Authorising bortezomib treatment prior to reviewing haematology results: a step toward home administration

Home is best. Self-administration of subcutaneous Bortezomib at home in patients with multiple myeloma - A mixed method study

OBJECTIVES

To examine the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals of self-administration of subcutaneous (SC) injection of Bortezomib in the homes of patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM), and to assess organizational aspects.

METHODS

A prospective, clinical, parallel mixed-method design with a qualitative core and a quantitative supplementary component was conducted at a single hematological centre in Denmark. Qualitative data were obtained from individual, semi-structured interviews with patients (n = 10) and a focus group interview with healthcare professionals (n = 5); data were analyzed using a hermeneutic approach. Quantitative data were acquired from time registrations performed by patients and nurses and descriptively analyzed applying a micro-costing approach, using cost data per individual.

RESULTS

In general, patients and healthcare professionals were pleased with self-administration as patient empowerment increased. Qualitative findings yielded three themes: "Home is best", "Everyone is different", and "Safety first". Quantitative data were confirmative and revealed self-administration to be time saving for patients and nurses. In a Danish context, delivery of the medicine to the patient's home was slightly more expensive than administration at the hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-administration of SC Bortezomib in the homes of patients with MM is advantageous for patients and healthcare professionals. It is feasible, safe, and timesaving. These advantages come with a negligible increase in expenses.

Evidence to guide the optimal timing for pre-chemotherapy blood tests for early breast, colorectal cancer and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Background

Re‐designing services and processes to meet growing demands in chemotherapy services is necessary with increasing treatments. There is little evidence guiding the timing and thresholds to be attained of pre‐chemotherapy blood assessments, namely neutrophils.

Methods

A survey was developed and distributed to health professionals in the United Kingdom (UK) to examine current practice in timing and threshold values of neutrophils and platelets before treatment administration. This was followed by a retrospective cohort study, using data from electronic patient record systems; including patients initiating treatment between January 2013 and December 2018, to determine a safe timeframe for blood assessments; comparing neutrophil, platelet, creatinine and bilirubin levels at different time points.

Results

The survey captured 25% of hospitals in the UK and variations were apparent in both the timing of assessments and thresholds needed, particularly for neutrophils. 616 (6.5%) of 4007 patients included had neutrophil levels measured twice within 7 days of treatment (with the first level taken beyond 3 days and the second test being within 3 days of treatment‐ the UK standard). Of the patients that attained an acceptable neutrophil level at their first test, five of the 616 (0.8%) became ineligible for administration from the test 2 level. 23% of patients improved their grade and became eligible for treatment. Little difference was observed for platelets.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that extending the timeframe for blood tests can be safe, however, this practice may cause unnecessary delays for patients if only an early test is relied on for eligibility.