = 3) at baseline as the only predictor of drop-out.

Conclusions

High-intensity therapist training seem key to prevent patient nonresponse and drop-out. Leadership training might positively affect both, although not enough to compensate for less intensive therapist training. More complex cases (higher PTSS and exposure to more traumas) predict nonresponse and drop-out respectively, which underscores the importance of symptom assessment to tailor the treatment. The lack of predictive effect of therapist education increases the utilization of TF-CBT.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrials, ref. nr. NCT05248971.