Toxicity profile, adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions among geriatric cancer patients under metronomic chemotherapy in a South Indian tertiary care hospital

Metronomic Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes the most relevant studies found in the scientific literature regarding metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) in the geriatric oncology population to support its use as a feasible treatment of care in the frail elderly patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent years have seen a reevaluation of cancer chemotherapeutic drugs and MCT is an emerging schedule in phase II and III clinical trials. Ageing is one of the risk factors for the development of cancer, the incidence of whom increases dramatically in people who live longer. To date, standard oncological protocols involve chemotherapeutic drugs in short cycles of therapy at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Although these therapeutic regimens may be successful, they can cause important adverse drug reactions, especially in elderly or frail patients. MCT is a different modality of delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs (frequent low dose for prolonged time) and it looks at the overcoming of the limitations and disadvantages of MTD, in particular the toxicity aspect. We reviewed the experience of clinicians who have used MCT in clinical trials enrolling elderly patients with different cancer types.

Implementation of pharmaceutical care service to elderly cancer patients in a tertiary care hospital in South India

PURPOSE

The goal of this study is to identify drug-related problems (DRPs) for elderly cancer patients receiving chemotherapy by implementing pharmaceutical care services.

METHODS

In this interventional study, patients were followed after each cycle till 12 weeks. The MOATT-MASCC teaching tool was used to educate patients about their therapy. The outcome measures included the occurrences of any DRPs such as inappropriate medication dose, dosage form, route of administration, therapeutic duplication, failure of the patient to adhere to the medication regimen, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and to resolve it.

RESULTS

On 186 patients, there were 38% ADRs, 16% DDIs, 6% non-adherence to therapy, 4% medical conditions for which no medication was prescribed, and 1% therapeutic duplication and transcribing error was identified. A total of 226 ADRs were documented. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequently occurring ADRs (24%) and platinum compounds caused the highest number of ADRs. Assessments of causality showed that the majority of cases are 'probable' (50%). In evaluating the severity of ADRs, 53% of ADRs were 'moderate' and 51% of ADRs were 'probably' preventable. Upon assessing the DDIs, 35% of the prescriptions had 'monitor therapy'. All of the DRPs, that were identified were notified to the treating oncologists and resolved without any disagreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmaceutical care is essential for elderly cancer patients. Oncologists and pharmacists should work together to identify and manage DRPs as well as educate patients about their disease. This will help in improved patient care and a better therapeutic outcome.